by mercurygirl » Mon 30 Jun 2008, 02:55:46
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('frankthetank', 'I') watched a PBS special on one of the dams in AZ. They pretty much said they won't last long and will crumble if not maintained/rebuilt. The silt behind them that builds up is a big problem.
The Mississippi River, i agree, is a bigger mess. I watched another PBS special (i watch them all!) about the history of my hometown (La Crosse) and in it they showed how through the years they tried everything they could to maintain a deep main channel, but couldn't get it to work until the locks and dams were put in. The stupid things don't ever work anyways. People still get flooded out of their homes about every couple of years. Its sad, but kind of reassuring that mother nature always wins. I'm not sure if my house would be flooded out or not, but i could care less. If the river wants it, just give me a hint (or about 10 inches of rain 100 miles north of here) and i'll pack my crap and be gone in less then a day.
The Mississippi does still maintain a lot of its "natural" look around this area. There is a ton of backwater sloughs and cuts that you can still cruise down.
I agree, Frank. Look up the book, "Riverhorse", about a guy piloting a small boat from coast to coast with a little help. He did part of the Mississippi and Missouri on the way. Talks a bit about how the rivers are "managed".
There are rare examples of humans working with nature in order to use water resources sustainably, but I don't know of many currently. Enormous dams for the purpose of energy as constructed probably don't fall into that category. However, hydro power in some areas well-suited can be beneficial. I'm thinking of Niagara Falls, for example. For some time, it has supplied inexpensive power to a broad area. That type of power is limited geographically and will become more so as we contract.
Some day, the Nile delta will be fertile in its yearly cycle again, not because of what we import.