Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

David Walker, US Comptroller

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Re: Financial Tsunami

Postby MrBill » Thu 26 Jun 2008, 03:59:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('NTBKtrader', '
')Is the US gov trying to make it harder to 'financially' renounce US citizenship? If so, I didn't really find anything on that. I know the IRS is increasingly going after offshore tax shelters, but that is a different issue in my opinion.


Here is the article I was refering to:

UPDATE: escaping the taxman and other unintended consequences
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')
Under the proposed legislation, expatriates surrendering their citizenship with a net worth of $2m or more, or a high income, will have to act as if they have sold all their worldwide assets at a fair market price. If the unrealised gains on these assets exceed $600,000, capital-gains tax will apply. A study by the Congressional Budget Office guesses that the new law will progressively net the government up to $286m over five years. It is unclear, however, why people would suffer the consequences if they did not expect to save money in the long run by escaping American taxes.

That expats want to leave at all is evidence of America's odd tax system. Along with citizens of North Korea and a few other countries, Americans are taxed based on their citizenship, rather than where they live. So they usually pay twice—to their host country and the Internal Revenue Service. As this makes citizenship less palatable, Congress has erected large barriers to stop them jumping ship. In 1996 it forced people who renounced citizenship to continue paying income taxes for an extra ten years. Theoretically, the new law allows for a cleaner break.

But even as the law tries to prevent people from renouncing their citizenship, it may have the opposite effect. Under the new structure, it would make financial sense for any young American working overseas with a promising career to renounce his citizenship as early as possible, before his assets accumulate. For everyone else, plunging stock and property prices mean now may be as good a time as any to hand back the passport, says Kurt Rademacher, a partner at Withers, a global tax-planning firm.


Source: Congress increases the ransom expats must pay to escape the taxman



So it used to be that someone with a large, unpaid tax bill might conveniently move to London or some other tax haven for a few years, and then renounce their US citizenship before realizing gains on unsold assets for example. Now the IRS wants its pound of flesh before they can give up their citizenship.

As the economic noose tightens more laws like this will no doubt come into effect. It was only two years ago that the US announced a huge tax amnesty for corporations to repatriate profits from abroad reducing the effective tax rate from 40 to 5% if I remember correctly? That still netted billions of dollars for the state, but more importantly it brought that capital back onshore.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'F')ederated Market Opportunity Fund, with $1.8 billion of assets, is designed for investors who are convinced that the market is heading for a slump, the Wall Street Journal said in its ``Fund Track'' column.

The Pittsburgh-based fund differs from other bearish funds, which use short-selling or buy commodities such as gold, in that it has a great number of international investments, the newspaper said.

Steve Lehman, the fund's manager, judges that the U.S. financial system is in worse shape than many observers believe and predicts many years of diminished economic growth, the Journal said.

``At major turning points, the crowd tends to be wrong,'' he argues; he avoids big U.S. stocks, going into areas most mutual funds avoid, such as currencies and commodities, according to the newspaper.

Lehman admits that Market Opportunity, which has returned 4.75 percent a year on average for the past five years, doesn't do well in a rising market, but he's sure that there's now ``a much more favorable environment,'' the Journal said.

His favorite shares at present are Canada's Barrick Gold Corp., which explores for gold, copper, silver and zinc, and Valero Energy Corp., a U.S. oil refiner, the newspaper added.


Source: June 25 (Bloomberg)

I would not be too proud of a 4.75% annual return either! ; - ))
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia

Re: Financial Tsunami

Postby evilgenius » Thu 26 Jun 2008, 12:29:57

The only option I can see to get out of this is for the Fed to continue buying bad debt from damaged financial institutions then turn around and package that debt as semi-sovereign property holdings and sell it to the Arabs and the Chinese. Let's say semi-sovereign means possessed of local voting rights and some other rights heretofore reserved for citizens only. That way the holders of the semi-sovereign debt can own the ghost towns and the strip malls. They will initially think that they are getting a good deal, until they want their capital out of it in order to finance improvements at home and discover the only way to realize anything from their investment is one month at a time in a very deflated percentage yield environment.

The sale of semi-sovereign packages would serve nicely to contract the money supply internationally. Coming on the heels of the deflationary contraction now underway domestically it would put an extended cap on the hyperinflation hypothesis. This would give the US time to try and complete its endeavor in the Middle East, to lock up enough production that it ensures the dollar as reserve currency throughout the end cycle of oil. After that is done reinflation is then possible and acceptable (will even be called out for by Joe Sixpack).

It will work until it enters the military phase. They have been naive to believe that they can control the Middle East. The very players they trust the most will undermine them. Not to mention the plethora of international enemies that such a policy will make as the screws tighten.
When it comes down to it, the people will always shout, "Free Barabbas." They love Barabbas. He's one of them. He has the same dreams. He does what they wish they could do. That other guy is more removed, more inscrutable. He makes them think. "Crucify him."
User avatar
evilgenius
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3730
Joined: Tue 06 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Stopped at the Border.

Re: Financial Tsunami

Postby Kingcoal » Thu 26 Jun 2008, 17:47:41

I don't know, a turd is a turd, be it polished or wrapped in nice packaging. It still stinks, everyone knows it, no one will buy it.
"That's the problem with mercy, kid... It just ain't professional" - Fast Eddie, The Color of Money
User avatar
Kingcoal
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2149
Joined: Wed 29 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Pennsylvania, USA

Re: Financial Tsunami

Postby Heineken » Thu 26 Jun 2008, 22:54:58

I agree. I think the era of the Chinese and Arabs etc. buying our crappy debt is coming to an end. They're not stupid. They'll make their own way.

Then the REAL trouble begins.
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog

"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia

Re: Financial Tsunami

Postby cube » Fri 27 Jun 2008, 00:07:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('evilgenius', 'T')he only option I can see to get out of this is for the Fed to continue buying bad debt from damaged financial institutions then turn around and package that debt as semi-sovereign property holdings and sell it to the Arabs and the Chinese.

Sounds like a great idea.
Maybe if we sell off the entire west coast of the USA (Alaska, Hawaii, Washington, Oregon, California) we can pay off our debts. :)
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Financial Tsunami

Postby MrBill » Fri 27 Jun 2008, 03:50:06

It may be more cost-effective to invade smaller countries - maybe Caribbean Islands or Latin America - and sell them off instead? Canada would fetch a good price and they do not even have ice breakers or submarines that are water-tight. Easy pickings. You'll be home by Christmas.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia

Re: Financial Tsunami

Postby Heineken » Fri 27 Jun 2008, 09:01:14

It seems fantastic to contemplate, but I do think an invasion of Canada by a desperate America is a possibility in future. A starving populace would support any crazy scheme that promised dinner.

Canada is vulnerable.
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog

"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia

Re: Financial Tsunami

Postby Kingcoal » Fri 27 Jun 2008, 09:09:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', 'I')t may be more cost-effective to invade smaller countries - maybe Caribbean Islands or Latin America - and sell them off instead? Canada would fetch a good price and they do not even have ice breakers or submarines that are water-tight. Easy pickings. You'll be home by Christmas.


Based on Roman history, that's not too far fetched. The Romans made nothing, imported everything and we able to do so by their constant annexing and conquering of neighboring regions. Oh yeah, I forgot, the Romans had gold/silver based money so maybe not such a good comparison.
"That's the problem with mercy, kid... It just ain't professional" - Fast Eddie, The Color of Money
User avatar
Kingcoal
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2149
Joined: Wed 29 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Top

Re: Financial Tsunami

Postby MrBill » Fri 27 Jun 2008, 09:18:59

All it would take is one ugly international incident like the Canadian's deciding to bomb the Baldwin Bros., or Celine Dion releasing another bad album, and thus a war with Canada would quickly spiral out of control. Quite plausable. If you ever wondered about Canada's military capability just ask your grandfather. They are still using the same technology today! ; - ))


Image

Canadian Sea King helicopter. Over forty years in service.

Image

Used (leaky) submarine purchased from Britain.

Image

Canada should have a half-dozen of these babies running on nuclear to patrol the Arctic, and do search and rescue off our Atlantic and Pacific coasts as well as control illegal immigration and fishing, but that's right, they never got built.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia

Re: Financial Tsunami

Postby MrBill » Fri 27 Jun 2008, 10:11:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Kingcoal', '
')Based on Roman history, that's not too far fetched. The Romans made nothing, imported everything and we able to do so by their constant annexing and conquering of neighboring regions. Oh yeah, I forgot, the Romans had gold/silver based money so maybe not such a good comparison.


On the way back from the Crusades, Richard the Lion Hearted conquered Cyprus, married a local bride here in Limassol (Lemesos), and then sold the island (twice). Later the British bought it back for 500 quid of Sterling. Slightly more than a string of beads, but still not too bad a deal.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Financial Tsunami

Postby mobil1 » Fri 27 Jun 2008, 10:12:19

Yes, our Canadian military is relatively pathetic, at least compared to the US who we have traditionally depended on should Russia come over the pole for us.

On the plus side, we've been running budget surpluses for many years and our formerly pathetic Canuck dollar is now virtually at par with US.
User avatar
mobil1
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 66
Joined: Fri 20 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Quebec/Ottawa, Canada

Re: Financial Tsunami

Postby MrBill » Fri 27 Jun 2008, 10:39:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mobil1', 'Y')es, our Canadian military is relatively pathetic, at least compared to the US who we have traditionally depended on should Russia come over the pole for us.

On the plus side, we've been running budget surpluses for many years and our formerly pathetic Canuck dollar is now virtually at par with US.


Absolutely. I didn't mean to dis the Canadian military. More like heap abuse on the politicians that have enfeebled it by chronic under-investment for over three decades.

Personally, I am very happy that Canada broke out of its tax and spend rut, and started to pay down the debt by running budget surpluses. Now if Ontario and Quebec would follow suit it would be perfect.

None the less aside from setting aside money to pay down the debt there is no good economic argument to running a budget surplus. Balanced budget, yes. Deficit, no. But senseless to run a surplus. Return that money to the taxpayers that earned it.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Financial Tsunami

Postby ROCKMAN » Fri 27 Jun 2008, 14:15:16

Mr. Bill,

I do recall that years ago, towards the end of the Cold War , a comedian stated that Canada was essential to the US defense against the commie hord coming over the pole. In effect, we could use Canada as a free-fire zone.

And can you belive it...some folks actually laughed. Damn Yankees!

Back on point: as you have a much clearer view of the picture: should there be a serious seroius drop in worldwide GNP how would that impact the US ability to continue to float our debt let alone increase it to pay for then obvious need to modify our infrastructer/lifestyles.

Needles to say I'm jealous of any success the C's have had paying down debt.
User avatar
ROCKMAN
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11397
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: TEXAS

Re: Financial Tsunami

Postby wisconsin_cur » Fri 27 Jun 2008, 21:17:32

Barclays warns of a financial storm

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')arclays Capital has advised clients to batten down the hatches for a worldwide financial storm, warning that the US Federal Reserve has allowed the inflation genie out of the bottle and let its credibility fall "below zero".

"We're in a nasty environment," said Tim Bond, the bank's chief equity strategist. "There is an inflation shock underway. This is going to be very negative for financial assets. We are going into tortoise mood and are retreating into our shell. Investors will do well if they can preserve their wealth."

Barclays Capital said in its closely-watched Global Outlook that US headline inflation would hit 5.5pc by August and the Fed will have to raise interest rates six times by the end of next year to prevent a wage-spiral. If it hesitates, the bond markets will take matters into their own hands. "This is the first test for central banks in 30 years and they have fluffed it. They have zero credibility, and the Fed is negative if that's possible. It has lost all credibility," said Mr Bond.


...

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he two leaders - MBIA and Ambac - have already been downgraded as the rating agencies belatedly turn stringent. The risk is further downgrades could set off a fresh wave of bank troubles. "The creditworthiness of many US financial institutions will decline in coming months," he said.

The bank warned that engineering and auto firms we're likely to face a crunch as steel and oil costs surge. "Their business models will have to be substantially altered if they are going to survive," said Mr McAdie.

A small chorus of City bankers dissent from the view that inflation is the chief danger in the US and other rich OECD countries. The teams at Societe Generale, Dresdner Kleinwort, and Banque AIG all warn that deflation may loom as housing markets crumble under record levels of household debt.

Bernard Connolly, global startegist at Banque AIG, said inflation targeting by central banks had become a "totemism that threatens to crush the world economy".

He said it would be madness to throw millions out of work by deflating part of the economy to offset a rise in imported fuel and food prices. Real wages are being squeezed by oil, come what may. It may be healthier for society to let it happen gently.
http://www.thenewfederalistpapers.com
User avatar
wisconsin_cur
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4576
Joined: Thu 10 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: 45 degrees North. 883 feet above sealevel.
Top

Re: Financial Tsunami

Postby mobil1 » Sat 28 Jun 2008, 00:49:55

I suspect the Canadian gov't will need some of that money to ease the pains of the hard times ahead. IMO we have reasonably decent social assistance programs, but in hard times, those programs will be stretched.

It may be tempting for our National Gov't to try to bring back something like the National Energy Program (NEP) that Trudeau created in the 1970s oil crisis. Albertans and the west of Canada has hated Trudeau ever since. This program effectively siphoned oil profits from Alberta and put it back in he manufacturing base in Ontario.

Retiring baby boomer problem too. Perhaps some more immigration will be considered for that issue. Hey if Chinese shipping costs go too high, we can just bring China here, one Chinese at a time. Strangely enough, I work for a company run by ethnic Chinese, who sponsor Beijing employees to North America.... (ah, so)
User avatar
mobil1
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 66
Joined: Fri 20 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Quebec/Ottawa, Canada

Re: Financial Tsunami

Postby MrBill » Mon 30 Jun 2008, 03:10:33

Rockman, I have posted it before, but it is worth repeating:

Globally,

Current Account Surplus = Current Account Deficit

where

Current Account = Budget (surplus/deficit) + Trade (surplus/deficit) + Balance of Payments (surplus/deficit)

and

Trade Surplus = Trade Deficit

plus

Balance of Payment Surplus = Balance of Payment Deficit.

So anytime that GNP/GDP falls it translates directly into less capital to fund deficits regardless of who's they are. Less Asian exports means less capital to fund the US' current account deficit. High food and energy prices, however, are a wealth transfer from consumers to producers, and do not necessarily mean less capital to fund the US' deficits. But the only reason to invest in the US for foreign investors is if they believe that their capital is safe and that they can earn an attractive yield net of inflation. Those assumptions are fraying at the edges per Cur's post above.

The US currently consumes some two-thirds of the world's current account surplus or savings. We doubt they can consume 100-percent. Especially given a low growth environment and negative real interest rates. And we know the US cannot consume more than 100-percent of the world's savings. That is impossible. So we are currently somewhere between two-thirds and impossible.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia

Re: Financial Tsunami

Postby wisconsin_cur » Mon 30 Jun 2008, 03:42:14

Interview on Bloomberg TV:

The interview is with Martin Hennecke.

1. We are already in a recession if you account for inflations eating into GDP numbers

2. The American government is in a worse position than 1929 due to unfunded liabilities

3. The expected depression will be worse than 1929.

4. Move out of the dollar, don't trust in Euros or oil, look to edible commodities as a way to preserve wealth.

I am having trouble linking the video. It can be accessed from the front page of the Bloomberg site. www.bloomberg.comwww.bloomberg.com
http://www.thenewfederalistpapers.com
User avatar
wisconsin_cur
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4576
Joined: Thu 10 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: 45 degrees North. 883 feet above sealevel.

Re: Financial Tsunami

Postby MrBill » Mon 30 Jun 2008, 04:31:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '4'). Move out of the dollar, don't trust in Euros or oil, look to edible commodities as a way to preserve wealth.


Or land.

"A man without land is nobody." Simcha from The Apprenticeship of Duddy Kravitz.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Financial Tsunami

Postby Battle_Scarred_Galactico » Mon 30 Jun 2008, 05:12:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', 'I')t seems fantastic to contemplate, but I do think an invasion of Canada by a desperate America is a possibility in future. A starving populace would support any crazy scheme that promised dinner.

Canada is vulnerable.


Its' my understanding that under their own law the US has rights to all Canadas' resources anyway ?

No need to invade.
---
Battle_Scarred_Galactico
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 935
Joined: Thu 07 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Financial Tsunami

Postby manu » Mon 30 Jun 2008, 06:33:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Battle_Scarred_Galactico', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', 'I')t seems fantastic to contemplate, but I do think an invasion of Canada by a desperate America is a possibility in future. A starving populace would support any crazy scheme that promised dinner.

Canada is vulnerable.


Its' my understanding that under their own law the US has rights to all Canadas' resources anyway ?

No need to invade.


Yes, but they may just want to take it in the future. Remember John Candy in that one movie? Can't remember the name. Also Wag the Dog.
User avatar
manu
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 751
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron