Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE "War on Drugs" Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: The War on Drugs

Unread postby TWilliam » Sun 09 Mar 2008, 17:01:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vision-master', 'F')YI:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'a')nd a perfect alternative for those who find smoking difficult.


Another alternative to smoking is using what are generally referred to as vaporizers (no, not the kind your mother filled with Vick's Vaporub when you were a baby with a cold).

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he vapors from the Volcano® were found to consist overwhelmingly of THC, the major active component in marijuana, whereas the combusted smoke contained over 100 other chemicals, including several polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), carcinogenic toxins that are common in tobacco smoke. The respiratory hazards of marijuana and tobacco smoke are due to toxic byproducts of combustion, not the active ingredients in the plant, known as cannabinoids.


(my emphasis)

Cal NORML/MAPS Study Shows Vaporizer Can Drastically Reduce Toxins in Marijuana Smoke

The basic premise behind vaporizing is that by using a regulated heat source rather than a flame, the active constituents in the plant are released and made available for inhalation without producing the undesirable byproducts of full combustion. The method effectively eliminates, or at least drastically reduces, the harmful effects associated with smoking.
"It means buckle your seatbelt, Dorothy, because Kansas? Is goin' bye-bye... "
User avatar
TWilliam
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2591
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: The War on Drugs

Unread postby Kingcoal » Sun 09 Mar 2008, 22:12:42

Hemp was a major cash crop before it was made illegal in the 1930's. Hemp fibers are stronger, pound for pound than wood fiber. Hemp was the de facto material used to manufacture heavy duty clothing, canvas, etc. Hemp seeds were eaten as food for centuries. Then there is the female hemp plant, AKA marijuana. In the colonial days, farmers were required to grow a quota of the hemp plant. George Washington was one of those farmers who commented in his writings on the "interesting" properties of the female plant.

The ridiculous thing is that not only is marijuana illegal, it is a schedule 1 substance - right up there with heroin. The government, in its infinite wisdom considers there to be no legitimate use for marijuana. Not only that, during the Reagan administration, marijuana was seen as the gateway drug towards harder drugs, so almost all effort went into enforcement against marijuana. Not only do you have a relatively harmless intoxicant illegal, but you have the government ignoring very dangerous drugs in favor of suppressing marijuana. WTF?
"That's the problem with mercy, kid... It just ain't professional" - Fast Eddie, The Color of Money
User avatar
Kingcoal
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2149
Joined: Wed 29 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Pennsylvania, USA

Re: The War on Drugs

Unread postby mattduke » Sun 09 Mar 2008, 22:24:18

Government outlaws private money.
Government monopolizes money creation.
Government outlaws gambling.
Government runs lotto.
Government outlaws liquor sales.
Government runs ABC stores.
Government outlaws cocaine.
CIA runs cocaine.
User avatar
mattduke
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3591
Joined: Fri 28 Oct 2005, 03:00:00

Re: The War on Drugs

Unread postby The_Toecutter » Mon 10 Mar 2008, 00:04:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'G')overnment outlaws private money.
Government monopolizes money creation.
Government outlaws gambling.
Government runs lotto.
Government outlaws liquor sales.
Government runs ABC stores.
Government outlaws cocaine.
CIA runs cocaine.


Angry patriots kill government.
The unnecessary felling of a tree, perhaps the old growth of centuries, seems to me a crime little short of murder. ~Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
The_Toecutter
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Wars on Drugs

Unread postby CarlosFerreira » Wed 10 Dec 2008, 07:19:43

I have been discussing the War on Drugs with friends lately. Can't get my head over the idea it should be legal, because of the possible effects it might have on your nervous system. I'm also, by principle, against any sort of product that promotes unconsciousness - and that includes alcohol and tranquilizers, Prozac, Xanax & friends. I can happily report that, although I enjoy a good glass of wine, I've never been drunk.

But I am also very sensitive to the economics arguments over these sort of problems. I found this:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'U')nder the headline “The Failed War on Drugs,” Washington’s respected, middle-of-the-road Brookings Institution said in a November report that drug use had not declined significantly over the years and that “falling retail drug prices reflect the failure of efforts to reduce the supply of drugs.”

Cocaine production in South America stands at historic highs, the report noted.

Like other think tanks, Brookings stopped short of recommending a radical departure from past policies with a proven track record of failure such as spending billions on crop eradication in Latin America and Asia while allotting paltry sums in comparison to rehabilitating addicts.

Enter Law Enforcement Against Prohibition (LEAP), an organization started in 2002 by police officers, judges, narcotics agents, prison wardens and others with first-hand experience of implementing policies that echo the prohibition of alcohol. Prohibition, now widely regarded a dismal and costly failure of social engineering, came to an end 75 years ago this week.


Insanity and the War on Drugs

So, I would like to promote a discussion on this. Feel free to give your opinions, whatever they are.
Last edited by Ferretlover on Wed 01 Apr 2009, 09:51:29, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Merged with THE "War on Drugs" Thread.
Environmental News and Clippings:
http://www.google.co.uk/reader/shared/1 ... 4898696533
Environmental Economics and Systems
http://enviroecon.wordpress.com/
CarlosFerreira
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 734
Joined: Wed 02 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Canterbury, UK
Top

Re: Wars on Drugs

Unread postby Cloud9 » Wed 10 Dec 2008, 07:47:23

The current situation is the same as prohibition. Legalize and tax and you strip away the finacial base of the drug lords.
User avatar
Cloud9
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2961
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Wars on Drugs

Unread postby TommyJefferson » Wed 10 Dec 2008, 08:51:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('CarlosFerreira', 'C')an't get my head over the idea it should be legal


Argument from Effect: Prohibition causes more suffering and misery than legal drug abuse would.

Argument from Principle: Human beings should own their own bodies. If they choose to cripple them, that is their choice, as owners of said body, as long as they don't harm others.

Which one do you disagree with?
Conform . Consume . Obey .
User avatar
TommyJefferson
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1757
Joined: Thu 19 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Texas and Los Angeles
Top

Re: Wars on Drugs

Unread postby CarlosFerreira » Wed 10 Dec 2008, 08:55:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TommyJefferson', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('CarlosFerreira', 'C')an't get my head over the idea it should be legal


Argument from Effect: Prohibition causes more suffering and misery than legal drug abuse would.

Argument from Principle: Human beings should own their own bodies. If they choose to cripple them, that is their choice, as owners of said body, as long as they don't harm others.

Which one do you disagree with?


None, really. I just used to work in marketing, in market research for tobacco companies. And I know how the briefings went: they wanted to know how much we could infer from young people's habits. Surveys started with 18 year olds, sometimes 21s. But there was always the question of what would 15 year olds answer to that some question.

How would you stop kids from getting hold of drugs? Well, you don't now, anyway. And I fear there is no consensus on the real effects of drugs on people.

But I agree with liberalisation.
Environmental News and Clippings:
http://www.google.co.uk/reader/shared/1 ... 4898696533
Environmental Economics and Systems
http://enviroecon.wordpress.com/
CarlosFerreira
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 734
Joined: Wed 02 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Canterbury, UK
Top

Re: Wars on Drugs

Unread postby vision-master » Wed 10 Dec 2008, 09:07:49

Every morning I start the day with some good drugs......... :razz:

Image
vision-master
 

Re: Wars on Drugs

Unread postby mos6507 » Wed 10 Dec 2008, 10:43:36

You legalize drugs but you criminalize doing things while under the influence of drugs, like driving.
mos6507
 

Re: Wars on Drugs

Unread postby TWilliam » Sat 13 Dec 2008, 01:06:45

Oh man, don't get me started...

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')rgument from Effect: Prohibition causes more suffering and misery than legal drug abuse would.

Certainly true. On the other hand prohibition is far more profitable, for certain sectors at least (pharmaceutical and law enforcement being two big ones)...

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')rgument from Principle: Human beings should own their own bodies. If they choose to cripple them, that is their choice, as owners of said body, as long as they don't harm others.

I agree that we should be allowed physical sovereignty. I disagree, however, with the unstated assumption that use of mind-altering substances is necessarily 'crippling'. Everyone is an individual, and the effects are just as individual, depending on both physiological and psychological factors.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')ow would you stop kids from getting hold of drugs?

Stop prohibiting them. 'Forbidden fruit is the sweetest', as they say. A big initial attraction for the kids is the fact that they're not permitted. For those that are curious nonetheless, teach responsible use and provide safe environments for their experimentation.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')nd I fear there is no consensus on the real effects of drugs on people.

Of course there isn't, nor will there be. Again, individual experience is unique...

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')ut I agree with liberalisation.

[smilie=icon_thumleft.gif] [smilie=headbang.gif]

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'Y')ou legalize drugs but you criminalize doing things while under the influence of drugs, like driving.
Hmmm... not sure how effective that would be... tho' it's certainly preferable to criminalizing the use. I just think about how many DUIs still occur, even tho' it's been illegal to drive under the influence for years, and pretty stiffly penalized. I'm sure it's dissuaded some people, but apparently there's still a lot that it hasn't...
"It means buckle your seatbelt, Dorothy, because Kansas? Is goin' bye-bye... "
User avatar
TWilliam
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2591
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Wars on Drugs

Unread postby vision-master » Sat 13 Dec 2008, 10:27:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')an't get my head over the idea it should be legal, because of the possible effects it might have on your nervous system. I'm also, by principle, against any sort of product that promotes higher [s]un[/s]consciousness


Better......
vision-master
 
Top

Re: Wars on Drugs

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Sat 13 Dec 2008, 11:16:57

"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Wars on Drugs

Unread postby CarlosFerreira » Sat 13 Dec 2008, 11:26:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', '[')url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wVkk6fH2u0Y]We're winning the war on drugs![/url]


Hadn't laughed so hard in some months. Thanks for that! :lol:
Environmental News and Clippings:
http://www.google.co.uk/reader/shared/1 ... 4898696533
Environmental Economics and Systems
http://enviroecon.wordpress.com/
CarlosFerreira
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 734
Joined: Wed 02 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Canterbury, UK
Top

Re: Wars on Drugs

Unread postby TommyJefferson » Sat 13 Dec 2008, 13:15:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TWilliam', 'I') disagree, however, with the unstated assumption that use of mind-altering substances is necessarily 'crippling'.


Any argument from Principle must include every possibility. If exceptions can be show to an Argument from Principle, the argument is not valid.

The argument from principle against drug prohibition must include situations where an individual does indeed cripple themselves with drug abuse. The principle must remain valid in those situations, or it fails.
Conform . Consume . Obey .
User avatar
TommyJefferson
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1757
Joined: Thu 19 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Texas and Los Angeles
Top

Re: Wars on Drugs

Unread postby MrBill » Sat 13 Dec 2008, 13:40:45

I cannot get over how F---- dumb the pro-drug lobby is? Drug dealers are not peddling open source software to better humanity. They are selling drugs because of the profit margin between illicit and legal drugs. If Mary Jane and hash were legal then they would be forced to sell, well, crack. If not crack then heroine. What the hell are wrong with you people? Give your head a shake and think for a change. Duh!
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia

Re: Wars on Drugs

Unread postby HeckuvaJob » Sat 13 Dec 2008, 13:52:31

Great topic CarlosFerreira, timely and relevant. This is my first attempt at putting this argument down in writing, but I've had some thoughts swimming around for some time. I think the first step is to separate this complex issue into 2 broad topics:

1. drug problems
2. drug money problems


I think most politicians would secretly agree that while the war on drugs is not winnable, it is eminently fund-able. Government agencies at every level get earmarks to help fight the war on drugs. Then there is the issue of imprisonment and privately run prisons:
The United States has less than 5 percent of the world's population. But it has almost a quarter of the world's prisoners.

For the first time in the nation’s history, more than one in 100 American adults is behind bars, according to a new report.

The majority are incarcerated due to non-violent, first time drug charges; victims of tougher, new anti-drug legislation. The California Prison Guard Union has become a powerful political entity.

Some resources:
LEAP - Law Enforcement Against Prohibition
Judge Jim Gray.com - Why Our Drug Laws Have Failed and What We Can Do About It

One other issue I need more info on is hemp vs. cotton. I'm under the impression that, despite lacking any THC, hemp is still illegal. I've also heard that while hemp grows like a... weed, cotton requires tons of fertilizers, pesticides and herbicides. It makes sense to replace cotton with hemp - another victim of the war on drugs?

Without a war on drugs, the US would need to come up with another reason for our excursions in Latin America.

The Forbidden Fruit Theory. Holland claims that they've managed to "make pot boring".

We seem to have forgotten the lessons of Prohibition. There's money to be made in making drugs illegal. Unfortunately, the government has replaced Al Capone. Without a massive grass-roots campaign, I don't see anything changing soon.
User avatar
HeckuvaJob
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 326
Joined: Sat 09 Aug 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Pittsburgh

Re: Wars on Drugs

Unread postby HeckuvaJob » Sat 13 Dec 2008, 13:55:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', 'I') cannot get over how F---- dumb the pro-drug lobby is? Drug dealers are not peddling open source software to better humanity. They are selling drugs because of the profit margin between illicit and legal drugs. If Mary Jane and hash were legal then they would be forced to sell, well, crack. If not crack then heroine. What the hell are wrong with you people? Give your head a shake and think for a change. Duh!

Ignorance is also a major obstacle. Thank you for pointing that out, MrBill.
User avatar
HeckuvaJob
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 326
Joined: Sat 09 Aug 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Pittsburgh
Top

Re: Wars on Drugs

Unread postby MrBill » Sat 13 Dec 2008, 13:58:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('HeckuvaJob', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', 'I') cannot get over how F---- dumb the pro-drug lobby is? Drug dealers are not peddling open source software to better humanity. They are selling drugs because of the profit margin between illicit and legal drugs. If Mary Jane and hash were legal then they would be forced to sell, well, crack. If not crack then heroine. What the hell are wrong with you people? Give your head a shake and think for a change. Duh!

Ignorance is also a major obstacle. Thank you for pointing that out, MrBill.


My own ignorance should first and foremost a lesson to all! ;-)
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Wars on Drugs

Unread postby CarlosFerreira » Sat 13 Dec 2008, 14:56:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', 'I') cannot get over how F---- dumb the pro-drug lobby is? Drug dealers are not peddling open source software to better humanity. They are selling drugs because of the profit margin between illicit and legal drugs. If Mary Jane and hash were legal then they would be forced to sell, well, crack. If not crack then heroine. What the hell are wrong with you people? Give your head a shake and think for a change. Duh!


Thank you for that! This thread was turning into a quagmire, not a discussion. I was wondering if any of the members who don't agree with drugs liberalisation had missed the post.

I would like to discuss market size. I got the United Nations World Drug Report. It states, on page 13, that the total percentage of world population of drug users is close to 5%, and that the total percentage of problem users is around 0.6% - all values for the 15-64 age group. The report also states that the consumption of all kinds of drugs has increased, in 2006-07, with the exception of amphetamines.

Number of consumer estimated for these kinds of drugs (in millions):
Cannabis: 165.6
Amphetamines: 24.7
Ecstasy: 9
Cocaine: 16
Opiates (includes Heroin):16.5

Liberalizing Cannabis, Amphetamines and Ecstasy would drop their prices, I presume. Instead of 231,8 illicit drug users, we would have 199,3 million drug users and 32,5 illicit drug users. Arguably, this is like increasing the threshold of speed limits inside cities from 30 to 200mph, and then report that no speeding occurs; but my point is, the total size of market for smugglers is so reduced, profits tumble and some players are forced to leave the market.

A whole lot of gangstas might be left unemployed. I don't even want to imagine the lines for unemployment benefit.

I won't go into the debate of "better quality drugs available" - I wouldn't put any of that stuff inside my body if I was paid to do it - but there may be healthcare benefits from using quality controlled drugs, reducing treatment costs. Detox treatment could be targeted and people who want to let go of cannabis would, like nowadays smokers of drinkers, pay to obtain it. Tax could and should be charged in purchase of those products: not only VAT, but the sort of taxes people pay nowadays on cigarettes.

I only see one potential source of trouble: these products would be cheaper so demand would increase. That would put more pressure on agricultural sectors to respond, shifting production from other other products into cannabis, for instance. That's a worry, the market would naturally to respond to price signals.
Environmental News and Clippings:
http://www.google.co.uk/reader/shared/1 ... 4898696533
Environmental Economics and Systems
http://enviroecon.wordpress.com/
CarlosFerreira
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 734
Joined: Wed 02 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Canterbury, UK
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests