by seahorse » Mon 27 Oct 2008, 17:57:48
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', 'I') had always thought that the main threat caused by the peaking of world oil production was geopolitical strife, resource wars and such - simply because the Pentagon is what it is, because The Carter Doctrine has been formalized over the years, and institutions like those don't change their spots overnight.
Also, the private, historical Anglo-American oil interests are powerful capitalist groups who are admirably represented in Washington by people like Dick Cheney. So, if fields in Mexico, the North Sea, and elsewhere have already peaked, its not surprising that a Dick like Cheney is at the helm guiding US actions in Iraq - the last, rich, cheap oil province left on the planet. This has always been my main interest; its a working hypothesis that will be proven true or untrue in the near future.
It sounds like you fall into the doomer camp. I feel the same way, and there's nothing more "doomer" than believing mankind will resort to resource wars to "solve" energy issues.
Also, its not only Deffeyes saying these current economic issues are based on peak oil, Campbell predicted the same in his 1999 book "The Coming Oil Crisis" essentially predicting that PO would manifest itself as a series of continuing economic recessions, each worse than the one before.