Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

PO == the end of sex

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: PO == the end of sex

Unread postby JPL » Wed 15 Oct 2008, 17:36:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', 'I')f it is the end of sex, then maybe that would solve our overshoot problem once and for all.


Hey, so you have that problem too! Emberassing isn't it (giggle)...

JP
Nothing ever happens, nothing happens at all
The needle returns to the start of the song
And we all sing along like before


Del Amitri
JPL
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1264
Joined: Sat 18 Mar 2006, 04:00:00
Location: Off with the Fey Folk

Re: PO == the end of sex

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Wed 15 Oct 2008, 17:52:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('charliebrownout', 'I') don't think Christianity has been trying to stamp out sex--maybe some sects have, but not as a whole.

Chastity doctrines were pretty heavy in the Paulian epistles. It's not just the Shakers. That's why Catholic priests, for example, aren't supposed to marry. Obviously most people won't do the whole chastity thing and if they did they'd go the way of the Shakers. The Catholic church therefore makes an exception if you're having sex only to procreate and you try not to enjoy it very much. There were Protestant sects that use to use a sheet with a little hole in it to have sex, so that the people wouldn't be tempted to lust after each other.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')s for premarital sex: All I have to say is, if you've got the possibility of bringing a child into the world involved in any particular act, having a binding contract beforehand doesn't sound like a BAD idea.


If people were rational about sex, most would probably never do it at all. That's a biologically unacceptable alternative, so mother nature went to a lot of trouble to make sure we weren't too logical about the whole thing.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: PO == the end of sex

Unread postby JPL » Wed 15 Oct 2008, 18:09:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'T')here were Protestant sects that use to use a sheet with a little hole in it to have sex.


My imagination is now doing overtime! I'm sorry, I'm having problems taking this thread seriously... (Mpgghmph...)

(Rolls off chair and staggers out with fit of giggles...)

JP
Nothing ever happens, nothing happens at all
The needle returns to the start of the song
And we all sing along like before


Del Amitri
JPL
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1264
Joined: Sat 18 Mar 2006, 04:00:00
Location: Off with the Fey Folk

Re: PO == the end of sex

Unread postby Sixstrings » Wed 15 Oct 2008, 18:30:11

Well.. hard economic times may once again encourage couples to stay together. Our massive divorce rate in recent decades is a direct corelation to the economic ability for the old lady to say "enough of your crap," and live on her own. ;)

Besides.. gloom and doom times mean more sex, not less. And, it's a statistical fact that poor people have MORE children, not less.

The wealthier a society is, the lower the birthrate. That's why USA would have negative population growth if not for immigration. Many first world countries without much immigration do have negative pop growth.

So fear not.. sex is here to stay.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: PO == the end of sex

Unread postby turner » Wed 15 Oct 2008, 20:51:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergyUnlimited', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('turner', '
')You must be mixing in the wrong circles if you think that's all women do. Today I went to my dentist and my doctor both of whom are women. I spoke to my three sister-in-laws (lawyer,teacher,house painter/signwriter) and two girlfriends (accountant, writer/journo). On any given other day I would have contact with several women with 'useful' occupations.

House painter, signwriter and accountant are between jobs at very high risk, if you want to analyze implications of societal collapse or involuntary powerdown.

And journalist will have to be a very good one and struggle very much to keep afloat.

Lawyers who deals with conveyancing may well pack up right now but these who are specialized in bankruptcy proceeding or criminal justice will carry on for a while.

Dentist is perhaps safe and doctor... that depends what she can actually do.
Impoverished peoples will not attend these very often and if so, only in absolute necessity.
Nevertheless these professions are perhaps safe.

Really, think about that. :)


I don't know that their husbands are going to fare much better - lawyer, mortgage broker, robot inventor, road maker, courier driver. They aren't all that adept with a screwdriver and certainly have no skills snaring wild beasts. The point is that both men and women in our society may need to change their roles and there is no reason to suggest these women are any less capable than their husbands in making the transition.
User avatar
turner
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 168
Joined: Tue 10 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: PO == the end of sex

Unread postby Ludi » Wed 15 Oct 2008, 21:23:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergyUnlimited', '
')And all of these want to run easy, consumerist lifestyles.

And no, most of these have no interest in permaculture whatsoever.


You seem to be claiming they would find it easier and more interesting to be prostitutes than to learn permaculture or any other useful new skill.
Ludi
 
Top

Re: PO == the end of sex

Unread postby Ludi » Wed 15 Oct 2008, 21:25:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Falconoffury', 'U')s guys had better get our vasectomies now, before the cost skyrockets.


Hear! hear! :)
Ludi
 
Top

Re: PO == the end of sex

Unread postby charliebrownout » Thu 16 Oct 2008, 00:36:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', '
')Chastity doctrines were pretty heavy in the Paulian epistles. It's not just the Shakers. That's why Catholic priests, for example, aren't supposed to marry. Obviously most people won't do the whole chastity thing and if they did they'd go the way of the Shakers. The Catholic church therefore makes an exception if you're having sex only to procreate and you try not to enjoy it very much. There were Protestant sects that use to use a sheet with a little hole in it to have sex, so that the people wouldn't be tempted to lust after each other.


Priests did marry in the earlier versions of the Catholic church. Also, views on human sexuality within Christianity are diverse. The popular "Puritanical" form found in America is not the only form. If you check out Humanae Vitae, the Church has a lot of good things to say about sex (yes, even sex that does not or cannot produce children). They just don't agree with 1) the contraceptive view of sex 2) the use of hormonal birth control which seeks to alter or damage an otherwise functional system in the body.



$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', ' ')If people were rational about sex, most would probably never do it at all. That's a biologically unacceptable alternative, so mother nature went to a lot of trouble to make sure we weren't too logical about the whole thing.


I wouldn't disagree that people throw logic under the bus when it comes to sex. All the more reason to put some rules on the game.
User avatar
charliebrownout
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 290
Joined: Thu 17 Apr 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: PO == the end of sex

Unread postby EnergyUnlimited » Thu 16 Oct 2008, 01:51:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('turner', 'T')he point is that both men and women in our society may need to change their roles and there is no reason to suggest these women are any less capable than their husbands in making the transition.

For men transition will involve return to physically exhausting work.
But in case of women such transition will usually involve return to houseviving.
That is because gross majority of women are not fit or willful to do physically exhausting jobs and there will be very few other jobs around.

There will be exceptions but lets say 90% of "value added" society will be gone, so it will prove difficult to maintain "professional" jobs.

So for women who are not interested in houseviving and yet who are not bright enough to keep one of sparse professional jobs left prostitution will become to be one of very few options left.
Have seen it during economic collapse at the end of communism in Poland.
Plenty of girls "hitchhiking" along the road, as you drive...

And for men not fit for physically strenuous jobs/military service and not bright enough to do very sparse professional job Mother Nature has quite nasty, slow death in store.
That is how huge numbers of Russian men are ending up right now and there is nothing wrong with it.
User avatar
EnergyUnlimited
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7537
Joined: Mon 15 May 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: PO == the end of sex

Unread postby EnergyUnlimited » Thu 16 Oct 2008, 02:00:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '
')You seem to be claiming they would find it easier and more interesting to be prostitutes than to learn permaculture or any other useful new skill.

That is because they are trained from early childhood, that everything should come easy and also there is no need for so called responsibility to restrict your personal development horizons.

It will be very difficult if not impossible to rectify such beliefs once victim are adult.
Prostitution will seem to be an easy way out for a while at least for many of these.
User avatar
EnergyUnlimited
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7537
Joined: Mon 15 May 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: PO == the end of sex

Unread postby AgentR » Thu 16 Oct 2008, 02:14:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'T')hat's why Catholic priests, for example, aren't supposed to marry.


Its a discipline of the Church, and serves it well; but entirely alterable if conditions so warranted.

Makes it less complicated for us heathen Americans to import priests from more devout nations. :P
Yes, we are. As we are.
And so shall we remain; Until the end.
User avatar
AgentR
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: Fri 06 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas
Top

Re: PO == the end of sex

Unread postby ReverseEngineer » Thu 16 Oct 2008, 02:15:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergyUnlimited', 'A')nd for men not fit for physically strenuous jobs/military service and not bright enough to do very sparse professional job Mother Nature has quite nasty, slow death in store.
That is how huge numbers of Russian men are ending up right now and there is nothing wrong with it.


I would say a minority of the men dieing a nasty and slow death would agree there is nothing wrong with it. At a certain point most would opt to speed the process along and find ways to Kill or be Killed.

Regardless of the form the march into death takes, most folks here who accept the idea we long ago overshot the population carrying capacity of the earth agree that die off has to take place in some form. What form that takes, and whether the die off has already begin seems to be a point of some dispute however. I already indicated i believe the Great Die Off has already begun, your informal stats regardking Russia would seem to bear out that analysis.

What also would be a question mark would be just what percentage of the population actually has to die off worldwide before some sort of recovery might take place, assuming the ecosystem doesn't continue to deteriorate from feedback loops related to global warming. It would seem to me that at the 20-30% mark it might be possible to restabilize, but more likely right now as I see it we are looking at closer to an 80% die off over say the next 5 years.

Assuming that to be an accurate assessment, will the die off be distributed equally between men and women, or will substantially more men die off than women? Historically speaking, one would figure that those killed would be skewed toward the male side of the gender equation.

This leads to the inevitable conclusion that assuming there is restabilization at some point in the future, any men left standing will have more than a few women to pick from.

Reverse Engineer
User avatar
ReverseEngineer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3352
Joined: Wed 16 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: PO == the end of sex

Unread postby EnergyUnlimited » Thu 16 Oct 2008, 02:39:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ReverseEngineer', '
')What also would be a question mark would be just what percentage of the population actually has to die off worldwide before some sort of recovery might take place, assuming the ecosystem doesn't continue to deteriorate from feedback loops related to global warming. It would seem to me that at the 20-30% mark it might be possible to restabilize, but more likely right now as I see it we are looking at closer to an 80% die off over say the next 5 years.

It is widely accepted that carrying capacity for humankind is in range of 2-3 billions as long as environment is kept in optimal conditions.

So with current mess it is likely for carrying capacity to be much lower than that, perhaps as low as several hundreds of millions.

Nevertheless it is unreasonably to expect dieoff to be completed within 5 years, unless it is a designed die off (say atomic war or something similar).
It is more reasonable to expect for die off to go on for much longer time, perhaps even for century.
Heck, that will give you death toll of WWII every year for 100 years and that under optimistic scenario. :-D

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')ssuming that to be an accurate assessment, will the die off be distributed equally between men and women, or will substantially more men die off than women? Historically speaking, one would figure that those killed would be skewed toward the male side of the gender equation.

This leads to the inevitable conclusion that assuming there is restabilization at some point in the future, any men left standing will have more than a few women to pick from.

You conclusion is correct if dieoff is caused by low tech warfare on global scale.

However this scenario is unlikely.

If dieoff is caused by disease then slightly more females will survive - they are a bit more immune by biology and also look better for their health.
In case of famine more men will survive - brute force helps to secure food.

So in typical famine/disease/loss of fertility scenario (natural dieoff) you will end up with smaller but ballanced population.
Nature has equal opportunities policy.

Total atomic war would also deliver equal opportunity policy.
User avatar
EnergyUnlimited
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7537
Joined: Mon 15 May 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: PO == the end of sex

Unread postby turner » Thu 16 Oct 2008, 02:46:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergyUnlimited', '
')But in case of women such transition will usually involve return to houseviving.


LOL - what's with this returning business you speak of?
User avatar
turner
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 168
Joined: Tue 10 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: PO == the end of sex

Unread postby ReverseEngineer » Thu 16 Oct 2008, 03:50:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergyUnlimited', 'Y')ou conclusion is correct if dieoff is caused by low tech warfare on global scale.

However this scenario is unlikely.

If dieoff is caused by disease then slightly more females will survive - they are a bit more immune by biology and also look better for their health.
In case of famine more men will survive - brute force helps to secure food.

So in typical famine/disease/loss of fertility scenario (natural dieoff) you will end up with smaller but ballanced population.
Nature has equal opportunities policy.

Total atomic war would also deliver equal opportunity policy.


The analysis is BASED on the idea that both Global Thermonuclear War AND species die off from Gobal Warming will not occur, and I agree that both seem more likely outcomes at the moment. Both of course are Equal Opportunity in Death, and in either case NOBODY gets out alive.

Pandemic is also relatively equal in Death Opportunity, but pandemic would pretty much destroy the opportunity for Global War, and reduce warfare to a more local level with the survivors of the pandemic. So you end up with more conventional warfare in this scenario.

What is happening in Russia would seem to me to be a good Canary in the Coal mine for what will happen World Wide if we DON'T suicide the whole planet through Thermonuclear War. Russian men are dieing of starvation, Russian women and children are being sold off as slaves and prostitutes. You didn't read that obituary of the Russian Supermodel that threw herself out the window of her NYC Condo? She was just a high priced whore really. This is what Russian society has devolved down to in the aftermath of the collapse of their Empire. They are eating themselves up, those in power are basically gangsters and human life has become about worthless. Such is the nature of the Decline and Fall of a Civilization.

For Americans, coming soon to a Theatre Near You.

Reverse Engineer
User avatar
ReverseEngineer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3352
Joined: Wed 16 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: PO == the end of sex

Unread postby cube » Thu 16 Oct 2008, 04:19:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('turner', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergyUnlimited', '
')But in case of women such transition will usually involve return to houseviving.


LOL - what's with this returning business you speak of?
Once the economy contracts society will have to cut back on spending and a prime candidate is of course a return to eating home cooked meals and giving up on restaurants.
The difference in cost is so great, there is no economic debate. This is one of the ultimate end results of PO.

however.....

Here's the more interesting question ---> who is going to be doing the cooking? :wink:
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: PO == the end of sex

Unread postby turner » Thu 16 Oct 2008, 07:44:46

Most of us women with external employment continue to perform the lion share of the domestic duties - hence my laugh about the 'return' to housework. Sure in the future there will be less machinery to ease the process but then if we only have one job to do that won't be so bad. Yes, drudgery but there will be plenty of male occupations in that category.

I'm not sure about your experience in the US but for most families I know the restaurant meal is still fairly infrequent even for those earning a good income. There is more convenience food to buy now but I personally wouldn't eat that cr*p and wouldn't serve it to anyone else.
User avatar
turner
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 168
Joined: Tue 10 Jun 2008, 03:00:00

Re: PO == the end of sex

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Thu 16 Oct 2008, 08:36:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('charliebrownout', 'P')riests did marry in the earlier versions of the Catholic church. Also, views on human sexuality within Christianity are diverse. The popular "Puritanical" form found in America is not the only form. If you check out Humanae Vitae, the Church has a lot of good things to say about sex (yes, even sex that does not or cannot produce children). They just don't agree with 1) the contraceptive view of sex 2) the use of hormonal birth control which seeks to alter or damage an otherwise functional system in the body.


It's not just a Church thing. It's a Paul thing.

1 Corinthians 7:1 Now for the matters you wrote about: It is good for a man not to marry.

1 Corinthians 7:7 I wish that all men were as I am[ i.e. Chaste]

1 Corinthians 7:8 Now to the unmarried and the widows I say: It is good for them to stay unmarried, as I am. But if they cannot control themselves, they should marry, for it is better to marry than to burn with passion.

1 Corinthians 7:25 Now about virgins: I have no command from the Lord, but I give a judgment as one who by the Lord's mercy is trustworthy. Because of the present crisis, I think that it is good for you to remain as you are. Are you married? Do not seek a divorce. Are you unmarried? Do not look for a wife. But if you do marry, you have not sinned; and if a virgin marries, she has not sinned. But those who marry will face many troubles in this life, and I want to spare you this.

1 Corinthians 7:32 I would like you to be free from concern. An unmarried man is concerned about the Lord's affairs—how he can please the Lord. But a married man is concerned about the affairs of this world—how he can please his wife— and his interests are divided. An unmarried woman or virgin is concerned about the Lord's affairs: Her aim is to be devoted to the Lord in both body and spirit. But a married woman is concerned about the affairs of this world—how she can please her husband. I am saying this for your own good, not to restrict you, but that you may live in a right way in undivided devotion to the Lord.

1 Corinthians 7:36If anyone thinks he is acting improperly toward the virgin he is engaged to, and if she is getting along in years and he feels he ought to marry, he should do as he wants. He is not sinning. They should get married. But the man who has settled the matter in his own mind, who is under no compulsion but has control over his own will, and who has made up his mind not to marry the virgin—this man also does the right thing. So then, he who marries the virgin does right, but he who does not marry her does even better.

Paul had huge hang ups WRT sex. That has echoed through centuries of Christian theology.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: PO == the end of sex

Unread postby deMolay » Thu 16 Oct 2008, 22:14:13

You sound bitter Turner?
"We Are All Travellers, From The Sweet Grass To The Packing House, From Birth To Death, We Wander Between The Two Eternities". An Old Cowboy.
User avatar
deMolay
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2671
Joined: Sun 04 Sep 2005, 03:00:00

Re: PO == the end of sex

Unread postby ReverseEngineer » Fri 17 Oct 2008, 03:40:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', '
')Paul had huge hang ups WRT sex. That has echoed through centuries of Christian theology.


I don;t think from any of the quotes attributed here to Paul you necessarily have to conclude he was hung up on Sex, rather he might have simply been concerned about the Population problem resulting from sex.

The Dark Ages encouraged the Monastic life, men and women heading for Monasteries as both Nuns and Monks. Why? Because likely all these folks knew they could not support any children they might bring into the world.

Generally speaking in even a well-to-do family, only the First Born inherited all the wealth, unless said first born was unlucky enough to die of some childhood disease or get killed in a war or die from syphillis after too many trysts with the whores of the day. The rest of the kids often were shipped off to Nunneries or became Priests or Monks and forswore off sex mainly as a means of keeping the population in check. Such a life raised your Spiritual value in such a society, to be able to forgo the pleasures of the Flesh in favor of the Dedication to the Spirit was something to be respected in a time of great hardship.

Like Polygamy in Islamic and Mormon cultures, the repudiation of sex in Dark Ages Christian cultures was a reaction to population problems more than anything else. In the Christian world it led to a schism between those who lived in the Real World and those who lived int he Spiritual world. For a long time those who lived the latter lifestyle held power, but they lost it to those who lived for real world wealth when the New World was discovered. This led to the Reformation and a reorganization into sects of Christians who accepted real world wealth as well as the systems of banking and trade that go with it. Such Christians are of course perversions of the actual teaching of Jesus Christ, and they will Burn in Everlasting Damnation in the Fires of Hell.

Not being a Christian myself, its pretty easy to pick out Christians who are actually cognizant of the teaching of Jesus Christ, they are however few and far between, I have met very few in my life who actually understand this stuff for what it really means. To be clear, the fact Jesus Christ taught this stuff does not necessarily mean he was mortal incarnation of Deity, it just means he was a good man who understood principles of society and tried to deliver those prinicples to others through his life.

You can approach the issues of resource depletion and over population in any number of ways, and frankly if you hold to any of the principles carefully enough almost any of them can work here. The Mormon model can work, the Islamic model can work, the Christian model can work, and so also can a Naturalist Philosophy work.

As living breathing human beings raised in certain cultures, we place Value Judgements on each of these models, and I could justify any one of the models on a moral level. It all depends on the postulates you hold as true, but they have to be examined carefully. In order to do that though, you have to try to step outside your own box, andunderstand the nature of life on earth. Not easy to do this, I fall short in it all the time. But I do see that there is justification for principles held in all the texts handed down from Ancient History. How you want to interpret it is up to you, but the Fundamental Truth is only One, and if you don;t figure out what that One is, you are not getting into the Kingdom of Heaven. No amount of blind faith will get you there. You have to figure it out for yourself.

Reverse Engineer
User avatar
ReverseEngineer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3352
Joined: Wed 16 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron