Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

The Spreading Global Food Crisis Thread pt 2 (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Food inflation to hit 43% this year - US Sec'y. of Agri.

Unread postby kjmclark » Tue 03 Jun 2008, 21:36:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('hope_full', 'I')'ve always been puzzled why energy and food are left OUT of the CPI. It's not like we can get by without those two items...


They don't leave food and energy out of the CPI. What are all of you smoking!?!?

They leave food and energy out of the core inflation numbers, not the CPI. The CPI includes both of them. Read the Wikipedia entry for Consumer Price Index.

They leave food and energy out of the core inflation figures for two reasons. First, they rapidly flip back and forth between months. It would look strange to have inflation at 1.5% one month, then 4.2% the next and 2.1% the third. Second, they look at the core rate because when the core rate increases they know we're hosed. The core rate increasing means that food, energy, and other sources of inflation are forcing up prices overall.

Now, they *do* doctor the CPI, even though it includes food and energy. They use substitutes and hedonics to doctor things up. So the CPI is still a tool to cheat social security recipients, but food and energy are included.
User avatar
kjmclark
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 428
Joined: Fri 09 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

Re: The Rome Summit: Stop the Food Crisis

Unread postby Ivan_M » Tue 03 Jun 2008, 22:50:56

stop the food crisis, eh? so if you rub to politicians together does corn come out?
User avatar
Ivan_M
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 163
Joined: Sat 29 Mar 2008, 03:00:00

Re: The Rome Summit: Stop the Food Crisis

Unread postby Dreamtwister » Wed 04 Jun 2008, 00:58:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('virgincrude', '[')url=http://www.avaaz.org/en/world_food_crisis/5.php?cl=94737528]avaaz.org Stop the Food Crisis[/url]


Hey look! One-stop shopping for dissident termination lists! Where do I sign?*

*Not that it matters, since everyone here is probably already on "the list"...
The whole of human history is a refutation by experiment of the concept of "moral world order". - Friedrich Nietzsche
User avatar
Dreamtwister
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2529
Joined: Mon 06 Feb 2006, 04:00:00

Re: The Rome Summit: Stop the Food Crisis

Unread postby mystiek » Wed 04 Jun 2008, 01:36:07

Well stated Ludi!
User avatar
mystiek
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 240
Joined: Tue 20 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Tennessee

Re: The Rome Summit: Stop the Food Crisis

Unread postby municipal » Wed 04 Jun 2008, 03:31:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('virgincrude', 'H')ere's an online petition to be presented to Ban Ki Moon on Wednesday, (if they reach the One Million signatures) telling the leaders gathering there to get their heads out of the corporate feed trough and take concrete measures to stop the ongoing food crisis.

Please take a minute, this organisation is one of the best run activist sites, and believe it or not, these simple actions (signing online petitions) can get results. They rarely solve anything, but often they make things better. Isn't that better than nothing?

avaaz.org Stop the Food Crisis

Why sould they want to stop the food crises after spending trillions and waiting dosens of decades to engineer it?

If I were you I would not join an activist org, most of them are begun by gov to attract the trouble makers so they can be the first to go to summer camp.
User avatar
municipal
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 45
Joined: Mon 28 Apr 2008, 03:00:00

Increasing the food supply may be wishful thinking

Unread postby farmerleaf » Thu 05 Jun 2008, 23:45:46

The UN Secretary General called for increasing the food supply by 50%, suggesting that this was a feasible goal. While it's a nice political statement, full of soothing sounds for hungry people, it is not grounded in the current reality. Growing food is a biological process, not an industrial process where output can be ramped up at will. One is left to wonder where the land to farm will come from, since so much arable land has been paved over, built upon, or flooded behind mega-hydro dams.

Although most food consumed in this country is produced on industrial scale farms, using industrial-type methods, it is still subject to the realities of the natural world. And those realities include drought, pestilence, soil depletion, floods, and extreme climate changes. (and let's not forget commercial development either) Furthermore, we have seen the negative results of industrial farming first hand: land and water pollution, soil compaction, desertification, mad cow disease, avian flu, honeybee colony collapse, e-coli tainted food, pesticide residues, malnutrition, etc.

When it comes to the contemporary industrial-petroleum based, so called scientific "green revolution" to solve the world food problems, I am certain I hear the fat lady singing. It is well past time to tear up the lawn and plant something useful, such as fruit trees and vegetables.

-farmerleaf
Living & teaching sustainable, Earth-friendly agricultural practices.
User avatar
farmerleaf
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu 29 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Rockwood, TN

Re: Increasing the food supply may be wishful thinking

Unread postby wisconsin_cur » Fri 06 Jun 2008, 07:30:11

First off, welcome to peakoil.com

I hope you look around and decide to stick around. Since I see you are interested in issues of food supply and world hunger I would invite you over to This discussion where we have been talking about the issue for a while now.

If you have any questions, please let me know.

Cur
http://www.thenewfederalistpapers.com
User avatar
wisconsin_cur
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4576
Joined: Thu 10 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: 45 degrees North. 883 feet above sealevel.

Re: Increasing the food supply may be wishful thinking

Unread postby Homesteader » Fri 06 Jun 2008, 08:05:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('farmerleaf', 'T')he UN Secretary General called for increasing the food supply by 50%, suggesting that this was a feasible goal. While it's a nice political statement, full of soothing sounds for hungry people, it is not grounded in the current reality. Growing food is a biological process, not an industrial process where output can be ramped up at will. One is left to wonder where the land to farm will come from, since so much arable land has been paved over, built upon, or flooded behind mega-hydro dams.

Although most food consumed in this country is produced on industrial scale farms, using industrial-type methods, it is still subject to the realities of the natural world. And those realities include drought, pestilence, soil depletion, floods, and extreme climate changes. (and let's not forget commercial development either) Furthermore, we have seen the negative results of industrial farming first hand: land and water pollution, soil compaction, desertification, mad cow disease, avian flu, honeybee colony collapse, e-coli tainted food, pesticide residues, malnutrition, etc.

When it comes to the contemporary industrial-petroleum based, so called scientific "green revolution" to solve the world food problems, I am certain I hear the fat lady singing. It is well past time to tear up the lawn and plant something useful, such as fruit trees and vegetables.

-farmerleaf


Ditto to what WC said.
User avatar
Homesteader
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1856
Joined: Thu 12 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Economic Nomad

Re: Increasing the food supply may be wishful thinking

Unread postby farmerleaf » Sat 07 Jun 2008, 18:32:44

I'll be around, but being a farmer who actually touches the land (we don't own a tractor) and the seed planted therein, my time online is rather limited during the peak growing season. Even using permaculture principles, organic methods, and operating the farm in a holistic manner, we are hard pressed to keep ahead of the changes wrought by climate change.
Living & teaching sustainable, Earth-friendly agricultural practices.
User avatar
farmerleaf
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu 29 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Rockwood, TN

Re: Increasing the food supply may be wishful thinking

Unread postby Ludi » Sat 07 Jun 2008, 18:40:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('farmerleaf', 'w')e are hard pressed to keep ahead of the changes wrought by climate change.


I hope you'll post more about your experience dealing with climate change, the sorts of changes you're experiencing and how they are making more work for you, if you can possibly find the time.

Thanks.
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Increasing the food supply may be wishful thinking

Unread postby farmerleaf » Sun 08 Jun 2008, 16:22:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('farmerleaf', 'w')e are hard pressed to keep ahead of the changes wrought by climate change.


I hope you'll post more about your experience dealing with climate change, the sorts of changes you're experiencing and how they are making more work for you, if you can possibly find the time.

Thanks.


Thank you for your request as I can always find time to talk about real situations happening on our farm. (not real big on slinging rhetoric about)
The most obvious change / challenges for us are the temperature swings and unpredictability of temperature stability.
In March of 2007 we had temperatures in the high eighties the last three weeks of March. So we began to transplant young frost intolerant plants (tomatoes & peppers) from the greenhouse as they were suffering from the excessive heat indoors. We knew it was too early, but even the Oak trees began to leaf out which is usually a sign that frost nights are over. Then we got zapped by the Easter hard freeze of April 7th. More than a frost, it was three nights of 27-28 degrees-much too cold for frost covers to be useful. Everything we set out was killed and all the tree foliage on the farm turned black, including our berries and fruit trees. We permanently lost 95% of our raspberry canes, 50% of our blueberry plants, and temporarily 100% of our fig bushes.
This was followed by what came to be called an exceptional drought. Here in E. Tennessee, we get 31 days per year (average) of days where it is 90 degrees or more. Last year we got 62 days. Our 2007 harvest was barely enough to sustain our own food needs.
This Spring we had what could be considered a normal, gradual Spring as regards temperatures. We planted cool weather crops, which are frost tolerant and will germinate and grow in cooler soil (around 60 degrees). We resisted setting out frost intolerant plants, even after our "official" last frost date of April 15th. That was fortunate as we had a "late" frost on April 28th. The temperature gradually increased until the last week of May when it suddenly spiked in the high eighties a couple of times. On June second, the temperature shot into the nineties where it has been for six days. (this is 13 degrees above "normal.") Our cool weather crop of green peas might be a total wash as a result. Fortunately we didn't plant lettuce, beets, or radishes this Spring or we would have lost those crops as they bolt (go to seed) prematurely.
The high temperatures heat stress not only the farmers here, but the chickens (lay fewer eggs) and bees (get cranky and sting more readily) as well. To offset the heat, we have planted groups of fast growing trees (hackberry, silver maple, and box elder) to create shady micro-climates in and around the chicken yards. They work pretty well and being solar powered plants, convert that intense sun energy and excess CO2 into moist, cool areas. However, the added heat means more water consumed by poultry, which means our collected and stored rainwater system is pushed harder and drawn down faster. When it is not replenished by rain, it creates a water crises (last summer) and we are forced to use (unwillingly) utility provided water.

Other factors negatively affecting us are wind (lots more of it than in the past) and more insects and fewer birds to eat them.
By the way, I am 62, so I do speak with some experience of past seasonal history, albeit short in the big picture time frame.

I hope this response will generate more concrete discussions of local, firsthand climate change effects. We also have a link from the PO Links page under Agriculture (main) Broadened Horizons Organic Farm- where my blogs on industrial farming, micro-climates, and other sustainability issues are discussed.
Living & teaching sustainable, Earth-friendly agricultural practices.
User avatar
farmerleaf
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu 29 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Rockwood, TN
Top

Re: Increasing the food supply may be wishful thinking

Unread postby RedStateGreen » Mon 09 Jun 2008, 23:26:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('farmerleaf', '
')I hope this response will generate more concrete discussions of local, firsthand climate change effects.

You might take a look in the Environment forum, there's been a running description of people's experiences with weather that might be of interest to you.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('efarmer', '&')quot;Taste the sizzling fury of fajita skillet death you marauding zombie goon!"

First thing to ask: Cui bono?
User avatar
RedStateGreen
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1859
Joined: Sun 16 Sep 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Oklahoma, USA
Top

Re: Increasing the food supply may be wishful thinking

Unread postby farmerleaf » Tue 10 Jun 2008, 11:12:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('RedStateGreen', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('farmerleaf', '
')I hope this response will generate more concrete discussions of local, firsthand climate change effects.

You might take a look in the Environment forum, there's been a running description of people's experiences with weather that might be of interest to you.


I visited the suggested site, and found lots of posted stories that were "second-hand" postings, mostly excerpts from news items with comments.
With all due respect, talking about the problem as an intellectual exercise, and being immersed in the problem as a farmer, are two different matters entirely.
I really don't need more prophetic stories or speculations as to when the "big collapse" will occur. I need to deal with keeping the farm a viable, living, functioning, self-sustaining ecosystem for as long as I am able.
Let us stop cursing the darkness and light a candle instead!
Living & teaching sustainable, Earth-friendly agricultural practices.
User avatar
farmerleaf
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu 29 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Rockwood, TN
Top

Re: Increasing the food supply may be wishful thinking

Unread postby RedStateGreen » Tue 10 Jun 2008, 13:30:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('farmerleaf', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('RedStateGreen', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('farmerleaf', '
')I hope this response will generate more concrete discussions of local, firsthand climate change effects.

You might take a look in the Environment forum, there's been a running description of people's experiences with weather that might be of interest to you.


I visited the suggested site, and found lots of posted stories that were "second-hand" postings, mostly excerpts from news items with comments.
With all due respect, talking about the problem as an intellectual exercise, and being immersed in the problem as a farmer, are two different matters entirely.
I really don't need more prophetic stories or speculations as to when the "big collapse" will occur. I need to deal with keeping the farm a viable, living, functioning, self-sustaining ecosystem for as long as I am able.
Let us stop cursing the darkness and light a candle instead!


This sort of thread is what I was referring to: Summer Weather 2008
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('efarmer', '&')quot;Taste the sizzling fury of fajita skillet death you marauding zombie goon!"

First thing to ask: Cui bono?
User avatar
RedStateGreen
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1859
Joined: Sun 16 Sep 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Oklahoma, USA
Top

Re: Food inflation to hit 43% this year - US Sec'y. of Agri.

Unread postby arretium » Sun 22 Jun 2008, 22:31:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('burtonridr', 'D')ude.... HOW? I would bet you could cut it down to $500 a month if really took a good look at what you are buying each month. It took me a few years to get it down to as cheap as we are now.

Basically we buy lots of fruits and veggies $30, 8 of the cheapest steaks we can buy $20, about $30 in canned food, plus what we used the previous month $10, a 5 lb bag of rice $3, 2 whole chickens $10, Yogurt $10, Milk $16, Frozen veggies $10, Frozen Juice $10, 2 bags of tortillas $6, 2 things of salsa $10, 5lb Cheese $10, 10lbs of hamburger $11, Beer $10, 5 dozen eggs $8.

That all adds up to about $200, then there are misc things we usually have to by(condiments, spices, beer, etc) throughout the month. We clip coupons and watch for sales at the first of the month before going shopping, it saves us anywhere from $20 to $50 a month.

We do not waste anything, I eat left overs everyday at work, Anything that goes bad(which is very little) goes into the compost pile.


Sorry, I didn't see your post earlier, or I would have responded. My wife does most of the shopping for food. I see the bills. We probably eat well compared to most. I live in the Pac NW. We buy alot of fish which is always expensive. We eat Salmon (Copper River/Sockeye/King/Local NW varities/no alantic), Halibut, Mussels, Mahi Mahi, some cod). We buy turkey and chicken, no red meat.

I'm a starbuckaholic, so I buy loads of coffee, but I only buy drip and not mochas or lattes. Most of the starbucks is actually on my business, so we don't see those expenses out of our home budget.

We buy loads of fruit, but mainly through costco. I've been into pink lady apples lately. Strawberries are out so we're buying them.

We buy fruits and vegies and other things like that. It adds up.
User avatar
arretium
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 452
Joined: Mon 04 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Seattle, WA
Top

Re: Food inflation to hit 43% this year - US Sec'y. of Agri.

Unread postby strider3700 » Mon 23 Jun 2008, 02:58:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('burtonridr', ' ')5 dozen eggs $8


Where do you live that 5 dozen eggs are $8?

Up here 1 dozen organic free range is $7 and the ultra cheap factory farm cost $3.50/dozen at the store. Hell the guy down the street sells at $3/dozen.

I don't do most of the shopping so I didn't bother looking at the rest of your list but I have been thinking of getting chickens and looked into egg prices to see if it was easy to justify or pure doomer justification. Up here at least it's easy.

Back on topic a week or so ago the canadian numbers came out and had May at 2% food inflation vs april.
shame on us, doomed from the start
god have mercy on our dirty little hearts
strider3700
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2865
Joined: Sun 17 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Vancouver Island
Top

Re: Food inflation to hit 43% this year - US Sec'y. of Agri.

Unread postby patience » Mon 23 Jun 2008, 07:48:06

Egg prices are cyclical, because chickens don't lay as many in winter, when feed prices are typically higher, but egg price drops in spring. We pay $1.29 at Wal MArt, to $1.49 locally now. It was $2.29 last winter. We live in Indiana, where corn, chickens and eggs are produced and processed in massive quantities, so prices will be higher farther from production areas.

Big corporate egg producers hedge feed prices with future contracts, so what we see now is based on what they contracted maybe 6 months ago. With corn futures bouncing around $7 to $8 bushel, the next feed contracts will be higher, so eggs will go up when that hits. Depending on how this crop season goes, we could see some very high food prices next winter.

That includes the prices of beef, pork, and poultry, that will also suffer from high grain prices. Beef and pork will also be impacted by the current high prices of feed that have caused a lot of livestock to be sent to slaughter early, lowering herd numbers on the farm. With corn futures at record levels, farmers will continue to cull herds. At some point, possibly next winter, those depleted herds will cause a reduction in the amount of meat in the stores, and commensurate higher prices. I read somewhere beef could hit $7/lb., I think quoted from a WSJ article. Just a guess. But it will go up, nobody knows how much. I stocked the freezer this summer.
Local fix-it guy..
User avatar
patience
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 3180
Joined: Fri 04 Jan 2008, 04:00:00

Re: Food inflation to hit 43% this year - US Sec'y. of Agri.

Unread postby jdmartin » Mon 23 Jun 2008, 16:22:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('burtonridr', '
')
Dude.... HOW? I would bet you could cut it down to $500 a month if really took a good look at what you are buying each month. It took me a few years to get it down to as cheap as we are now.

Basically we buy lots of fruits and veggies $30, 8 of the cheapest steaks we can buy $20, about $30 in canned food, plus what we used the previous month $10, a 5 lb bag of rice $3, 2 whole chickens $10, Yogurt $10, Milk $16, Frozen veggies $10, Frozen Juice $10, 2 bags of tortillas $6, 2 things of salsa $10, 5lb Cheese $10, 10lbs of hamburger $11, Beer $10, 5 dozen eggs $8.

That all adds up to about $200, then there are misc things we usually have to by(condiments, spices, beer, etc) throughout the month. We clip coupons and watch for sales at the first of the month before going shopping, it saves us anywhere from $20 to $50 a month.

We do not waste anything, I eat left overs everyday at work, Anything that goes bad(which is very little) goes into the compost pile.


We budget every single dollar of our monthly income and get receipts for everything. I see every single receipt.

You are not buying "lots" of fruit and veggies for $30/month. Even on sale, Wallyworld bananas are $.50/pound. If you can find 3 tomatos for $1 you're lucky. And this is all "conventional", not "organic". 8 steaks for $20, if I even believe you could find this, is going to be fit for dog food, hormone & antibiotic loaded gristle at Wallyworld that's on the verge of going bad. Ground beef at Wallyworld is $1.99/lb, for the non-lean stuff, so I'd like to know what dumpster you pull $1/lb ground beef from.

Your post is akin to the guys I know that can drive to a city 100 miles from here in "about an hour". Sure, if you shave 15 minutes off of the trip in each direction you can make it in "about an hour" :roll:

For two of us, plus my dog, we spend about ~650/month on food. This is eating a large percentage of organic foods & free range/hormone free meats & eggs, which add about 50-80% premium depending on what we would buy (interestingly enough, as oil costs have increased this premium has decreased). If we ate "conventional", I estimate our food bill would be about $400.
After fueling up their cars, Twyman says they bowed their heads and asked God for cheaper gas.There was no immediate answer, but he says other motorists joined in and the service station owner didn't run them off.
User avatar
jdmartin
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1272
Joined: Thu 19 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Merry Ol' USA
Top

Re: Food inflation to hit 43% this year - US Sec'y. of Agri.

Unread postby MonteQuest » Mon 23 Jun 2008, 16:49:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('hope_full', 'I')'ve always been puzzled why energy and food are left OUT of the CPI. It's not like we can get by without those two items...


It was one of those little ways to reduce the deficit. The COLA's (cost of living allowances) are tied to the CPI. If the CPI goes up, then the amount of money the Govt has to pay out goes up. Cut out energy and food from the CPI and you save tax dollars.

It's like when they raised the price to enter a NP to $20. That money didn't go to the parks, it went into the general fund and then they cut the NPS budget.

Smoke and mirrors.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'O')ne way to lower entitlements would be to bring the inflation rates down, which would translate into lower Cost of Living Adjustments (COLA). The way to do this was to bring down the rate of inflation. However, this was not done by natural means, but artificially through statistical manipulation. The supply of money and credit began to go parabolic in the 1990s as shown in the graph of M3. The rise in money and credit would mean higher inflation rates. Higher inflation rates would mean higher COLA adjustments, which would lead to bigger deficits.

The solution was to change the way inflation is measured. Media reports began to surface on how CPI was overstated. The real inflation rate was actually much lower according to government and Federal Reserve officials. The Senate Finance Committee appointed the Boskin Commission to study the problem and find a solution. The Boskin Commission published its final report ”Toward a More Accurate Measure of the Cost of Living,“ and submitted its findings to the Senate on December 4, 1996. The Boskin report recommended downward adjustments in the CPI of 1.1%. The CPI, which is used as the basis for COLAs to Social Security and government pensions, if lowered as recommended by the commission, would reduce future entitlement payments as well as impact other government programs. The CBO estimated that by overstating CPI by 1.1% it added $691 billion to the national debt by 2006. By then the annual deficit would rise anywhere from $148 billion to $200 billion annually by overstating the inflation rate. In effect the government was overpaying because the actual inflation rate was much lower.


The Core Rate
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

The Spreading Global Food Crisis Thread pt 2 (merged)

Unread postby wisconsin_cur » Wed 06 Aug 2008, 05:52:52

Previous Thread Found Here
Part One:
World Protein Consumption and the use of grain feeds Ok, that was not the original name of the FAO report but I like my title better.

Why the increased prices of grains over the last few years when, as has been demonstrated on earlier pages, the actual calorie per capita has gone up? We are using that increase to make meat, eggs and milk.

Pork has around a 6:1 conversion ratio (I will assume that the developing nations producing most of this meat are getting the same results as their American counterparts):

Image

Chicken, when producing broilers, has ~2:1 ration

Image

Eggs and milk are a little harder to figure. In 2003 the USDA reported (on average) that 51 pounds of grain were used to produce every 100 eggs and 69 pounds were required to produce 100 pounds (~11.5 gallons) of milk.

Image
Image

So what does all of this mean for grain usage for animal feed?

Image

So while grain production has gone up 1,500 tonnes over the last few decades,
Image
only about 1/2 of this increase is available for human consumption (~600 million tonnes) all of this during a time when population has doubled.

Image

So doing the math quickly and in my head this translates into treading water since the 1960's, no improvement, no loss in respect to grain available per person.

If we are to in anyway "blame" corn based ethanol it really seems to be a secondary problem since so little is used compared to how much the world puts into the production of meat as to make it a small portion of overall usage.

Image

Part Two:
So the question remains, while there were famines in the past, is there anything different about today, in respect to that ability of people to purchase from the pie of food that is available?

Image

The purchasing power of the top 2 Billion has gone up compared to the middle and lower 2 Billion. That increased purchasing power has a number of effects. Among them,

ImageObesity rate in China growing

Conclusion:
I have already been too brief and cursury. I expect and hope for some useful additions and corrections in response, but let me add just a few more thoughts.

1. Most of the concepts that we use for Oil production and consumption apply to food and grain production and consumption. Jeavon's Paradox, for example, goes a long way to explain why the excess grain production has been eaten up by increased meat production and human population expansion. Export Land Model is helpful in thinking about how things will unfold as time goes on.

Image
Field Depletion rates even find a rough correlary in the way that the green revolution has resulted in increased but unsustainable yields as
the impacts of the Green Revolution undermine the soil and water upon which it depends..
Image
How long will the plateau last?

So I'm sure I have over simplified or forgotten something. Have at it!

Moved to Open Discussion = “Post off-topic (non-peak oil) current events news & media here.” –FL
http://www.thenewfederalistpapers.com
User avatar
wisconsin_cur
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4576
Joined: Thu 10 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: 45 degrees North. 883 feet above sealevel.

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron