Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Hummer/SUV Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: It's Time to Mourn the SUV

Unread postby Waterthrush » Sat 07 Jun 2008, 16:25:54

My previous words - $this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'G')eez, a salary that allows the purchase of two vehicles, a vacation, and a college fund - and that's supposed to be greedy and horrifying
- show just how much "the car" is entwined with the US lifestyle.

LOL, I was thinking of the past of the working class. Two vehicles is NOT in the future for any of us except the very rich. I look at my one with a very jaundiced eye these days. My bicycle, though, still awaits more use from me.
Waterthrush
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri 03 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: New Jersey

Re: It's Time to Mourn the SUV

Unread postby Pretorian » Sat 07 Jun 2008, 16:41:04

SUV is well and alive-- I just filled up mine. $69.99.
Pretorian
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4685
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Somewhere there

Re: It's Time to Mourn the SUV

Unread postby indybrat » Sat 07 Jun 2008, 17:29:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cashmere', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dukey', 'i')f GM dies the economy is finished
doesnt GM have like a million people on it's health care ?
The cost of company healthcare for pensioners destroyed GM years ago. That's why they can't compete with Japan which has national healthcare system.
We in the US with our free-market zeal destroyed the automotive industry so we wouldn't have to share national health. dumb huh?

I disagree.
Human nature killed U.S. competitiveness.
The U.S. automotive industry began dying when the workers were able to command more than they were worth through the power of their unions.
This his zero to do with a national health care catastrophe plan.
I agree, I work for a company that makes automotive parts,and and GM is killing me.They make all the BIG Bucks so why cant they pass that on to the rest of us and provide better and cheaper health care too.And why in the Hell cant the unoins help the little guy get ahead insted of waisting $ on the BBD ( Bigger Better Deal )Hell I put in 40 hours a week and don't even make more then $10.00 per hour.
people that make it possible to make their BIG Bucks.
User avatar
indybrat
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat 07 Jun 2008, 03:00:00

Re: It's Time to Mourn the SUV

Unread postby indybrat » Sat 07 Jun 2008, 17:44:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pretorian', 'S')UV is well and alive-- I just filled up mine. $69.99.
Yeah SUV's are indeed alive and doing well all I have to do is look out my front door to see that.It's a life style choice.But how in the hell can ya afford to drive anywhere with the gas prices continuesly going up.
User avatar
indybrat
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat 07 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: SUV owners keep on truckin' despite gas prices

Unread postby joewp » Thu 12 Jun 2008, 00:27:46

How fat are these kids that can't sit three across in a car?
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '"')I don't want to be labeled as a soccer mom,"

How stupid.
Joe P. joeparente.com
"Only when the last tree is cut; only when the last river is polluted; only when the last fish is caught; only then will they realize that you cannot eat money." - Cree Indian Proverb
User avatar
joewp
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2054
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Keeping dry in South Florida
Top

Re: SUV owners keep on truckin' despite gas prices

Unread postby TreebeardsUncle » Thu 12 Jun 2008, 00:39:06

Hi. Ford did a market research study recently and found that most SUV drivers would keep them when gas goes to $4/gallon.
The actually break point for the suv fad (I expect) is in the $8 to $10/gallon range.
It will be a little higher to get the pick-up trucks off the road in great numbers ($12 to $15/gallon). Vans should head off about the same time.
At $20/gallon, people will pick price over safety and get motor-cycles and scooters in large numbers.
At $40 to $50/gallon they will be forced onto trains and bikes. That will bein the 2040s.
Lates.
g
TreebeardsUncle
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 683
Joined: Thu 15 Jun 2006, 03:00:00

Re: SUV owners keep on truckin' despite gas prices

Unread postby dinopello » Thu 12 Jun 2008, 01:22:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '"')I don't want to be labeled as a soccer mom," she said.

Classic.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')tephanie Torgerson, 32, of Pataskala, Ohio, said she simply can't put her three boys in her husband's Mazda 626. The 1-year-old needs a car seat, the 5-year-old needs a booster chair and she doesn't feel comfortable wedging her 8-year-old between the two.

Sounds like a dependency problem...
Really, these people need help. How can we help them?
User avatar
dinopello
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6088
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Urban Village
Top

Re: SUV owners keep on truckin' despite gas prices

Unread postby seldom_seen » Thu 12 Jun 2008, 01:27:37

I've seen a whole family riding one bicycle in Brazil.

Dad riding, with kid behind, mother on handlebars holding the other kid.
seldom_seen
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2229
Joined: Tue 12 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Re: SUV owners keep on truckin' despite gas prices

Unread postby Madpaddy » Thu 12 Jun 2008, 02:23:52

I thought soccer mums are mums who drive SUVs so her arguement stupid as it is is not even correct.
User avatar
Madpaddy
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2043
Joined: Fri 25 Jun 2004, 03:00:00

Re: SUV owners keep on truckin' despite gas prices

Unread postby Gvil » Thu 12 Jun 2008, 02:34:27

4$ per US gallon would be here in Europe (Slovenia) translated into 0.6€ per litre and this is still DIRT CHEAP. Here 1 litre of gas costs 1.2 € which would be app. 8$ per gallon and people still drive around like usual (even more). Also you must consider that the average salary here is in the range of 850€ (1275$) per month - I think this is much less than average US salary. Also you can see quite a lot of SUV on the streets. So I think that when the prices in US will be in the 8$ range people will just spend more money on gas and buy less other stuff.
I think that the price in the range 15-20$ per gallon will break the habit. People are not keen to downsize.
User avatar
Gvil
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 27
Joined: Sun 27 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: SUV owners keep on truckin' despite gas prices

Unread postby wisconsin_cur » Thu 12 Jun 2008, 02:43:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('joewp', 'H')ow fat are these kids that can't sit three across in a car?

Actually it is a problem with the children's and booster seat. I have two (skinny) kids. I can get them both in the back of my 50mpg Golf just fine one in a booster and the other in a car seat. That is fine but there is not even room for the Jack Russel Terrier, let a lone an 8 year old between them.
The Mazda looks like it might have a little more room than my VW,
Image
but not by too much. In this case you can blame the safety laws that require the booster and child seat but you can not assume that the kids are fat.
http://www.thenewfederalistpapers.com
User avatar
wisconsin_cur
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4576
Joined: Thu 10 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: 45 degrees North. 883 feet above sealevel.
Top

Re: SUV owners keep on truckin' despite gas prices

Unread postby Rabbit » Thu 12 Jun 2008, 03:05:21

Yes, but any one with more than 2 kids is a gross polluter. Breeding must be limited to 2 kids per family or less.
Last edited by Rabbit on Thu 12 Jun 2008, 10:25:06, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Rabbit
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 492
Joined: Tue 30 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Fresno, CA

Re: SUV owners keep on truckin' despite gas prices

Unread postby wisconsin_cur » Thu 12 Jun 2008, 03:19:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Rabbit', 'Y')es, but any one with more than 2 kids is a gross polluter. Breading must be limited to 2 kids per family or less

I don't think you could be more simplistic if you tried. Would you care to qualify that at all? If I am living an conservative amish lifestyle and each of those kids produces more food and fosters an environment that sequesters more carbon than they produce would it still apply? If we limit everyone to 2 children and still try to live a western lifestyle the planet and the race will be just as dead.
Simplistic anger will get us no where, whether it be against people who drive SUV's or those who have more than two children. We need to adjust the culture and you can not build a positive culture on negative emotions. Decide what and advocate for what you would promote (as opposed to what you are against). Promote the virtue of two or less children instead of calling people names who violate your aribitrary rule (why not 1 child or perhaps only those with superior genetics should have children or the rich or the left handed).
Simplistic anger is for simple people.
Don't be simple.
http://www.thenewfederalistpapers.com
User avatar
wisconsin_cur
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4576
Joined: Thu 10 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: 45 degrees North. 883 feet above sealevel.
Top

Re: SUV owners keep on truckin' despite gas prices

Unread postby ozkrenske » Thu 12 Jun 2008, 04:02:01

Alright I don't understand the soccer mum thing either. (It must be regional or something because my image of soccer mum is 4wd driver.)
But she is ferrying 3 kids two who must sit in the back and another she doesn't want in the middle. Ummm .... mmm .... surely there is a passenger seat in front or is that for the handbag or something?
I agree with the fuel price thing. Unless they lose a paypacket they will probably find savings to pay out $150 a week for the commute, before considering the change over. They would eat a loss on the current vehicle and probably pay more then the difference in fuel costs modernising. It is an issue that will only be fixed by rationing or shortage.
User avatar
ozkrenske
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 221
Joined: Wed 27 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Queensland, Australia

Re: SUV owners keep on truckin' despite gas prices

Unread postby wisconsin_cur » Thu 12 Jun 2008, 04:24:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ozkrenske', 'A')lright I don't understand the soccer mum thing either. (It must be regional or something because my image of soccer mum is 4wd driver.)
But she is ferrying 3 kids two who must sit in the back and another she doesn't want in the middle. Ummm .... mmm .... surely there is a passenger seat in front or is that for the handbag or something?

In some places it is illegal to have small children in the front seat. At the very least we are told not to until the child is around high school age. We can claim she is a victim of propaganda (but who isn't?) but we do not do anyone a service by dismissing her as an idiot.
By hey if it makes you all feel better about your own oil dependence to look down on someone else, so be it. Lord knows it is easier than actually doing something to plan for the future.
http://www.thenewfederalistpapers.com
User avatar
wisconsin_cur
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4576
Joined: Thu 10 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: 45 degrees North. 883 feet above sealevel.
Top

Re: SUV owners keep on truckin' despite gas prices

Unread postby grampybone » Thu 12 Jun 2008, 05:51:44

I don't have any sympathy for these people at all. Why did they buy these wasteful vehicles to begin with? Is it my fault they have several kids?
So if these Big vehicle owners want to get somewhere they are going to have to PUT THE GAS IN IT AND SHUT UP. Either that or sell thier SUV for scrap metal because nobody wants it. Then apply that money towards a smaller vehicle. If not then walk.
Tough. Not my problem man.
User avatar
grampybone
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 77
Joined: Sat 31 May 2008, 03:00:00

Re: SUV owners keep on truckin' despite gas prices

Unread postby cube » Thu 12 Jun 2008, 07:10:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('joewp', 'H')ow fat are these kids that can't sit three across in a car?
...
We're talking about Americans here.
Does that answer the question? :P
//
Anyways the demand for SUV's right now is about 50% from it's peak years ago. I think that's very significant. These folks seem like they want to dig their heels into the ground and stand firm.
I think any position can be breeched with enough force. $8 / gallon gasoline should be enough to force 3 fat kids to sit across, either that or on top of each other. :lol:
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: SUV owners keep on truckin' despite gas prices

Unread postby TheDude » Thu 12 Jun 2008, 10:15:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('wisconsin_cur', 'I')n some places it is illegal to have small children in the front seat. At the very least we are told not to until the child is around high school age.

California is an example: California Driver Handbook - Safe Driving Practices
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')HILD RESTRAINT SYSTEM AND SAFETY SEATS
Any child under the age of six weighing less than 60 pounds must be secured in a federally approved child passenger restraint system and ride in the back seat of a vehicle.
A child under the age of six weighing less than 60 pounds may ride in the front seat of a vehicle when:
* There is no rear seat or the rear seats are either side-facing jump seats or rear-facing seats.
* The child passenger restraint system cannot be installed properly in the rear seat.
* All rear seats are already occupied by children under the age of 12 years.
* A medical reason requires the child to ride in the front seat.

A child may not ride in the front seat of an airbag-equipped vehicle if the child:
* Is under one year of age.
* Weighs less than 20 pounds.
* Is riding in a rear-facing child passenger restraint system.
Children ages six and older but less than 16 and children under age six who weigh more than 60 pounds, must be properly secured in an appropriate child passenger restraint system or safety belt which meets federal safety standards.

Nothing about what kind of vehicle. Or strapping them to the roof. :lol: What medical reason is there for a kid to require being in the front? ADHD? When I was a tyke I spent the whole trip with my head jammed in between the front seats for the best view, while my Mom smoked. Ah, salad days...cough!
Thought "soccer mom" = minivan, as the story actually implies.
Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
And let me tell you something: I dig your work.
User avatar
TheDude
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests

cron