by Monkeydust » Mon 02 Jun 2008, 20:50:31
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')t's getting a little too late in the game. We needed to do something BIG 30 years ago. The damage will be done. The storm is in the horizon NOW. You can't stop the rain.
I'm not so sure, but let's say for a moment that you're right, and that no technological advances will prevent or even slow the problem. Does it still follow that we'll see an outright Malthusian catastrophe?
I'm not so sure we will. I normally look at my own country, the UK, which is probably not too dissimilar to other urbanized and materially developed Western countries. In our case, we could do a number of things even if technology was static from this point onward, to mitigate the 'die-off' that some people envision.
First off, we could
massively reduce our dependency on oil. We could put a near halt to flights, and forbid all but the most economically-essential car and haulage journeys. We could make much more efficient use of our energy overall, which currently is profusely wasteful. All of this is really painful, but far from impossible under special circumstances, and certainly wouldn't entail a mass die-off.
We could replace much of our fossil fuel-based energy production with renwables, particularly offshore wind, which we have in abundance, but also nuclear and tidal energy. This would hopefully at least keep the lights on.
And in terms of food, even in this densely populated state, we have unused land, land used for non-edible agricultural products (e.g. flowers), land used for 'inefficient' or low-calorie per land space crops, and gardens and urban spaces - all of which could grow food, and even without petrochemical products, as was done for hundreds of years beforehand.
This would require remarkable change and state intiative, but such is possible in a crisis and has been done before. In the two world wars, as I mentioned before, our economic activity and ability to cope under stress was remarkable, and the same could be said for most other countries in these circumstances. All this is also possible without technological breakthroughs, but you should also bear in mind that crises - including the world wars - seem also to be times when we are able to find some of our most remarkable technological solutions.
So very painful? Yes. A massive die-off, I'm not so sure.