by KillTheHumans » Thu 12 Jun 2008, 23:00:36
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', '
')
I think the term "economically uninhabitable" will be applied to larger homes when electricity reaches that price.
Excessive square footage will be regarded as a kind of "financial black mold."
A demonstration on why this assumption may not hold any more true than one involving automobiles, when one has the ability to become more efficient.
I've lived in 2 different places over the past decade. My costs for year round heating and cooling in the first house was $1.10/square foot living space/year. In other words, $1.1 * 1800 square feet = $2000/year heating/cooling costs.
Now, I moved just a short distance. My living space went from 1800 to 3100 square feet, plus I heat another 1700 square feet which isn't living space ( garage + basement ). Same electric and gas utility, no basic changes in weather during the years in question. If I had been stupid, and not paid attention to energy costs, I would have paid about the same for heating and cooling as the old place, call it $1.1 X 4800 = $5280/year.
But I am not stupid, and in this rapidly deteriorating post peak world (

) I paid attention to utility costs. I paid $1700 for the first full year, $1700/4800 square feet = $0.35/square foot/year.
Cut my heating/cooling costs by 66% on a square foot basis, 15% on a gross basis. Double the living space. What is it called when you can have square footage AND cheaper energy costs than your neighbors? Smart!
( the key is skip DirectX and insulate, insulate, insulate...and throw some strategic tree's in as well )