Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Energy Recession Thread (merged)

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Re: Will peak oil cause recession or collapse?

Unread postby ProudFossil » Mon 02 Jun 2008, 16:13:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('kpeavey', 'P')roudfossil wrote$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'P')lease give me one example from anthropology of the die off a population.

-Mayan Empire
-Greenland Vikings
-1620-21 Plymouth Colony Pilgrims
-Anasazi Indians
-Ireland, Potato Famine
-St Matthews Island, reindeer population
Granted, they are not human, but humans are animals after all

I honeymooned in the Yucatan area. I road buses with hundreds of Mayans. They did not die off. They are still there.

1620-1621 colony. So losing 100 people is a die off. Then our rural areas having been dying off for the last 100 years even though our population has grown by three fold.

Anasazi Indians. I live in New Mexico. There are thousands of Anasazi still living here, only they live in Pueblos along the Rio
Grande now.

And some of my wife's ancestors came from Ireland. They did not die off, they moved. Yes 1/3 of the population did die, but that was because the land owners, basically the British, were exporting their grain stocks to Europe and not feeding the local population.

And if you want to start on animals, there are lots of die offs, it is a natural process called extinction and has caused the loss of 99% of all species ever existing on this planet.

I still want an example of where a HUMAN population loses a resource and simply sits down to die rather than adapting or moving. THERE is none, at least none on a large scale and most of you doomers are predicting it will be world wide. I might possibly grant the Easter Island disaster but that is the only one I can think of.
User avatar
ProudFossil
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 92
Joined: Mon 26 May 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Will peak oil cause recession or collapse?

Unread postby Nickel » Mon 02 Jun 2008, 16:30:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ProudFossil', 'I') still want an example of where a HUMAN population loses a resource and simply sits down to die rather than adapting or moving. THERE is none, at least none on a large scale and most of you doomers are predicting it will be world wide. I might possibly grant the Easter Island disaster but that is the only one I can think of.


Your examples are all predicated on the idea that a crucial resource, having become scarce or exhausted in one location, prompts a population to move on, presumably to find it elsewhere -- but this begs the question: if, in the 21st century, the population in question is the entire human race, and the exhausted resource is the global supply of oil, to where to you propose people up and move?

You speak of adaptation. I'm curious if you can provide the people here who don't see alternative energy pulling a deus ex machina with examples of a culture that was about to "lay down and die" but for adapting instead, rather than moving or actually dying.
User avatar
Nickel
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1927
Joined: Tue 26 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Canada of America

Re: Will peak oil cause recession or collapse?

Unread postby vision-master » Mon 02 Jun 2008, 16:31:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ProudFossil', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vision-master', 'a')n I believe we are not. Show me some "adapting" evidence that "we" can change.

The first one I noticed this morning is sales of SUV's has dropped 24% during the last year.

So ppl can still continue business are usual. That's not adapting, that's reacting. The happy motor culture continues as normal.

Too little too late. We need to change our entire lives - ain't gonna happen until we are forced.
vision-master
 
Top

Re: Will peak oil cause recession or collapse?

Unread postby Nickel » Mon 02 Jun 2008, 16:38:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ProudFossil', 'I') honeymooned in the Yucatan area. I road buses with hundreds of Mayans. They did not die off. They are still there.

"Die off" is a process of a large population declining sharply when some factor supporting its numbers is removed. You're thinking of extinction, when species "die OUT".

An example of die off in human terms occurred in the Americas between the initial contact with European explorers at the end of the 15th century and the beginning of colonialization in earnest later in the 16th, without the Europeans even being aware of it. Estimates I've seen suggest that diseases from Europe may have reduced the population of the Americas from something like a hundred million down to only ten million within generations. Imagine the human misery and disruption to culture, trade, and the infrastructure of settled areas. Little wonder European settlement was managed relatively easily... most of the people who might have objected were already long gone when it started. Including most of the ancestors of your Mayan survivors.

I think that's the kind of thing they're talking about.
User avatar
Nickel
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1927
Joined: Tue 26 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Canada of America
Top

Re: Will peak oil cause recession or collapse?

Unread postby nobodypanic » Mon 02 Jun 2008, 16:58:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ProudFossil', ' ')I honeymooned in the Yucatan area. I road buses with hundreds of Mayans. They did not die off. They are still there.

where's their original civilization?
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ProudFossil', '1')620-1621 colony. So losing 100 people is a die off.

are you serious? it is if your population was only around 150.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ProudFossil', 'A')nasazi Indians. I live in New Mexico. There are thousands of Anasazi still living here, only they live in Pueblos along the Rio Grande now.

where's their original civilization?
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ProudFossil', 'A')nd some of my wife's ancestors came from Ireland. They did not die off, they moved. Yes 1/3 of the population did die, but that was because the land owners, basically the British, were exporting their grain stocks to Europe and not feeding the local population.

that's what a die off is! it really doesn't matter why the limiting resource became scarce, and btw it was more complicated than you state as there was also a pathogen involved.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ProudFossil', 'A')nd if you want to start on animals, there are lots of die offs, it is a natural process called extinction and has caused the loss of 99% of all species ever existing on this planet.
and human beings are... that's right, say it w/me, an animal.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ProudFossil', 'I') still want an example of where a HUMAN population loses a resource and simply sits down to die rather than adapting or moving. THERE is none, at least none on a large scale and most of you doomers are predicting it will be world wide. I might possibly grant the Easter Island disaster but that is the only one I can think of.
who said people just lie down? i am sure in every case they fought like hell--it just didn't matter in the end.

seriously my friend, your reasoning is highly flawed. taking the descendents of the surviving remnants of populations that collapsed hundreds of years ago as evidence that no die off occurred is beyond silly.
User avatar
nobodypanic
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1103
Joined: Mon 02 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Will peak oil cause recession or collapse?

Unread postby Ferretlover » Mon 02 Jun 2008, 17:26:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ProudFossil', 'I') still want an example of where a HUMAN population loses a resource and simply sits down to die rather than adapting or moving.

I *think* you still don't get it. It is not as simple as losing one resource causing a dieoff. It is all the feedback loops attached to that resource, and that act independently of the resource, that are going to greatly increase, if not ensure, the future scenario of eventual massive dieoff. This site is full of debate and explanations regarding this topic. Please do a bit more reading in the current topic threads and in the archives.
[edited to fix typo.]
Last edited by Ferretlover on Mon 02 Jun 2008, 21:36:22, edited 1 time in total.
"Open the gates of hell!" ~Morgan Freeman's character in the movie, Olympus Has Fallen.
Ferretlover
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 5852
Joined: Wed 13 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Hundreds of miles further inland
Top

Re: Will peak oil cause recession or collapse?

Unread postby malcomatic_51 » Mon 02 Jun 2008, 17:35:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ProudFossil', 'P')lease give me one example from anthropology of the die off a population. The closest I can think of real quickly is the Mayan Empire. It did go through the first three but don't tell the thousands of Mayan Indians in the Yucatan they are dead.

There were about 25 million original inhabitents of the Americas at the time of the Spanish conquest of the Incas. 90% of the population died of diseases like Small Pox brought by the Spanish, against which the Americans had no immunity. In many places, the Europeans advanced into areas deserted by pandemic.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ProudFossil', 'T')he only historically recent case which could be made for the die off of a population would be the Nazi elimination of the Gypsies and Jews. And even though that did follow a depression, I don't think that is in the same context as PO.

Quite to the contrary, the Holocaust is highly relevant to Peak Oil. Although the hardcore of the Nazi party drove it out of racial hatred, the population reduction caused by the murder of Christian Poles, Ukranians and Russians (inter alia) was supported by many economists on the basis of necessity. It was believed that the population had to be reduced to the maximum feeding capacity of the land. This mentality of "demographic economics" will become all too attractive once we enter a world of shortages in which we have only 70% of the food to feed the planet.

Not that I think systematic mass murder will return. It will be more passive than that - an academic rationalisation to justify classifying people as "surplus" and looking the other way as they die of starvation. This already happens of course. The scale of it will magnify, thus the need to rationalise will strengthen.
User avatar
malcomatic_51
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 185
Joined: Sat 24 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: UK
Top

Re: Will peak oil cause recession or collapse?

Unread postby malcomatic_51 » Mon 02 Jun 2008, 17:44:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('NeoPeasant', 'I')'m hoping that we merely decline into a lifestyle that resembles a cross between 30's depression /40's rationing /coldwar eastern Europe. I don't know if I can prepare for much worse than that.

I agree. This is a realistic perspective. Societies do not easily degenerate to Mad Max, and that state of hoodlum mayhem never lasts long. Always there arises an organising authority to assert order, peace of the commons, in order to exploit the commons. The victory of the organised over the disorganised. Humans are game-playing animals. The rulers agree on the game and they stick to the rules in their collective interest. This is such a predictable pattern that it can be taken as "human nature".

I have no expectation that society will "disintigrate" to anarchy. If it happens, it will be localised cases due to extreme events and order will soon return. However, the mood of the society may be very nasty, intolerant. Who wold want to live under the Inquisition? There is always a danger that faith will be used for tyranny. A Carbon Tyranny? You can already observe how far the Safety Tyranny has sunk its grip on our society.
User avatar
malcomatic_51
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 185
Joined: Sat 24 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: UK
Top

Re: Will peak oil cause recession or collapse?

Unread postby dohboi » Mon 02 Jun 2008, 18:22:41

Many nice points, Monkey. I think it is, in fact, overlooked by some how much excess is in the system that could be lost quickly. Car sharing and a quick increase in bus use both for local and intercity use could drop gas use significantly.

On the other hand, we have seen gas prices more than triple in the last eight years, and through much of that period, gas-sucking SUV's were among the most popular vehicles to buy, only dropping off recently as prices approach and pass $4/g.

The main reason PO will lead to a major population reduction (die off, not extinction) on a global level (not necessarily as severe in every location) is that most of the exponential growth in world population in the last century or so has been enabled by increasing efficiencies on the farm, enabled in turn by fossil fuels, particularly:

--mechanization (tractors, trucks to bring produce to market)
--fertilizer (made directly from fossil fuels, or produced with energy from ff)
--pesticides

It may be possible that rapid conversion to latest organic and permaculture methods could help ween agriculture from dependence on pesticides and some fertilizers, but we're still a long way from that for most of the major food crops.

Keep reading. Have you read any Heinberg or Kunstler yet? They are some of the most accessible, even if they aren't considered experts in geology or any of the other speciallized areas relating to this important topic.

Anyway, welcome, and don't write people off as irrationally doomerish too soon--after all some paranoid people really do have people who are out to get them ;-)
User avatar
dohboi
Harmless Drudge
Harmless Drudge
 
Posts: 19990
Joined: Mon 05 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Will peak oil cause recession or collapse?

Unread postby ProudFossil » Mon 02 Jun 2008, 19:06:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ferretlover', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ProudFossil', 'I') still want an example of where a HUMAN population loses a resource and simply sits down to die rather than adapting or moving.

I *think* you still don't get it. It is not as simple as losing one resource causing a dieoff. It is all the feedback loops attached to that resource, and that act independently of the resource, that are going to greatly increase, if not ensure, the future scenario of eventual massive dieoff. This site is full of debate and explanations regarding this topic. Please do a bit more reading in the current topic threads and in the archives.

But all the arguments against my asking the questions is that this involves the entire planet. That leads to the assumption that there is no place to move to. Which leads to simply sitting in one place because your neighbors are also dying off. So I will hold to my basic question, where is the example of a population dying off because of the loss of a single resource. Granted the population may decline and the example of the American Indian is a very good one. The example of the South and Central American is not. There the Spanish were interested in the slave and peonage labor of the local Indians and so they did not decimate the local populations nearly at all like the English (and French) did in North America. It may be possible for the human population to go back to the levels of the 1800's but I still contend that much of the world is already existing at that level and so the die off will not be as drastic as being proposed, ie., up to 85%.

And to NoBodyPanic:
The pathogen which you mentioned in the Irish Famine was on the potato, not the humans. And incidentally the US lost more of its potato crop from that same pathogen than the Irish. The only difference is we used our other grains to feed the population, the British did not.

And if 125 people leaving a colony is classified as a die off than we have a die off going on every day in New York City, Los Angelos, Chicago, etc., etc. I classify a die off (at least from the term itself) as the complete depopulation of an area. That did happen in Ireland in the famine and in fact there are parts of it which have not had anybody return to it. That also has happened in New Mexico. We have several communities with less population now than in 1880. Are those die offs? The whole world is full of chost towns. Are those die offs?

And my understanding of a die off has nothing to do with the decline or loss of a civilization. The Mayans still speak the language, practise the same religion, and have much of the same culture as those in the 1400's. The government of that time is gone. If the loss of a civilization iis based upon the loss of a government then I would suppose all the monarchies of Europe and Asia were subjected to die-offs.

Did we have a die off because we went from a colonial system under a monarchy to a republic?

Before you start chastising somebody please define the terms you are basing your discussion on. I am still asking for a definition of the term die-off. I have seen at least five different ones so far in these forums.
User avatar
ProudFossil
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 92
Joined: Mon 26 May 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Will peak oil cause recession or collapse?

Unread postby threadbear » Mon 02 Jun 2008, 19:19:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ProudFossil', 'I') honeymooned in the Yucatan area. I road buses with hundreds of Mayans. They did not die off. They are still there.

That is one unique bus riding culture. I wonder if they ever get off for bathroom breaks! [smilie=pottytrain5.gif]
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Will peak oil cause recession or collapse?

Unread postby ProudFossil » Mon 02 Jun 2008, 19:22:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ProudFossil', '
')I honeymooned in the Yucatan area. I road buses with hundreds of Mayans. They did not die off. They are still there.
.


That is one unique bus riding culture. I wonder if they ever get off for bathroom breaks! [smilie=pottytrain5.gif]


Yes, at the police checkpoints between states. And there was actually five different buses with no chickens, but one did have a cross-eyed driver.
User avatar
ProudFossil
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 92
Joined: Mon 26 May 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Will peak oil cause recession or collapse?

Unread postby Pops » Mon 02 Jun 2008, 19:23:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ProudFossil', 'S')o I will hold to my basic question, where is the example of a population dying off because of the loss of a single resource.


It isn't a single resource Friend, it it a critical, basic resource.

I guess I'd ask what you think is the most basic resource is for your survival in your current lifestyle?

Pepsi, popcorn, cable TV?

No wait, those all depend on oil.

So?
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac
Top

Re: Will peak oil cause recession or collapse?

Unread postby Homesteader » Mon 02 Jun 2008, 19:32:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Nickel', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ProudFossil', 'I') honeymooned in the Yucatan area. I road buses with hundreds of Mayans. They did not die off. They are still there.

"Die off" is a process of a large population declining sharply when some factor supporting its numbers is removed. You're thinking of extinction, when species "die OUT".

An example of die off in human terms occurred in the Americas between the initial contact with European explorers at the end of the 15th century and the beginning of colonialization in earnest later in the 16th, without the Europeans even being aware of it. Estimates I've seen suggest that diseases from Europe may have reduced the population of the Americas from something like a hundred million down to only ten million within generations. Imagine the human misery and disruption to culture, trade, and the infrastructure of settled areas. Little wonder European settlement was managed relatively easily... most of the people who might have objected were already long gone when it started. Including most of the ancestors of your Mayan survivors.

I think that's the kind of thing they're talking about.


ProudFossil,

Read Nikels post again, carefully. As several have pointed out die-off does not equal extinction.

You riding on a bus with Mayans on your honeymoon while lending a personal touch to the debate in no way proves that the Mayan population did not suffer die-off when their civilization collapsed.
On the contrary, you will need to prove that their population didn't decline.
User avatar
Homesteader
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1856
Joined: Thu 12 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Economic Nomad
Top

Re: Will peak oil cause recession or collapse?

Unread postby Monkeydust » Mon 02 Jun 2008, 19:37:35

Some great responses here, and again it's good to see that there's a good number of people - even among the 'doomers' here - who are fairly open-minded on this topic.

I've got a lot more research to do, but I still remain fairly optimistic. If petrochemicals were cut off tomorrow, we'd have an agricultural crisis on our hands without parallel. But this isn't going to happen. We will have time to cultivate more land, diversify our crops, grow our own in our gardens via 'permaculture', and make use of urban space for growing crops - in ways that aren't really thought about at the moment.

My own view is that this change - or decline, if you prefer - is going to be a long-term phenomenon. Rather than a 'die-off', we may see cultural views regarding having children change as we realize the limits to growth. Where having a large family used to be considered the 'proper' thing for couples, we may see the reverse happen, and foregoing raising children might become 'the norm' as the economy changes dramatically. Such a state of affairs might make a die-off, at least on the 90% scale people here envision, fail to materialize.

Instead we might see a slow contraction of population - unfortunately coupled with 'die-offs' in the more vulnerable parts of the world - along with changes to our way of life, technological adaptations (if not solutions), and wide-ranging changes in culture and lifestyle.

One thing I am sure of, and that is that we are not heading back to the stone age. The collective knowledge, expertise, and technology we have amassed - not to mention the amount of products and machines we have already built - makes this kind of dramatic regression an impossibility. Instead, we might see some kind of quite different, more localized way of life. It might not necessarily be all bad in the long-run. My view of the coming decades is that we're going to see huge upheaval and change, and considerable economic contraction, but not necessarily widespread death and famine. Whether or not this is a catastrophe depends on how attached to modern life you are.
User avatar
Monkeydust
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon 02 Jun 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Will peak oil cause recession or collapse?

Unread postby Pops » Mon 02 Jun 2008, 19:48:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Monkeydust', 'I')'ve got a lot more research to do, but I still remain fairly optimistic. If petrochemicals were cut off tomorrow, we'd have an agricultural crisis on our hands without parallel. But this isn't going to happen.

No they won't.

But Ag is a business and like any other business enough red ink makes it tank.

http://www.peakoil.com/fortopic39608.html
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac
Top

Re: Will peak oil cause recession or collapse?

Unread postby roccman » Mon 02 Jun 2008, 19:50:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Monkeydust', 'S')ome great responses here, and again it's good to see that there's a good number of people - even among the 'doomers' here - who are fairly open-minded on this topic.

I've got a lot more research to do, but I still remain fairly optimistic.


Well - I think we are screwed big time.

I think we are well into overshoot and there is little (if anything) that will reverse the course we are on.

We should have started 250 years ago with the "mitigation".

No - Peak Oil WILL BE DEFINED by a complete and utter global economic meltdown.

It will just be this way.

Read this...then come back and refute what Perry Arnet wrote over 2 years ago.

Here is just a teaser...

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'O')ne can have his “time-to-collapse” interval however he wants it! That is:

An annual depletion rate of 2% allows roughly 50 years for all of a resource to deplete, (and for one to get one’s mind around the concept of the import of that event.) An annual depletion rate of 3% gives one 33 years.

4% gives one 25 years.

5% gives one 20 years.

6% gives one 16 years.

7% gives one 14 years.

8% gives one 12 years.

9% gives one 11 years.

10 % gives one 10 years.

11% gives one 9 years.

12% gives one 8 years.

13% gives one 7.6 years.

14% gives one 7 years; and,

An annual resource depletion rate of 15% gives one just ~6.6 years until the energy resource is, for all practical purposes, GONE! We must remember that we are talking here about the continuance or the cessation of this fossil-fueled Industrial Civilization — NOT patching joints on sailing boats on the shores of the Black Sea.

We should also remember, that as more liquid fossil fuels are depleted, the depletion rate per annum will continue to INCREASE to 50% and higher in the final years, until the resource is ultimately (for all practical considerations) 100% depleted, thus ANY time period one chooses will be drastically shortened as it approaches its own end.

Pick a number! YOU pick the period of time that you would like to give yourself for accepting reality, and realizing the inevitability of the event. One can pick a false low depletion rate and attempt to fool oneself into denying the inevitability, or one can pick a depletion rate that is at or near the ACTUAL, EFFECTIVE depletion rate, and accept the consequences. We all have that choice.


Cheers !!
"There must be a bogeyman; there always is, and it cannot be something as esoteric as "resource depletion." You can't go to war with that." Emersonbiggins
User avatar
roccman
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4065
Joined: Fri 27 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Great Sonoran Desert
Top

Re: Will peak oil cause recession or collapse?

Unread postby Ludi » Mon 02 Jun 2008, 19:55:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Monkeydust', ' ')My view of the coming decades is that we're going to see huge upheaval and change, and considerable economic contraction, but not necessarily widespread death and famine. Whether or not this is a catastrophe depends on how attached to modern life you are.


Looking forward to your posts in the Planning forum about how you are making the transition to a different way of life. :)
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Will peak oil cause recession or collapse?

Unread postby vision-master » Mon 02 Jun 2008, 20:05:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('roccman', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Monkeydust', 'S')ome great responses here, and again it's good to see that there's a good number of people - even among the 'doomers' here - who are fairly open-minded on this topic.

I've got a lot more research to do, but I still remain fairly optimistic.


Well - I think we are screwed big time.

I think we are well into overshoot and there is little (if anything) that will reverse the course we are on.

We should have started 250 years ago with the "mitigation".

No - Peak Oil WILL BE DEFINED by a complete and utter global economic meltdown.

It will just be this way.

Read this...then come back and refute what Perry Arnet wrote over 2 years ago.

Here is just a teaser...

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'O')ne can have his “time-to-collapse” interval however he wants it! That is:

An annual depletion rate of 2% allows roughly 50 years for all of a resource to deplete, (and for one to get one’s mind around the concept of the import of that event.) An annual depletion rate of 3% gives one 33 years.

4% gives one 25 years.

5% gives one 20 years.

6% gives one 16 years.

7% gives one 14 years.

8% gives one 12 years.

9% gives one 11 years.

10 % gives one 10 years.

11% gives one 9 years.

12% gives one 8 years.

13% gives one 7.6 years.

14% gives one 7 years; and,

An annual resource depletion rate of 15% gives one just ~6.6 years until the energy resource is, for all practical purposes, GONE! We must remember that we are talking here about the continuance or the cessation of this fossil-fueled Industrial Civilization — NOT patching joints on sailing boats on the shores of the Black Sea.

We should also remember, that as more liquid fossil fuels are depleted, the depletion rate per annum will continue to INCREASE to 50% and higher in the final years, until the resource is ultimately (for all practical considerations) 100% depleted, thus ANY time period one chooses will be drastically shortened as it approaches its own end.

Pick a number! YOU pick the period of time that you would like to give yourself for accepting reality, and realizing the inevitability of the event. One can pick a false low depletion rate and attempt to fool oneself into denying the inevitability, or one can pick a depletion rate that is at or near the ACTUAL, EFFECTIVE depletion rate, and accept the consequences. We all have that choice.


Cheers !!


But we only need 85,000,000 bbl day............. :razz:

an 25% of tath is for the good ol USA.



---------------------------------------------------------------------------
like a swirl down the drain
vision-master
 
Top

Re: Will peak oil cause recession or collapse?

Unread postby Ludi » Mon 02 Jun 2008, 20:19:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ProudFossil', ' ')I am still asking for a definition of the term die-off. I have seen at least five different ones so far in these forums.


die off
To undergo a sudden, sharp decline in population:

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/die+off



Main Entry:
die–off
Pronunciation:
\ˈdī-ˌȯf\
Function:
noun
Date:
1936
: a sudden sharp decline of a population of animals or plants that is not caused directly by human activity


http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/die-off


die-off
• n. a period in which a significant proportion of a population dies naturally, usually within a short time.
∎ a process causing this. ∎ [mass noun] the death of a significant proportion of a population in this way.

http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O999-dieoff.html
Ludi
 
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 47 guests