Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Kudos To Roccman And SJN

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Kudos To Roccman And SJN

Unread postby jboogy » Wed 21 May 2008, 19:37:54

Demand destruction is the wildcard, many have said it would probably kick in for real at about 100.00. That has proven to be incorrect. I have personally observed widespread changes in peoples choices only very recently, but these changes have been stark and unmistakeable. I'm talking about all the trucks, boats and campers with for sale signs on them, this has been supported with sales data from the automakers. Simply changing from a truck to a compact won't impact oil futures, not with china and india ready to pick up the slack. If however, America sinks into a depression or serious recession then you may see people parking their compacts and then you would see an impact on demand. America currently uses roughly 30% of the worlds oil don't forget.
Perhaps the population would be less swayed to socialism if we had fewer examples of socialism from our "Free Market Capitalists". -----fiddler dave
User avatar
jboogy
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1191
Joined: Mon 06 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: the place where smartasses dwell

Re: Kudos To Roccman And SJN

Unread postby zzzpeakoil » Wed 21 May 2008, 19:52:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('roccman', '
')I am not quite done with this newbeee...


Well, thanks for being polite and not calling me noob, at least. : )

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('roccman', '
')what he said..


I never said I am some kind of po guru, but from what I see you are too emotionally involved (you seem to want so much for collapse to occur that you are seeing it everywhere). - you are wishing ,600$ not predicting it.. I am also hoping and wishing it just like you, however it is wishful thinking to predict that it is ever probable this year.

Matt Simmons.. Matt Simmons is human and humans make mistakes sometimes. He made some very scary predictions in his Twilight in the Desert book in 2004 , and from what I understand, the timing is way off. Heard of appeal to authority? X sais it so it must be true. Very logical, indeed. This is how religions flourish.

I noticed you calculate in terms of percentages. However that is not always the right thing to do if you want accuracy.
1:10 may seem just like 10 is to 100 and 100 is to 1000. But how can you ignore the math so bad that you don't see 10-1= 9 units, and 1000-100= 900 units? So it is not the same thing.

In the end, we'll see who is closer to the truth. The fact that i underscored the maximum value for oil this year does not mean that I won't end up much better place than you. And if I lose, I' bite the bullet and eat my words. If..

Oh, and I apologise if I always seem disruptive and bitchy, it's only that I don't see what kind of logic and math PMS was operating with when starting this thread, with you still penultimate in price prediction for this year. Don't take it so personal. SJN is even worse than you. ;)
User avatar
zzzpeakoil
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Thu 27 Dec 2007, 04:00:00

Re: Kudos To Roccman And SJN

Unread postby sjn » Wed 21 May 2008, 19:58:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jboogy', 'D')emand destruction is the wildcard, many have said it would probably kick in for real at about 100.00. That has proven to be incorrect. I have personally observed widespread changes in peoples choices only very recently, but these changes have been stark and unmistakeable. I'm talking about all the trucks, boats and campers with for sale signs on them, this has been supported with sales data from the automakers. Simply changing from a truck to a compact won't impact oil futures, not with china and india ready to pick up the slack. If however, America sinks into a depression or serious recession then you may see people parking their compacts and then you would see an impact on demand. America currently uses roughly 30% of the worlds oil don't forget.
Price controls and rationing will come in before there is the complete "demand destruction" of the USA, without a functional road haulage system (read: profitable) the whole ediface will collapse. Oil will be procured through whatever means are necessary to prevent (delay) that outcome.
User avatar
sjn
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 1332
Joined: Wed 09 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: UK

Re: Kudos To Roccman And SJN

Unread postby roccman » Wed 21 May 2008, 19:59:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('zzzpeakoil', '
')
Matt Simmons.. Matt Simmons is human and humans make mistakes sometimes.


Well - you don't get to be a well respected investor and advisor to presidents making too many mistakes.

To date Matt Simmons is in the five ring.

I take my cues from Matt and a few others - here - and on a handful of tech groups.

I also work almost exclusively in this field and have for the past 15 years.

Cheers and good luck with all "that"...
"There must be a bogeyman; there always is, and it cannot be something as esoteric as "resource depletion." You can't go to war with that." Emersonbiggins
User avatar
roccman
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4065
Joined: Fri 27 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Great Sonoran Desert

Re: Kudos To Roccman And SJN

Unread postby jboogy » Wed 21 May 2008, 20:15:34

I think you misunderstand my use of the term "demand destruction" SJN, I'm talking about the destruction of the price of oil due to reduced demand. At least this has always been my interpretation of the phrase, but I could be wrong.
Perhaps the population would be less swayed to socialism if we had fewer examples of socialism from our "Free Market Capitalists". -----fiddler dave
User avatar
jboogy
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1191
Joined: Mon 06 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: the place where smartasses dwell

Re: Kudos To Roccman And SJN

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Wed 21 May 2008, 20:42:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('zzzpeakoil', '
') I don't see what kind of logic and math PMS was operating with when starting this thread
I've already explained that, before you said you don't see the logic. Let me put it another way: it took two years to get from the $30 range to the $60 range; it took one year to get from the 60 to the 120 range. It took a matter of days to get from 120 to 134. see a pattern?
Turn those Machines back On! - Don Ameche in Trading Places
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Top

Re: Kudos To Roccman And SJN

Unread postby DantesPeak » Wed 21 May 2008, 20:47:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('sjn', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jboogy', 'D')emand destruction is the wildcard, many have said it would probably kick in for real at about 100.00. That has proven to be incorrect. I have personally observed widespread changes in peoples choices only very recently, but these changes have been stark and unmistakeable. I'm talking about all the trucks, boats and campers with for sale signs on them, this has been supported with sales data from the automakers. Simply changing from a truck to a compact won't impact oil futures, not with china and india ready to pick up the slack. If however, America sinks into a depression or serious recession then you may see people parking their compacts and then you would see an impact on demand. America currently uses roughly 30% of the worlds oil don't forget.
Price controls and rationing will come in before there is the complete "demand destruction" of the USA, without a functional road haulage system (read: profitable) the whole ediface will collapse. Oil will be procured through whatever means are necessary to prevent (delay) that outcome.


Well put. There will be attempts by all countries eventually to control the flow of oil. Those that think governments will allow free markets in oil to continue much longer are fooling themselves.

Heck India is already starting to close down its commodity markets (although I am not sure what holders of commodities futures are supposed to do in the mean time).

Anyway it's just a matter of time when there will be no publcly traded market price for oil. I'm just hoping we have at least a few more years before those incovenient gasoline lines become the rule of the day.
Last edited by DantesPeak on Wed 21 May 2008, 21:02:31, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
DantesPeak
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6277
Joined: Sat 23 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: New Jersey
Top

Re: Kudos To Roccman And SJN

Unread postby dinopello » Wed 21 May 2008, 20:50:35

PMS, if the future could always be predicted as a continuation of the patterns of the past, we wouldn't have Jazz music. But, I digress...

I assume that you don't ascribe a 100% probability to oil reaching $400 a barrel this year ? What probability would you ascribe to that event ?

I would put something as high as a 20% chance on it.
User avatar
dinopello
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6088
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Urban Village

Re: Kudos To Roccman And SJN

Unread postby DantesPeak » Wed 21 May 2008, 21:10:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dinopello', 'P')MS, if the future could always be predicted as a continuation of the patterns of the past, we wouldn't have Jazz music. But, I digress...

I assume that you don't ascribe a 100% probability to oil reaching $400 a barrel this year ? What probability would you ascribe to that event ?

I would put something as high as a 20% chance on it.


My WAG estimate is that there is a 40% chance we have or will enter a hyperbolic runup past $200 this year, a 50% chance that will happen in 2009 or 2010, and a 10% chance it will not happen at all.

But it is important to discuss this issue now.
User avatar
DantesPeak
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6277
Joined: Sat 23 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: New Jersey
Top

Re: Kudos To Roccman And SJN

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Wed 21 May 2008, 21:12:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dinopello', '
')I assume that you don't ascribe a 100% probability to oil reaching $400 a barrel this year ? What probability would you ascribe to that event ?

I would put something as high as a 20% chance on it.
Good question. I'll tell you one thing, I am very curious to see what will happen tomorrow and Friday after what happened today. Of course I can't put a 1.0 probability on anything here. I personally would assign the PMS probability index of >.5 for $300 oil by December. That is based on the overall trend of the last three years. However, recent developments make me think we are shifting from parabolic to hyperbolic, i.e. a price shock this year putting us in roccman/sjn territory or worse.
Turn those Machines back On! - Don Ameche in Trading Places
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Top

Re: Kudos To Roccman And SJN

Unread postby roccman » Wed 21 May 2008, 21:15:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', 'H')owever, recent developments make me think we are shifting from parabolic to hyperbolic, i.e. a price shock this year putting us in roccman/sjn territory or worse.


And Matt Simmons territory.
"There must be a bogeyman; there always is, and it cannot be something as esoteric as "resource depletion." You can't go to war with that." Emersonbiggins
User avatar
roccman
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4065
Joined: Fri 27 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Great Sonoran Desert
Top

Re: Kudos To Roccman And SJN

Unread postby roccman » Wed 21 May 2008, 21:26:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('sjn', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jboogy', 'D')emand destruction is the wildcard, many have said it would probably kick in for real at about 100.00. That has proven to be incorrect. I have personally observed widespread changes in peoples choices only very recently, but these changes have been stark and unmistakeable. I'm talking about all the trucks, boats and campers with for sale signs on them, this has been supported with sales data from the automakers. Simply changing from a truck to a compact won't impact oil futures, not with china and india ready to pick up the slack. If however, America sinks into a depression or serious recession then you may see people parking their compacts and then you would see an impact on demand. America currently uses roughly 30% of the worlds oil don't forget.
Price controls and rationing will come in before there is the complete "demand destruction" of the USA, without a functional road haulage system (read: profitable) the whole ediface will collapse. Oil will be procured through whatever means are necessary to prevent (delay) that outcome.
This is the key point. The price of petroleum will reflect the mirror universe we are about to enter. As Confusious says: "Crazy things look normal when you are inside them"

If we enter a Depression (because there is not enough cheap petroleum to make and sell tons of consumer crap) then it goes lower.

If we enter a Crazed Hyperinflation (because the government tries to bale out this sick f*ck society) then the price goes higher.

In either case the price will be whatever it needs to be to keep us very uncomfortable and it will be too expensive to keep the party going.


And if we get both we have $1000 oil with no job.

I think we get both.
"There must be a bogeyman; there always is, and it cannot be something as esoteric as "resource depletion." You can't go to war with that." Emersonbiggins
User avatar
roccman
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4065
Joined: Fri 27 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Great Sonoran Desert
Top

Re: Kudos To Roccman And SJN

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Wed 21 May 2008, 21:38:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('DantesPeak', '
')
My WAG estimate is that there is a 40% chance we have or will enter a hyperbolic runup past $200 this year
But DP, we've already seen a parabolic pattern:

2 years: 30 to 60

1 year: 60 to 120

so next comes:

6 months: 120 to 240

3 months: 240 to 480 and so on.

some folks here seem to be assuming things will get better simply because this pattern is too awful to accept.
Turn those Machines back On! - Don Ameche in Trading Places
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Top

Re: Kudos To Roccman And SJN

Unread postby DantesPeak » Wed 21 May 2008, 21:47:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('DantesPeak', '
')
My WAG estimate is that there is a 40% chance we have or will enter a hyperbolic runup past $200 this year
But DP, we've already seen a parabolic pattern:

2 years: 30 to 60

1 year: 60 to 120

so next comes:

6 months: 120 to 240

3 months: 240 to 480 and so on.

some folks here seem to be assuming things will get better simply because this pattern is too awful to accept.


I was one of the first here at PO.com to discuss the possibility of hyperinflation. It was not readily accepted at that time. Basically I said in 2005 that the dollar will be ruined by 2010.

To move into the hyperbolic phase, we will probably need some specific event - a major financial bankruptcy, the dollar being abandoned by the Gulf Cooperation Council, etc., although that may not be required.

It's just a little early to say that more likely than not we are going to $240 within six months.
User avatar
DantesPeak
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6277
Joined: Sat 23 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: New Jersey
Top

Re: Kudos To Roccman And SJN

Unread postby jboogy » Wed 21 May 2008, 22:19:50

If you throw hyper-inflation into the mix then who the hell knows what the price would be relative to todays stable, predictable level of inflation. If we see hyper-inflation, and I've said before it appears there's a good chance we're heading there, then I'm not sure the price of barrel of oil will even matter. If the U.S. economy sneezes the rest of the world catches cold ( as they're fond of saying), U.S. hyper-inflation means game over for all intents and purposes. Remember when the Bear-Sterns story broke? We all thought our markets were going to crash, but remember whose markets did take a dive. Everyone has been exposed to the CDO, bad paper, hedge fund witches brew. This whole freakin' mess, and I mean worldwide, is looking like it's going to come to a standstill, if not crash.
Perhaps the population would be less swayed to socialism if we had fewer examples of socialism from our "Free Market Capitalists". -----fiddler dave
User avatar
jboogy
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1191
Joined: Mon 06 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: the place where smartasses dwell

Re: Kudos To Roccman And SJN

Unread postby TWilliam » Thu 22 May 2008, 01:47:54

Just in case anyone has missed it, the crude oil price chart on the Peak Oil Google Portal page normally displays the 1-month graph, but there are rollovers beneath the graph that switch the display between month, quarter, year and five year displays. Altho' it presently only displays data from early '05 going forward, the five year graph shows a definitely steepening price curve...


Peak Portal

If the trend continues ('hockey-stick', anyone?), then it is likely that 2008 will be a decidedly UN-merry Xmas for a LOT of people... :cry:
"It means buckle your seatbelt, Dorothy, because Kansas? Is goin' bye-bye... "
User avatar
TWilliam
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2591
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Kudos To Roccman And SJN

Unread postby BigTex » Thu 22 May 2008, 01:58:17

I think we are standing in a space that is similar to 1968.

- Several years of expensive and pointless war
- Out of control government spending
- On the cusp of a gold boom
- On the cusp of an era of high oil prices
- Presidential election that could go either way
- Lots of pissed off Americans
- Stupid Texan in the White House

I think stagflation is what we're looking at. I don't know how you can have anything except stagflation when oil prices remain high no matter how much economic growth slows.
:)
User avatar
BigTex
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3858
Joined: Thu 03 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Graceland

Re: Kudos To Roccman And SJN

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Thu 22 May 2008, 02:27:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('DantesPeak', '
')To move into the hyperbolic phase, we will probably need some specific event - a major financial bankruptcy, the dollar being abandoned by the Gulf Cooperation Council, etc., although that may not be required.

It's just a little early to say that more likely than not we are going to $240 within six months.
I don't even see the need for any special event of the sorts you mentioned. It seems like all it would take is more of the same: rising demand and flat production. Throw in a little Export Land Model and we're there, $240 in six months. $5 a week for 24 weeks doesn't seem so far fetched now, does it? Then consider that we just had a $5 increase in one day...

btw, I'm not talking about the bigger economic picture here. Just the price of oil, period.
Turn those Machines back On! - Don Ameche in Trading Places
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests