Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE US Economy Thread (merged)

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Unread postby nth » Mon 28 Mar 2005, 14:52:11

damn, i want a $65k house.
heck, i can pay in cash.
User avatar
nth
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1978
Joined: Thu 24 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby nth » Mon 28 Mar 2005, 15:02:12

marko,

One thing about your scenario of the currency market that puzzles me is how does USD fall and no one gain from it?

I was taught that currency values depreciate against another currency. So if USD is weaken, then another currency must be strengthen as people sell USD, they have to buy another currency.

On another point, I always assumed Euro will be the other choice. If Euro is the other choice, then how is it not in their best interest to lend that money back to US to save their pre-existing investment and their pension and insurance business?
I mean they have a few trillion dollars invested in US. Are you saying they are willing to abandon all that money? Are you also saying that a few trillion dollars are going to leave US?

I cannot imagine the G7 finance ministers allowing this to happen. I think they just shutdown the market like what Malaysia did in the 90's and institute a fixed exchange with allotted quantities.
User avatar
nth
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1978
Joined: Thu 24 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby cube » Mon 28 Mar 2005, 15:15:17

I remember not too long ago, about 2 years agao, during the run up to the invasion of Iraq it was quite fashionable to speak of the US as not just a super power but a hyper power...a power that is beyond super power. This was all over the news and op-ed articles in just about every newspaper you can shake a stick at.

Today, I know of no sane person who would make the same claim today. My what a difference 2 years can make. I wonder where the US will be in another 2 years? 8)
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby RiverRat » Mon 28 Mar 2005, 17:20:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('nth', 'd')amn, i want a $65k house.
heck, i can pay in cash.


avg sale price = ~$105k
avg rent = ~$300/month

Right now ... I'm looking at a $12k 'beater'. I estimate ~$12k in rehab and probably a final sale price of ~$55k - $60k.

Come on PO ... hold off a weeee bit longer!!
:-D
If ...'If's' and 'But's' ... were Candy and Nuts ... we would all be happy and fat !
RiverRat
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 197
Joined: Wed 16 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby RdSnt » Mon 28 Mar 2005, 23:47:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('nth', 'm')arko,

One thing about your scenario of the currency market that puzzles me is how does USD fall and no one gain from it?

I was taught that currency values depreciate against another currency. So if USD is weaken, then another currency must be strengthen as people sell USD, they have to buy another currency.

On another point, I always assumed Euro will be the other choice. If Euro is the other choice, then how is it not in their best interest to lend that money back to US to save their pre-existing investment and their pension and insurance business?
I mean they have a few trillion dollars invested in US. Are you saying they are willing to abandon all that money? Are you also saying that a few trillion dollars are going to leave US?

I cannot imagine the G7 finance ministers allowing this to happen. I think they just shutdown the market like what Malaysia did in the 90's and institute a fixed exchange with allotted quantities.


If you don't mind my attempt at an explaination.
The US currency is the global reserve currency, meaning every other countries currency is guaranteed against the US dollar. Since we all abandoned the gold standard and the US bailed on Brenton Woods, everyone has been gleafully printing paper money that is not supported by any tangible assets. The worst offender is obviously the US and in particular Chairman Greenspan, who is historically the worst perpetrator of fraud in all of history. With no constraints what so ever he's been printing worthless money for over a decade. Pretty much the entire US economy is being held up by hot air, and thus everyone elses funds are floating there too.
If you could liquidate the entire United States, everything, you couldn't get a fraction back on the liabilities, something approaching 50 trillion dollars, the US owes.
Gravity is not a force, it is a boundary layer.
Everything is coincident.
Love: the state of suspended anticipation.
To get any appreciable distance from the Earth in
a sensible amount of time, you must lie.
User avatar
RdSnt
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1461
Joined: Wed 02 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Canada

Unread postby threadbear » Mon 28 Mar 2005, 23:50:21

Rdsnt, I like your take on things. When and how did you start to get interested in the American economy, if you don't mind me asking?
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby RdSnt » Tue 29 Mar 2005, 10:57:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'R')dsnt, I like your take on things. When and how did you start to get interested in the American economy, if you don't mind me asking?


Thanks,
I'm an information nut, I hate not knowing what's going on. The US is an extraordinarily fascinating place and quite frankly only a fool wouldn't pay attention to what it does and how.
I have a great deal of admiration for some of the accomplishments that have been achieved, however the last 30 or so years have seen a progressive and accelerating slide into a conservative abys.
I really became enamored with the States during John Kennedy's presidency, which coincided with Nasa's moon shots.
I really don't think American's appreciate how hard the blow was at his death, throughout the world. I was a young boy then, living in Canada, and I cried.

To my mind that was the turning point for the US. It was when the conservative, and if I'm in a harsh mood, the cowards of America, took over. Since then America and Americans have been in a death spiral of progressively worse levels of self-absorbed greed, consumption and murder. America has lost it's gift of looking to the future, which was it's pre-eminent power over the rest of the world and one we all gladly wished to follow.

Now, the rest of the world is just trying to find the best way to get out of the way and survive as the monster the US has become crashes into murderous chaos and dust.
Gravity is not a force, it is a boundary layer.
Everything is coincident.
Love: the state of suspended anticipation.
To get any appreciable distance from the Earth in
a sensible amount of time, you must lie.
User avatar
RdSnt
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1461
Joined: Wed 02 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Canada

Unread postby nth » Tue 29 Mar 2005, 11:11:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cube', 'T')oday, I know of no sane person who would make the same claim today. My what a difference 2 years can make.


Really? The way US is going about things I would say they still act like it.
User avatar
nth
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1978
Joined: Thu 24 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby nth » Tue 29 Mar 2005, 13:16:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('RdSnt', 'I')f you don't mind my attempt at an explaination.


No, I don't mind, cuz more than one person claims that the USD falls and everyone else will just watch, which makes no sense to me.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')The US currency is the global reserve currency, meaning every other countries currency is guaranteed against the US dollar. Since we all abandoned the gold standard and the US bailed on Brenton Woods, everyone has been gleafully printing paper money that is not supported by any tangible assets.


When US floated their currency, the value is based on perception/market determined value. Economists have written quite a bid on this phenomenon. The idea of using gold as a reserve doesn't really make economic sense, but again people don't really act rational during crisis.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')The worst offender is obviously the US and in particular Chairman Greenspan, who is historically the worst perpetrator of fraud in all of history. With no constraints what so ever he's been printing worthless money for over a decade. Pretty much the entire US economy is being held up by hot air, and thus everyone elses funds are floating there too.
If you could liquidate the entire United States, everything, you couldn't get a fraction back on the liabilities, something approaching 50 trillion dollars, the US owes.


Actually, I am not sure how much to fault Greenspan. Congress did change the way the Fed operates. As far as I know, the Federal Reserve Bank is the only central bank that gives equal weight to economic growth as inflation management. That was done through legislative act from Congress. He can say he is just doing his job.

I still don't understand how you can sell all that USD. We are talking about currency exchange.
User avatar
nth
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1978
Joined: Thu 24 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Unread postby marko » Tue 29 Mar 2005, 23:35:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('nth', 'O')ne thing about your scenario of the currency market that puzzles me is how does USD fall and no one gain from it?

I was taught that currency values depreciate against another currency. So if USD is weaken, then another currency must be strengthen as people sell USD, they have to buy another currency.


Yes, they will sell US dollars for another currency, which will rise relative to the dollar, though probably not very much relative to real things like oil or other commodities, which will also be rising in dollar terms. The euro may hold its value in terms of buying power while the US dollar drops.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('nth', 'O')n another point, I always assumed Euro will be the other choice. If Euro is the other choice, then how is it not in their best interest to lend that money back to US to save their pre-existing investment and their pension and insurance business?
I mean they have a few trillion dollars invested in US. Are you saying they are willing to abandon all that money? Are you also saying that a few trillion dollars are going to leave US?

I cannot imagine the G7 finance ministers allowing this to happen. I think they just shutdown the market like what Malaysia did in the 90's and institute a fixed exchange with allotted quantities.


What I have outlined is a scenario in which a global recession both cuts off the flow of dollar/IOUs from the US to its trade partners and increases the need for those trade partners to spend their reserves to shore up their own economies. Meanwhile, the recession swells the US federal budget deficit and the federal government's need for credit. However, the recession will render Asia and Europe unable to meet the US government's need for credit. This sends US interest rates through the roof and ultimately leads to US bankruptcy, as the US is unable to service its debt.

Ultimately, this is where the US seems to be headed inevitably, even without a near-term recession. Its external debt is growing at a rate of 6% of GDP per year and accelerating. External debt now totals more than a third of GDP. Even at an interest rate as low as 5%, which is unlikely to prevail if external borrowing continues to expand, it takes no more than 7 or 8 years even at the current rate of external debt expansion (not counting the acceleration) before servicing this debt consumes all of GDP growth and then some. Within a few more years, US bankruptcy appears inevitable.

There is really nothing that the G7 can do about this, and ultimately European corporations will simply have to write off whatever US assets they are unable to sell. I think that there is a recognition in Europe that this is inevitable. I have seen articles to this effect, for example, in Der Spiegel, the leading German news weekly.
User avatar
marko
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 443
Joined: Mon 31 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Massachusetts
Top

Unread postby threadbear » Wed 30 Mar 2005, 01:43:36

Rdsnt, Thanks for the reply. It was really heart felt and well written. I think many people feel the way you do. The death of Kennedy was a blow to the collective American soul. Do you mind if I ask where you are in Canada? I'm in Canada too, and damned worried about what this country might become.

Marko, That was a great summary. I'm going to reread it tomorrow. I've been reading analyses of this nature for a few years now, and this ranks in the top ten.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby RdSnt » Wed 30 Mar 2005, 09:53:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'R')dsnt, Thanks for the reply. It was really heart felt and well written. I think many people feel the way you do. The death of Kennedy was a blow to the collective American soul. Do you mind if I ask where you are in Canada? I'm in Canada too, and damned worried about what this country might become.

Marko, That was a great summary. I'm going to reread it tomorrow. I've been reading analyses of this nature for a few years now, and this ranks in the top ten.


I'm in Toronto.
I too am worried, this is not a good continent to be on given the growing problems.
I've posted elsewhere on this site the comment that while the North American continental isolation has worked to our advantage, especially during the past two world wars, that isolation is going to now work against us.
Canada is really in an indefensible position regarding the US need for water and energy.
If things go really badly I fully expect the US to take what they need from us, even possibly annexing the country. Given their un-preparedness I don't see them having much choice.

I'm nominally an NDP supporter, however I've been very disappointed with all our political parties which seem to be completely oblivious to the train wreck that's approaching. None seem willing to take any sort of responsibiity.
We need to start researching clean coal burning technology, we need to be out front of nuclear development, we need to re-localize our industry, start an emergency level of conservation and abandon free trade.
These are all counter-trends and certainly, accept for free trade, things the NDP are thoroughly against. However, each one of these will be thrust upon us as the crisis becomes unavoidably apparent. Someone needs to lead and make every effort to prepare as best we can.
Gravity is not a force, it is a boundary layer.
Everything is coincident.
Love: the state of suspended anticipation.
To get any appreciable distance from the Earth in
a sensible amount of time, you must lie.
User avatar
RdSnt
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1461
Joined: Wed 02 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Canada
Top

Unread postby nth » Wed 30 Mar 2005, 11:37:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('marko', '
')Yes, they will sell US dollars for another currency, which will rise relative to the dollar, though probably not very much relative to real things like oil or other commodities, which will also be rising in dollar terms. The euro may hold its value in terms of buying power while the US dollar drops.


If you don't mind, can we explore in greater detail, if you don't want to talk about minute details, that is fine, but it really doesn't make sense according to what I learn.

Inflation will be checked by recession as consumers lose income, purchasing power drops, so more supply will be in the market and pricing power will drop, so inflation will drop.

The only time that is not true is when we have stagflation. This will require recession and yet supplies remain scarce. So are you saying supplies will remain low despite economic collapse?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')What I have outlined is a scenario in which a global recession both cuts off the flow of dollar/IOUs from the US to its trade partners and increases the need for those trade partners to spend their reserves to shore up their own economies.


Okay, you loss me right there.
What are the trading partners doing with there reserves?
Can you be more specific?
"shore up their own economies" doesn't make sense if by doing so, it doesn't help the US economy. How does these trading partners use reserves to boost their own economy without strengthening US?

For instance, when China uses its foreign reserves to bail out its banks, it strengthens the dollar. When China uses USD to buy oil, it strengthens the dollar. So, how are you picturing these trading partners spending their reserves? You already agreed the reserves will grow when people sell USD.

Now, I am not saying there is no scenario where USD can collapse, but your reasoning doesn't explain how USD can collapse. It just simply states it will.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Meanwhile, the recession swells the US federal budget deficit and the federal government's need for credit. However, the recession will render Asia and Europe unable to meet the US government's need for credit.


What you are saying is that US will borrow more than what lenders have?
All US debt are dollarized. Please explain how this is possible.
I can only think of one possible way and it cannot occurr under your scenario. Please be detail on currency flows.
Example, US buys goods from EU with USD. EU lends USD to US to pay for it. etc....

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')This sends US interest rates through the roof and ultimately leads to US bankruptcy, as the US is unable to service its debt.


Yes, US long term rate will go up. If inflation is going up, then short term rates will go up to. At some point, the inflation will be checked. The only time this cannot be checked is when government abandons checking it. If government checks it, there is no way for inflation to go up.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Ultimately, this is where the US seems to be headed inevitably, even without a near-term recession. Its external debt is growing at a rate of 6% of GDP per year and accelerating. External debt now totals more than a third of GDP. Even at an interest rate as low as 5%, which is unlikely to prevail if external borrowing continues to expand, it takes no more than 7 or 8 years even at the current rate of external debt expansion (not counting the acceleration) before servicing this debt consumes all of GDP growth and then some. Within a few more years, US bankruptcy appears inevitable.


Yes, if debt and defict grow faster than GDP growth, then US will go bankrupt. The whole idea of having a floating USD is to prevent this. The cost of purchase should go up and consumers should purchase less. At some point, a recession has to occurr before bankruptcy.

Luckily, US does have checks in place regarding debt and Congress is reluctant to override these checks, but since it is all up to Congress and US President, I guess it can be very scary. Some silver lining, heh?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')There is really nothing that the G7 can do about this, and ultimately European corporations will simply have to write off whatever US assets they are unable to sell. I think that there is a recognition in Europe that this is inevitable. I have seen articles to this effect, for example, in Der Spiegel, the leading German news weekly.

I disagree, until I see a well thought out scenario. As for media accounts, they have been calling collapse since Nixon became President. During Reagan and Bush, Sr., the debate was intense, but the nay sayers were proven wrong with the go go 90's internet boom. Budget surplus! I don't know any single media publish an article predicting that we will see a surplus before the millenium- with or without accounting tricks.

The economic scenarios calling for US economic collapse are all based on the world not investing in the US economy. What we know today that didn't know in 80's and prior is that the world does invest in US. There are a lot of papers studying this subject, so now we understand why people invest in US that people didn't understand in the 20th century. The main reason simply is that US gives a higher rate of return. Until EU proves it can give higher rates of return, money is not going to flow there. As for Asia, all Asian economies are based on US growth, so unless they don't care about their own economies, not investing in US is not an option.
User avatar
nth
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1978
Joined: Thu 24 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Unread postby RdSnt » Wed 30 Mar 2005, 14:20:11

Nth,

I think you need to read this:

http://www.financialsense.com/series4/part1.html
Gravity is not a force, it is a boundary layer.
Everything is coincident.
Love: the state of suspended anticipation.
To get any appreciable distance from the Earth in
a sensible amount of time, you must lie.
User avatar
RdSnt
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1461
Joined: Wed 02 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Canada

Unread postby nth » Wed 30 Mar 2005, 14:37:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('RdSnt', 'N')th,

I think you need to read this:

http://www.financialsense.com/series4/part1.html


Hrm... and how is that related to what we are talking about?
User avatar
nth
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1978
Joined: Thu 24 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Unread postby nth » Wed 30 Mar 2005, 14:57:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('RdSnt', 'N')th,

I think you need to read this:

http://www.financialsense.com/series4/part1.html


Btw, you read it?

Do you know who James J. Puplava is?

Anyways, I won't comment about him. I wonder if he made millions based on his predictions.
User avatar
nth
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1978
Joined: Thu 24 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Unread postby chris-h » Wed 30 Mar 2005, 15:07:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('nth', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('RdSnt', 'N')th,

I think you need to read this:

http://www.financialsense.com/series4/part1.html


Hrm... and how is that related to what we are talking about?


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')HAT IS TO COME

It is my belief that we are now embarked on a journey that will take us into a hyperinflationary depression. There may be brief deflationary spurts that punctuate this journey along the way, but an examination of history leads me to conclude hyperinflation is much more likely than deflation. Unlike the U.S. economy during the 1930s or Japan in the 1990s, the U.S. economy is no longer self sufficient in capital, manufacturing, and energy. And unlike the 1930s, our currency is no longer backed by gold. The U.S. is now the world’s largest debtor nation versus the world’s largest creditor nation as we were in the 30’s. We are no longer self sufficient in energy as we were during the last depression. We import 60 percent of our energy needs, a percentage that is growing each decade. We must also compete with other nations for the world’s last remaining barrels of oil as we enter into the twilight of the oil age. During the 30’s the U.S. created the Texas Railroad Commission to regulate oil and prop up prices because of the abundance of oil in this country. In contrast to the 1930s, U.S. oil and natural gas production decline each year. This forces the U.S. to import more of its energy needs, energy we pay for with dollars. When the world no longer accepts those dollars as payment, the full impact of inflation will hit home.

88822-88822=0
chris-h
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 414
Joined: Mon 11 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby nth » Wed 30 Mar 2005, 16:30:05

chris-h,

I am not sure what you are trying to say.

James' predictions are different than what Marko's envisioning.

If Marko is saying the same, that is fine, but that is not what he posted.

James' prediction is world currency devalueing based on commodities. As I said in my posts, Marko needs to clarify how all the world's currencies just get devalued. Also, Marko claims the world won't have enough money to save US. That is far from what James is saying. James is saying there is too much in this world.

They are saying very different things.
User avatar
nth
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1978
Joined: Thu 24 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby threadbear » Wed 30 Mar 2005, 17:23:26

"Inflation will be checked by recession as consumers lose income, purchasing power drops, so more supply will be in the market and pricing power will drop, so inflation will drop".--Nth



Nth--Really? How do you figure? Without govt. price controls, it's not going to happen. The market dynamics are differrent this time, as natural resources, oil etc...do NOT have the built in flexibility, (built on the assumption of infinite supply) that traditional economic theory rests on. Asset bubbles will deflate, but that's different.

The dollar could drop a further 50% in relation to the Euro, if things proceed as they are now. It won't be hyperinflationary, as some people think-- That would be good news for those with debt, but it will be gawdawfully inflationary. The dollar will retain just enough worth and utility to be maintained as a currency and a national burden and shame. The dollar sign of the future will have all the symbolic panache of a swastika.


Corporations don't have a lot of pricing power at the present time. So forget prices dropping to meet what Joe 6Pack can afford. There will be waves of consolidation and merger creating super oligarchy/monopolies, a perfect breeding ground for price fixing; not price reductions.

The prices will be set to accomodate the lucky 10 to 20% who manage to avoid the train wreck. This is classic Marx theory of what eventually happens to a Capitalist system, past it's best before date.
Subtle market "signals" to retailers to drop prices, like hungry hordes of the indebted waving placards and baseball bats will be met with armed cops in tanks, not lower prices..

I read in the New York times a few years back about a group of economists who attended a meeting, the conclusion of which was that Marx had been stunningly accurate at prediction. They certainly weren't communists, but had to admit his analysis of the ultimate fate of capitalist laissez faire economies was correct.

Greider, in "One World, Ready or Not", describing globalization's various pitfalls and ideological fantasies, concluded in his final paragraph, that ultimately, free marketeers would be stopped in their tracks by the finite nature of the earth itself. This was remarkably accurate, given what we know about peak oil, now. He wrote the book about 6 or 7 years ago, I think.

RdSnt--Interesting post, will respond more about it later, or send you a pm :)
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby nth » Wed 30 Mar 2005, 18:06:06

threadbear,

Yes, inflation and recession normally play against each other. Of course, it doesn't have to be like that. I never said it has to be. I was giving the classical case. If it is different, then it needs to be explained why it is deviates from the norm.

Yes, I agree under your scenario of high prices due to scarcity of oil and commodities will maintain inflation even when recession hits. Stagflation is the result. I stated it already. Let me copy and paste it.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')The only time that is not true is when we have stagflation. This will require recession and yet supplies remain scarce.


As for your claim that USD will fall 50% to the Euro, didn't that already happen before? Actually, more than 50%. Will it happen another 50%? Unless US gov't debt and trade deficit reduces in relation to GDP, the USD should keep devaluing. It should keep devaluing until one of those two get reduced.

marko's scenario is puzzling to me. Not yours.
User avatar
nth
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1978
Joined: Thu 24 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron