by zzzpeakoil » Wed 21 May 2008, 19:52:37
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('roccman', '
')I am not quite done with this newbeee...
Well, thanks for being polite and not calling me noob, at least. : )
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('roccman', '
')what he said..
I never said I am some kind of po guru, but from what I see you are too emotionally involved (you seem to want so much for collapse to occur that you are seeing it everywhere). - you are
wishing ,600$ not predicting it.. I am also hoping and wishing it just like you, however it is wishful thinking to predict that it is ever probable this year.
Matt Simmons.. Matt Simmons is human and humans make mistakes sometimes. He made some very scary predictions in his Twilight in the Desert book in 2004 , and from what I understand, the timing is way off. Heard of appeal to authority? X sais it so it must be true. Very logical, indeed. This is how religions flourish.
I noticed you calculate in terms of percentages. However that is not always the right thing to do if you want accuracy.
1:10 may seem just like 10 is to 100 and 100 is to 1000. But how can you ignore the math so bad that you don't see 10-1= 9 units, and 1000-100= 900 units? So it is not the same thing.
In the end, we'll see who is closer to the truth. The fact that i underscored the maximum value for oil this year does not mean that I won't end up much better place than you. And if I lose, I' bite the bullet and eat my words.
If..
Oh, and I apologise if I always seem disruptive and bitchy, it's only that I don't see what kind of logic and math PMS was operating with when starting this thread, with you still
penultimate in price prediction for this year. Don't take it so personal. SJN is even worse than you.
