Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Communism Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Why is communism so appealing to young people?

Unread postby MrBean » Mon 17 Nov 2008, 06:37:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('xerces', 'O')n election night, I was hanging out with a group of friends. And we were basically discussing some of the wealth re-distribution plans that Obama was proposing. I strongly disapprove of such methods and very quickly found out that nearly all of my friends were for it. In short, almost all of a group of educated mid-20s people were supporting a government that would give them money that they didn't earn.

Being a little perplexed by all of this, I gave my old man a call and we talked about this obsession with socializing other people's wealth. My father mentioned that when he was my age, he believed it as well. He believed as a young man that people should willingly give up their wealth and material possessions for the greater good. That a society should take all that a person is capable of producing and give to those that needs it. He also mentioned that it was all government bullsh*t, just propaganda designed to get young people to do stupid things for a political party. He told me that during the cultural revolution in China, a generation of young people sacrificed their youth and energy for the corrupt goals of handful of political power-brokers. In the end those people woke up in their 30s with no money, no skills, and was totally abandoned by their own government. And that was why he stopped believing that communism could work.

I'm interested in hearing everyone's opinion on this matter?


I'm perplexed how stock-holders and others profiting from toil of others by usury justify their version of redistribution of wealth (from poor to rich).
User avatar
MrBean
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1202
Joined: Sun 26 Sep 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Why is communism so appealing to young people?

Unread postby VMarcHart » Mon 17 Nov 2008, 09:19:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cube', 'H')owever there is a BIG difference between Americans vs. Western Europeans in what society expects from government and how much "support" one should receive from government.
I lived in 3 western european countries for years. From experience, they tend to expect a lot from their gov'ts. Forgive me, did I miss your point?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cube', 'E')ven Obama, "the socialist according to his opponents", doesn't even dare open his mouth and propose universal health care.
We must be watching different news channels. I'm in Obamaville. The economy, Iraq, Guantanamo, healthcare are his top priorities.
On 9/29/08, cube wrote: "The Dow will drop to 4,000 within 2 years". The current tally is 239 bold predictions, 9 right, 96 wrong, 134 open. If you've heard here, it's probably wrong.
User avatar
VMarcHart
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1644
Joined: Mon 26 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Now overpopulating California

Re: Why is communism so appealing to young people?

Unread postby VMarcHart » Mon 17 Nov 2008, 09:30:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Snowrunner', 'T')he average single income in Canada was, last I checked, 35K/year. Making more than four times that is pretty rich.
You call it pretty rich, I call it living comfortably. Pretty rich for me is the person who could retire. Even I had earned $150K for the last 10 years, I woudn't be able to retire. Let's say we agree we disagree on this.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Snowrunner', 'W')hat, in your opinion, is a model citizen supposed to do?
Pull its own weight would be a good start.
On 9/29/08, cube wrote: "The Dow will drop to 4,000 within 2 years". The current tally is 239 bold predictions, 9 right, 96 wrong, 134 open. If you've heard here, it's probably wrong.
User avatar
VMarcHart
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1644
Joined: Mon 26 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Now overpopulating California
Top

Re: Why is communism so appealing to young people?

Unread postby Javaman » Mon 17 Nov 2008, 09:36:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('xerces', 'O')n election night, I was hanging out with a group of friends. And we were basically discussing some of the wealth re-distribution plans that Obama was proposing. I strongly disapprove of such methods and very quickly found out that nearly all of my friends were for it. In short, almost all of a group of educated mid-20s people were supporting a government that would give them money that they didn't earn.

Being a little perplexed by all of this, I gave my old man a call and we talked about this obsession with socializing other people's wealth. My father mentioned that when he was my age, he believed it as well. He believed as a young man that people should willingly give up their wealth and material possessions for the greater good. That a society should take all that a person is capable of producing and give to those that needs it. He also mentioned that it was all government bullsh*t, just propaganda designed to get young people to do stupid things for a political party. He told me that during the cultural revolution in China, a generation of young people sacrificed their youth and energy for the corrupt goals of handful of political power-brokers. In the end those people woke up in their 30s with no money, no skills, and was totally abandoned by their own government. And that was why he stopped believing that communism could work.

I'm interested in hearing everyone's opinion on this matter?


It probably could explained by some varying combinations of ignorance, inexperience, indoctrination, poor reasoning, or a general lack of intelligence. Even a very intelligent person can be temporarily misled by propaganda and a lack of information.

An equal distribution of money is somewhat analogous to an equal distribution of energy; in either case it is not possible to get any work done. Maybe if more kids concentrated on physical science and business in school, their world view might change for the better.
User avatar
Javaman
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 261
Joined: Wed 18 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Why is communism so appealing to young people?

Unread postby Nickel » Mon 17 Nov 2008, 10:46:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('VMarcHart', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Snowrunner', 'W')hat, in your opinion, is a model citizen supposed to do?
Pull its own weight would be a good start.


What about a good stop, then? What is a "model" citizen making $150K a year morally obliged to do that one making $35K isn't?
User avatar
Nickel
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1927
Joined: Tue 26 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Canada of America
Top

Re: Why is communism so appealing to young people?

Unread postby Nickel » Mon 17 Nov 2008, 10:52:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Javaman', 'A')n equal distribution of money is somewhat analogous to an equal distribution of energy; in either case it is not possible to get any work done.


Your argument here is based on the non sequitur that all the money or energy is initially evenly distributed. Obviously, in our economy, that isn't the case. Work is done BY THE TRANSFER OF ENERGY from one place to another: stationary is just as odious as initial uniformity (of what use is a battery that sits forever in a drawer?). Ditto the transfer of money. For instance, a human being making a billion dollars a year eats, roughly, the same as one making a thousand dollars a year: on a biological level, of course. The person with a billion dollars is going to spend a tiny fraction of that literally surviving. However, the ten, or hundred, a thousand others his excess can support with him barely noticing the loss represents a lot of work -- work they can subsequently do, farmers their feeding will support, and so on. It's not hard to see how the redistribution of excess accumulated funds has a broadly ameliorating effect on the gears and wheels of a society.
User avatar
Nickel
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1927
Joined: Tue 26 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Canada of America
Top

Re: Why is communism so appealing to young people?

Unread postby graham » Mon 17 Nov 2008, 11:37:30

Most 'young' people over here are completely indifferent to politics. The few that are politically active (such as myself- though being nearly 30 is not so young) tend to gravitate towards out of the box critical thinking, and sustainability/green issues. 'Isms' are generally seen as irrelevant. Ask yourself this- is capitalism a perfect meritocracy? Little has actually changed since the nineteenth century, the worst aspects of capitalism (ie. worker exploitation/sweatshops) have simply been off shored.
User avatar
graham
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 97
Joined: Fri 20 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Location: U.K.

Re: Why is communism so appealing to young people?

Unread postby Maddog78 » Mon 17 Nov 2008, 12:23:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('VMarcHart', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Snowrunner', 'T')he average single income in Canada was, last I checked, 35K/year. Making more than four times that is pretty rich.
You call it pretty rich, I call it living comfortably. Pretty rich for me is the person who could retire. Even I had earned $150K for the last 10 years, I woudn't be able to retire. Let's say we agree we disagree on this.


It depends a lot on where you live.
$150K a yr. is barely living comfortably in the Vancouver, BC area, for the last 7 or 8 yrs. or so, if you want to own your own home.
$35K/yr. is barely above poverty level here.
Some of the highest RE prices in NA.
That is, of course, changing quickly. Prices dropping fast nowadays.
Last edited by Maddog78 on Mon 17 Nov 2008, 15:31:13, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Maddog78
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1626
Joined: Mon 14 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Why is communism so appealing to young people?

Unread postby Maddog78 » Mon 17 Nov 2008, 12:25:43

Sorry, d.p.
The site was working very slowly earlier.
Last edited by Maddog78 on Mon 17 Nov 2008, 15:30:17, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Maddog78
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1626
Joined: Mon 14 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Why is communism so appealing to young people?

Unread postby VMarcHart » Mon 17 Nov 2008, 15:20:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Nickel', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('VMarcHart', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Snowrunner', 'W')hat, in your opinion, is a model citizen supposed to do?
Pull its own weight would be a good start.
What about a good stop, then? What is a "model" citizen making $150K a year morally obliged to do that one making $35K isn't?
My apologies, Nickel, I didn't understand the first question. As for the second, I don't think there's a moral difference between the 2 persons. Is there?
On 9/29/08, cube wrote: "The Dow will drop to 4,000 within 2 years". The current tally is 239 bold predictions, 9 right, 96 wrong, 134 open. If you've heard here, it's probably wrong.
User avatar
VMarcHart
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1644
Joined: Mon 26 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Now overpopulating California
Top

Re: Why is communism so appealing to young people?

Unread postby ROCKMAN » Mon 17 Nov 2008, 15:53:39

I'd have to put a harsher spin on all of it. I always refer to such "sharing" philosophies as the "thief mentality". Very simple: I deserve what anyone else has. It’s not right that they have (fill in the blank) and I don’t. Most of my kin are thieves to some degree. They no more consider stealing wrong then most of us think working for what we have as wrong. At times you can even smell their sense of self rightness.

As I said -- harsh. But simplistically true.
User avatar
ROCKMAN
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11397
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: TEXAS

Re: Why is communism so appealing to young people?

Unread postby MrBean » Mon 17 Nov 2008, 16:15:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ROCKMAN', 'I')'d have to put a harsher spin on all of it. I always refer to such "sharing" philosophies as the "thief mentality". Very simple: I deserve what anyone else has. It’s not right that they have (fill in the blank) and I don’t. Most of my kin are thieves to some degree. They no more consider stealing wrong then most of us think working for what we have as wrong. At times you can even smell their sense of self rightness.

As I said -- harsh. But simplistically true.


You take for your consumption from the livelihood of future generations - you are a thief.

You say this mine and only mine and not to be shared with anyone - you are a thief from All the Rest of Nature.

You behave according to mechanisms of selfishness and greed - you are a thief.

Harsh. But simplistically true.

Most natural mode of human behaviour is gift economy. The one giving most and best gifts is the best dude in eyes of others. The Santa Clause economy.

It takes only 24/7 hypnotizing barrage of infomercial propaganda to enforce most unnatural behavioral patterns of pure greed and selfishnes - and even that is not succeeding. The gift economies of Linux, Wikipedia etc. survive regardless, as do everyday compassion - especially among the most "poor" and "depraved".
User avatar
MrBean
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1202
Joined: Sun 26 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Why is communism so appealing to young people?

Unread postby Quinny » Mon 17 Nov 2008, 19:41:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('GreyGhost', 'O')lder people prefer capitalism because older people tend to have more money.


Very simplistic, but very true!
Live, Love, Learn, Leave Legacy.....oh and have a Laugh while you're doing it!
User avatar
Quinny
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3337
Joined: Thu 03 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Why is communism so appealing to young people?

Unread postby eastbay » Mon 17 Nov 2008, 21:16:44

.... just something to point out:


Few communists envision an economic system with a totally equal distribution of wealth and equal incomes for all. No socialist system has had this either.

As a lifelong socialist, for me, a 100X spread in income and a reasonable cap on net worth would be ideal. This would allow a living wage for all, and a decent financial motivation for great scientists, inventors, and other kinds of creative genius.

In todays terms (in US dollars for N. America) an annual income spread between approximately $20,000 and $2,000,000 per year and a net worth (and inheritance) limited to $10,000,000.
Got Dharma?

Everything is Impermanent. Shakyamuni Buddha
User avatar
eastbay
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sat 18 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: One Mile From the Columbia River

Re: Why is communism so appealing to young people?

Unread postby jbrovont » Mon 17 Nov 2008, 21:36:32

Pure capitalism would ideally be supported by an equality of opportunity and ROI for every individual - such that from birth if everyone put in the same effort, they would reap the same benefit of their investment.

It's easy to see that this is never the case, however. Every individual is different in ability and in how they react in different situations. We're all born into slightly different circumstances. Equal effort will never equate to equal success for two different individuals.

Some people are greedy, and competative, and "enough" isn't "enough" unless it's more than someone else. Some people are generous and naive that there are liars, cheats and predators that look and act like them until it's time to make the proverbial kill and take from them.

I always laugh when I hear the "social darwinism" argument to justify success and failure of individuals. It usually comes from those who want to simultaneously enjoy the benefits of civilization and social structure, while exploiting a specific knowledge or ability to extract from that society more than they put in. They then claim that their success in enriching themselves is the fruit of their own hard labor and mental superiority and the losses from others are proof of their social failure.

Pure capitalism rewards the predator and the opportunist. The herd wanders and grazes while the lion sleeps the day away. Once the heard has done the work of collecting the grass and processing it into tasty nutricious meat, the predator comes and harvests the fruits of the herd's work.

It's very easy to see who the biggest freeloaders in society are. Simply look around for those who think that they deserve more than they contribute. How much wealth they've accumulated has nothing to do with it.
User avatar
jbrovont
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1003
Joined: Fri 16 Jun 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Why is communism so appealing to young people?

Unread postby VMarcHart » Tue 18 Nov 2008, 09:59:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('eastbay', 'F')ew communists envision an economic system with a totally equal distribution of wealth and equal incomes for all. No socialist system has had this either.
I'm with you on this. I wonder where people get this idea that communism and socialism mean to equally divide the sum of all wealth among all people.
On 9/29/08, cube wrote: "The Dow will drop to 4,000 within 2 years". The current tally is 239 bold predictions, 9 right, 96 wrong, 134 open. If you've heard here, it's probably wrong.
User avatar
VMarcHart
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1644
Joined: Mon 26 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Now overpopulating California
Top

Re: Why is communism so appealing to young people?

Unread postby MrBean » Tue 18 Nov 2008, 10:31:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('VMarcHart', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('eastbay', 'F')ew communists envision an economic system with a totally equal distribution of wealth and equal incomes for all. No socialist system has had this either.
I'm with you on this. I wonder where people get this idea that communism and socialism mean to equally divide the sum of all wealth among all people.


Not certainly from "Each according his abilities, to each according his needs".
User avatar
MrBean
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1202
Joined: Sun 26 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Why is communism so appealing to young people?

Unread postby LoneSnark » Tue 18 Nov 2008, 12:43:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'P')ure capitalism rewards the predator and the opportunist. The herd wanders and grazes while the lion sleeps the day away. Once the heard has done the work of collecting the grass and processing it into tasty nutricious meat, the predator comes and harvests the fruits of the herd's work.

That is hallarious. Regretfully, it doesn't quite work. The more lions we have the more gazelles get eaten until there are too few gazelles to support all the lions. This is nothing like a capitalist society, where the more capitalists we have (IBMs, Dells, Googles) the more jobs there are for workers and the more competition there is for customers. We can always ask: individual gazelles are always against being eaten, while individual workers are always eager to be offered a job.

I think a much better metaphore would be farmers and their crops. The more farmers we have, the more crops can be tended. Afterall, while crops can survive in nature, they do terribly. Similarly, while workers can survive in nature, they do terribly. Crops need the protection provided by farmers' fences and pesticides; workers need the organization and planning provided by capitalists. The more farmers we have, the better cared for individual crops will be; the more capitalists we have, the better served in terms of jobs and products individual workers will be. Too few farmers and some crops must be abandoned to nature; too few capitalists and some workers must be abandoned to nature (unemployment).

It doesn't work perfectly, just an any metaphore. Farmers can always plant more seeds to get more crops, capitalists must just sit back and pray the next generation of workers will be larger. Also, crops cannot just switch allegiance to a more attentive farmer, where-as workers are required by capitalist doctrine to seek the best mix of working conditions and wages they can.
User avatar
LoneSnark
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 514
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Why is communism so appealing to young people?

Unread postby MrBean » Tue 18 Nov 2008, 16:34:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('LoneSnark', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'P')ure capitalism rewards the predator and the opportunist. The herd wanders and grazes while the lion sleeps the day away. Once the heard has done the work of collecting the grass and processing it into tasty nutricious meat, the predator comes and harvests the fruits of the herd's work.

That is hallarious. Regretfully, it doesn't quite work. The more lions we have the more gazelles get eaten until there are too few gazelles to support all the lions. This is nothing like a capitalist society, where the more capitalists we have (IBMs, Dells, Googles) the more jobs there are for workers and the more competition there is for customers. We can always ask: individual gazelles are always against being eaten, while individual workers are always eager to be offered a job.


Hallarious to you. Wage-slaves are eager to get wage that is the only way for them to keep eating. It's not free choice but extortion.

And more wage-slaves got eaten, more capitalist predators there are until wage-slaves ability to increase profit margins for the predators stops and collapse comes. What do you think is the reason for the boom-bust cycles of capitalism and how is that reason dirrerent from codependent population changes in lions and gazelles?

This collapse became really visible only after one predator species wen't extinct, namely Wall Street investment bank predator species. But it started of course much much earlier.
User avatar
MrBean
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1202
Joined: Sun 26 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Why is communism so appealing to young people?

Unread postby mackina1 » Tue 18 Nov 2008, 20:20:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('LoneSnark', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'P')ure capitalism rewards the predator and the opportunist. The herd wanders and grazes while the lion sleeps the day away. Once the heard has done the work of collecting the grass and processing it into tasty nutricious meat, the predator comes and harvests the fruits of the herd's work.

That is hallarious. Regretfully, it doesn't quite work. The more lions we have the more gazelles get eaten until there are too few gazelles to support all the lions. This is nothing like a capitalist society, where the more capitalists we have (IBMs, Dells, Googles) the more jobs there are for workers and the more competition there is for customers. We can always ask: individual gazelles are always against being eaten, while individual workers are always eager to be offered a job.

I think a much better metaphore would be farmers and their crops. The more farmers we have, the more crops can be tended. Afterall, while crops can survive in nature, they do terribly. Similarly, while workers can survive in nature, they do terribly. Crops need the protection provided by farmers' fences and pesticides; workers need the organization and planning provided by capitalists. The more farmers we have, the better cared for individual crops will be; the more capitalists we have, the better served in terms of jobs and products individual workers will be. Too few farmers and some crops must be abandoned to nature; too few capitalists and some workers must be abandoned to nature (unemployment).

It doesn't work perfectly, just an any metaphore. Farmers can always plant more seeds to get more crops, capitalists must just sit back and pray the next generation of workers will be larger. Also, crops cannot just switch allegiance to a more attentive farmer, where-as workers are required by capitalist doctrine to seek the best mix of working conditions and wages they can.


The metaphore is flawed, not because it's not well made, but because of the subject. You base your assumptions on more capitalists being good. This works perfectly in a borderless, limitless universe. If you base it on our earth the metaphore illustrates perfectly well on of the main problems of capitalism: YOu have a given amount of land. Then you add more farmers, and more and so on till you get to the point where there are too few workers per farmer. The result is either war or famine or both....

Free market would work if we could achive a world wherein these point were true:
Total information. Everybody knows about the best product at any time.
Limitless capabilty of expansion.
Eternal competetion in a perfect balance.
Free competition in all forms.
A way to cushion all the emotional costs and societal cost associated with the system working...

The two first are not possible to get in the world of today, the three last are rather utopic...

Just to declare my stance, i'm neither a free market beliver nor a dogmatic communists. I've been both, and today I see no reason to be... All systems are flawed, and will be so long as we accept the concept of free will. This little concept is something i like to much to give up so for now i'll advocate a mixed solution...
User avatar
mackina1
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon 25 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron