Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

The Spreading Global Food Crisis Thread pt 2 (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Food Seizure?

Unread postby wisconsin_cur » Fri 05 Dec 2008, 21:58:08

A guy not far from here was closed down by the USDA because a person who does not buy from him and has never been on his farm heard from a friend that he was selling raw milk... at the moment I cannot recall if it was part of a cow share program or not...

anyway he got a cease and desist and ended up getting back on the industrial food wagon as far as his milk. We bought some pastured chicken from him before we were producing our own. He was unsure as to what to do with his dairy in the future.

busisness week

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'F')or nearly a year-and-a-half, everything went as planned. The milk arrived on schedule and the health of Gelhaus' children improved dramatically. But on Mar. 6 of this year, everything changed. At about 1:15 in the afternoon, Gary Oaks arrived at a Cincinnati parking lot for what he thought would be a routine delivery, distributing milk to his shareholders. He got out of his truck, opened the trailer, and began handing out bottles of milk to a few of the dozen or so shareholders present.

Gelhaus wasn't there, but another shareholder who was, Joanne Miller, of Morrow, Ohio, remembers vividly what happened next. "I was placing empty bottles in carriers when I noticed a Cincinnati police cruiser moving through the parking lot slowly toward the trailer. Another cruiser followed. Officers moved toward the cow-share owners and told them not to pick up the milk that had already been set out, and actually moved in to prevent members from picking up the milk."

Out of several unmarked cars emerged men in plain clothes who "gathered near the tailgate of the trailer," Miller says. Only one would identify himself, an agent of the Ohio Dept. of Agriculture (ODA), she says.
http://www.thenewfederalistpapers.com
User avatar
wisconsin_cur
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4576
Joined: Thu 10 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: 45 degrees North. 883 feet above sealevel.

Re: Food Seizure?

Unread postby Pops » Fri 05 Dec 2008, 22:11:42

So a guy who sold raw milk without following the rules and was told to quit constitutes Food Seizure?

Gotta do better...
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: Food Seizure?

Unread postby wisconsin_cur » Fri 05 Dec 2008, 22:19:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'S')o a guy who sold raw milk without following the rules and was told to quit constitutes Food Seizure?
Gotta do better...

I cannot vouch for him personally but the neighbor said he was following the rules but did not have the money to fight it in court.

No one ever asked him if he was following the rules or not. Someone complained to the authorities and he walked out of his door and found a bunch of men who told him to drain the milk in his tanks. He refused and the deputies were called and the milk was dumped.

He did not fight because he cannot afford to fight.... just like pretty much everyone else who might find themselves in that situation.
http://www.thenewfederalistpapers.com
User avatar
wisconsin_cur
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4576
Joined: Thu 10 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: 45 degrees North. 883 feet above sealevel.

Re: Food Seizure?

Unread postby Pops » Fri 05 Dec 2008, 22:44:27

That could be, Cur, but also it could be a convienient hook to hang the They Are Out To Get Us hat on as it seems the folks who promoted this story (which I linked to) are won't to do.

But what I can't figure out is why anyone would post in such a conspicuous place as this if they were worried about a Jack Boot on their teat.

We need to be real.
Hysterics are probably not helpful.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: Food Siezure?

Unread postby jupiters_release » Sat 06 Dec 2008, 01:05:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'I') guess my question is:
How many folks who have responded or become agitated at the topic of this thread have much food or ability to produce food which might be seized?
I'm going to guess 1%.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'B')ut what I can't figure out is why anyone would post in such a conspicuous place as this if they were worried about a Jack Boot on their teat.

First you say we're not involved in our own food supply if we haven't posted about it, and then you say it's stupid to post about it. :-D

Whether the co-op was following some regulation isn't the point, it's the way they were raided with automatic weapons aimed at their children ALL DAY long. Why are you so quick in refusing to recognize the insanity of gitmo-style tactics? Perhaps the all too typical cognitive dissonance? It doesn't matter that we're not breaking any laws once martial law strips away any artificial rights we currently have.
Do not seek the truth, only cease to cherish opinions.
jupiters_release
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1301
Joined: Mon 10 Oct 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Food Seizure?

Unread postby wisconsin_cur » Sat 06 Dec 2008, 09:51:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'T')hat could be, Cur, but also it could be a convienient hook to hang the They Are Out To Get Us hat on as it seems the folks who promoted this story (which I linked to) are won't to do.

That could be Pops but couldn't we say that about any report of abuse of the USDA of which we are not a first person witness?

We should not let our pre-conceptions get in the way that either every USDA action is unjust or that every one is justified. Both are fundamentalisms to be avoided.

Hysteria is never of any use... neither is a beforehand dismissal of the complaint.
http://www.thenewfederalistpapers.com
User avatar
wisconsin_cur
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4576
Joined: Thu 10 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: 45 degrees North. 883 feet above sealevel.
Top

Re: Food Seizure?

Unread postby HeckuvaJob » Sat 06 Dec 2008, 13:54:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'A')gain, I'd ask who on this board has experienced or can corroborate any such actions at their local co-op, farmers market or farmstand? I'm going to bet zero this time even though we have thousands of Members.
Of course, if anything like this did happen to any of our members and they alerted us to it here, it would simply be a tactic to increase sales of grass-fed beef and raw milk cheese. After all...
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'T')his is the internet folks, hysterics get ratings.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'I') guess if you don't care about what, where or how your food is produced this is a big deal. I thought many here wanted more responsibility placed on those who grow their food - it seems this "blah" just the opposite. Personally I welcome any inspector here at my farm.

Pops, I think you misunderstand the local food movement. It's not about buying your beef from some traveling "meat-man" or pulling into Crazy Eddie's Expiration Date Grab-Bag to do your grocery shopping. It's about building relationships of trust. It's about having the ability to see how your food is raised, how it's killed, and maybe even taking part in the process! Try doing that with Cargill or Smithfield. Nothing screams "safety" like a voluntary recall issued by some lobbyist-funded bureaucracy 30 days after sh!t was found in the hamburger.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'M')ake a plan and work it.

Isn't that what these people were doing? I suggest you amend your signature as follows:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'M')ake a plan* and work it. *Note: said plan may be subject to random, unjust government shutdown. If such government suspension should occur, do not alert anyone, as this will be interpreted as a tactic to generate hysteria and increase sales.
Seriously Pops, up until this post, I'd always regarded you as the voice of reason on PO.com. Now I can only hope you go check the battery in your carbon monoxide detector. :cry:
User avatar
HeckuvaJob
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 326
Joined: Sat 09 Aug 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Pittsburgh
Top

Re: Food Seizure?

Unread postby Pops » Sat 06 Dec 2008, 14:50:17

From http://www.mannastorehouse.com/policy.html :
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')c. Manna Storehouse is not licensed or approved by any federal, state or local agency and it does not have any plans to do so in the future.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'd'). Members agree to take full responsibility for their own health, health choices, food choices and food quality.

And this part is good too:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'L')IABILITY WAIVER

Members voluntarily release, forever discharge, and agree to indemnify and hold harmless Manna Storehouse and any individual of the Stowers family including any property in connection with Manna Storehouse and any individual of the Stowers family from any and all claims for any damages to member, members persons, or members property.

Members agree to indemnify and hold harmless Manna Storehouse and any member of the Stowers family including any property in connection with Manna Storehouse and any member of the Stowers family from any responsibility from any transactions or spoken words, suggestions or assistance in any way regarding nutrition, health and healing.

Members acknowledge that they are completely responsible for any damages to anyone, including but not limited to children, friends, family acquaintances or individuals brought by the member.

Members understand they have waived their right to maintain a lawsuit against Manna Storehouse and any individual of the Stowers family including any property in connection with Manna Storehouse and any individual of the Stowers family.

Members acknowledge they have had sufficient opportunity to read this entire document and they have read and understood it, and they agree to be bound by its terms. Members also understand and intend that this assumption of risk, waiver and release be binding upon the members heirs, executors, administrators and assigns and includes any and all children.

Members acknowledge and agree should Manna Storehouse and any individual of the Stowers family or anyone acting on their behalf be required to incur attorney’s fees and costs to enforce this agreement, that the member in connection with the action agrees to indemnify and hold them harmless for all such fees and costs.

I only bolded a few lines but the last time I went to a supermarket, farmers market or Sam's Club it seems I didn't need to agree to such.

See, I have been promoting local food production here for years. I have also been promoting the idea that if one does not like a law they should try to get a better one passed - not simply ignore it.

I'm not excusing whatever excess in preforming the search the cops made but when you publish your intent to commit a crime it seems an invitation to John Law.

Flaunting the law is bound to bring attention, is that so surprising?

Further, ignoring laws, especially when it concerns food, is what caused 300,000 Chinese babies to get sick from adulterated milk and the big scare from BSE and it surprises me so many here and elsewhere take up for a company who chooses to make the consumer:

...take full responsibility for their own ... food choices and food quality.


While they as the supplier hire a lawyer write a bunch of crap so they take none.

I'm thinking the milk producers in China who put melamine in the watered milk to make it look kosher wish they could be indemnified likewise.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac
Top

Re: Food Seizure?

Unread postby jupiters_release » Sat 06 Dec 2008, 15:33:31

Pops,

Asking for just laws is like asking for transparency and accountability in the market, never been and never will. Forget China, most food sold and consumed in the states is nutritionless junk with varying degrees of toxicity. There's no ground to defend standards that are in themselves symptoms of a sick and insane society. One doesn't have to agree with the law in order to follow it either, don't be afraid to speak your mind, such egocentric self-censorship is more worrying than actually believing the USDA operates in the interest of the public's health.
Do not seek the truth, only cease to cherish opinions.
jupiters_release
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1301
Joined: Mon 10 Oct 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Food Seizure?

Unread postby Pops » Sat 06 Dec 2008, 15:45:55

You miss my point, JR.

The company not only ignored the rules in place but put the responsibility for the safety of the food they sold on the purchaser.

Tell me that is not a move backwards in food safety, wholesomeness and accountability.

Ask the people who sold the stuff on this list and have paid the price.


If you sell food you are accountable.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: Food Seizure?

Unread postby DomusAlbion » Sat 06 Dec 2008, 15:52:59

What would the cost have been to these people to simply learn the rules, fill out some papers and pay a few licensing fees. Very little I would imagine. Now they are paying dearly.

I call this behavior stupid.
"Modern Agriculture is the use of land to convert petroleum into food."
-- Albert Bartlett

"It will be a dark time. But for those who survive, I suspect it will be rather exciting."
-- James Lovelock
User avatar
DomusAlbion
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1979
Joined: Wed 08 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Beyond the Pale

Re: Food Seizure?

Unread postby Dreamtwister » Sat 06 Dec 2008, 16:37:05

And none of this explains why the Gestapo siezed the family's personal food stores.
The whole of human history is a refutation by experiment of the concept of "moral world order". - Friedrich Nietzsche
User avatar
Dreamtwister
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2529
Joined: Mon 06 Feb 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Food Seizure?

Unread postby Pops » Sat 06 Dec 2008, 17:27:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Dreamtwister', 'A')nd none of this explains why the Gestapo siezed the family's personal food stores.

I have stuff to sell, that is my personal stuff until someone buys it or I claim it on a tax form as inventory I pay taxes on.
But of course I need to declare myself a business, follow the laws and get whatever permits etc. as required.

Why is following the rules so hard to understand and why do so many seem afraid someone is protecting their food supply? Or is it just fun to type Gestapo?

Oh, yea, it is;
never mind.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac
Top

Re: Food Seizure?

Unread postby HeckuvaJob » Sat 06 Dec 2008, 17:29:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'T')he company not only ignored the rules in place but put the responsibility for the safety of the food they sold on the purchaser. Tell me that is not a move backwards in food safety, wholesomeness and accountability.

Ask the people who sold the stuff on this list and have paid the price.

So, to illustrate how important following the rules are and how effective the current system is at keeping us safe, you post a link to several dozen product recalls?

You're all over the map, Pops, and now I don't know what arguments you're trying to make. Are you saying the FDA is trying to generate hysteria by posting this on the internet? Should the SWAT team be deployed to General Mills?

Personally, I'm totally comfortable with a disclaimer that places the onus of safety on me, if, and only if, I'm able to personally inspect the method by which the food was brought to my plate. This is something that can only be accomplished via a local food co-op. It all comes down to a question of transparency and trust.

I would trust my rule-breaking neighbor more than a fully compliant corporation.

If you're under the impression that the FDA or the USDA is primarily concerned with consumer safety... I don't know what to tell you. Pops, I don't mean to be disrespectful and I hope my tone isn't too a$$holish, but watching you defend the USDA as an agent of consumer protection is only slightly less disturbing than watching German porn.
User avatar
HeckuvaJob
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 326
Joined: Sat 09 Aug 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Pittsburgh
Top

Re: Food Seizure?

Unread postby eXpat » Sat 06 Dec 2008, 17:38:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('HeckuvaJob', '
')I would trust my rule-breaking neighbor more than a fully compliant corporation.

I nominate this as the phrase of the day.
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw

You can ignore reality, but you can't ignore the consequences of ignoring reality.” Ayn Rand
User avatar
eXpat
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3801
Joined: Thu 08 Jun 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Food Seizure?

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Sat 06 Dec 2008, 17:43:11

I sympathize with Pops' position that we have to abide by the laws - for now. But the laws of the land seems to be crumbling. It's a very tricky and confusing situation. I think there is a strong correlation between the heavy-handed enforcements we are seeing and the precariousness of authority in general. This is bound to get much worse next year.
Turn those Machines back On! - Don Ameche in Trading Places
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Re: Food Seizure?

Unread postby Ludi » Sat 06 Dec 2008, 17:52:17

As far as I know it is quite legal to GIVE AWAY raw milk, etc, to your friends, family, and neighbors. I see no need to get involved in the legal mess of SELLING these products if you don't want to follow the rules. If you don't want to follow the rules for selling,* DON'T SELL.

It's not all that difficult.

*edited to add "or you don't want to fight to change them"
Last edited by Ludi on Sat 06 Dec 2008, 18:17:40, edited 1 time in total.
Ludi
 

Re: Food Seizure?

Unread postby Pops » Sat 06 Dec 2008, 17:58:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('HeckuvaJob', 'S')o, to illustrate how important following the rules are and how effective the current system is at keeping us safe, you post a link to several dozen product recalls?

Yea.

What about a product recall confuses you?

Someone didn't follow the rules, bad stuff got on the market and they are trying to ameliorate the problem.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('HeckuvaJob', 'Y')ou're all over the map, Pops,

Sorry, I tried to make myself clear last post but here it is clearer:

Sell good, local food, follow the law and take responsibility for what you sell.

I would make that statement shorter but I don't know how.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac
Top

Re: Food Seizure?

Unread postby Ludi » Sat 06 Dec 2008, 18:16:34

Of course the laws are structured to favor large business. That's not new information, and I'm not surprised you're upset about them, so am I. But, they are hard to fight. Have you had any success fighting them?

One of my heroes is Vandana Shiva. :)

http://www.navdanya.org/

You must think I've suddenly gotten really stupid/ignorant overnight, Shanny. I've only been posting about food issues here on the board for years.

This makes me sad. :(
Last edited by Ludi on Sat 06 Dec 2008, 18:23:25, edited 1 time in total.
Ludi
 

Re: Food Seizure?

Unread postby Pops » Sat 06 Dec 2008, 18:21:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', ' ')If you don't want to follow the rules for selling, DON'T SELL.

I may be reading this all wrong but the whole deal seams somewhat of a crusade on principle and not practicality.

We trade with our neighbors for young animals, crops of all sorts, OTC medications, gravel, lumber, you name it!

The interest in this thread is the title.

Name it "Unregulated Food Supply" and I'd bet the response would be way different.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron