Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Al Gore Thread pt 2 (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Al Gore - Wants no FF for electric w/in 10 years . . .

Postby yesplease » Mon 21 Jul 2008, 01:47:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cashmere', 'T')he best part would be in 4 years or 10 years or whenever when some part starts to go. On all 200,000 giant ass windmills. Have fun swapping out the bearings, or whatever . . .
Maintaining wind power is clearly unpossible! :lol:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he east and south area of the Tehachapi Pass has one of California's larger Wind farms, generating electricity. The turbines have been in place since the early 1980s and have been upgraded through the years.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Professor Membrane', ' ')Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!
User avatar
yesplease
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3765
Joined: Tue 03 Oct 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Al Gore want's lots and I mean LOTS of windmills

Postby arretium » Mon 21 Jul 2008, 02:20:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('darwinsdog', 'W')here's the energy for producing all that cement, mining & smelting all that iron & copper, supposed to come from? Get real big Al. There's not going to be much more energy than your own muscles can provide, provided you have anything to eat, in the near future. We're going to be lucky if we can even score wood to burn. All the techno-fix visionaries are full of crap. Denial motivated by fear, is all they're spewing.



Believe it or not, people actually did exist before oil. Trains existed before oil. Ships existed before oil. Life will exist after oil.
User avatar
arretium
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 452
Joined: Mon 04 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: Al Gore want's lots and I mean LOTS of windmills

Postby arretium » Mon 21 Jul 2008, 02:26:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Blewbird', 'W')ith all respect, I understand you are an expert but we must remember that the problem is not energy per se, but expensive energy.
Again, sorry if you already know this but I will state it for others who are new. In mentioning building trillions of dollars of solar and windmills for a small increase of energy we must remember two things.
1. Building time until production time.
2. Cost total must be paid for by raising prices
3. the problem will not come from lack of energy, but from lack of cheap energy.
4. Downsizing will completely destroy the american economy

With all due respect, and I mean all...due....respect.... :). (A little Will Farrell).... I totally disagree with you. Yes, there is building time to production time, of course. We can greatly mitigate the problem ahead for us with sensible and smart energy choices. I think Al is partially right: wind power is necessary, but I also think solar, geothermal, hydro, oceanic hydro, and nuklure (sp intended) is critical. All of these together will result in cheap energy. As cheap as today? Maybe not.

The last point I really disagree with. Downsizing the U.S. economy or, err, really the consumption of Americans is absolutely CRITICAL to saving our economy. If we don't attempt to downsize and reduce our consumption, Monte is right. You'll end up with Anarchy. So if your goal is anarchy, just be a proponent of that Dick Cheney and propose that we do nothing but drill.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 's')o instead of gasoline, and now talking about more expensive and less amount of more difficult to produce energy (wether renewable is not the point) what is going to happen is our economy is going to crack and the countries are going to irritate each other to the point of final war.

Sounds like I should move to Alaska.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')his is inevitable, and now, when international war starts, it won't last long, but niether will the entire infrastructure.

It is not inevitable. What is inevitable is that you and I will die everything else is premature. The problem is not whether we could replace it, but that everything is going to collapse long before the billionth windmill is built or the thousandth nuclear plant is going to be built.
There just is no time to prevent the big economic downsizing that is in full sway as we speak. It is too late to save the economy, but we do have a few years left as the mighty titanic raises itself up, slowly and then disappears beneath the waves quickly and efficiently.[/quote]
User avatar
arretium
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 452
Joined: Mon 04 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Seattle, WA
Top

Re: Al Gore want's lots and I mean LOTS of windmills

Postby Blewbird » Mon 21 Jul 2008, 02:45:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('arretium', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('darwinsdog', 'W')here's the energy for producing all that cement, mining & smelting all that iron & copper, supposed to come from? Get real big Al. There's not going to be much more energy than your own muscles can provide, provided you have anything to eat, in the near future. We're going to be lucky if we can even score wood to burn. All the techno-fix visionaries are full of crap. Denial motivated by fear, is all they're spewing.



Believe it or not, people actually did exist before oil. Trains existed before oil. Ships existed before oil. Life will exist after oil.


amazing.
No one understands.

Ok, people existed before oil. Ok, how did they eat?
how did they dress before oil?
How did they move heavy equipment before oil
How did they fight wars?
How did they keep food cold?
How did they preserve their meat?
How did they can their foods?
where did they stor them?
How did they heat their house?
How did they communicate and move letters from town to town before oil?


Well, ALL that is now gone.
There will be no people after oil, because of one slight overlook on your part.

the last was will be fought not using bayonetts, guns.
The infrastructure will disappear and the background radiation will not allow life.

without oil this was not possible, now, all things are possible.
User avatar
Blewbird
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun 20 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Al Gore want's lots and I mean LOTS of windmills

Postby Blewbird » Mon 21 Jul 2008, 02:48:33

There will be no downsizing of the economy. It either grows or collapses.
User avatar
Blewbird
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun 20 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Al Gore want's lots and I mean LOTS of windmills

Postby Blewbird » Mon 21 Jul 2008, 03:19:46

Look, let me put it in a way that modern kids can understand:
Let me set up a scenario.

BONANZA!
The show chronicled the weekly adventures of the Cartwright family, headed by wise, thrice-widowed patriarch Ben Cartwright (played by Lorne Greene). He had three sons, each by a different wife: the oldest was the urbane architect Adam Cartwright (played by Pernell Roberts) who built the ranch house; the second was the warm and lovable giant Eric, better known by his nickname: "Hoss" (played by Dan Blocker); and the youngest was the hotheaded and impetuous Joseph or "Little Joe" (played by Michael Landon). The family's cook was the Chinese immigrant Hop Sing (played by Victor Sen Yung). "Bonanza" was considered an atypical western for its time, as the core of the storylines dealt with Ben and his three dissimilar sons, how they cared for one another, their neighbors and their land.

The family lived on a thousand-square-mile ranch called "The Ponderosa", on the shore of Lake Tahoe in Nevada; the name refers to the Ponderosa Pine, common in the West. The nearest town to the Ponderosa was Virginia City, where the Cartwrights would go to converse with Sheriff Roy Coffee (played by veteran actor Ray Teal), or his deputy Clem Foster (Bing Russell). Greene, Roberts, Blocker, and Landon were equal stars. The opening credits rotated among four versions, with each of the four being shown first in one version (in the order above). As the series advanced, writers began to showcase one or two Cartwrights in each episode, while the others would be seen briefly in the prologue and epilogue. Not only did this provide for more thorough character development, it also gave all four actors more free time.

Originally, the Cartwrights tended to be depicted as put-off by outsiders. Lorne Greene pointed out to the producers that as one of the region's most affluent timber and livestock producers, they had better moderate their clannishness. The producers agreed with this observation and changed the Cartwrights to be more amiable.



Ok, Hoss and little joe are taking their wagon into Virginia city and as they arrive in the city, suddenly the oil warp occurs. Little do they realize that 200 years into the future, the oil runs out and the simultaneous explosion of tens of thousands of nukes warp time and space.

Suddenly we have a 21st centruy of people transported back to the ponderosa.

Instead of 5000 head of cattle in the field you have all the people from

Carson city, Fariview, stewart, indian hills, jack's valley, Glenbrook, lincoln park, skyland incline village crystal bay Kings beach Brockway, Carson hot springs, new empire, Brunswick, all suddenly appear. standing in the fields.

And they are hungry.

And Hoss and little Joe only have two guns.

and all the cattle die from the shock (since we will not have cattle or horses or wagons these must be removed by le machine de deux, or somthing so lets say the wagon collpses the horse dies and the cows keel over.

just from sheer weight the wheat fields are trampled.

the population of virginia city increases from 1400 to 2 million.

and Hop sing doesn't have enough flied chicken for these people.

What will happen?
Will the cartwrights have unexpected dinner guests?
How long will they survive?
Who will these people attack?
How many will run for the nearest farm house with flied chicken smell coming from the windows?
Who gets their first?
How many bullets does Aaron and papa cartwright have?
Will hop sing have a heart attack?

stay tuned.
User avatar
Blewbird
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun 20 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Al Gore - Wants no FF for electric w/in 10 years . . .

Postby JC_SaltLaker » Mon 21 Jul 2008, 04:16:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cashmere', 'I')f you wanted to convert 20% of America's electricity to solar, riddle me this . . .

Nevada Solar One (STE) produces about 134 million kWh/yr with a reported construction cost of $266 million USD. That's 266/134 = $1.985/KWh build cost. In terms of GWh, it's $1,985,074/GWh.

So to cover 20% of U.S. demand (2005) we multiply 4,062,000 GWh X 20% X $1,985,074 = $1.6 trillion build cost.

The problem would be scaling up quickly enough to deploy this (and the transmission infrastructure) within 10 years. In theory, we have the engineers, the mining operations, and manufacturing capability to do this...but short of a World War II command economy model, how would you get all these businesses and individuals to "drop what they're doing" and focus on this epic project?

Not sure if anybody has mentioned that we're already 28% carbon-free in our nationwide electricity generation -- 19.4% nuclear, 7% hydroelectric, and 2.4% renewable. So if we get another 20% from solar and 20% from wind and ratchet up nuclear just a bit, then we're 70% of the way there.

We can get the last 30% through demand destruction, to wit:
    1) a system of feebates and gorgeously misanthropic consumption tiers
    2) tax the beJesus out of carbon but reduce payroll taxes (Gore's "tax what we burn, not what we earn" idea)
    3) mandate efficiency in new building codes
    4) fund retrofits of worthy older structures through the feebate funds mentioned above
10 years probably is too short, but in a 15-20 year time frame, we could maybe just pull this off...
Last edited by JC_SaltLaker on Tue 22 Jul 2008, 01:38:40, edited 1 time in total.
JC_SaltLaker
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Thu 18 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Salt Lake City USA
Top

Re: Al Gore - Wants no FF for electric w/in 10 years . . .

Postby idiom » Mon 21 Jul 2008, 05:59:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '4')7,788 windmills


That is actually a conceivable number. There a lot of things produced in those sort of number and deployed world wide. It could be done with a big push and you might actually expect a return on investment.
User avatar
idiom
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 672
Joined: Mon 23 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: New Zealand
Top

Re: Al Gore - Wants no FF for electric w/in 10 years . . .

Postby cube » Mon 21 Jul 2008, 06:36:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('idiom', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '4')7,788 windmills


That is actually a conceivable number. There a lot of things produced in those sort of number and deployed world wide. It could be done with a big push and you might actually expect a return on investment.
I guess you didn't read everything I said previously.
That's only good enough for 20%.
Al Gore says we can do 100%.
so 47,788 x 5 == 238,940 windmills in 10 years :roll:
and also
1) upgrade + expand electric grid
2) battery storage
3) electronic controls
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Al Gore - Wants no FF for electric w/in 10 years . . .

Postby Hagakure_Leofman » Mon 21 Jul 2008, 07:53:21

too bad we can't power off the hot air in this thread.
Such as waste of energy.
User avatar
Hagakure_Leofman
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 387
Joined: Wed 02 Jan 2008, 04:00:00
Location: out dispatching ronan...

Re: Al Gore - Wants no FF for electric w/in 10 years . . .

Postby Cabrone » Mon 21 Jul 2008, 10:10:12

The US consumes around 21M bbl of oil p.day @ around $140.

Current daily cost = $2.94 billion

Cost over 10 years = $10.7 trillion (assuming current consumption and a steady $140 p.bbl price over the next decade)

How many CSP\Wind\Tidal\Wave\Biomass\Nuclear plants could be put up for this amount of $$ and how much would grid strengthening cost?

Al Gore is right, it's a no brainer really (except to some of the cave dwellers on here).
User avatar
Cabrone
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 433
Joined: Fri 21 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: London

Re: Al Gore - Wants no FF for electric w/in 10 years . . .

Postby Dont_Panic » Mon 21 Jul 2008, 11:17:44

For every great development in history, there has been a choir of naysayers screaming "WAAAAAAAAAAAH! IT'S IMPOSSIBLE!!".

Naysayers don't bring the world forward, people with visions do.
By concluding that it's impossible, you're not a part of the solution. But I guess you guys don't want a solution anyway.

Even if 100% in 10 years is too optimistic, we should really try to get as close as possible and start now before it's too late. 100 in 10 is basically a random number, the idea Gore is trying to get across is that there's trouble ahead we should should start moving our fat butts NOW.
But I reckon the situation needs to get really critical before things start happening. It may or may not be too late by then.
User avatar
Dont_Panic
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 47
Joined: Mon 09 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Philippines

Re: Al Gore - Wants no FF for electric w/in 10 years . . .

Postby Toyota » Mon 21 Jul 2008, 11:24:08

This man is getting crazy, he likes being in the middle!

Nobody cares what he says, and how he got the FN award, i dont now! How many poor people have he saved, not many! :shock: :x
User avatar
Toyota
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu 26 Jun 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Al Gore - Wants no FF for electric w/in 10 years . . .

Postby Cashmere » Mon 21 Jul 2008, 12:21:46

Wow. The Alaholics on this thread are amazing.

One says - "10 trillion - that's doable." Nice. The U.S. budget is about 2.9 trillion. So if we simply stop spending money, we'll have the required amount, by your number, in about 3 years. Well done.

Another implies - "take the money we spend on oil and use it to put up wind turbines." Great. I suppose we'll use donkey carts to move people and stuff while the turbines go up.

Another says - "look at this link - it supports my side" and then I go to that link and it says that the turbines have been updated since their 1980s installation. If you're going to try to argue that windmills are low maintenance, you'll have to do better.

Another says that 100% no-carbon based electricity in 10 years is "optimistic." If that's "optimistic", so too is a colony on Mars by 2050.

Another says that I'm a nay-sayer and people like me impeded progress.

People like me drive this world. I can look at my tax receipts and tell you that.


Let me be clear about this. The idea of dumping a bunch of money into windmills misses the core issue, which, if you've been reading the site Kiosk recently, you'll recognize as overshoot.

It makes little sense to invest in an expanded electrical infrastructure at this juncture for <i>at least</i> the following reasons:

1. We will have a liquid fuels/natural gas crisis long before we have an electricity crisis.

2. Spending money on wind turbines without first mandating massive power downs in usage is a waste of money. We would be, essentially, putting up windmills so that people could watch big TVs and use hairblowers.

3. The biggest problem that we will face in the next 2 decades will have nothing to do with electricity. The biggest problem we will face is keeping society from fragmenting and keeping people fed.

4. We already have more than enough electrical generation. I suggest that we immediately impose a 20-50% usage reduction on all non-commercial users. If you don't want to turn your lights off, and you pass your limit, then you pay 10x the amount for additional power. <i><b>Generating more electricity is not the answer, because the problem is not insufficient electrical generation</b></i>.


It is my opinion that much of the to-do about windmills is left over from a pre-peak oil mindset.

Peak Oil changes everything. Carbon emissions are now completely and irreversibly irrelevant.

What is relevant is that <b><i>we will soon be facing a potential 8%+ decline in oil and perhaps more in Natural Gas, with a halving of supply within 10 years, and we're going to need to worry about feeding everyone well before we worry about everybody having 24/7 110V/AC access</b></i>.

I suppose I've pulled a MonteQuest here, but I hope everybody understands why I have made this argument.

Arguing about carbon emissions and wind power and this sort of thing is now a major distraction from the core issue, and as long as people like Al Gore continue to keep the spot light on such uncritical issues, we further dig ourselves into the oil depletion pit of no return.

If we had 10 trillion laying around to spend, we should use it to immediately begin setting up a population control system and a power down plan that considers as its end point that we are a mere decade or two away from returning to non-fossil fuel based food production.

THAT is the critical issue, and remember this admonition . . .

You cannot eat electricity.
Massive Human Dieoff <b>must</b> occur as a result of Peak Oil. Many more than half will die. It will occur everywhere, including where <b>you</b> live. If you fail to recognize this, then your odds of living move toward the "going to die" group.
User avatar
Cashmere
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1882
Joined: Thu 27 Mar 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Al Gore - Wants no FF for electric w/in 10 years . . .

Postby joelcolorado » Mon 21 Jul 2008, 12:49:28

I have natural gas well on my land that they are just waiting on the price to go up before opening it up. I KNOW THIS for a fact. Geologist who developed it said the gas in the area is huge but they need a certain price to develop the lines and piping to make it pay off.

You go out there and turn the big valve and cannot believe the pressure.
User avatar
joelcolorado
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 513
Joined: Sun 25 May 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Al Gore - Wants no FF for electric w/in 10 years . . .

Postby joelcolorado » Mon 21 Jul 2008, 12:51:32

Look Al might be right on some things but he uses a thousand times more energy than the common man. If he was serious, he would do better.

He also outsources his company to England and stands to make untold millions on GREEN energy policies he is helping to create.
Fox guarding the henhouse
User avatar
joelcolorado
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 513
Joined: Sun 25 May 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Al Gore - Wants no FF for electric w/in 10 years . . .

Postby yesplease » Mon 21 Jul 2008, 13:14:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cube', 'I') guess you didn't read everything I said previously.
That's only good enough for 20%.
Al Gore says we can do 100%.
Al Gore said 100% Carbon free electricity. The can be some combo of wind, solar thermal, solar pv, nukes, hydro, geothermal, and possibly others. Not just wind AFAIK. :)
Last edited by yesplease on Mon 21 Jul 2008, 13:21:52, edited 1 time in total.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Professor Membrane', ' ')Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!
User avatar
yesplease
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3765
Joined: Tue 03 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Al Gore - Wants no FF for electric w/in 10 years . . .

Postby joelcolorado » Mon 21 Jul 2008, 13:17:19

There are 8 pieces in every pie.
User avatar
joelcolorado
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 513
Joined: Sun 25 May 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Al Gore - Wants no FF for electric w/in 10 years . . .

Postby yesplease » Mon 21 Jul 2008, 13:21:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cashmere', 'O')ne says - "10 trillion - that's doable." Nice. The U.S. budget is about 2.9 trillion. So if we simply stop spending money, we'll have the required amount, by your number, in about 3 years. Well done.
Wait a ignore the rest of the post. :lol: Yeah, sure, we could drop the entire budget on it and have it done in three years, or we could dump whatever is spent on gasoline and the externalized costs of autos and have it done in a decade, or by 2020 assuming the minimal estimate of the externalized costs of autos.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cashmere', '4'). We already have more than enough electrical generation. I suggest that we immediately impose a 20-50% usage reduction on all non-commercial users. If you don't want to turn your lights off, and you pass your limit, then you pay 10x the amount for additional power. <i><b>Generating more electricity is not the answer, because the problem is not insufficient electrical generation</b></i>.
Head out to CA, they have tiers just like you suggested.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Professor Membrane', ' ')Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!
User avatar
yesplease
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3765
Joined: Tue 03 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Al Gore - Wants no FF for electric w/in 10 years . . .

Postby Cashmere » Mon 21 Jul 2008, 14:13:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('yes please', 'W')ait a ignore the rest of the post. Laughing Yeah, sure, we could drop the entire budget on it and have it done in three years, or <b><i>we could dump whatever is spent on gasoline and the externalized costs of autos and have it done in a decade</b></i>, or by 2020 assuming the minimal estimate of the externalized costs of autos.


Emphasis added by me.

So this is your grand plan? We don't spend money on gasoline?

Or we don't spend money on the "externalized costs of autos".

What's that? Alaholic code for "some thing I don't understand."?

No need for jargon.

State your plan.

So part 1 is . . . nobody uses any more gasoline?

Did I get that right?

And part 2 is . . . something about "externalized"? Can you dumb that down for me and put it in plain English?
Massive Human Dieoff <b>must</b> occur as a result of Peak Oil. Many more than half will die. It will occur everywhere, including where <b>you</b> live. If you fail to recognize this, then your odds of living move toward the "going to die" group.
User avatar
Cashmere
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1882
Joined: Thu 27 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron