Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Men and women and disagreements about peak oil

Discussions related to the physiological and psychological effects of peak oil on our members and future generations.

Men and women and disagreements about peak oil

Unread postby hope_full » Fri 30 May 2008, 11:21:57

I've noticed that this board appears to be populated by more men than women and that's a puzzle to me. I'm a smart woman who's married to a very smart man and today he told me, "I don't know why you're obsessed over this peak oil thing and recession and the real estate market. I wish you'd stop talking about all this. It just depresses me."

I've made a POINT of NOT talking about it for days at a time but sometimes, I'd like to help him understand what's on the horizon. He's a hyper-intelligent fellow but has a high stress job and he says that when he comes home, he just wants "peace and calm."

So, I've decided to make some quiet, easy-to-do preparations on my own and buy gold on my own and save some money on my own (and he's fine with all that) but it's very frustrating to be with someone who is so very smart and so very educated and so very decent, yet denies that America is (or will be) in recession.

Last night, he made a point of showing me the news report that showed growth for the first quarter of 2008, adding, "See, you were wrong about predicting a recession. The economy is doing great!"

SO I have two points/questions. One, why does it seem to be that men are more interested in this topic than women (generally), and two, what can I do with a GOOD, decent, honest, caring man who refuses to talk about this subject? He grew up in very modest means and put himself through college and post-grad school and I think he just can't bear to think/talk/ponder a contracting American economy. And I wonder if age matters? He's now almost 60 years old.

HF
User avatar
hope_full
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 357
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Men and women and disagreements about peak oil

Unread postby DomusAlbion » Fri 30 May 2008, 11:51:33

Hope_full,

There are several good threads in the psychology forum that might help you. My advice would be to let it go; let him have the peace he craves. However, continue to educate yourself and prepare as best you can. Walk the walk and he'll notice the difference and then he'll come around. Besides you don't need to convince him. If the consequences of the PO theory are correct then reality will get his attention, then you'll be there with your preps.

DA
"Modern Agriculture is the use of land to convert petroleum into food."
-- Albert Bartlett

"It will be a dark time. But for those who survive, I suspect it will be rather exciting."
-- James Lovelock
User avatar
DomusAlbion
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1979
Joined: Wed 08 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Beyond the Pale

Re: Men and women and disagreements about peak oil

Unread postby Ferretlover » Fri 30 May 2008, 11:56:01

Hope_full, I could have written that post..oh, wait... I HAVE written that post! :)
He'll come around, but gosh darn it, it will be Very slow. Just keep mentioning a few low-key comments here and there. My DH is not there yet, but he is beginning to see the same horizon as I do.
"Open the gates of hell!" ~Morgan Freeman's character in the movie, Olympus Has Fallen.
Ferretlover
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 5852
Joined: Wed 13 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Hundreds of miles further inland

Re: Men and women and disagreements about peak oil

Unread postby Lumpy » Fri 30 May 2008, 12:17:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('DomusAlbion', 'H')ope_full,

There are several good threads in the psychology forum that might help you. My advice would be to let it go; let him have the peace he craves. However, continue to educate yourself and prepare as best you can. Walk the walk and he'll notice the difference and then he'll come around. Besides you don't need to convince him. If the consequences of the PO theory are correct then reality will get his attention, then you'll be there with your preps.

DA


Hope - Yes, there are many good threads, and yes, I agree with DomusAlbion that your self-education and beginning to prepare (even if that just means starting a list of everything you need to learn, stock up on, etc -- info available on other threads here -- use the "Google po.com" link in the left column here under "NEWS" heading) are the best things you can do.

I would disagree with his categorical statement that "he'll come around." I base this on the fact that there are a number of threads here where people talk about their marriages/relationships ending over peak oil concerns, preparations, etc.

Being in a situation where one HAS to hold one's tongue entirely about ANYTHING one perceives to be a problem or real threat (as most of us here think of peak oil's impact) can be devastating to a marriage.

You will find that the cyber-acquaintances you make here on peak oil will be helpful listeners -- and suggestion providers. That may help will relieve some of the pressure and frustration you experience.

I hope for both your sakes that your husband does come around.

Good luck to you -- and we will be here with and for you.

Lumpy
"A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have." Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
Lumpy
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 377
Joined: Fri 16 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Rural Western Idaho

Re: Men and women and disagreements about peak oil

Unread postby Cashmere » Fri 30 May 2008, 12:25:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')e's a hyper-intelligent fellow


Obviously not.

I suppose everyone has their own definition of intelligent.

I suppose I include as a must-have on the list of things that an intelligent person must have is the ability to see a train coming when he's laying on the tracks, eyes wide open, looking in the direction the train is coming.

I think too many people confuse the ability to memorize and spit back with the ability to reason.

It's nice that someone has a massive vocabulary.

But if they're 60 and they still think the newspaper is reporting the real news, then they're not really that smart.

I really feel bad for you.

It appears that you man has a bunch of good characteristics but is lacking the most critical one.

Fortunately, he may get it.

Most people on this board are sensitive, give-em time types.

I'm not.

Life's way too short, and it's about to get shorter.

I'd ultimatum his dumb ass.

"You're either going to get serious about this or I'm going to have to move on."

Why the ratio of men to women?

Because women are biologically less inclined to want to believe such things. Most women I know are the, "oh it'll work out" types. My wife is, but with my opinion thrown in, she's 100% on board with preps and such.

Guys are more hard wired to look for problems.

I think culturally and biologically women are more programmed to accept the status quo, fit in, find a support system and stick to it.

Men are more likely to say - f - - - it --- and move on their own.

Like I said - I feel bad for you.

Finally, I have to throw this out there, and I acknowledge it's harsh.

The guy is 60. That's old. He's got a life expectancy of 15 years.

His kids should be grown and out of the house.

In short, the man has very little left on the table to lose.

If I was 60 with no kids, I probably not even stock up on food.

What would be the point?

To squeeze an extra few years out of an already long life.

How old are you?

If the answer is 40 and you still want to have kids . . .


You're with the wrong guy.
Massive Human Dieoff <b>must</b> occur as a result of Peak Oil. Many more than half will die. It will occur everywhere, including where <b>you</b> live. If you fail to recognize this, then your odds of living move toward the "going to die" group.
User avatar
Cashmere
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1882
Joined: Thu 27 Mar 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Men and women and disagreements about peak oil

Unread postby Aaron » Fri 30 May 2008, 12:37:32

Image

Peak Oil IQ Test.
The problem is, of course, that not only is economics bankrupt, but it has always been nothing more than politics in disguise... economics is a form of brain damage.

Hazel Henderson
User avatar
Aaron
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 5998
Joined: Thu 15 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Houston

Re: Men and women and disagreements about peak oil

Unread postby AlwaysThere » Fri 30 May 2008, 12:48:34

Planning for the "Big One" as people like Matt Savinar like to propogate is fruitless and in the end it will get a person nowhere as hoarding food as opposed to sharing with your neighbors will get you nowhere. That entire mindset is going to be our biggest hurdle to overcome - There is very little natural affection between people anymore.

Living conservatively is what we (as a collective nation), should do anyway. Yes Walmart and Macdonalds will suffer, but the only way we are going to reposition our society (If it is even possible) is to take our lumps and start investing in our future as opposed to our immediate gratifcation.

I am 40 and my wife is 30 - She fully accepts that change is coming . Maybe if you frame the discussion around making conserative changes as opposed to "peak oil" and economic collapse it will be better recieved.

I don't even talk about PO anymore - It sounds to culty and besides rising prices speak for themselves.
User avatar
AlwaysThere
 
Joined: Mon 05 May 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Men and women and disagreements about peak oil

Unread postby aflurry » Fri 30 May 2008, 13:12:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cashmere', 'B')ecause women are biologically less inclined to want to believe such things. Most women I know are the, "oh it'll work out" types. My wife is, but with my opinion thrown in, she's 100% on board with preps and such. ...
You're with the wrong guy.

So much for armchair relationship counseling. Sheesh.

Dude, do you do stand up comedy? "Women be like wa wa wa wa... Men be like duh duh duh duh duh... Am i right? Am i right?"
User avatar
aflurry
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 824
Joined: Mon 28 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Men and women and disagreements about peak oil

Unread postby AlwaysThere » Fri 30 May 2008, 13:33:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('aflurry', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cashmere', 'B')ecause women are biologically less inclined to want to believe such things. Most women I know are the, "oh it'll work out" types. My wife is, but with my opinion thrown in, she's 100% on board with preps and such. ...
You're with the wrong guy.

So much for armchair relationship counseling. Sheesh.
Dude, do you do stand up comedy? "Women be like wa wa wa wa... Men be like duh duh duh duh duh... Am i right? Am i right?"

Did you notice the sentence structure and writing style? Short clipped emotional statements with very little factual content. Probably not a person to be taken seriously in a matter such as this.
User avatar
AlwaysThere
 
Joined: Mon 05 May 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Men and women and disagreements about peak oil

Unread postby dunewalker » Fri 30 May 2008, 13:34:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AlwaysThere', 'L')iving conservatively is what we (as a collective nation), should do anyway. Yes Walmart and Macdonalds will suffer, but the only way we are going to reposition our society (If it is even possible) is to take our lumps and start investing in our future as opposed to our immediate gratification.

Would you please expand upon this paragraph? Thanks
"Wilderness is another civilization apart from our own." - H.D. Thoreau
User avatar
dunewalker
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1253
Joined: Thu 30 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: northern California
Top

Re: Men and women and disagreements about peak oil

Unread postby Cashmere » Fri 30 May 2008, 13:53:15

Huh?

Armchair what?

That's my take on it.

What's your take? Hmm? Why is the male/female ratio at PO.com about 3 or more to 1.

But also, answer this . . .

Are women, on average, more emotional than men, on average?

Because if you don't get that, then the only difference in your mind between men and women is what exactly? Tits and balls?
Massive Human Dieoff <b>must</b> occur as a result of Peak Oil. Many more than half will die. It will occur everywhere, including where <b>you</b> live. If you fail to recognize this, then your odds of living move toward the "going to die" group.
User avatar
Cashmere
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1882
Joined: Thu 27 Mar 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Men and women and disagreements about peak oil

Unread postby AlwaysThere » Fri 30 May 2008, 14:14:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dunewalker', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AlwaysThere', 'L')iving conservatively is what we (as a collective nation), should do anyway. Yes Walmart and Macdonalds will suffer, but the only way we are going to reposition our society (If it is even possible) is to take our lumps and start investing in our future as opposed to our immediate gratification.

Would you please expand upon this paragraph? Thanks

Our society is consumed with consumerism. If we were to begin to invest in locally based economies in which at least some of our basic necessities of life are provided by local people we would be a lot better off in the long run. I live in a place surrounded by farmland in a city of 300k. Most of that farmland is being used to grow and export grass seed. If some of that land were dedicated to growing food it would create jobs locally keep some of the commerce in our local region, as opposed to sending it to ADM or some other fortune 25 comglomerate.

We could also promote local mass transit, in car pools, bike pools etc. There are many things we can do that would involve a difficult transitionary period, but would help. Our community is beggining to explore smaller Power Generation grids as well that burn biofuels.

These are all things that would take money away from our retail based economy, but would benefit us in the long run.
User avatar
AlwaysThere
 
Joined: Mon 05 May 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Men and women and disagreements about peak oil

Unread postby charliebrownout » Fri 30 May 2008, 14:39:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('hope_full', 'I')'ve noticed that this board appears to be populated by more men than women and that's a puzzle to me. I'm a smart woman who's married to a very smart man and today he told me, "I don't know why you're obsessed over this peak oil thing and recession and the real estate market. I wish you'd stop talking about all this. It just depresses me."
HF

I'm a female in my late twenties. My husband is in his mid-thirties.

I have to say, my husband says the EXACT same thing. He thinks I'm obsessed. He doesn't really want to talk about it. He finds the subject depressing.

As an added frustration factor, we have three kids. We love them to pieces, but they're young enough that economically it makes sense to stay home with them. (In other words: if I went to work, most of my "extra income" or 3/4 of it would go to childcare related costs--no gain and we all know what childcare is like in America :( )

So, we're scraping along on one income. I've exhausted my savings. Thanks to unexpected healthcare costs and layoffs here-and-there over the last two years.

We are, essentially, sitting ducks. The economy tanks and we're history. We're both only children of really obnoxious baby-boomer generation parents who haven't learned to think beyond the ends of their noses. Odds are, they'll come tracking us down to save them when we can't even save ourselves.

So, you'd think TALKING about this stuff would be a good idea and PRONTO...wouldn't you? To make whatever band-aid plans we can?

Nope. It's depressing, probably not even a real threat, not worth talking about.

I don't think this is a male or female problem. I think this is a denial of current events problem. Although, I will say, my gender and child-rearing status ain't a bonus at the moment.
User avatar
charliebrownout
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 290
Joined: Thu 17 Apr 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Men and women and disagreements about peak oil

Unread postby FoolYap » Fri 30 May 2008, 14:50:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('hope_full', 'S')O I have two points/questions. One, why does it seem to be that men are more interested in this topic than women (generally)

Speaking 1) as a guy and 2) from many observations of how couples divide the household responsibilities, it may be that men are more traditionally expected to be the "strategic thinkers" for the household? (I have plenty of counter-examples, so I'm not claiming this is the way it is for most households, but it's probably at least a large minority of them.)

Indeed, my ex-wife and I settled quickly into a division that I would call strategic versus tactical w/r/t money matters. She was "tactics": watching for sales, managing & balancing the checkbook, etc. I was "strategy": figuring out how much we needed to be saving and investing, trying to carve that amount out of the budget, etc.

While my ex-wife was great at saving $5 off a grocery bill with coupons and sales, she really just did not want to be bothered with a longer-term view of money matters. Indeed, she downright did not want to contemplate any opinions or even facts that she interpreted as "pessimistic". Such as, for example, Peak Oil.

I believe this was partly due to the fact that she, while earning a paycheck, was far from the primary wage-earner. She evidenced some "magical thinking" about money; it always seemed to appear every two weeks, so it always would. :lol:

I don't claim that's the reason why women are not represented equally here. But it probably is a reason. Peak Oil is one of those long-term things, and it's also one that -- unless/until you learn enough about it to understand how huge the effects will be -- many probably think of as some sort of abstract issue for "techies" to deal with. Unlike Climate Change, which has mascots like cute polar bear cubs to get people at least claiming to care about it. :razz:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('hope_full', 't')wo, what can I do with a GOOD, decent, honest, caring man who refuses to talk about this subject? He grew up in very modest means and put himself through college and post-grad school and I think he just can't bear to think/talk/ponder a contracting American economy. And I wonder if age matters? He's now almost 60 years old.
HF

Age may be a factor. He's nearly of my parents' age, and my father is a dyed-in-the-wool technophile. He's a retired engineer, quite bright, and certain that things like Peak Oil are merely technical problems that enough thought and money will solve. He reads a lot on the issue, surprisingly to me, but is quite certain it's ultimately a non-issue. I attribute some of this to his education, and some of it to the kind of technological changes that he has observed firsthand in his lifetime. He has firmly and probably permanently swallowed the "Progress" hook of post-WWII American culture.

I don't think there is anything you can do to change your DH's mind by way of conversation, or perhaps in any way at all. As others have, I recommend that you concentrate on making the kind of changes that you have, with his knowledge and approval.

I walk a somewhat fine line myself at home, with my now wife. I cannot talk about my worries for the worst scenarios of post-Peak-Oil, because she immediately subjectifies it in terms of what it might mean for our four-year-old daughter. It frightens her too much, I think, to think of mass starvation in the world.

OTOH, she is absolutely on board with making changes that save us money, or that reduce our footprint (especially carbon), or that I enjoy as hobbies. Hence: Line-drying laundry is okay with her. So is gardening. And learning to can food. And getting a flock of chickens. And stocking up on dry goods. And buying hand-powered appliances like a grain mill. Etc. Etc.

She sees goodness in these changes that are entirely unrelated to Peak Oil. And I can talk of Peak Oil in terms of rising energy costs, and the knock-on effects of that on food & everything shipped around, and the bad climate effects of emitting much more CO2 to get oil substitutes like from tar sands.

But Peak Oil just isn't her "thing". She doesn't read about it (except the odd article I'll forward to her), or probably think about directly. And I respect that. It's working pretty well for us, so far. And I like to think that if things truly do begin to get dire, she will not try to deny it.

I hope you can also find a kind of compromise like that, which works for the both of you.

--Steve
User avatar
FoolYap
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 472
Joined: Sun 04 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: central MA, USA
Top

Re: Men and women and disagreements about peak oil

Unread postby RedStateGreen » Fri 30 May 2008, 15:09:47

I'm in the same boat as you, hope_full. I'm 45, my husband is almost 50. Just do what you can do.

Fortunately, we have a decent amount of cash and he doesn't mind me spending it (I used to never spend money, to a fault, so he sees my new 'hobbies' as a good thing. :lol: ). I'm having fun with my preps, which he sees as a plus also.

Keep things pleasant and he should come around.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('efarmer', '&')quot;Taste the sizzling fury of fajita skillet death you marauding zombie goon!"

First thing to ask: Cui bono?
User avatar
RedStateGreen
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1859
Joined: Sun 16 Sep 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Oklahoma, USA
Top

Re: Men and women and disagreements about peak oil

Unread postby BigTex » Fri 30 May 2008, 15:11:53

Think about how YOU came to peak oil. Think about if someone else had tried to push you to it. Would you have resisted? It's something you should ask yourself.

This is a BIG deal, and people really need to come to their own understanding of it. With that said, I find that my wife is coming around more and more to see what I see, but it has been a gradual process.

If you love your partner, respect their view of the world and the future. When it comes to the future, no one knows for sure what will happen. Just make your case in a clear and respectful way and don't go doomer on them. Doomer rants are a turnoff to others, no matter how much fun they are for you (unless you happen to be talking to another doomer, in which case it's great fun for both of you).

***

I have a theory about a person's predisposition to believe in doom scenarios, and it has to do with the years of a person's life between ages 5 and 10, along with the age of the parents.

My theory is that the economic climate during the time period between ages 5 and 10 will have about a 66% determinant effect on one's predisposition to believe in doom as an adult, and the remaining 33% is determined by the economic climate during the parents' childhood.

For me, the doom stars are in almost perfect alignment.

I was age 5-10 in 1975-1980, a truly depressing and doomalicious period.

My parents' childhood was the mid to late 1930s for my mother and the late 1930s to early 1940s for my dad, so they each had been exposed to lots of doomishness as kids as well.

Thus, I grew up with my parents passing along their experiences and perspectives while I was developing my own in similarly bleak economic conditions.

Thus, as an adult I am like a quickdraw doomer, and any prosperity kind of annoys me, because every bit of economic growth feels like a hole being dug deeper. I can't help being this way, it's just how I see things. The lucky (or maybe unlucky) thing is that I happen to be alive when this doomer sensibility is ver important to have, because I think that we are looking at a future that will be very challenging, and the people whose childhoods were after about 1985 and whose parents' childhoods were after about 1946 are going to have a LOT of cognitive dissonance to overcome.

***

Back to the OP, and considering my theory, the member's husband is 60 years old, which means he was age 5-10 in 1953-1958, some of the most prosperous times in our history. I'm not surprised he is resistant to doom scenarios. It wouldn't surprise me either if his parents were ages 5-10 in the 1920s, in which case he would have a double dip of rose colored thinking to overcome.

I think that a double dip of deluxe doom thinking will serve one well in coming years.

Try this theory out on people. If they seem to "get" the peak oil thing right off the bat, find out the years in which they were ages 5-10.
:)
User avatar
BigTex
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3858
Joined: Thu 03 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Graceland

Re: Men and women and disagreements about peak oil

Unread postby taizy8 » Fri 30 May 2008, 15:33:21

I am a woman in my 40's ........my husband doesn't want to think about "peak oil" type things (he's 10 yrs older).....We are both from Ireland and visiting the USA for a year, he is still in an "enamoured" stage. I lived here before in the early 90's and sensed that something wasn't right even then...... and finding the pressure and lifestyle too "at odds"... I moved back to Ireland only for it to follow.

We did see a PBS (BBC) news programme recently which helped bring some of my points across. For now I will get as prepared as I can do in terms of knowledge, books, small transportable stuff...(.thanks everyone for all the great info on the site). We are both cycling more, giving up the booze and eating better. I am sorting out my affairs etc... I have savings and small investments in Euros, have no debts, no property...

If there are more men than women aware of peak oil, I think it depends on what your occupation is, how busy you are. I have no kids so I am not preoccupied in day to day management like many women are.

I don't think anywhere is quite safe if there is a major crisis. Ireland is too close to the huge population of Britain. The US has too many big cities and too many guns. I haven't even breached these scenerios with my husband...the only person I could talk to is my dad who is 86 and KNOWS that the world is ending....
T8....

Big Tex wrote:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')ry this theory out on people. If they seem to "get" the peak oil thing right off the bat, find out the years in which they were ages 5-10.

that's funny Big tex.....I had just written this post and then noticed your one.....My Dad was born in 1922 in Ireland and lived through very tough times ....Ireland in the 20's, was just getting over a civil war...my mother born in 1929 had a middle class more privileged existence until WW2(called The Emergency in Ireland)

My husband was born in the 50's and his family lived very well until his father died when he was 9 and they were sunk to poverty.

Me...I was middle class, but from a large family frugally brought up...always a conflict between my Dad wanting to save money and my mother wanting more comfort, though neither are/ were spendthrifts.

I am more inclined to "doomed" scenarios
User avatar
taizy8
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 36
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Ireland
Top

Re: Men and women and disagreements about peak oil

Unread postby AlwaysThere » Fri 30 May 2008, 16:06:35

I guess I have a question: Do we live in a happy society ? 40% of the adult population is consuming and/or addicted to some form of drug, that does not seem to happy to me. A good old fashion depression will be good for the people in this country.
User avatar
AlwaysThere
 
Joined: Mon 05 May 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Men and women and disagreements about peak oil

Unread postby MattSavinar » Fri 30 May 2008, 16:10:25

I've found a disproportionate number of lesbians to be interested in PO and the collapse of society. My thinking is if you're a lesbian, you're already in a head-space fare beyond what is considered acceptable to the greater culture, even more so than gay dudes. So coming to understand an issue like PO - which automatically places in you in a headspace at odds with the greater culture - is an easier pill for them to swallow.

We have a 4-to-1 ration of men to women at LATOC, at least according to what people identify as in there profiles. A lot of women don't put their gender though, so I suspect it is more like 3 or 3.5 to 1. It used to be 5.5 to 1. Then I appointed a lot of female mods and more ladies started showing up.

The net in general is about 70% guys and PO is mostly talked about on the net so right there you can expect more men than women just because the primary medium in which it is being discussed is populated by mostly men.
User avatar
MattSavinar
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 1918
Joined: Sun 09 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Men and women and disagreements about peak oil

Unread postby Ludi » Fri 30 May 2008, 16:28:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AlwaysThere', 'I') guess I have a question: Do we live in a happy society ? 40% of the adult population is consuming and/or addicted to some form of drug, that does not seem to happy to me. A good old fashion depression will be good for the people in this country.

I'm not sure more stress will be good for people. People are on drugs mainly because they feel stress. This is mostly the bad stress of inactivity, noise, crowding, emotional isolation, and worry. If a "good old fashion depression" can help people, it will be because they have found a way to get more physical activity, community, and mental stimulation of problem solving. Simply falling on hard times won't in itself help people, in my opinion. :(
Ludi
 
Top

Next

Return to Medical Issues Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron