by TWilliam » Tue 30 Sep 2008, 11:26:10
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dohboi', 'B')ut style can only get you so far.
"History shows that economic downtrends below the median tend to happen periodically..."
Economist types tend to use the word "history" to refer to past trends in some numerical pattern.
Actually history as a discipline is a bit more complex than that.
Economists "history" would show that investing broadly in US stock market over the last 80 or so years or so has been a winning proposition over time. They then confidently say that this will proceed indefinitely into the future.
But actual history shows that the last hundred years or so was "the American Century." Even ignoring PO (which one does at one's peril), how likely is it that the next century will also be and "American Century"?
Statistical economic "history" is a particularly blinkered vies of the world.
+1
Something that people tend to forget is that in reality, the most one can ever really say with regard to 'history' as a guide to the future is that
so far, there are certain aspects of human cultural expression that
appear to manifest some cyclic traits.
There is a fundamental maxim in self-development circles that says that
the past does not equal the future. Our ability as humans to engage in
thoughtful response to stimuli, as opposed to simply reacting, means that there is
always the possibility of bucking a trend. The fact that we may rarely do so does not guarantee that we will continue to refrain from doing so indefinitely.
"It means buckle your seatbelt, Dorothy, because Kansas? Is goin' bye-bye... "