by virgincrude » Fri 07 Nov 2008, 05:36:48
dohboi: $this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')nd even though I have understood PO fairly well for a number of years now, it still kind of scares the crap out of me to have it confirmed by these folks, just as the Hirsch Report was a sobering read a few years back, even though it did no hold much new for those familiar with the issues.
+1
Is it really so important that the MSM dedicates pages and pages to PO in and of itself, or rather, that they start explaining
what PO means to every day life as we know it? The actual event of PO, the ultimate peak, and whether or not the IEA uses the term or acknowledges the possibility is really like arguing over whose job it is to rearrange the deck chairs on the Titanic.
Grabbing hold of the data to explain production rate declines, arguing over details such as 'depletion' and 'decline', tends to cast shadow on the more important points. If the MSM do start talking about PO you can bet it will be to discuss such details and not to make the connections and emphasise how people can prepare individually and at a community level for what such levels of depletion and production decline mean in our every day lives.