by Carlhole » Sun 16 Nov 2008, 13:17:44
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Chief', 'L')ets flip this around and see what bona-fide wealth re-distribution a.k.a communism gets you: Devestation. Hopelessness. The feeling that no matter what you do you'll still be poor. I spent a lot of time in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union from 1985 until 2003 and saw this first hand.
Why not talk about Sweden's Socialism instead of the USSR's?
Looking back at the corrupt and brutal Soviet Union under Stalin or back at Mao's China, which were utterly wretched, does not address the fundamental philosophical questions that concern us here:
(1) What functions do human beings do best
collectively in society?
(2) What do human beings do best
individually in society?
(3) How does society best balance socialized vs. individual action to achieve maximum productive happiness?
If we were to eliminate in America some of our favored socialized institutions, we would have to scrap our entire military and defense industry, all our intelligence organizations - all those overseas bases and everything.
Our police forces would have to become private. We would no longer have community built sewer systems or roads or bridges. No friendly neighborhood post-office or library.
If one listens to the Libertarians on these matters, they would have you believe that sewage systems, roads and other basic infrastructure, police, etc can be managed privately. I have never thought so.
I think there are some things that people do best collectively and some things that people do best individually. The society with the greatest wisdom is able to structure a rewards system that balances the public with the private in a sensible way. But then, for the past thousand years, human societies have not remained static long enough for any equilibrium between public and private to have become established. This is because population growth, political economy, and technology have always served to disrupt equilibrium in society. It's been a forever changing thing.
In the past, hugely successful Capitalists have benefited by providing goods and services whose production also heedlessly polluted the environment or willfully exploited women, children, slaves or other low-paid laborers in the pursuit of maximum profits. Despite their wretched living conditions, the poor have always bred like rats.
One of the big problems with the human race is
there is no full accounting system which takes into account things like population growth and damage to or changes in the environment. After all, the environment is something we all share collectively. A poor environment affects our individual lives. Rampant population growth is something that will inevitably affect all of us tremendously.
It certainly looks as though the human race is approaching the limits to growth. And this is bound to have a profound effect on the way people structure society. None of the hide-bound dogmas of the past whether they be Communist or Libertarian is going to help us in the future.
Personally, I think there will indeed be some sort of violent third revolution whereby everyone simply MUST become concerned with environmental and population issues in addition to the old arguments of political economy. I don't have any clear idea of how the world might look after such a revolution but I sense that advanced computing, advanced communications, possibly machine intelligence, etc. will cause a re-emergence of the old philosophical debate about the utility of collective vs individual action in human society.
In a way, in this global economic crunch we are experiencing, with the dire warnings about global warming hanging over us - we seem to be on the verge of having this discussion - perhaps this revolution - in the near future.