by MarkJ » Thu 14 Aug 2008, 12:38:38
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TheDude', '[')In New Hampshire NG only serves 6.7k customers in a state of 1.3 million. The conversion to NG costs $4-8k, too, according to the WSJ article. Pick your poison. My understanding was that use of heating oil persisted due to inacessability of delivery for NG, and low incomes preventing the switchover.
Most of our heating oil, kerosene and propane customers live in areas without natural gas lines. Many heating oil customers have natural gas available, but they've never paid to connect to the gas mains. Many customers also choose to replace their oil fired systems with an ultra efficient oil fired system, or they already have an efficient oil fired system, so it wouldn't pay to replace it. Many have a huge financial investment in new safety oil tank(s), stainless chimney liners, triple wall chimneys, ultra efficient boilers, burners etc.
The low income homeowners often don't have the money and/or credit to insulate, weatherize, replace windows, connect to the gas mains, run gas lines, remove underground storage tanks, remove basement oil tanks, upgrade, replace or remove chimneys, replace boilers/furnaces/water heaters, relocate equipment, replace piping, controls, circulators, ductwork, remove asbestos etc.
Many installations of highly efficient modulating condensing gas boilers, indirect water heaters, multiple zones, controls and re-piping, fittings, valves and other necessary components are well over in the numbers quoted by the WSJ.
The low income funding to replace heating equipment hasn't scaled with the increasing cost of fuel, materials, parts, equipment and labor either. Low income homeowners look at you like you're crazy when you give them a quote for a new boiler, piping, re-piping, controls and extras. Many can't even afford the materials and equipment, let alone the high labor costs which are often the largest portion of the bill.