What bothers me about Ms. Palin is not that she has children and a career -- hurray for the equality and freedom to do that! Daycare need not be a bad option, and for goodness sake, I'm ever so sick of people who try to make women feel guilty for choosing that path.
No, what bothers me is the hypocrisy in the far-right (and her) position re: "family values", religion, etc.
Far-right position: No sex, no abortions. Yet, also no education on how to prevent pregnancies and transmitting sexual disease. Sex happens. Hence, ignorant people having sex will get pregnant, and/or spread diseases. Yet the far-right position is simply: No sex, no abortions.
Far-right position: Religion in politics is good; no more separation of church and state. Whose religion? Theirs, of course: Fundamentalist Christian religion. No Islam? No Jews? No Catholics? No atheists anyway, for damned sure.

Yet, do any of the far-right peoples who are politically active actually strike you as "good Christians"? Do they follow the teachings of Christ vis-a-vis charity, helping others, living a simple life without material wealth? Do they tell the truth? Or are they caught constantly in blatant lies Often with their pants down around their ankles?
Ms. Palin strikes me as the embodiment of the worst possible combinations of hypocrisy that comes from the far-right, wrapped in a pretty package. I for one don't care a fig if her daughter is pregnant; mistakes happen. But I care very much that she's one of those "abstinence only" nuts. I care that she wanted to ban library books while mayor. I care that she lied about not wanting the "Bridge to Nowhere" -- she only rejected it when it was clear it was not going to happen. I care that she tells people the war in Iraq is a "mission from God" -- is that the kind of person we want with potentially (if McCain dies in office) their finger on the Big Red Button?? I don't care that she spent six years at five different colleges (or whatever it was) to get a journalism degree; I care that she seemingly wouldn't what "integrity" (journalistic or otherwise) was if it had antlers and bit her on the butt.
People who do not want McCain to win should be careful in how they attack her. She's a "target-rich environment", as they say, for substantive criticisms of her amazingly unsubstantive resume. But, keep it on point. I'm sure Karl Rove and crew would love for everyone to debate endlessly whether her fifth child is really her grandchild, but that misses the point of her very real dis-qualifications to be vice president.
--Steve