by CarlosFerreira » Sat 13 Dec 2008, 14:56:36
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', 'I') cannot get over how F---- dumb the pro-drug lobby is? Drug dealers are not peddling open source software to better humanity. They are selling drugs because of the profit margin between illicit and legal drugs. If Mary Jane and hash were legal then they would be forced to sell, well, crack. If not crack then heroine. What the hell are wrong with you people? Give your head a shake and think for a change. Duh!
Thank you for that! This thread was turning into a quagmire, not a discussion. I was wondering if any of the members who don't agree with drugs liberalisation had missed the post.
I would like to discuss market size. I got the
United Nations World Drug Report. It states, on page 13, that the total percentage of world population of drug users is close to 5%, and that the total percentage of problem users is around 0.6% - all values for the 15-64 age group. The report also states that the consumption of all kinds of drugs has increased, in 2006-07, with the exception of amphetamines.
Number of consumer estimated for these kinds of drugs (in millions):
Cannabis: 165.6
Amphetamines: 24.7
Ecstasy: 9
Cocaine: 16
Opiates (includes Heroin):16.5
Liberalizing Cannabis, Amphetamines and Ecstasy would drop their prices, I presume. Instead of 231,8 illicit drug users, we would have 199,3 million drug users and 32,5 illicit drug users. Arguably, this is like increasing the threshold of speed limits inside cities from 30 to 200mph, and then report that no speeding occurs; but my point is, the total size of market for smugglers is so reduced, profits tumble and some players are forced to leave the market.
A whole lot of gangstas might be left unemployed. I don't even want to imagine the lines for unemployment benefit.
I won't go into the debate of "better quality drugs available" - I wouldn't put any of that stuff inside my body if I was paid to do it - but there may be healthcare benefits from using quality controlled drugs, reducing treatment costs. Detox treatment could be targeted and people who want to let go of cannabis would, like nowadays smokers of drinkers, pay to obtain it. Tax could and should be charged in purchase of those products: not only VAT, but the sort of taxes people pay nowadays on cigarettes.
I only see one potential source of trouble: these products would be cheaper so demand would increase. That would put more pressure on agricultural sectors to respond, shifting production from other other products into cannabis, for instance. That's a worry, the market would naturally to respond to price signals.