Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Pope Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Unread postby lorenzo » Sun 03 Apr 2005, 18:06:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Barbara', ':')lol:
"Everybody can be Pope?"
:lol:
I can't believe you believe this! Only cardinals can be Pope, and only when they are under 80 years of age. You believe Roman Church is a democracy? HA! It's an absolute monarchy. The Pope is elected by cardinals, not by "we the people".
Sorry, but none of us will ever be Pope. And me, more than you of course, being a girl!


The Church doesn't have to be a democracy. It is directly inspired by God.

I thought you could be elected Pope even if you're not a cardinal, not even a priest. The constitution says even a lay man can be elected. Of course, only men are allowed to the office, which is logical, since women are too good to take up a formal pastoral role (as the Pope himself has said: no female priests, women are too good to become priest).
The Beginning is Near!
User avatar
lorenzo
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2184
Joined: Sat 01 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby linlithgowoil » Sun 03 Apr 2005, 18:06:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hy do people continually skirt over the issue of paedophilia in the Church. How is this any different to abortion or euthanasia? It's even worse IMO, the ultimate betrayal of trust between a priest and his young flock. And yet it is ignored. Why?


Paedophilia exists in many walks of life and the Catholic Church has been damaged by recent events. It isnt ignored, it is acknowledged. The Pope held a special emergency meeting at the time to express his disgust. You cannot compare this to matters of doctrine like abortion or euthenasia. Paedophilia is seen as a mortal sin by the Catholic Church.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')orry, I disagree. If you were right you would have alot less Catholics. Virtually none of the Catholics in my country adhere strictly to Catholicism in the way you suggest. They are part-time Catholics, paying lip service whenever guilt or obligation forces them to... this kind of hypocrisy makes me sick, and yet it's what every Catholic I know does.. and I know ALOT of Catholics.


If you dont adhere to Catholicism, then you are not a true Catholic. What is there to disagree with? If you join a Golf club and dont adhere to all the rules you wont be a member for long. Just because many Catholics dont abide by the rules, doesn't mean anything. It just means they are deliberately sinning and ignoring God's will because it is convenient for them to do it. I know many people like this too but these things shall have to be answered for in death and there are a lot of hypocrits in many religions.

We are all sinners and shall sin from time to time.

Also, just because people dont follow rules, doesn't mean they should be changed. I know tons of people who go 35 mph in 30mph limits - passed schools and everything. Should we then change the speed limit to 35 because of this?
User avatar
linlithgowoil
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 828
Joined: Mon 20 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Scotland

Unread postby lorenzo » Sun 03 Apr 2005, 18:17:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('linlithgowoil', '
')The Catholic Church is more relevant now than it has ever been. And, pray tell, what are these 'rants on abortion'? Abortion is wrong and is the same as stabbing a new born baby to death - murder. Just because you cant see the baby being torn limb from limb doesn't mean it isn't happening and doesn't mean it isn't dying in total silent agony.

Abortion and euthenasia lead to the dehumanising of people. People are only valued in terms of what benefits they can bring or what skills they have - not for the simple fact that they are a human being.

The Catholic Church is one of the last remaining pillars of light in this dark world we live in. Without Jesus and the Church, there is no hope.

Additionally, i wish people would stop talking about 'conservative' or 'liberal' catholics. The Catholic Church has one true viewpoint which all Catholics must adhere to. You are either a Catholic or you are not. If you do not agree with all of the views of the Catholic Church you are not a Catholic.


I couldn't have said it better myself. And I fully agree with you.

The Catholic Church, as the sole guard of the divine Law, is crucial for our age. I even see a serious revival, especially in "secular" Europe and America. Many of my friends are converting to Catholicism or are taking it up again, because they feel that we've had the best of modernity now; we all know what it's like to live materialistically, to enjoy shallow freedoms, we've all had this now. But that's not enough. We need a new, broader dimension. There's something missing.

And the Catholic Church provides this extra dimension. Many people of my generation feel they miss something more deep, something that transcends shallow, empty consumerism, free sex, and an individualistic, atomized society. I love to consume, I am tempted by free sex, I love all earthly pleasures, and I try to rationalize and explain everything away (of course, to no avail). But there's got to be more.

It's not easy to come to terms with the teachings of the Catholic Church, but by accepting its laws, you also accept that there are things beyond your control, that can't be fully explained by reason, and that are indeed sacred. I think accepting Catholic law is an exercise in humbleness.

So to conclude: modernity was fun, but I think we're beyond it now. We've had it, seen it all. It gave us a lot of good things, but it also destroyed lots of essential values, and these will be coming back.
The 21st century will be very very spiritual, I think.
The Beginning is Near!
User avatar
lorenzo
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2184
Joined: Sat 01 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby Ebyss » Sun 03 Apr 2005, 18:23:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')t isnt ignored, it is acknowledged. The Pope held a special emergency meeting at the time to express his disgust.


It was ignored for decades. DECADES. Ignored by even the highest cardinals and archbishops. It was only when it became a legal issue that anyone did anything. Over here abuse was very common, and no-one did anything. How anyone can do these things is beyond me, but not only did they do it, they were protected BY THE CHURCH!! If anyone does something like that, or protects those who do, they lose all rights to preach to others.. and they should certainly lose any positions of power that they have. Any religion/organisation that harbours and protects paedophiles should be immediatly disbanded and stripped of any and all priviledges. Why they are above the law on this matter (of such importance) is beyond me... people in America go to prison for such things (harbouring terrorists for example), why are the Church exempt?
We've tried nothin' and we're all out of ideas.

I am only one. I can only do what one can do. But what one can do, I will do. -- John Seymour.
User avatar
Ebyss
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 834
Joined: Sun 20 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Ireland
Top

Unread postby CarnbY » Sun 03 Apr 2005, 18:25:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('linlithgowoil', 'T')he Catholic Church is one of the last remaining pillars of light in this dark world we live in. Without Jesus and the Church, there is no hope.
8O :lol: Man that's rich! The church has plagued the world for far too long already. It's high time reason and common sense got a chance instead. Though I agree with what you say about either being a catholic or not at all, there are far too many hypocritical christians who want to have their cake and eat it too. With that being said, shouldn't you be out stoning your neighbour to death for mowing the lawn on a Sunday or something?
User avatar
CarnbY
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 106
Joined: Tue 15 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Norway
Top

Unread postby lorenzo » Sun 03 Apr 2005, 18:27:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('uNkNowN ElEmEnt', 'D')oes the Catholic church really amount to anything now?


Well, it is the biggest community of people on the planet, and it's growing steadily. And in Europe and the USA, there's a revival happening as we speak.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('uNkNowN ElEmEnt', ' ')Does anyone really listen to their rants on abortion?


Absolutely. And more and more, especially young people are taking this very seriously.

Why do you feel that life is "rant"? I think life is important.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('uNkNowN ElEmEnt', ' ')to the AIDS plight in Africa?


The Catholic Church nor any other Christian denomination is responsible for AIDS. It's the liberal mores that are responsible for its spread. The Catholic Church says that deep relations between people, based on loyalty and love, are more important and deserve priority over sex as a consumer product.
Sex is not a consumer product. Condoms encourage sex to be seen as such a consumer product. And hence condoms are bad, considering these effects.
I fully support the conservative view of the Pope on this matter.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('uNkNowN ElEmEnt', 'H')ow they condone and expect their people to keep bringing babbies into the world so they can live with AIDS and in starvation?


When a child is born into a loyal Catholic couple, it can rest assured that it does not have AIDS, and that it will not starve.

Abstinence and love are the best remedies against AIDS. Not one single individual has ever gotten HIV through abstinence.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('uNkNowN ElEmEnt', 'D')oes anyone listen to any of the churches when they go on about whether or not Isreal has a valid claim?

Oh yes, absolutely. Ask any Palestinian how much courage and hope he has received because the Pope supported their cause. Ask any world leader whether the Pope's view on the conflict in the Middle East matters.

Ask any Jew what he thinks of the fact that the Holy Father has proclaimed that anti-semitism is a sin. That's hugely important.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('uNkNowN ElEmEnt', ' ')Do they care that the church says abstinence is the only way and ignorance is best?

Why do you equate abstinence with ignorance? I think people who understand why abstinence is the best way to attain a fulfilling, joyful and inspired life, are not ignorant. On the contrary, I suspect they're thinking on a higher level.

I know you're sticking your tongue in your cheek, and so am I. :roll:
The Beginning is Near!
User avatar
lorenzo
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2184
Joined: Sat 01 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Unread postby lorenzo » Sun 03 Apr 2005, 18:34:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('CarnbY', 'T')he church has plagued the world for far too long already. It's high time reason and common sense got a chance instead.


We've had reason for over 200 years now, and it has led to industrially organized genocide, to nazism, communism, liberalism, shallow hyper-individualism, the destruction of the most basic instincts of man (the respect for life) and a consumer culture that's empty, dumb, dull and destructive.

Thank God, my generation (of people born after 1975) are a bit tired of all these shallow social principles based on "reason".

It's time the Church re-enters the secularized societies. I am fully confident that she will be successful.
Last edited by lorenzo on Sun 03 Apr 2005, 18:39:28, edited 1 time in total.
The Beginning is Near!
User avatar
lorenzo
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2184
Joined: Sat 01 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Unread postby zed » Sun 03 Apr 2005, 18:38:33

It seems to me that the Catholic Church's strongest area is now Latin America. Europe's population is slow growing and increasingly nonreligious while Latin America's population is growing rapidly and still mostly Catholic. I think it would be a good message to 'break the mold' of having strictly European popes..
User avatar
zed
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 89
Joined: Wed 19 May 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby lorenzo » Sun 03 Apr 2005, 18:38:40

The pedophilia case in the USA is a case in itself. It has nothing to do with the universal church as such. The Pope has recognized and condemned it. That suffices.

In any large organization (and the Church is the largest on the planet) there are excesses. The Church is not different.

And this doesn't change her message in any way.
The Beginning is Near!
User avatar
lorenzo
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2184
Joined: Sat 01 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby lorenzo » Sun 03 Apr 2005, 18:49:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ebyss', '
')Sorry, I disagree. If you were right you would have alot less Catholics. Virtually none of the Catholics in my country adhere strictly to Catholicism in the way you suggest. They are part-time Catholics, paying lip service whenever guilt or obligation forces them to... this kind of hypocrisy makes me sick, and yet it's what every Catholic I know does.. and I know ALOT of Catholics.


I think you don't know much about Catholicism. In contrast to many cold, individualistic, cerebral, dispassionate protestant sects, the Catholic Church has a warm, latin feel to it: you do your best, but we all know we are sinners; and your sins can be absolved; it's not as harsh, disciplined as some protestant sects.
Moreover, it's about your intentions: do you agree with the doctrines of the Catholic Church and are you doing your best to live by these rules? Yes? Then you are a Catholic and you can join the great community of believers.

Moreover, Catholicism, this warm, sensual religion, has an entire aesthetic apparatus (rituals, art, traditions, a sense of belonging in a group), which makes it far easier to cope with the hard doctrinal points.

I think this is what makes Catholicism so attractive to people; it's the religion of passions. I think that's why you see so many Catholics in your country.
Last edited by lorenzo on Sun 03 Apr 2005, 18:50:57, edited 2 times in total.
The Beginning is Near!
User avatar
lorenzo
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2184
Joined: Sat 01 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Unread postby Ebyss » Sun 03 Apr 2005, 18:49:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')Condoms encourage sex to be seen as such a consumer product. And hence condoms are bad, considering these effects.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hen a child is born into a loyal Catholic couple, it can rest assured that it does not have AIDS, and that it will not starve.

Abstinence and love are the best remedies against AIDS. Not one single individual has ever gotten HIV through abstinence.


Now that is ignorance. And by ignorance I don't mean stupidity, I mean lack of fact or knowledge.

First of all, AIDS is not exclusively a sexually transmitted disease. It can be contracted in other ways (infected needles for example). Therefore your "abstinence" argument is basically nonsense.

Second, there are many starving Catholics, children and otherwise. You may aswell have said that Catholicism = Wealth, (well it does for the Church, but not for it's subjects)

Third, Condoms actually prevent sexually transmitted diseases (like AIDS) and unwanted pregnancies (there are many of these in Catholic countries). Why should married couples who do not yet wish to concieve not use condoms?

Fourth, does not the bible say "Go forth and multiply"? How does abstinence fit in with that? Surely we should all be having more sex.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')dditionally, i wish people would stop talking about 'conservative' or 'liberal' catholics. The Catholic Church has one true viewpoint which all Catholics must adhere to. You are either a Catholic or you are not. If you do not agree with all of the views of the Catholic Church you are not a Catholic.



Ok... the hypocrisy here is so glaring it's unreal. By that rationale (and I fully agree with it btw) any pope, cardinal, archbishop or priest who does not strictly follow all of the views of the Catholic Church is not a Catholic. As paedophilia is a sin, then any pope, cardinal, archbishop or priest who harboured, protected, ignored or committed acts of paedophilia from other clergymen are not Catholics, and thus do not belong in the Church from that point on. And yet many of these Cardinals, Archbishops (etc) are still functioning in the Church, and are still telling other people what is right and what is wrong. These non-Catholics have positions of power in the Catholic Church and preach in the name of Catholicism. How does that work?
Last edited by Ebyss on Sun 03 Apr 2005, 18:51:20, edited 1 time in total.
We've tried nothin' and we're all out of ideas.

I am only one. I can only do what one can do. But what one can do, I will do. -- John Seymour.
User avatar
Ebyss
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 834
Joined: Sun 20 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Ireland
Top

Unread postby khebab » Sun 03 Apr 2005, 18:50:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('lorenzo', ' ')
The Catholic Church nor any other Christian denomination is responsible for AIDS. It's the liberal mores that are responsible for its spread. The Catholic Church says that deep relations between people, based on loyalty and love, are more important and deserve priority over sex as a consumer product.
Sex is not a consumer product. Condoms encourage sex to be seen as such a consumer product. And hence condoms are bad, considering these effects.
I fully support the conservative view of the Pope on this matter.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('uNkNowN ElEmEnt', 'H')ow they condone and expect their people to keep bringing babbies into the world so they can live with AIDS and in starvation?


When a child is born into a loyal Catholic couple, it can rest assured that it does not have AIDS, and that it will not starve.

Abstinence and love are the best remedies against AIDS. Not one single individual has ever gotten HIV through abstinence.

You can't be serious. Africa is currently being decimated by AIDS. Condoms are the only defense they can afford and the Catholic Church has not supported that option. Abstinence has never worked and will nerver worked. Maybe it works among priests or monks except among those who are busy with young boys.
khebab
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 899
Joined: Mon 27 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Canada
Top

Unread postby Geology_Guy » Sun 03 Apr 2005, 18:57:28

When was the last time civilization collapsed and barbarians ran through the streets? It was the fall of the Roman Empire.

The Catholic Church was the only Roman institution that survived the fall of the western Roman Empire.

It will also survive peak oil and will do many good works for humanity.
Geology_Guy
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 239
Joined: Tue 06 Jul 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby lorenzo » Sun 03 Apr 2005, 19:06:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('khebab', 'A')frica is currently being decimated by AIDS. Condoms are the only defense they can afford and the Catholic Church has not supported that option.


I think you are confusing principle and reality.

The principle of abstinence is based on a very broad view on life: when a couple lives loyally together, in a marriage based on love, belief, and catholic practise, there will be no sexual relations outside marriage; hence, there will be no AIDS introduced into this couple. And hence, condoms are not needed. So in principle, abstinence is the only defense against AIDS. And the plea for abstinence should not be reduced to this problem of AIDS. It's a much broader, ethical notion.

Of course, the reality and the tragedy is that not enough African people are good Catholics yet; they are lured into modernity which advocates consumer-sex (the real cause of the spread of AIDS); and they are confronted with all kinds of misery, which lead to sex seen as a kind of shallow pleasure, and adultery as a means to forget your misery for a while.

So in order to combat AIDS, you don't need condoms (these only fight the symptoms), you need a broad contextual program:
-social progress and a fight against poverty (the Catholic Church does its utmost here)
-education (the Church does its utmost here)
-loyalty and a pious catholic lifestyle, which involves love and spirituality within marriage, and abidance to the rules of the Church

I challenge you to point me to one family that abides by these rules, and has AIDS. You won't find one. Not a single one.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('khebab', 'A')bstinence has never worked and will nerver worked.


Abstinence always works. Per definition. (The word abstinence means: to abstain.)
The Beginning is Near!
User avatar
lorenzo
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2184
Joined: Sat 01 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Unread postby Ebyss » Sun 03 Apr 2005, 19:07:46

How can you compare Roman expansion in Europe with Worldwide resource depletion? The two are totally different phenomena.

All that analogy says is that "Some situations have similar effects", it has no logic to it.
We've tried nothin' and we're all out of ideas.

I am only one. I can only do what one can do. But what one can do, I will do. -- John Seymour.
User avatar
Ebyss
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 834
Joined: Sun 20 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Ireland

Unread postby Ebyss » Sun 03 Apr 2005, 19:13:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') think you are confusing principle and reality.

The principle of abstinence is based on a very broad view on life: when a couple lives loyally together, in a marriage based on love, belief, and catholic practise, there will be no sexual relations outside marriage; hence, there will be no AIDS introduced into this couple. And hence, condoms are not needed. So in principle, abstinence is the only defense against AIDS. And the plea for abstinence should not be reduced to this problem of AIDS. It's a much broader, ethical notion.

Of course, the reality and the tragedy is that not enough African people are good Catholics yet; they are lured into modernity which advocates consumer-sex (the real cause of the spread of AIDS); and they are confronted with all kinds of misery, which lead to sex seen as a kind of shallow pleasure, and adultery as a means to forget your misery for a while.

So in order to combat AIDS, you don't need condoms (these only fight the symptoms), you need a broad contextual program:
-social progress and a fight against poverty (the Catholic Church does its utmost here)
-education (the Church does its utmost here)
-loyalty and a pious catholic lifestyle, which involves love and spirituality within marriage, and abidance to the rules of the Church

I challenge you to point me to one family that abides by these rules, and has AIDS. You won't find one. Not a single one.


khebab wrote:
Abstinence has never worked and will nerver worked.


Abstinence always works. Per definition. (The word abstinence means: to abstain.)


I think you are confusing principle and reality. You basically ignored my comment about AIDS not being an exclusively sexually transmitted disease. This makes your abstinence argument moot. It is possible to abstain from sex and still contract AIDS. You are basically saying that Catholics won't have AIDS. Thus any Catholic that does contract AIDS is immediately no longer a Catholic. Convenient.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he principle of abstinence is based on a very broad view on life: when a couple lives loyally together, in a marriage based on love, belief, and catholic practise, there will be no sexual relations outside marriage; hence, there


You don't have to be catholic to be in a loving AIDS free sexual relationship. That's what I have. No marriage either :shock horror: and yet my relationship has lasted longer than many Catholic marriages, even though divorce is a sin and not allowed in the Catholic Church. Do you suggest that divorce is immoral?
We've tried nothin' and we're all out of ideas.

I am only one. I can only do what one can do. But what one can do, I will do. -- John Seymour.
User avatar
Ebyss
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 834
Joined: Sun 20 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Ireland
Top

Unread postby lorenzo » Sun 03 Apr 2005, 19:19:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ebyss', 'Y')ou basically ignored my comment


Ebyss, I'm still writing my reply, I first repsonded to Khebab. Please don't be so quick with your judgement. Be a good Catholic and show some patience. :-D

Be right back, working on a reply to your comment.
The Beginning is Near!
User avatar
lorenzo
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2184
Joined: Sat 01 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Unread postby Ebyss » Sun 03 Apr 2005, 19:23:59

Lol :lol:


(I'm not Catholic... Imagine I had said "Be a good Jew and show some patience"... lucky for you I have a sense of humour ;) :P )



(Why is the wink emot not a wink?.. I just have some dude with a sheepish smile)
We've tried nothin' and we're all out of ideas.

I am only one. I can only do what one can do. But what one can do, I will do. -- John Seymour.
User avatar
Ebyss
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 834
Joined: Sun 20 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Ireland

Unread postby lorenzo » Sun 03 Apr 2005, 19:32:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ebyss', '
')First of all, AIDS is not exclusively a sexually transmitted disease. It can be contracted in other ways (infected needles for example).


Of course, but that was not the topic of discussion. Or are you suggesting that we use condoms and put them over our needles? Please stick to the topic at hand.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ebyss', '
') Therefore your "abstinence" argument is basically nonsense.


I think I just showed you the contrary.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ebyss', '
')Second, there are many starving Catholics, children and otherwise. You may aswell have said that Catholicism = Wealth, (well it does for the Church, but not for it's subjects)


Of course, but again, please try to go along with the broader context; you understand that starving is horrible, but starving AND having AIDS is even more horrible. Since Catholics don't get AIDS, that part of the problem of the life-situation of many Africans is already solved.

Then we can expand: when more Africans are Catholics - that is: fewer people with AIDS - their societies will not collapse, which leads to less people starving.

We can go on along this chain of causality for quite a while. I think it's clear though that a pious Catholic life-style would lead to better socio-economic and material conditions for many Africans.




$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ebyss', '
')Third, Condoms actually prevent sexually transmitted diseases (like AIDS)


Catholicism does even more: it prevents STDs from spreading in society in the first place.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ebyss', ' ')unwanted pregnancies

Catholicism prevents unwanted pregnancies as well. A loyal, pious catholic family only brings loved and wanted children on this planet.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ebyss', ' ')Why should married couples who do not yet wish to concieve not use condoms?

Because sex is there to create life. If you don't want to create life, you should not have sex. Sex is not a free hobby or some value-less activity; it's an intimate encounter between two loving people who want to make children.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ebyss', ' ')Fourth, does not the bible say "Go forth and multiply"? How does abstinence fit in with that? Surely we should all be having more sex.

Of course! The more Christian children the better. Abstinence means: not having sex when you don't need to. Of course, if you want to have children, you have to have sex. That's obvious.

The essence of abstinence is: do not have sex outside your marriage, and do not have sex when you do not intend to create a love-child.
The Beginning is Near!
User avatar
lorenzo
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2184
Joined: Sat 01 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Unread postby Geology_Guy » Sun 03 Apr 2005, 19:45:20

I agree the two situations are not the same, but they do share similarities. History rolls on, but we can learn from the past.

The reason I bring up the fall of the Roman Empire is because it was the last time that European society almost totally collapsed. As western "European" civilization now dominates the world (at least in it's American form) it is relevant to look at past collapses and see what relevance they have to a possible future collapse due to peak oil.

I suggest a good read of Jared Diamond's books on the rise and collapse of complex societies. As the Catholic Church was the most successful organization (the Eastern Empire and the Orthodox Church also did pretty well) to survive the fall a look at how it accomplished this might be beneficial.

You do not have to be Catholic or even like the Catholic Church to admit that certain groups of Catholics like the Irish monks did pretty well for themselves in the Dark Ages. This is of course a rather "Eurocentric" look at things. I figure the Emperor in China or the Mayans were doing pretty well thank you and did not care a bit what problems the Romans got themselves into.

As for the problems of the Romans not being relevant. They are partially relevant to peak oil. The Romans were running out of good farmland and forests -look what they did to North Africa.
Geology_Guy
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 239
Joined: Tue 06 Jul 2004, 03:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron