Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Are we fools? Time to eat some crow?

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: Are we fools? Time to eat some crow?

Unread postby threadbear » Sun 16 Nov 2008, 18:06:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('sjn', 'T')he shortage was chronic, and it exibited itself in the indebtment of the general economy. Credit availablity only shifted what was available to those able to attain that credit and away from those who could not. The credit crunch is/was the process of that pool of credit shrinking, cutting availability first to large parts of what have been until now the first world (including US home buyers) and now into the rapidily developing countries, such as is now occuring in China.

SJN, There has been an intentional easing of credit and expansion of the money since the crash of the Nasdaq and dot com problem. The subprime fiasco, and the financial innovations, derivatives, credit default swaps, that arose from that expansion are largely responsible for where we are today. Expensive oil didn't help, though money flows from Opec nations back into American financial system, certainly provided fresh capital to keep the whole rotting mess going longer than it should have. I wouldn't be surprised to find out one of the key reasons American banks began to fail, is Saudi Arabia became antsy about continuing to pour fresh money into them.

This is an interesting article. I don't completely agree with it, but Engdahl makes some good points, that help knock some of the legs out from under fundamentalist "peak think"

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Eco ... 6Dj07.html
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Are we fools? Time to eat some crow?

Unread postby yesplease » Sun 16 Nov 2008, 18:32:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('sjn', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('yesplease', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('sjn', 'T')hat is self evidently not the case. Oil prices above a certain point render large swathes of the economy unprofitable - this is exactly what you would expect as more energy is diverted towards energy production and away from the general ecomomy.
What large swathes are you referring to?

How secure is YOUR job?
Very secure! :)
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Professor Membrane', ' ')Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!
User avatar
yesplease
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3765
Joined: Tue 03 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Are we fools? Time to eat some crow?

Unread postby bodhinagami » Sun 16 Nov 2008, 19:28:51

So, how much months or weeks do you think petroleum will be kept at this price?

Each falling of the price of petroleum, I think is related to economic destruction... but the price of the u$a dollar should be taken also into account.
User avatar
bodhinagami
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri 07 Nov 2008, 04:00:00

Re: Are we fools? Time to eat some crow?

Unread postby sjn » Sun 16 Nov 2008, 19:52:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('sjn', 'T')he shortage was chronic, and it exibited itself in the indebtment of the general economy. Credit availablity only shifted what was available to those able to attain that credit and away from those who could not. The credit crunch is/was the process of that pool of credit shrinking, cutting availability first to large parts of what have been until now the first world (including US home buyers) and now into the rapidily developing countries, such as is now occuring in China.
SJN, There has been an intentional easing of credit and expansion of the money since the crash of the Nasdaq and dot com problem. The subprime fiasco, and the financial innovations, derivatives, credit default swaps, that arose from that expansion are largely responsible for where we are today. Expensive oil didn't help, though money flows from Opec nations back into American financial system, certainly provided fresh capital to keep the whole rotting mess going longer than it should have. I wouldn't be surprised to find out one of the key reasons American banks began to fail, is Saudi Arabia became antsy about continuing to pour fresh money into them.
This is an interesting article. I don't completely agree with it, but Engdahl makes some good points, that help knock some of the legs out from under fundamentalist "peak think" link

Engdahl is wrong. He's come out as not believing in PO, which is also plain by the language he uses. Peak Oil Myth? I know you are not someone who subscribes to the idea of PO as a myth, and really I don't think PO is central the point I was trying to make. Available Energy is a bigger, more chronic, and insiduous problem than Peak Oil.

The price of oil in the benchmark futures markets is part a financial instrument as Engdahl suggests, and part a commodity contract. Few use the Nymex or other exchanges to buy oil directly, but they use it to hedge the sale of purchase of oil at various grades at offsets from the benchmark futures prices. It provides liquidity. That enables production projects to go ahead knowing they will be able to guarantee a certian price for their oil, and purchasers to lock in a price where they know they can plan forward with a known expense when it comes to their procurement.

This really doesn't make any difference to my argument, which was about the ability to pay, for different buyers, given their credit availabilty. The price went up because people could afford to pay those prices. The regulated markets require participants to be willing to provide the contacted commodity or pay cash and compensation if not. That people could make side bets, is no different to making bets on the outcome of anything else you might care to make bets on, it doesn't directly affect the price people pay for oil. Though it does allow people to make and lose vast sums of money.

The price of oil went up because the money supply went up, and it was the thing people/industry needed to spend that extra money on, the same goes for other commodities vital to the global economy. The price of other items (except real estate and equities!), didn't see the inflationary effect of the loose lending standards, that's why they could get away with claiming a low CPI.

Energy is fundamental to economic activity, and to all types of *work*. It's basic thermodynamics. Money is not. Money is just an abstraction, the mechanism we use to determine who gets what, and what goes where. We haven't run out of money, it's just that it's no longer possible to keep recycling the petrodollars through the oil producers and back into the general economy. The system became short-circuited.
User avatar
sjn
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 1332
Joined: Wed 09 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: UK
Top

Re: Are we fools? Time to eat some crow?

Unread postby sjn » Sun 16 Nov 2008, 19:55:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('yesplease', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('sjn', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('yesplease', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('sjn', 'T')hat is self evidently not the case. Oil prices above a certain point render large swathes of the economy unprofitable - this is exactly what you would expect as more energy is diverted towards energy production and away from the general ecomomy.
What large swathes are you referring to?

How secure is YOUR job?
Very secure! :)

Do you think that's typical?
User avatar
sjn
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 1332
Joined: Wed 09 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: UK
Top

Re: Are we fools? Time to eat some crow?

Unread postby yesplease » Sun 16 Nov 2008, 20:28:01

The numbers seem to indicate so, at least according to this among other sources. If U.S. real unemployment/underemployment rate is ~12% (supposedly hasn't been used since Reagan), that's ~88% of the population who are employed and do not wish for more work, as opposed to the unemployed and underemployed 12%. Even during the great depression, we only saw 25% unemployment IIRC. That means that equity markets can fall flat on their faces, essentially going to zero, w/ the resulting shocks moving through the economy, and three out of four people were still employed.

Granted, if you asked people how they felt about their job their outlook would probably depend on whatever was being touted on the tube, e.g. if the U-6 is at 9% and "everything is fine" they may tend to feel secure, while they may feel insecure if the U-6 is a 12% and "the markets are in chaos", even though in both cases their jobs are still very secure, albeit less secure w/ the economy down.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Professor Membrane', ' ')Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!
User avatar
yesplease
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3765
Joined: Tue 03 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Are we fools? Time to eat some crow?

Unread postby grom » Fri 05 Dec 2008, 11:44:44

Well, when talking about peak oil or related issues, my prediction is (and has been for the last few years):

"My son (currently 3yo) will consume less energy than I do"
For me, that is what PO is about.

I never really tried to predict what will be the immediate cause for my son lower energy compsuption.
Will it be a supply crisis & shortage?
will he become relatively poorer than I am (due to a recession)? will he live in a much more energy-efficient world?

Impossible to know, human society is a really complex system.

However, I dont think the last drop in oil prices changes my prediction a bit.

Feel free to disagree. Anyone thinks her son will consume more energy than herself?
User avatar
grom
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 53
Joined: Fri 18 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Are we fools? Time to eat some crow?

Unread postby bodigami » Fri 05 Dec 2008, 16:27:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('grom', '(')...) Feel free to disagree. Anyone thinks her son will consume more energy than herself?

I don't plan to have offspring. At least not with 7 000 000 000+ alive humans.
bodigami
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1921
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Are we fools? Time to eat some crow?

Unread postby vaseline2008 » Sat 06 Dec 2008, 18:49:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'C')orn and beans and copper and aluminum are off 40% - 50% from their highs this year; cattle, milk, hogs cotton, sugar, lumber, wheat and ethanol are likewise down.

So what to make of all that?

The one thing I haven't seen mentioned in this thread (aside from those mentioned above) is there are huge amounts of money out there looking for a place to go. Pension funds, hedge-funds, petro-dollars, etc. had been in .coms, then went into mortgages, then in commodities - each time they burnt one bridge they simply went to the next.

Looks like they ran out of bridges.

So to answer the question, there is no crow to eat regarding PO, this was just a taste, just one feather's worth of what is to come when when geologic peak or EROEI peak happens, or simply when desire exceeds ability to pay regardless of production.


I totally agree Pops. The Peak will happen no matter what...it's just a matter of time. Many variables play into the "when", but it will happen sometime in the future. Human events prolonging or accelerating Peak Oil is not relevant.
I'd rather be the killer than the victim.
The Money Badger don't care. Sucks to be poor!
User avatar
vaseline2008
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 307
Joined: Mon 28 Apr 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Are we fools? Time to eat some crow?

Unread postby Elijah » Thu 18 Dec 2008, 19:06:13

On March 8, 2005, I posted the following: 8)

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')re we in the grip of a Peak Oil decline? Probably not. Yet. Not this time. There's a good chance we're just feeling the effects of the under-investment of the 90s and Chindia's growth. And even if we are feeling the effects of decline, do not underestimate our ability to conserve and adapt in ways that will prolong the hydrocarbon age for decades and quite possibly centuries to come. When he has to, man can be quite resourceful and adaptive.

Our family recently cut our already modest home energy bills by 20% in response to higher costs, and we barely noticed any difference in our way of life. The potential for conservation is huge without a lot of pain. Granted, that's only a temporary reprieve, but it could be a significant one, one that forestalls any real pain for decades.

I fear some Peak Oil adherents risk discrediting a perfectly good theory in their zeal for a good apocalypse. By crying "Wolf!" when the wolf isn't at the door, they risk making the theory a laughing stock when it ought to be percolating into our national consciousness as a real threat looming on the horizon.


http://www.peakoil.com/fortopic17133-0-asc-195.html
User avatar
Elijah
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 29
Joined: Tue 08 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Are we fools? Time to eat some crow?

Unread postby Zero-point » Sat 20 Dec 2008, 00:53:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Leanan', 'N')o, it's not time to eat crow. It's time for everyone else to. We peak oilers always knew that the "Grand Depression" scenario was likely.
Heck, it was peak oilers like Matt Simmons and Mike Ruppert who put the phrase "demand destruction" on the map. It wasn't a term ordinary economists used. It really is a peak oil thing. And now it's appearing in MSM headlines.

I know this post is from October but to make a point.

If the mainstream media put the term "demand destruction" , probably via Council of Foreign Relations shill Matt Simmons, who do you think is behind the peak oil scenario?

Why would you think having the mainstream media acknowledge peak oil makes it legitimate or gives it credibility?

The answer via a question is "just who do you think owns the mainstream media"? It's their corporations, the same people who have Matt Simmons evangelizing about peak oil.
User avatar
Zero-point
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 67
Joined: Sun 10 Aug 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Are we fools? Time to eat some crow?

Unread postby Plantagenet » Sat 20 Dec 2008, 01:28:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Zero-point', 'w')ho do you think is behind the peak oil scenario?

Thats no mystery. Dr. M. King Hubbert discovered and first described the concept in 1956.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

Re: Are we fools? Time to eat some crow?

Unread postby Zero-point » Sat 20 Dec 2008, 01:33:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Zero-point', 'w')ho do you think is behind the peak oil scenario?
Thats no mystery. Dr. M. King Hubbert discovered and first described the concept in 1956.

What I meant was who do you think is behind the "implementation" or maybe playing out of the peak oil script?
User avatar
Zero-point
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 67
Joined: Sun 10 Aug 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Are we fools? Time to eat some crow?

Unread postby Plantagenet » Sat 20 Dec 2008, 02:21:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Zero-point', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Zero-point', 'w')ho do you think is behind the peak oil scenario?
Thats no mystery. Dr. M. King Hubbert discovered and first described the concept in 1956.
What I meant was who do you think is behind the "implementation" or maybe playing out of the peak oil script?

No doubt some of the same folks that are behind things like gravity and crystal symmetry in minerals. 8)
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

Re: Are we fools? Time to eat some crow?

Unread postby Zero-point » Sat 20 Dec 2008, 06:58:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'N')o doubt some of the same folks that are behind things like gravity and crystal symmetry in minerals. 8)

I mean some things that affect peak oil, like political decisions, economic decisions, technological innovations can be manipulated to bring about peak oil type scenarios. That won't be a naturally occurring peak oil but it looks the same except for who has influence to those events.
User avatar
Zero-point
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 67
Joined: Sun 10 Aug 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Are we fools? Time to eat some crow?

Unread postby sparky » Sat 20 Dec 2008, 07:57:26

No secret there, they are not behind it ...they are pretty much in front their nose in the trough.

nobody cared about peak oil until the second Iraq war, then traders cottoned on the fact that a bit of a scare (well justified) about Nigeria going feral , Iraq deeply disturbed and Iran having a stranglehold on Hormuz , this was making a lot of money to wall street, A parallel line was conveniently presented as a rebuttal of " climate change IE why worry , we are running out of the stuff anyway .

Of course this sudden realisation that the end was night upon us satisfie some deeply masochistic instinct in people , if things are good , then some really bad news is around the corner .
This is usually correct .
User avatar
sparky
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3587
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Sydney , OZ

Re: Are we fools? Time to eat some crow?

Unread postby Zero-point » Sat 20 Dec 2008, 12:37:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('sparky', 'N')o secret there, they are not behind it ...they are pretty much in front their nose in the trough.
nobody cared about peak oil until the second Iraq war, then traders cottoned on the fact that a bit of a scare (well justified) about Nigeria going feral , Iraq deeply disturbed and Iran having a stranglehold on Hormuz , this was making a lot of money to wall street, A parallel line was conveniently presented as a rebuttal of " climate change IE why worry , we are running out of the stuff anyway .
Of course this sudden realisation that the end was night upon us satisfie some deeply masochistic instinct in people , if things are good , then some really bad news is around the corner .
This is usually correct .

Since peak oil evangelist Matt Simmons is CFR and the CFR has a huge influence in the US govenrment and finance and the capabilities and connection to make it look like peak oil is happening I bet it's worth looking into if the CFR and their sister organizations are manipulating political and economic events to create a fake peak oil.
User avatar
Zero-point
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 67
Joined: Sun 10 Aug 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Are we fools? Time to eat some crow?

Unread postby shortonsense » Sat 20 Dec 2008, 12:44:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Zero-point', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Zero-point', 'w')ho do you think is behind the peak oil scenario?
Thats no mystery. Dr. M. King Hubbert discovered and first described the concept in 1956.
What I meant was who do you think is behind the "implementation" or maybe playing out of the peak oil script?
No doubt some of the same folks that are behind things like gravity and crystal symmetry in minerals. 8)

peak oil is not gravity. peak oil is not some great geologic fact. peak oil isn't symmetric. peak oil isn't even a peak, sometimes its a plateau. Sometimes its multiple peaks. Sometimes its 2nd peaks are higher than the 1st. Sometimes it doesn't look like a peak. lots of times it doesn't even resemble a bell shaped curve.

the more important question is: Does anything remotely resembling the peak oil concept even MATTER anymore, based on current events and the rather obvious and awe inspiring effects of what happens when people decide to drive less. No EV's, no PHEV's, just expensive fuel and people CHOOSING to change their behavior.

Monte is out buying a scooter, joining thousands upon thousands of others who reacted in a perfectly reasonable way to economic stimuli. As expected. For as much fun as we make of economists around here, they seem to have a better grip on this thing than anyone else.
User avatar
shortonsense
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3124
Joined: Sat 30 Aug 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Are we fools? Time to eat some crow?

Unread postby Nickel » Sat 20 Dec 2008, 12:53:21

I don't think we're fools, no. It's really just a matter of mathematics. Oil's going to run out someday. Even if we make some fantastic find that doubles the amount of oil in the world, we're still only looking at a few more generations before it's completely gone. We need to get serious about developing our numerous and bountiful renewable energy resources.

Also, even if we did find scads more oil, is it really a good idea to keep fueling our society by burning it? We're polluting the planet in myriad ways, and raising the global temperature through combustion (if not through the process of global warming). And I keep thinking of all things we could be doing with petroleum -- a complex, irreplaceable soup of useful carbon compounds -- besides just burning it, if we shepherd what we have left for a few centuries. I had this daydream a while ago that God comes back after an absence of several thousand years, asks us how we used the petroleum He spent millions of years cooking up for us, and is shocked to hear that, by and large, we just burned it.

We're not fools to want to stop burning oil, for whatever our reasons.
User avatar
Nickel
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1927
Joined: Tue 26 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Canada of America

Re: Are we fools? Time to eat some crow?

Unread postby shortonsense » Sat 20 Dec 2008, 19:39:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Nickel', 'W')e're not fools to want to stop burning oil, for whatever our reasons.

I got to agree with that. But the hysteria attached to how much we are producing globally at any one point in time is so overwrought its ridiculous. Kill off the population, permanent depressions for everyone, starvation is the scenario de jour, and I won't even mention the silliness that the Amish at LATOC or their skinhead mouthpieces are advocating.
User avatar
shortonsense
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3124
Joined: Sat 30 Aug 2008, 03:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests

cron