by ki11ercane » Mon 22 Sep 2008, 00:54:21
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', 'Y')ou know what it is?
It's that the peak oil theory and this website distill out a particular kind of mindset as measured against ALL the people who learn of the theory. Those whose imaginations are titillated by notions of impending civilizational collapse are more likely to remain here and submit regular posts which assume the inevitability of Doom.
Those who can immediately see flaws in the Doomer perspective drift off elsewhere or they do not contribute. The Doomers, therefore, tend to reinforce one another's thinking on the matter and then it becomes a group dynamic - an Us vs Them thing where "We" are right and "They" are delusional.
It's called Groupthink. Groupthink has been studied in corporations and government because it stifles innovation and creativity. Don't tell me that the neo-Luddite contempt for science and technology around here is stimulating and creative!
It is just one example of many scenarios that put Doomerism to the lie. But if you post an article like this around here, it's bound to be disparaged in the most off-hand, smirking, juvenile way. It reminds me of a particular cafeteria lunch table I used to sit at in Junior High School years ago.
I think the whole Doomer notion spoils much of the excitement of the peak oil idea. I also notice that the adolescent minds that gravitate to Doom, seem to believe that peer-pressure will bring someone around to their way of thinking. Someone should inform them that peer-pressure doesn't work so well on grown-ups.
Ok, so if Doomers are "groupthinkers," why then do Doomers constantly offer solutions to "others" for staving off horrible future realities like oh let me think FINITE ENERGY SUPPLIES by offering alternative solutions to avoid being doomed? If they re-inforced the Doom Mentality (there is no hope, we all screwed, tuck your head between your legs and bend over) to each other all the time, then they wouldn't be working on ways to either avoid crisis or make it through it. "Making it through" means they hope for "better things" on the other end for either themselves or their future generations of offspring. They hope to "end doom if doom comes." DEFINITELY DOOMERS ARE GROUPTHINKERS! They have to be in order to work together to stave off their own possible demise! They have already agreed "today" things don't look good for the next 5-10 years, and they need to "work now" to either weather crisis or avoid it, and no one has implemented at least one good idea to stave off energy disasters for the future. Everyone who disagrees with Doomers wants to write how idiotic they are and write some detraction or "idea" to disprove their attitudes, then get pissed when they say "buzz off." Why? Because the "talking" never becomes solid action to move things into another direction. At least Doomers discuss prepping, planning, and getting ready for "possible horrible realities." When was the last time Exxon, George Bush, or any major bank got together and said "people, we are in a pickle. We have less oil tomorrow than today. It's going to cost more, and if we don't polarize ourselves as a nation, as a species to come together to fix this problem, we are screwed." Instead on such a possible national stage, greed, corruption, and screwing the taxpayer takes center stage. Ask any of these "Doomers" if they want to see crisis averted, no financial collapse, no energy collapse, food for everyone, hot babies/guys surrounding them, not having to break their backs for the next 30 years prepping, and have a positive stable happy future for their kids and grand kids, all the energy they could want to live and prosper, a majority will say yes. "True Doomers" will either say "no" or "I don't care" because they've already assumed nothing can be done and therefore have the "leave me alone you're full of crap" mentality. Doomers as you speak of are extremely pessimistic about any alternative ideas because lots of talk hasn't offered up any permanent viable alternative to where we're headed. No one can point to a detractor saying "see, here was my idea. I wrote it. It's implemented. Peak Oil averted. Stop being a Doomer!"
It's all nice to talk and write about solving future energy woes. When I see your writings (or any other Peak detractor/debunker - JD) actually living and breathing in the real world actually making a mark to solve or stave off future problems such as Peak Oil, I'll be the first to dis-embark from the Doomer Train.