Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Sarah Palin: Family values?

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Family values?

Unread postby Ludi » Tue 09 Sep 2008, 13:29:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AlexdeLarge', '
')Liberals only support liberal women.


Guess I'm not a liberal, then. :roll: I think moms should take care of their babies unless they have a good excuse not to. Wanting a political career isn't a good excuse in my opinion.

If she didn't want to get pregnant, her husband should have had a vasectomy or she should have had a tubal ligation after their previous child. A woman who intends to be Vice President should not be so irresponsible as to have an "oopsy baby."

Have fun spinning that, Alex. :)
Ludi
 

Re: Family values?

Unread postby firestarter » Tue 09 Sep 2008, 13:34:42

Another family value inconsistency out of the religious right is the out of wedlock birth by Palin's daughter. Imagine the outrage from these sanctimonious boobs if Palin and her daughter were black.
Civilization: the biosphere's skin disease
User avatar
firestarter
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1171
Joined: Sun 19 Mar 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Family values?

Unread postby threadbear » Tue 09 Sep 2008, 13:42:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'I')t's just bizarre to me that apparently being Vice President is more important to her than her child.

:(


A lot of women want careers outside the home. Women are no longer satisfied to stay home and just be little suzy home-maker.

Image


Hey Pal, The most interesting women I know are "Suzy Homemaker" types. They have time to read the newspaper, get involved in on-line discussions, while they nurture the next generation, in the true sense. The women I can't relate to are from the big city, with great careers, (well paid slaves) who spend all of their free time ferrying their larvae around to their extra curricular activities. They're full of the confidence that mind numbing ignorance and status brings, and they bore the **** out of me.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Family values?

Unread postby FoolYap » Tue 09 Sep 2008, 14:39:54

What bothers me about Ms. Palin is not that she has children and a career -- hurray for the equality and freedom to do that! Daycare need not be a bad option, and for goodness sake, I'm ever so sick of people who try to make women feel guilty for choosing that path.

No, what bothers me is the hypocrisy in the far-right (and her) position re: "family values", religion, etc.

Far-right position: No sex, no abortions. Yet, also no education on how to prevent pregnancies and transmitting sexual disease. Sex happens. Hence, ignorant people having sex will get pregnant, and/or spread diseases. Yet the far-right position is simply: No sex, no abortions.

Far-right position: Religion in politics is good; no more separation of church and state. Whose religion? Theirs, of course: Fundamentalist Christian religion. No Islam? No Jews? No Catholics? No atheists anyway, for damned sure. :-P Yet, do any of the far-right peoples who are politically active actually strike you as "good Christians"? Do they follow the teachings of Christ vis-a-vis charity, helping others, living a simple life without material wealth? Do they tell the truth? Or are they caught constantly in blatant lies Often with their pants down around their ankles?

Ms. Palin strikes me as the embodiment of the worst possible combinations of hypocrisy that comes from the far-right, wrapped in a pretty package. I for one don't care a fig if her daughter is pregnant; mistakes happen. But I care very much that she's one of those "abstinence only" nuts. I care that she wanted to ban library books while mayor. I care that she lied about not wanting the "Bridge to Nowhere" -- she only rejected it when it was clear it was not going to happen. I care that she tells people the war in Iraq is a "mission from God" -- is that the kind of person we want with potentially (if McCain dies in office) their finger on the Big Red Button?? I don't care that she spent six years at five different colleges (or whatever it was) to get a journalism degree; I care that she seemingly wouldn't what "integrity" (journalistic or otherwise) was if it had antlers and bit her on the butt.

People who do not want McCain to win should be careful in how they attack her. She's a "target-rich environment", as they say, for substantive criticisms of her amazingly unsubstantive resume. But, keep it on point. I'm sure Karl Rove and crew would love for everyone to debate endlessly whether her fifth child is really her grandchild, but that misses the point of her very real dis-qualifications to be vice president.

--Steve
User avatar
FoolYap
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 472
Joined: Sun 04 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: central MA, USA

Re: Family values?

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Tue 09 Sep 2008, 14:48:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('FoolYap', 'F')ar-right position: No sex, no abortions. Yet, also no education on how to prevent pregnancies and transmitting sexual disease. Sex happens. Hence, ignorant people having sex will get pregnant, and/or spread diseases. Yet the far-right position is simply: No sex, no abortions.


It fits in well with their constant need for someone to look down scathingly upon. If people stopped having unintended pregnancies, who would there be for them to shout "Murderer" at. They'd have to come up with a whole new gig.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Family values?

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Tue 09 Sep 2008, 14:55:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', '
')It fits in well with their constant need for someone to look down scathingly upon.
so true, at least the left doesn't do that. 8)
Turn those Machines back On! - Don Ameche in Trading Places
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Top

Re: Family values?

Unread postby AlexdeLarge » Tue 09 Sep 2008, 15:11:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AlexdeLarge', '
')Liberals only support liberal women.


Guess I'm not a liberal, then. :roll: I think moms should take care of their babies unless they have a good excuse not to. Wanting a political career isn't a good excuse in my opinion.

If she didn't want to get pregnant, her husband should have had a vasectomy or she should have had a tubal ligation after their previous child. A woman who intends to be Vice President should not be so irresponsible as to have an "oopsy baby."

Have fun spinning that, Alex. :)



Let me give it try! First, and I do not know the answer to these questions........Did she say the pregnancy was not planned? Or, if she was on the pill, it did not work?? Next, when she discovered she was pregnant, I doubt she knew 15 months later she would be asked to be on the Republican ticket! LOL

Another aside.........so lets assume we have our first woman President. Are you suggesting she get her tubes tied or resign the Presidency if she found herself Pregnant during office. Maybe just abort Jr., for the good of the party! LOL

Should a man get the big V if he is the Prez? Do these rules only apply to the fairer sex??? Maybe our leaders should be well past menopause!!!

It seems equality for the sexes only applies to "liberal women". So a good Dem like yourself believes you need a penis to crack the glass ceiling!!! LOL
Viddy well, little brother. Viddy well.
User avatar
AlexdeLarge
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1806
Joined: Tue 20 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: I have a whole ward
Top

Re: Family values?

Unread postby Plantagenet » Tue 09 Sep 2008, 15:26:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('FoolYap', 'F')ar-right position: No sex.


Far-left position: Women should quit their jobs and stay at home and raise the kids 8)
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

Re: Family values?

Unread postby RedStateGreen » Tue 09 Sep 2008, 15:30:13

I think that the decision to take on national office is a serious one that shouldn't be entered into lightly. Sarah Palin:
    Is the Governor of Alaska
    Is married to a man who works full-time
    Has five children, four who are under 18
    Has a son deploying to Iraq, with all the stress and angst that entails
    Has a daughter getting married
    The same daughter is five months pregnant (presumably) with her first child
    Has an infant with Down syndrome

Isn't that enough on her plate? Why in the world would she add yet another item to her list of things to do? It boggles the mind.

And the idea that women taking care of their home and family is somehow demeaning, lower-than, or not an actual career is complete nonsense. :x
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('efarmer', '&')quot;Taste the sizzling fury of fajita skillet death you marauding zombie goon!"

First thing to ask: Cui bono?
User avatar
RedStateGreen
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1859
Joined: Sun 16 Sep 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Oklahoma, USA
Top

Re: Family values?

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Tue 09 Sep 2008, 15:32:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('FoolYap', 'F')ar-right position: No sex.


Far-left position: Women should quit their jobs and stay at home and raise the kids 8)
don't forget the barefoot part.

Image
Turn those Machines back On! - Don Ameche in Trading Places
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Top

Re: Family values?

Unread postby Plantagenet » Tue 09 Sep 2008, 15:36:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('RedStateGreen', 'I') think that the decision to take on national office is a serious one that shouldn't be entered into lightly. Sarah Palin:
    Is the Governor of Alaska
    Is married to a man who works full-time
    Has five children, four who are under 18
    Has a son deploying to Iraq, with all the stress and angst that entails
    Has a daughter getting married
    The same daughter is five months pregnant (presumably) with her first child
    Has an infant with Down syndrome
Isn't that enough on her plate? Why in the world would she add yet another item to her list of things to do? It boggles the mind.
And the idea that women taking care of their home and family is somehow demeaning, lower-than, or not an actual career is complete nonsense.

Gosh. Where were all these concerns about women working outside the home when Nancy Pelosi became speaker of the house?
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

Re: Family values?

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Tue 09 Sep 2008, 15:45:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('RedStateGreen', 'A')nd the idea that women taking care of their home and family is somehow demeaning, lower-than, or not an actual career is complete nonsense.

confusing times, bad times. I was a kid in the late 1950s and all the moms were in the homes. It was nice. You'd go to hang out at someone else's house and the mom was always there. Something definitely went wrong. Most of the moms ended up getting divorced, most of the kids got pissed off and took drugs and/or sniffed gasoline. thank god I never sniffed gas. I knew a guy who did that and he told me his lungs were shot. He wound up shooting his wife and then himself. The wife survived, he didn't. The girl who lived across the street from me died of anorexia. A kid I hung out with in elementary school died of a heroin od. Another kid I used to play whiffle ball and ping pong with got shot. He was crazy, he and his brother tied their mom to a tree because she wouldn't give them any money. Another kid told me how terrified his parents were that he would kill them like in some Doors nightmare. He told me this years later when he had become a Christian and was obsessed with backwards subliminal messages in Grand Funk Railroad albums.
Last edited by PenultimateManStanding on Tue 09 Sep 2008, 16:03:17, edited 1 time in total.
Turn those Machines back On! - Don Ameche in Trading Places
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Top

Re: Family values?

Unread postby RedStateGreen » Tue 09 Sep 2008, 16:00:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('RedStateGreen', 'I') think that the decision to take on national office is a serious one that shouldn't be entered into lightly. Sarah Palin:
    Is the Governor of Alaska
    Is married to a man who works full-time
    Has five children, four who are under 18
    Has a son deploying to Iraq, with all the stress and angst that entails
    Has a daughter getting married
    The same daughter is five months pregnant (presumably) with her first child
    Has an infant with Down syndrome
Isn't that enough on her plate? Why in the world would she add yet another item to her list of things to do? It boggles the mind.
And the idea that women taking care of their home and family is somehow demeaning, lower-than, or not an actual career is complete nonsense.
Gosh. Where were all these concerns about women working outside the home when Nancy Pelosi became speaker of the house?

Did she have any of that stuff going on? No. Her children were grown and only one even still lived with them.

Completely different situation.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('efarmer', '&')quot;Taste the sizzling fury of fajita skillet death you marauding zombie goon!"

First thing to ask: Cui bono?
User avatar
RedStateGreen
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1859
Joined: Sun 16 Sep 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Oklahoma, USA
Top

Re: Family values?

Unread postby Plantagenet » Tue 09 Sep 2008, 16:18:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('RedStateGreen', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'G')osh. Where were all these concerns about women working outside the home when Nancy Pelosi became speaker of the house?
Did she have any of that stuff going on? No. Her children were grown and only one even still lived with them. Completely different situation.

So its only OK for women to work outside the home if the children are all grown and gone?

A majority of American women with children now work outside the home....should they all quit their jobs and stay home and bake cookies?
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

Re: Family values?

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Tue 09 Sep 2008, 16:32:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', ' ')A majority of American women with children now work outside the home....should they all quit their jobs and stay home and bake cookies?

they can't. money issues. they've got to work and buy cookies and pre-cooked chickens at the supermarket on their way home.
Turn those Machines back On! - Don Ameche in Trading Places
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Top

Re: Family values?

Unread postby firestarter » Tue 09 Sep 2008, 16:45:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'A') majority of American women with children now work outside the home....should they all quit their jobs and stay home and bake cookies?

No. See, there's nothing wrong with stay home dads picking up the slack, if mom wants to become a wage slave though.

Too many kids are merely no more than stylish hood ornaments to their parents, especially from the middle class on up. I marvel at the local daycare in my neck of the woods, which is upper middle class. To see the little tots, day after day, being dropped off by their mommies in late model Mercedes is priceless. It's no wonder that my town has, per capita, one of the highest levels of lavish youth counseling establishments in the U.S.

Bottom line: you have kids, then raise them, baring unforeseen circumstances, yourselves. You, they and the world will be the better for it. Read Jean Leidloff for further clarification of this well established fact.
Civilization: the biosphere's skin disease
User avatar
firestarter
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1171
Joined: Sun 19 Mar 2006, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Family values?

Unread postby Plantagenet » Tue 09 Sep 2008, 16:50:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('firestarter', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'A') majority of American women with children now work outside the home....should they all quit their jobs and stay home and bake cookies?
No. See, there's nothing wrong with stay home dads picking up the slack, if mom wants to become a wage slave though.
Too many kids are merely no more than stylish hood ornaments to their parents, especially from the middle class on up. I marvel at the local daycare in my neck of the woods, which is upper middle class. To see the little tots, day after day, being dropped off by their mommies in late model Mercedes is priceless. It's no wonder that my town has, per capita, one of the highest levels of lavish youth counseling establishments in the U.S.
Bottom line: you have kids, then raise them, baring unforeseen circumstances, yourselves. You, they and the world will be the better for it. Read Jean Leidloff for further clarification of this well established fact.

I see your point. God bless moms.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

Re: Family values?

Unread postby FoolYap » Tue 09 Sep 2008, 16:55:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('RedStateGreen', 'A')nd the idea that women taking care of their home and family is somehow demeaning, lower-than, or not an actual career is complete nonsense.

Absolutely. Woman, and ideally men as well, should be free to make the choice to work or not work. I don't look down at stay-at-home-moms (or dads), nor moms (or dads) who work.

Fact is, most Americans don't really have the choice; they must work to make ends meet. If some have structured their lives and finances such that they can afford to choose between work/life, good for them. No one should criticize either choice made by someone else.

And for what it's worth, since some whackjobs on my ignore list seem to be implying that liberals are the ones wanting to "keep women at home, barefoot and pregnant", I'm pretty sure I hear that screed coming from the right far more often than the left.
--Steve
User avatar
FoolYap
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 472
Joined: Sun 04 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: central MA, USA
Top

Re: Family values?

Unread postby CarlinsDarlin » Tue 09 Sep 2008, 16:59:46

With the money she spent on that pre-cooked chicken and one dozen store bought cookies, she could have bought the ingredients for 12 dozen cookies, and fed a flock of 25 chickens for a week, getting the eggs as a bonus.

Not having money is a copout. If people lived more simply many wouldn't NEED the extra money of a second full-time breadwinner in the house. We have saved more money by my staying home than I earned when I was working full-time (and I earned more money at the time I quit my job than my husband did). Because when I worked full-time, we ate out often, paid for building and house maintenance, paid for yardwork, paid for groceries because we couldn't produce any ourselves, yadda yadda yadda. Now someone is home who can do all that stuff. We produce much of what we need, because I have the time to do it now.

It's a tradeoff. Time for money. My time is worth more than anyone could ever pay me.

And yep, I do the stay-at-home mom thing, I homeschool my kids, I am a 4-H leader, I run a farm, I raise animals and gardens, I put up and preserve food, I cook from scratch, and I get up by 5:00 am (earlier most days) and go to bed late every night. My "job" is 34/7/365. And I wouldn't trade it for the world.

Oh, and btw, I have also worked in the career world. I worked for 20 years in a professional capacity before I decided on this route. We didn't chance into having children, we adopted them. We didn't chance into unemployment. I resigned my position. Nothing we have now was unplanned, or happened by circumstance. It was a choice. Where I am now is much more satisfying.

There's not a more important job on the planet than raising the next generation of human beings to be better than yourself. Can it be done successfully by someone who sees their kids only in the evenings and on weekends, farming their care out to others (many times people they don't know from Adam's housecat) in the meantime? I suppose, but I'd be willing to bet having a dedicated, nurturing parent at home who puts her (or his, for that matter) children first would probably have a higher success rate. Not to mention happier children.
User avatar
CarlinsDarlin
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1363
Joined: Fri 02 Jul 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Family values?

Unread postby FoolYap » Tue 09 Sep 2008, 17:08:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('RedStateGreen', 'D')id she have any of that stuff going on? No. Her children were grown and only one even still lived with them. Completely different situation.

Moreover, if Ms. Pelosi has been yapping on about being of the "party of family values" (as if a party has cornered that virtue), and she's been working an executive job away from home, it'd be legitimate to wonder aloud if she's a hypocrite on that score.

If Sarah Palin wants to tout her wunnerful mothering skills while she wants to preach sexual abstinence, it's fair game to chortle over the results in her own home.
--Steve
User avatar
FoolYap
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 472
Joined: Sun 04 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: central MA, USA
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests