Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Cantarell Thread (merged)

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: Cantarell Esta Muriendo (. . . is dying)

Postby ROCKMAN » Mon 07 Jul 2008, 15:38:43

Actually panic I'm not a doomer at all. But I think Cashmere may actually be a little too optimistic. Even though I've been a petroleum geologist for over 30 years I don't have the details on Cantarell and thus can't pound the table. But I've worked projects like this and they are completely unpredictable with respect to the nitrogen breakthrough (as it is called). It can be modeled but that's just an educated guess. You don't really know how far out the end is until you get close. But when you do get close to the end it's typically not a slow decline. But given it'sa unique size it might hang in there better than many. The best analogy I can give is filling a glass from a hole in the bottom. Every goes Ok until you reach the top. But then it's not a little dribble but the whole top overflows at once. This is really a terrible analogy but reservoir dynamics is one of the most complex area in the oil patch.

What has really hurt Pemex's ability to replace Cantarell is the fact that they've been routinely stripped of their cashflow by the gov't. In the Deep Water Gulf of Mexico very large fields are being developed on the US side of the border. Even if Pemex were allowed to keep some money it would take at least 10 years to catch up. But as Cantarell depletes the gov't will probably snatch the money away even faster. The new Mex Prez has tried to open up the possiblility of international companies coming in to help with capital/technology. But the leftests once actually shut down their Congress in a protest just over the possibility of such discussions.

Even though life for many Mexicans is far below US standards it may become all the worse very soon. Migration to the north may become more a matter of survival (in absolute terms of life and death) than just looking for a better life as it is now.
User avatar
ROCKMAN
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11397
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: TEXAS

Re: Cantarell Esta Muriendo (. . . is dying)

Postby roccman » Mon 07 Jul 2008, 15:41:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cashmere', 'N')obodypanic, did you seriously direct the above response to me? I mean, seriously? You have got to be kidding. I glossed over nothing. I didn't even mention it - I expect any intelligent adult to read the article.
Bias? What are you talking about? What the hell interest could I possibly have in it either way? The number speaks for itself. I couldn't give a rat's ass about whether investment would help or not. It's not there, so it does not matter.
Finally, it's my opinion that BB is still throwing in those b-llsh-t lines like the one you quoted to keep the DSEs thinking that there IS a solution. It's a crock of crap. They can invest all they want, but it won't change much of anything. It's game over. Cantarell is in its death throes, and bringing in an English speaking or Dutch speaking group of surgeons will do absolutely nothing other than, maybe, slow the rate of death.
So save your accusations of bias. I quoted the most interesting part of the article, and I linked to it. 34% decline rate - which is HUGE news. Huge, staggering, and frightening.
And your response - "you're glossing over the part about it's not so bad." Whatever - I'm a doomer because I get it, and I don't look for the little glittery sequins sparkling from the steaming turd load the dog dropped in the front room carpet because he ate a kid's doll earlier that day - I leave that job to you.

DUDE are YOU ME?? !!

+1
"There must be a bogeyman; there always is, and it cannot be something as esoteric as "resource depletion." You can't go to war with that." Emersonbiggins
User avatar
roccman
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4065
Joined: Fri 27 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Great Sonoran Desert

Re: Cantarell Esta Muriendo (. . . is dying)

Postby burtonridr » Mon 07 Jul 2008, 16:24:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cashmere', 'W')hatever - I'm a doomer because I get it, and I don't look for the little glittery sequins sparkling from the steaming turd load the dog dropped in the front room carpet because he ate a kid's doll earlier that day - I leave that job to you.

Mind if I use that in my quote line :lol:
Tired of high gas prices? [smilie=BangHead.gif] Then stop driving to work, duh..... Learn to Work from home

Peak Oil Blog = http://getroasted.wordpress.com
User avatar
burtonridr
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 743
Joined: Fri 03 Aug 2007, 03:00:00

Re: Cantarell Esta Muriendo (. . . is dying)

Postby Ayame » Mon 07 Jul 2008, 17:04:10

If other elephant fields come anywhere near this rate of production decline then everyone everywhere is truly buggered. There will be no chance of any kind of transition, there will just be blind panic, despair and death.

The future seems to grow darker each day.
Ayame
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 631
Joined: Thu 29 Jun 2006, 03:00:00
Location: UK

Re: Cantarell Esta Muriendo (. . . is dying)

Postby Cashmere » Mon 07 Jul 2008, 17:10:17

G-d damn you Ayame. G-d damn you and I hope you burn.
I was having a decent day here. But then you come along and vomit the truth all over my face like that and I'm back to sucking down Doomer Porn and jonesing for vices.

And Burton - use anything I write any way you want. We are all buggered - truer words never spoken.
Massive Human Dieoff <b>must</b> occur as a result of Peak Oil. Many more than half will die. It will occur everywhere, including where <b>you</b> live. If you fail to recognize this, then your odds of living move toward the "going to die" group.
User avatar
Cashmere
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1882
Joined: Thu 27 Mar 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Cantarell Esta Muriendo (. . . is dying)

Postby burtonridr » Mon 07 Jul 2008, 17:14:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cashmere', 'G')-d damn you Ayame. G-d damn you and I hope you burn. I was having a decent day here. But then you come along and vomit the truth all over my face like that and I'm back to sucking down Doomer Porn and jonesing for vices.
And Burton - use anything I write any way you want. We are all buggered - truer words never spoken.

Any way I want eh? 8)
Tired of high gas prices? [smilie=BangHead.gif] Then stop driving to work, duh..... Learn to Work from home

Peak Oil Blog = http://getroasted.wordpress.com
User avatar
burtonridr
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 743
Joined: Fri 03 Aug 2007, 03:00:00

Re: Cantarell Esta Muriendo (. . . is dying)

Postby Troyboy1208 » Mon 07 Jul 2008, 18:27:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ayame', '[')b]If other elephant fields come anywhere near this rate of production decline then everyone everywhere is truly buggered. There will be no chance of any kind of transition, there will just be blind panic, despair and death.
The future seems to grow darker each day.

Thats my quote of the day!
User avatar
Troyboy1208
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 522
Joined: Wed 26 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Orlando FL

Re: Cantarell Esta Muriendo (. . . is dying)

Postby nobodypanic » Mon 07 Jul 2008, 18:39:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cashmere', 'N')obodypanic, did you seriously direct the above response to me? I mean, seriously? You have got to be kidding. I glossed over nothing. I didn't even mention it - I expect any intelligent adult to read the article.
Bias? What are you talking about? What the hell interest could I possibly have in it either way? The number speaks for itself. I couldn't give a rat's ass about whether investment would help or not. It's not there, so it does not matter.
Finally, it's my opinion that BB is still throwing in those b-llsh-t lines like the one you quoted to keep the DSEs thinking that there IS a solution. It's a crock of crap. They can invest all they want, but it won't change much of anything.
It's game over. Cantarell is in its death throes, and bringing in an English speaking or Dutch speaking group of surgeons will do absolutely nothing other than, maybe, slow the rate of death. So save your accusations of bias. I quoted the most interesting part of the article, and I linked to it.
34% decline rate - which is HUGE news. Huge, staggering, and frightening. And your response - "you're glossing over the part about it's not so bad." Whatever - I'm a doomer because I get it, and I don't look for the little glittery sequins sparkling from the steaming turd load the dog dropped in the front room carpet because he ate a kid's doll earlier that day - I leave that job to you.

you excerpted the worse sounding portion of the article without including the bit about lack of investment. not mentioning it is glossing over it. i wrote that you were giving the APPEARENCE of bias. frankly, given your rather violent, knee-jerk reaction, yeah, now i think you are biased; it might have been subconcious on your part, now i am not so sure, but that's beside the point. like i said, there's really no reason to even try and spin it; it's bad enough as it is.
you're very touchy. i am sorry if i may have bruised your ego in any way.
User avatar
nobodypanic
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1103
Joined: Mon 02 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Cantarell Esta Muriendo (. . . is dying)

Postby DantesPeak » Mon 07 Jul 2008, 18:52:19

Investment. You can't handle the truth! (Ok, that's sarcasm)
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'E')IU ViewsWire Mexico Economist Intelligence Unit
July 7, 2008 Section: EIU ViewsWire 07 Jul 2008 (T16:40)

Mexico politics: Energy reform talks continue
COUNTRY BRIEFING FROM THE ECONOMIST INTELLIGENCE UNIT:
The focus of Mexico's legislature remains on the Felipe Calderon administration's hydrocarbons reform bill, with discussions in the Senate (the upper house) scheduled to conclude on July 22nd. According to Gustavo Madero, the new Senate leader of the governing Partido Accion Nacional (PAN), there are plans to hold another special session of Congress in late July or early August to vote on the legislation, although Francisco Labastida of the opposition Partido Revolucionario Institucional (PRI), who heads the Senate's energy committee, has stated that a vote might not come until September.

The PRI has failed to give a clear message about whether it will support the measures and has recently indicated that it might present its own hydrocarbons reform bill. Although this is likely to form part of its strategy to extract concessions from the PAN, it highlights the extent to which the government is dependent on support from the PRI for passage of reforms.

The recent performance of the oil industry gives credence to the government's worst scenarios. Oil output has continued to decline, with total crude oil production in March falling to 2.9m barrels/day, the second-lowest level since December 1999. Although output rose by 16% at the Ku-Maloob-Zaap field, this was insufficient to counter a steep 25% fall in output at the Cantarell field, Mexico's largest producing area.

Reflecting the overall drop in production, the volume of crude oil exports fell by 12.4% in the first quarter to 1.5m b/d. Rising energy prices have helped to prevent deterioration in the country's external accounts. With the Mexican oil mix averaging US$83.1/b in January-March (74% higher than the first quarter of 2007), total export sales of crude and condensates reached US$13.1bn, an increase of 51% year on year. That said, limited refining capacity has meant that the import bill for refined products increased by 36% in the first quarter, while natural gas imports rose by 91%.

According to Pemex, the short-term outlook for production remains bleak. Although total reserves (proven, probable and possible) amount to 42bn barrels, 83% of total reserves are located in regions where it is difficult to extract the oil. In addition, only 14.7bn barrels are proven, meaning that the current ratio of proven reserves to production stands at 9.2 years.

Although new opportunities are evident, Pemex lacks the resources needed to carry out sufficient exploration activities, hence, the government's desire to loosen conditions to allow more private participation in the sector. According to Pemex, there could be 29bn barrels of crude in deep waters, but it would have to drill around 300 wells (implying exploration in 1,500 wells, assuming a 20% success rate) to find sufficient oil to maintain current production levels. Currently, Pemex has the capability to drill two wells per year in deep water and will be able to drill 10 wells per year in deep water by 2011.


[no link]
Last edited by DantesPeak on Mon 07 Jul 2008, 18:54:55, edited 1 time in total.
It's already over, now it's just a matter of adjusting.
User avatar
DantesPeak
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6277
Joined: Sat 23 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: New Jersey
Top

Re: Cantarell Esta Muriendo (. . . is dying)

Postby Cashmere » Mon 07 Jul 2008, 18:54:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('nobodypanic', 'y')ou excerpted the worse sounding portion of the article without including the bit about lack of investment. not mentionining it is glossing over it. i wrote that you were giving the APPEARENCE of bias. frankly, given your rather violent, knee-jerk reaction, yeah, now i think you are biased; it might have been subconcious on your part, now i am not so sure, but that's beside the point. like i said, there's really no reason to even try and spin it; it's bad enough as it is. you're very touchy. i am sorry if i may have bruised your ego in any way.

I "excepted" the <i>critical</i> portion of the article. The fact that it was the "worst-sounding" portion is only because the news was that bad.
I find it funny that you don't seem to see that difference. On a linguistic note, "gloss over" does not equal "ignore". You're wrong. I didn't "gloss over" the investment part; I ignored it entirely.

You wrote: "you're very touchy. i am sorry if i may have bruised your ego in any way."

Right. That's it. I have a fragile ego. But really, what is my bias and why do I have it? Please answer, as I am genuinely curious about what you think I'd get out of misleading people about what the article said.
Massive Human Dieoff <b>must</b> occur as a result of Peak Oil. Many more than half will die. It will occur everywhere, including where <b>you</b> live. If you fail to recognize this, then your odds of living move toward the "going to die" group.
User avatar
Cashmere
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1882
Joined: Thu 27 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Cantarell Esta Muriendo (. . . is dying)

Postby americandream » Mon 07 Jul 2008, 19:04:06

Nobodypanic

There are those on here who are convinced that we are at a crisis in human civilisation and I am one of them and consequently, I happen to agree with Cashmere's prognosis.

Now, no amount of civilised debating will convince me that we are capable of squeezing 6.5 billion (as in human numbers) capacity oil energy reserves out of the harder to extract deposits on this planet. We can barely get by on the current crop of happy campers.

I suspect thats where Cash (and most definitely I) feel exasperated by the likes of you. We have a serious problem here that requires hysteria my friend. We need to be, in word, shit-scared, to deal with it. Finely nuanced debates will not resolve the crisis, delay it yes as we sink our heads deeper in the sand, but resolve it, no.
americandream
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 8650
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Cantarell Esta Muriendo (. . . is dying)

Postby nobodypanic » Mon 07 Jul 2008, 19:16:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cashmere', 'I') "excepted" the <i>critical</i> portion of the article. The fact that it was the "worst-sounding" portion is only because the news was that bad. I find it funny that you don't seem to see that difference.
On a linguistic note, "gloss over" does not equal "ignore". You're wrong. I didn't "gloss over" the investment part; I ignored it entirely.

You wrote: "you're very touchy. i am sorry if i may have bruised your ego in any way."

Right. That's it. I have a fragile ego. But really, what is my bias and why do I have it?
Please answer, as I am genuinely curious about what you think I'd get out of misleading people about what the article said.

i am not exactly sure what your motivations might have been, but i am fairly certain that they led you to completely discount the opening of the article, dealing w/investment, as being 'uninteresting' in comparison to the portion you highlighted. perhaps it was unconscious on your part.

misleading? i said it was giving the appearance of bias. if you had included the first paragraph (i think that's the one) along w/the portion you quoted, well then you wouldn't have been open to any sort of criticism at all. as it is, i think someone could come along and reasonably conclude that there was an attempt at spin here. once again, the news was bad enough; there's no reason to give anyone any straws to grasp at, which it's my opinion you did, even if not consciously.
User avatar
nobodypanic
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1103
Joined: Mon 02 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Cantarell Esta Muriendo (. . . is dying)

Postby Cashmere » Mon 07 Jul 2008, 19:33:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Don'tPanic', ' ')i am not exactly sure what your motivations might have been, but i am fairly certain that they led you to completely discount the opening of the article, dealing w/investment, as being 'uninteresting' in comparison to the portion you highlighted. perhaps it was unconscious on your part.

Not only do I find the "investment" portion of the article "uninteresting", I also find it immaterial and of questionable intent. In other words, the story was, to me, the 34% decline rate. The rest of the article was noise.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')i think someone could come along and reasonably conclude that there was an attempt at spin here. once again, the news was bad enough; there's no reason to give anyone any straws to grasp at, which it's my opinion you did, even if not consciously.

I'm not following you. Which straws? Again I ask - What do you think my bias might be, and why might I have it?
Massive Human Dieoff <b>must</b> occur as a result of Peak Oil. Many more than half will die. It will occur everywhere, including where <b>you</b> live. If you fail to recognize this, then your odds of living move toward the "going to die" group.
User avatar
Cashmere
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1882
Joined: Thu 27 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Cantarell Esta Muriendo (. . . is dying)

Postby DantesPeak » Mon 07 Jul 2008, 20:33:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('americandream', 'N')obodypanic, There are those on here who are convinced that we are at a crisis in human civilisation and I am one of them and consequently, I happen to agree with Cashmere's prognosis.
Now, no amount of civilised debating will convince me that we are capable of squeezing 6.5 billion (as in human numbers) capacity oil energy reserves out of the harder to extract deposits on this planet. We can barely get by on the current crop of happy campers.
I suspect thats where Cash (and most definitely I) feel exasperated by the likes of you. We have a serious problem here that requires hysteria my friend. We need to be, in word, crap-scared, to deal with it. Finely nuanced debates will not resolve the crisis, delay it yes as we sink our heads deeper in the sand, but resolve it, no.

Well put. It looks like events are already set in motion in Mexico where the solutions to immeadiate problems will take whatever investment money is needed for future oil investment. Even then, it looks like Mexico faces a bankruptcy worse than the defaults of the early 1980s and early 1990s. I suspect Mexico will become an example of what we mean by 'catabolic collapse'.
It's already over, now it's just a matter of adjusting.
User avatar
DantesPeak
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6277
Joined: Sat 23 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: New Jersey
Top

Re: Cantarell Esta Muriendo (. . . is dying)

Postby Cashmere » Mon 07 Jul 2008, 20:50:04

DP's predictions will be vindicated again. Mexico's fate seems sealed. It also seems wretched. They may be the first country to "pop" post peak, as their short term oil production outlook, their reliance on oil revenue, and there socioeconomic demographics all seem to point very strongly toward social mayhem.

At 34% it won't take 12 more months to watch Mexico go into free fall, with the only caveat being that 200 dollar oil will give them a brief respite.

There was a brilliant line in the cited article. Think about this: The guy said that 144$ + oil will be a savior for them right up until the moment they go from net exporter to net importer. Thereafter, it's going to be their executioner. Brilliant, really.
Massive Human Dieoff <b>must</b> occur as a result of Peak Oil. Many more than half will die. It will occur everywhere, including where <b>you</b> live. If you fail to recognize this, then your odds of living move toward the "going to die" group.
User avatar
Cashmere
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1882
Joined: Thu 27 Mar 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Cantarell Esta Muriendo (. . . is dying)

Postby cualcrees » Mon 07 Jul 2008, 20:51:50

Holy crap!! I live in Mexico and I can tell you that most - if not all - people are completely clueless about PO; even more so, they don't want to know. To them is most an issue of "privatization vs. state ownership"; not about oil depletion.
I've tried talking to some people about it but I only get blank stares or the usual "someone, somehow, will come up with a solution someday". This is really scary stuff.
cualcrees
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 176
Joined: Wed 28 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Mexico

Re: Cantarell Esta Muriendo (. . . is dying)

Postby DantesPeak » Mon 07 Jul 2008, 20:57:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cualcrees', 'H')oly crap!! I live in Mexico and I can tell you that most - if not all - people are completely clueless about PO; even more so, they don't want to know. To them is most an issue of "privatization vs. state ownership"; not about oil depletion.
I've tried talking to some people about it but I only get blank stares or the usual "someone, somehow, will come up with a solution someday". This is really scary stuff.

Welcome cualcrees and BTW our discussions by no means implies we are against Mexico. If anything, I envision more bailouts in a few years run by the US government to help Mexico. That will cost us here.
It's already over, now it's just a matter of adjusting.
User avatar
DantesPeak
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6277
Joined: Sat 23 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: New Jersey
Top

Re: Cantarell Esta Muriendo (. . . is dying)

Postby ROCKMAN » Mon 07 Jul 2008, 21:43:09

cualcrees,

I'll second Dante's statement. I've spent in Mexico...did field work there as a young geologist a lifetime ago. I've always felt the Mexican people could really develop their society if they could take control from the elite power structure. But knowledge is power and the state did a great job of keeping them in the dark for generations. It will very sickening to watch their realization that they have been truly abandoned by those who pretended to be their protectors.

And Dante... you probably know this but others may not: there are two categories of "proved " reserves in the oil patch. Proved producing and proved non-producing. Watch the numbers that various folks throw out and see if they make the distinction.
User avatar
ROCKMAN
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11397
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: TEXAS

Re: Cantarell Esta Muriendo (. . . is dying)

Postby Revi » Mon 07 Jul 2008, 21:55:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cualcrees', 'H')oly crap!! I live in Mexico and I can tell you that most - if not all - people are completely clueless about PO; even more so, they don't want to know. To them is most an issue of "privatization vs. state ownership"; not about oil depletion.
I've tried talking to some people about it but I only get blank stares or the usual "someone, somehow, will come up with a solution someday". This is really scary stuff.

Bienvenidos al Club de Peak Oil. He tenido la misma experiencia, hablando con la gente aqui. No sabe, ni quiere saber.

Estamos en una situacion muy mala. Creo que la unica solucion es la communidad.

Nosotros tenemos mas dinero, pero ustedes en Mexico tienen mas communidad. Va a ser muy interesante.
Deep in the mud and slime of things, even there, something sings.
User avatar
Revi
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7417
Joined: Mon 25 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Maine
Top

Re: Cantarell Esta Muriendo (. . . is dying)

Postby cualcrees » Mon 07 Jul 2008, 22:12:50

Thank you for your comments!

@Dante: I didn't get the feeling that you were against Mexico, so no problem! :)

You know what I've been thinking lately? From what I understand, the U.S. gets a lot of its imported oil from Mexico; so it worries me to think what could eventually happen if my government where to decide - specially now that our oil production is in BIG decline -, to stop selling it to the U.S. and to conserve it for domestic use.

Do you envision a scenario like that happening? If so, how do you think the U.S. government would react?

Saludos a todos desde Mexico!
cualcrees
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 176
Joined: Wed 28 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Mexico

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron