Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE International Energy Agency (IEA) Thread pt 2 (merged) A

Discuss research and forecasts regarding hydrocarbon depletion.

Re: IEA: "the era of cheap oil is over"

Postby Starvid » Thu 06 Nov 2008, 12:45:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dohboi', 'H')aven't they filed an official retraction on this?
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Financial Times', 'T')he IEA refused to comment.

Which means it's true.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dohboi', ' ')And isn't there already a thread on this? Not that I mind it being discussed here. Sometimes the urge to have a discussion in just one place here limits the audience of potentially interested and informed discussants.

If you have a link, please post it in the thread, the moderators are bound to merge them. :)
Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
User avatar
Starvid
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3021
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Uppsala, Sweden

Re: IEA: "the era of cheap oil is over"

Postby AirlinePilot » Thu 06 Nov 2008, 12:55:55

I believe the most important message to take away here, regardless of the decline number, is that an agency like the IEA is coming up with it and not afraid to let the cat out of the bag.

If this is indeed the case, than it worries me immensely. What is the REAL decline picture going to look like? This is very big news and should reach mainstream sources. It will be interesting to see the results of that interaction.

My predition is that it is whitewashed and minimized. The markets may not see it that way, but I cant see how it wont be very bullish to crude prices long term.
User avatar
AirlinePilot
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4378
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South of Atlanta

Re: IEA: "the era of cheap oil is over"

Postby mos6507 » Thu 06 Nov 2008, 12:59:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Starvid', '
')Which means it's true.


We knew peak oil was true for years. It's the rest of the world that needs to get a clue. So the IEA coming out on it is a big deal. But they have to actually come out with it and let it burn a swath through the MSM for it to do some good. Right now the most imporant peak oil document we have to hang our hats on is the Hirsch report which is old news now.
mos6507
 

Re: IEA: "the era of cheap oil is over"

Postby nero » Thu 06 Nov 2008, 15:09:38

This is indeed big news, because most governments use the IEA's projections when planning. If they now are forced to use much more pessimistic numbers then the case for implementing mitigation policies NOW is much easier. Perhaps a little political activism when the numbers come out would be appropriate to light a fire under the governments asses to incorporate the new IEA numbers into their projections.
Biofuels: The "What else we got to burn?" answer to peak oil.
User avatar
nero
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1433
Joined: Sat 22 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Ottawa, Ontario

Re: IEA: "the era of cheap oil is over"

Postby Lanthanide » Thu 06 Nov 2008, 15:27:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dohboi', 'H')aven't they filed an official retraction on this? And isn't there already a thread on this?

Not that I mind it being discussed here. Sometimes the urge to have a discussion in just one place here limits the audience of potentially interested and informed discussants.

That was the first leak that they retracted, and there is a thread on the first leak.

This is the second leak, which they have not retracted, but have refused to comment on.
User avatar
Lanthanide
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 158
Joined: Sat 24 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Top

Re: IEA: "the era of cheap oil is over"

Postby TheDude » Thu 06 Nov 2008, 15:29:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AirlinePilot', 'I') believe the most important message to take away here, regardless of the decline number, is that an agency like the IEA is coming up with it and not afraid to let the cat out of the bag.


They're still projecting long term production gains, though. BAU, in other words.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')If this is indeed the case, than it worries me immensely. What is the REAL decline picture going to look like? This is very big news and should reach mainstream sources. It will be interesting to see the results of that interaction.


CERA announcing 4.5% provoked little beyond op eds. $147/bbl gave you some shifts in demand, and a lot of pols wanting to string up speculators/blathering on about drilling rights. Do you recall anyone in Congress calling for expansion of MT? It will be BAU down through the ages, until shortages appear, which will be blamed on Evil Oil Companies of course.

Perhaps this will light more fires in the EU. Or Obama will don a cardigan sweater. Who knows?
Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
And let me tell you something: I dig your work.
User avatar
TheDude
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia
Top

Re: IEA: "the era of cheap oil is over"

Postby CrudeAwakening » Thu 06 Nov 2008, 15:53:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AirlinePilot', '
') If this is indeed the case, than it worries me immensely. What is the REAL decline picture going to look like? This is very big news and should reach mainstream sources. It will be interesting to see the results of that interaction.

Althought the IEA has tended to become increasingly pessimistic in it's forecasts lately, I'm afraid that reality will be even worse.

This should become headline material across the MSM, but somehow I doubt that it will be... instead, it'll be buried in a small column of the business pages.
"Who knows what the Second Law of Thermodynamics will be like in a hundred years?" - Economist speaking during planning for World Population Conference in early 1970s
User avatar
CrudeAwakening
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 834
Joined: Tue 28 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: IEA: "the era of cheap oil is over"

Postby dohboi » Thu 06 Nov 2008, 19:08:59

Yessiree:

linky

"It" is definitely true, but it is not completely clear what the "it" is here.

There are various kinds of decline rates, and this one seem to be the one that does not take into account projected new production.

Still, it's a huge admission coming from this source. It suggests that there is some room now for real dialog between the PO community and some of these official agencies.

And even though I have understood PO fairly well for a number of years now, it still kind of scares the crap out of me to have it confirmed by these folks, just as the Hirsch Report was a sobering read a few years back, even though it did no hold much new for those familiar with the issues.
User avatar
dohboi
Harmless Drudge
Harmless Drudge
 
Posts: 19990
Joined: Mon 05 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

Re: IEA: "the era of cheap oil is over"

Postby Starvid » Thu 06 Nov 2008, 23:36:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Starvid', '
')Which means it's true.


We knew peak oil was true for years. It's the rest of the world that needs to get a clue. So the IEA coming out on it is a big deal. But they have to actually come out with it and let it burn a swath through the MSM for it to do some good. Right now the most imporant peak oil document we have to hang our hats on is the Hirsch report which is old news now.

I meant that the assertion that these things are in the IEA report is true, because the IEA refused to comment.
Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
User avatar
Starvid
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3021
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Uppsala, Sweden
Top

Re: IEA: "the era of cheap oil is over"

Postby TheDude » Fri 07 Nov 2008, 03:01:43

WSJ: Oil Supplies Will Tighten And Prices Jump, IEA Warns

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he agency on Thursday released a 15-page summary of its hefty annual study, the rest of which will come out next week. The study focuses on a detailed analysis of production rates and reserves within 800 oil fields around the world.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'R')ising demand and production declines in existing fields will require oil companies to add 64 million barrels a day in capacity over the next 22 years, more than six times Saudi Arabia's current production. Nearly half of that will be needed in the next eight years, the report warns.
Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
And let me tell you something: I dig your work.
User avatar
TheDude
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia
Top

Re: IEA: "the era of cheap oil is over"

Postby TreebeardsUncle » Fri 07 Nov 2008, 03:07:36

So, are they (the IEA) conceding that this is just not a problem of insufficient investment but a situation in which decline in production is likely to accelerate in spite of additional investment?

g
TreebeardsUncle
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 683
Joined: Thu 15 Jun 2006, 03:00:00

Re: IEA: "the era of cheap oil is over"

Postby virgincrude » Fri 07 Nov 2008, 05:36:48

dohboi: $this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')nd even though I have understood PO fairly well for a number of years now, it still kind of scares the crap out of me to have it confirmed by these folks, just as the Hirsch Report was a sobering read a few years back, even though it did no hold much new for those familiar with the issues.


+1


Is it really so important that the MSM dedicates pages and pages to PO in and of itself, or rather, that they start explaining what PO means to every day life as we know it? The actual event of PO, the ultimate peak, and whether or not the IEA uses the term or acknowledges the possibility is really like arguing over whose job it is to rearrange the deck chairs on the Titanic.

Grabbing hold of the data to explain production rate declines, arguing over details such as 'depletion' and 'decline', tends to cast shadow on the more important points. If the MSM do start talking about PO you can bet it will be to discuss such details and not to make the connections and emphasise how people can prepare individually and at a community level for what such levels of depletion and production decline mean in our every day lives.
User avatar
virgincrude
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 516
Joined: Thu 09 Mar 2006, 04:00:00
Location: Al-Mariyya, Al-Andalus
Top

Re: IEA: "the era of cheap oil is over"

Postby strider3700 » Fri 07 Nov 2008, 08:31:22

quick and dirty calculations here but at a 9% decline rate by 2030 the world will have roughly 12 million barrels/day to share. even at 6% we only have 24 million bpd.

$200 is laughable.
shame on us, doomed from the start
god have mercy on our dirty little hearts
strider3700
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2865
Joined: Sun 17 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Vancouver Island

Re: IEA: "the era of cheap oil is over"

Postby vaseline2008 » Fri 07 Nov 2008, 10:17:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tanada', 'I')s this just anoyther leak or is it officially official this time?


I did a little snooping around the FT website and here's an article from Oct. 28, 2008, just a week and a half prior. Seems the report has been viewed earlier than today:

Investment key to meeting oil demand

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he findings are critical because, as the IEA says, "future [oil] supply is far more sensitive to [production] decline rates than to the rate of growth in oil demand".

The draft report has found that the planet is far from running out of oil, as some so-called "peak oil" theorists argued. But it also finds that output from the world's oil fields, some of them discovered more than 30 years ago, is declining much faster than previously thought. That means the oil industry will need to invest more than expected.


They still have their heads in the sand....
I'd rather be the killer than the victim.
The Money Badger don't care. Sucks to be poor!
User avatar
vaseline2008
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 307
Joined: Mon 28 Apr 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: IEA: "the era of cheap oil is over"

Postby ROCKMAN » Fri 07 Nov 2008, 10:55:12

I hope the released report also includes a detailed explanation of their methodology. I’ve read that previous efforts utilized future consumption growth as an indication of future production rates. Essentially that oil production would be determined by demand and not actual capability. The “leak” sounds as thought they’ve switched from this ridiculous assumption. Understanding how they came up with their projection is as important as the numbers themselves.

Even if they are analyzing actual decline rates in the major fields this number should also be taken with a grain of salt. Mega fields, like Ghawar, are water-drive reservoirs. Ghawar’s current decline (truly known only by the KSA) will eventually take a sharp downward turn. Though the existing water-injection program had greatly aided in maintaining high production rates, there is a serious downside: when the water levels eventually reach the majority of the perforations in the wells the decline rate could jump to 15% to 20% in a year or two. Though a different drive mechanism this is why Cantrell is experiencing 30%+ decline rates lately. The injected N2 gas cap used to maintain high production rates has now reached the perfs in many wells. Both situations essentially amount to tipping points in each fields decline rates. Cantrell has reached it. Only the KSA has any idea when Ghawar will hit its tipping point. But it isn’t a matter of if it will…but when: 2 year…5 years…maybe next year. The same is true for all other water-drive mega field reservoirs.
User avatar
ROCKMAN
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11397
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: TEXAS

Re: IEA: "the era of cheap oil is over"

Postby mos6507 » Fri 07 Nov 2008, 11:01:49

More articles that never mentioned the dreaded "peak oil" term unless it's to reassure the public that this ain't it. Until we get beyond the euphamisms and evasion, we're not really making any progress.
mos6507
 

Re: IEA: "the era of cheap oil is over"

Postby aggie » Fri 07 Nov 2008, 11:57:41

Strider, at 12-24mpd, I don't think price will matter much anymore. Only the elite and governments will be able to afford it. The average person will probably get rationed a certain amount per month, if they can afford it.
User avatar
aggie
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Thu 28 Aug 2008, 03:00:00

Re: IEA: "the era of cheap oil is over"

Postby Starvid » Fri 07 Nov 2008, 14:17:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('strider3700', 'q')uick and dirty calculations here but at a 9% decline rate by 2030 the world will have roughly 12 million barrels/day to share. even at 6% we only have 24 million bpd.

$200 is laughable.

You have no idea what you are calculating then. The IEA has not said anything about net decline rates. At all.

They've said that current fields decline by 9 % per year if they go without investment and by 6.7 % if they get investment (which they do). This 6.7 % percent equal 5.7 mbpd which must be brought online every year to get net declines of 0 %.
Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
User avatar
Starvid
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3021
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Uppsala, Sweden
Top

Re: IEA: "the era of cheap oil is over"

Postby Starvid » Fri 07 Nov 2008, 14:21:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('aggie', 'S')trider, at 12-24mpd, I don't think price will matter much anymore. Only the elite and governments will be able to afford it. The average person will probably get rationed a certain amount per month, if they can afford it.

Try to understand the different kinds of decline instead of engaging in faith-based doom mongering.
Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
User avatar
Starvid
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3021
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Uppsala, Sweden
Top

Re: IEA: "the era of cheap oil is over"

Postby Starvid » Fri 07 Nov 2008, 14:21:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ROCKMAN', 'I') hope the released report also includes a detailed explanation of their methodology. I’ve read that previous efforts utilized future consumption growth as an indication of future production rates. Essentially that oil production would be determined by demand and not actual capability. The “leak” sounds as thought they’ve switched from this ridiculous assumption. Understanding how they came up with their projection is as important as the numbers themselves.

The total supply projections are still allegedly demand driven which is how they come up with ridculous numbers like 105 mbpd in 2030, but they've also done a big bottom up study of the 800(?) biggest fields, just like Fredrik Robelius Ph.d. thesis. They get the decline rates from this reality-based bottom up study.
Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
User avatar
Starvid
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3021
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Uppsala, Sweden
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Peak oil studies, reports & models

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron