by Homesteader » Sun 22 Jun 2008, 22:23:32
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AlexdeLarge', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '
')Nuke is a "current" solution? Strange meaning of the word "current" I guess...
Don't be so obtuse. You know full well that nuclear plants are a current viable energy source.
To those who are thick headed.........current is defined as something that can be done with current technology that will yield a significant power source. Obviously, it takes time for plants to be built, wells to be drilled. So why not start now??
Or are we waiting for the energy fairy to leave us batteries under our pillows???
I'm waiting.....any other ideas??? Being a "Doomer" is not a plan.
First, why the name calling? What is that doing to forward the debate?
Secondly, at the rate that the
current nuclear power plants are aging and approaching decommission time compared to the rate that new nuclear power plants are
currently being built it seems more likely that we will have a net loss of nuclear power plants.
Currently if memory serves it is a 10-12 year process to license and build a nuclear power plant . That is a long lead time per plant never mind the number needed to actually increase the nations overall electrical generating power. Plus the last nuclear power plant commissioned in the U.S. was in Tennessee in 1992 (again, if memory serves). The U.S. nuclear power industry has been on life support for nearly a generation. How do you propose to ramp it up in order to build McCain's proposed 45 new plants within the next 20 years? I'd love to hear your thoughts and, importantly, see the links you post to back up your thoughts.
Of course the price of building a nuclear power plant is going up all the time and there is a rumor about global credit crisis. And didn't I read, again on this site, the other day that their is only one place in the world that makes the castings for the either the core or the cooling tower? That might cause a bit of a bottleneck, don't you think?
This and a lot more information is available on this site with a little searching.
So yes, obviously, nuclear power is part of our
current energy mix however the picture going forward
(not current) is not so simple as you would make it appear.
See how easy it was to post all that and not call anyone names?
"The era of procrastination, of half-measures, of soothing and baffling expedients, of delays, is coming to a close. In its place we are entering a period of consequences…"
Sir Winston Churchill
Beliefs are what people fall back on when the facts make them uncomfortable.