by smallpoxgirl » Thu 12 Jun 2008, 22:15:24
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Denny', 'I') am sorry, I guess this term "upside down" is alien to me.
My point is if you sell your house bought at $400K for $300K and buy another at $300K elsewhere you are in the same predicament, not worse, except for transaction fees.
Upside down means you owe more on the house than it's worth.
You buy a house for $400,000. You spend several years making payments and accumulating equity. You've managed to pay down $50,000. Then your house suddenly looses value. You sell it, but only get $300,000. You now have no house, no equity, and you still owe the bank $50,000. Assuming the bank even approved the sale in the first place, no way are you going to find a new bank to loan you money on a new mortgage while you still owe $50,000 on a house you don't even own anymore.
People have been buying houses, basically, as a way to do leveraged speculation in the real estate market. Now they're finding out that leverage works both ways. If you buy a $400,000 house and it goes up in value, you win big. It goes down in value, you loose everything, plus some.