by zeke » Thu 13 Nov 2008, 07:22:35
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Economix', 'I')f Peak Oil is only about extraction, who gives a rip? In other words, if we're only measuring extraction rates, why lose sleep over it?
In my opinion, what we're really talking about on Peak Oil is this:
1. The dangerous socio-economic and political impact of Peak Oil.
2. The possible geopolitical violence that could result from Peak Oil.
3. The potential alternatives to oil to prevent #1 and #2 above.
It's not about oil, it's about energy -- and the big problem we have finding enough energy for the world's growing population. Just talking about extraction rates is nothing but a geology debate.
We're talking people here, folks. People = society. People = prices.
I'm not sure what's propelling your argument, truly. You talk about extraction rates as though it's some impertinent factoid unworthy of anything more than dismissal.
Friend...if we need oil to the extent that our every eyeblink, burp and sneeze don't happen without it, that we are willing to engage in never-ending war to get it, then it would seem obvious (to most) that extraction rates are just about as relevant as any fact could ever hope to
be.
I have seen variants of this argument before, wherein the arguer will offer up something like, "well, yanno it's all just economics. market forces will take care of it." The implied "reasoning" is that reality is somehow a subset of the human imagination, and that as soon as all the ninnies are winnowed out, then we can get back to the business of schlurping down what we deem to be infinite supplies of everything.
Perhaps that's not what you intend to convey, but it's pretty close to how it reads..to me anyway...plus with a little good-natured ribbing and sarcasm tossed in by yours truly.
zeke