by MonteQuest » Sat 21 Jun 2008, 12:59:27
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('btu2012', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PraiseDoom', '
')
Monte Speaks!Here are a few more opinions presented by MQ about this subject.
http://www.peakoil.com/fortopic33890-0-asc-675.html$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', ' ')This is why carrying capacity must veto all concerns, ethical or otherwise.
Fear of a self-defeating strategy must not veto carring capacity.
Ok, carrying capacity must veto reasoned conclusions.Other than a couple of members, this philosophical discussion was way beyond most people's ability to grasp or even discuss.
It is obvious they don't get it. [...]It's their thinking paradigm; the way they perceive and reason is rooted in a "full belly" Mechanical world view.
They froth and lash out at the messenger...like silencing me changes the reality. I have to be discredited. Otherwise, their whole world view crashes.[...]Yes, I find that quite amazing. They won't even go so far as to examine that incongruity in their thinking. [...]And how can you use those incoherent ethics to refute the criticism of those same ethics?
I can see my statement went right over your head. What do you think I meant when I wrote that?
I just don't think you have thought this through and it makes you say things that are hubristic and in denial of reality,..you just don't know it.
Your mindset is beyond changing.
It makes them think to see absurd positions debunked.
Oh, to the contrary. I Have thought out my position so far, you don't seem to able to comprehend it.
Thinking, Shannymara, thinking.
I have never advocated murder, but what if it is required?