by mackina1 » Tue 18 Nov 2008, 20:20:10
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('LoneSnark', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'P')ure capitalism rewards the predator and the opportunist. The herd wanders and grazes while the lion sleeps the day away. Once the heard has done the work of collecting the grass and processing it into tasty nutricious meat, the predator comes and harvests the fruits of the herd's work.
That is hallarious. Regretfully, it doesn't quite work. The more lions we have the more gazelles get eaten until there are too few gazelles to support all the lions. This is nothing like a capitalist society, where the more capitalists we have (IBMs, Dells, Googles) the more jobs there are for workers and the more competition there is for customers. We can always ask: individual gazelles are always against being eaten, while individual workers are always eager to be offered a job.
I think a much better metaphore would be farmers and their crops. The more farmers we have, the more crops can be tended. Afterall, while crops can survive in nature, they do terribly. Similarly, while workers can survive in nature, they do terribly. Crops need the protection provided by farmers' fences and pesticides; workers need the organization and planning provided by capitalists. The more farmers we have, the better cared for individual crops will be; the more capitalists we have, the better served in terms of jobs and products individual workers will be. Too few farmers and some crops must be abandoned to nature; too few capitalists and some workers must be abandoned to nature (unemployment).
It doesn't work perfectly, just an any metaphore. Farmers can always plant more seeds to get more crops, capitalists must just sit back and pray the next generation of workers will be larger. Also, crops cannot just switch allegiance to a more attentive farmer, where-as workers are required by capitalist doctrine to seek the best mix of working conditions and wages they can.
The metaphore is flawed, not because it's not well made, but because of the subject. You base your assumptions on more capitalists being good. This works perfectly in a borderless, limitless universe. If you base it on our earth the metaphore illustrates perfectly well on of the main problems of capitalism: YOu have a given amount of land. Then you add more farmers, and more and so on till you get to the point where there are too few workers per farmer. The result is either war or famine or both....
Free market would work if we could achive a world wherein these point were true:
Total information. Everybody knows about the best product at any time.
Limitless capabilty of expansion.
Eternal competetion in a perfect balance.
Free competition in all forms.
A way to cushion all the emotional costs and societal cost associated with the system working...
The two first are not possible to get in the world of today, the three last are rather utopic...
Just to declare my stance, i'm neither a free market beliver nor a dogmatic communists. I've been both, and today I see no reason to be... All systems are flawed, and will be so long as we accept the concept of free will. This little concept is something i like to much to give up so for now i'll advocate a mixed solution...