Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Peak Oil Hysteria

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: Peak Oil Hysteria

Unread postby mos6507 » Mon 19 May 2008, 21:32:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('hironegro', 'G')raeme you a baby boomer or an attention whore?


Why do you have a thing for baby boomers?
mos6507
 

Re: Peak Oil Hysteria

Unread postby yeahbut » Mon 19 May 2008, 21:34:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', 'A')lso, when you post an excerpt from a story and the link to the story, maybe you could post the significance of the story or some commentary if the purpose of the post is to start a discussion.

That shows that you thought about it yourself and have a starting point for relevance.


I enjoy reading some of the articles you bring to the attention of PO, Graeme, but I've gotta agree with Tex on this point, mate. Just posting the article without comment isn't really enough, you need to explain why you're posting and what parts you think are relevant. Otherwise, you get exchanges like drifter asking you how you can possibly believe that oil won't peak for another 30 years(part of the article), and you saying "hey I didn't say that, OPEC and the IEA did". How are we to know which parts of the article you agree or disagree with? A little bit of commentary and analysis of the articles you post would go a long way, I think. Also, maybe then you would not be quite so prolific, but more focussed, so people couldn't throw around the 'troll' tag, which is unjustified IMHO. Just my two cents...
User avatar
yeahbut
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 819
Joined: Tue 30 Oct 2007, 03:00:00

Re: Peak Oil Hysteria

Unread postby cube » Mon 19 May 2008, 22:43:58

to: Graeme
Let me tell you something I've learned in life.
When a person comes to you and talk it's serious.
When half a dozen people do it, it means you need to STOP doing it. *seriously*
I consider you to be a decent person, but this has been going on waaaay too long, and I would hate to have to turn to a moderator to ask you to stop this.
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Peak Oil Hysteria

Unread postby yesplease » Mon 19 May 2008, 23:01:09

I don't mind any posts honestly. Given how much trolling/ridicule is allowed no these sites it's silly to ask someone to stop posting when we can just ignore them. There's even a freakin' button to have it done automatically, how much easier can it be people?

Also, while I may not think that everything you post is as in depth as I prefer Graeme, I certainly do not mind new material to sink my teeth into be it from you or anyone else. If someone decides to post up something, don't shoot the messenger unless they're deliberately altering the information, or worse, flat out lying, when addressing the article itself is just as easy. And as for requests to stop posting, well... I don't think we can help those poor souls who don't have the wherewithal to find the ignore button in the first place and feel that they need to ask someone else to stop posting.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Professor Membrane', ' ')Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!
User avatar
yesplease
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3765
Joined: Tue 03 Oct 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Peak Oil Hysteria

Unread postby hironegro » Mon 19 May 2008, 23:23:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('hironegro', 'G')raeme you a baby boomer or an attention whore?


Why do you have a thing for baby boomers?


As a child I was molested by one? :cry:
hironegro
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 419
Joined: Tue 08 Apr 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Peak Oil Hysteria

Unread postby mos6507 » Tue 20 May 2008, 00:40:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('hironegro', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('hironegro', 'G')raeme you a baby boomer or an attention whore?


Why do you have a thing for baby boomers?


As a child I was molested by one? :cry:


Is that a question or a statement?
mos6507
 
Top

Re: Peak Oil Hysteria

Unread postby mos6507 » Tue 20 May 2008, 00:43:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('yeahbut', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', 'A')lso, when you post an excerpt from a story and the link to the story, maybe you could post the significance of the story or some commentary if the purpose of the post is to start a discussion.

That shows that you thought about it yourself and have a starting point for relevance.


I enjoy reading some of the articles you bring to the attention of PO, Graeme, but I've gotta agree with Tex on this point, mate. Just posting the article without comment isn't really enough, you need to explain why you're posting and what parts you think are relevant. Otherwise, you get exchanges like drifter asking you how you can possibly believe that oil won't peak for another 30 years(part of the article), and you saying "hey I didn't say that, OPEC and the IEA did". How are we to know which parts of the article you agree or disagree with? A little bit of commentary and analysis of the articles you post would go a long way, I think. Also, maybe then you would not be quite so prolific, but more focussed, so people couldn't throw around the 'troll' tag, which is unjustified IMHO. Just my two cents...


How come Graeme gets ripped for that modus operandi and Cid doesn't? It's got to be because the implied political message from Cid is more welcome than Graeme's.
mos6507
 
Top

Re: Peak Oil Hysteria

Unread postby Graeme » Tue 20 May 2008, 05:14:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mididoctors', 'i')f we are peaking now the early predictions are not that far off..

the jump in dates around 2000 onwards are interesting.

I would like to see the density of the data over time..IE the number of forcasts for each data point.

I would have thought the peak predictions would be less in the past.

Boris
London


I've finally been able to access the pdf file quoted in the original post. Here are the number of forecasts for each data point:

72 - 2
77 - 2
97 - 2
98 - 2
99 - 3
00 - 4
01 - 2
02 - 3
03 - 5
04 - 3
All the rest are one. So you are right, Boris, the peak predictions in the past are less.
Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe. H. G. Wells.
Fatih Birol's motto: leave oil before it leaves us.
User avatar
Graeme
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13258
Joined: Fri 04 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: New Zealand
Top

Re: Peak Oil Hysteria

Unread postby mididoctors » Tue 20 May 2008, 05:32:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Graeme', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mididoctors', 'i')f we are peaking now the early predictions are not that far off..

the jump in dates around 2000 onwards are interesting.

I would like to see the density of the data over time..IE the number of forcasts for each data point.

I would have thought the peak predictions would be less in the past.

Boris
London


I've finally been able to access the pdf file quoted in the original post. Here are the number of forecasts for each data point:

72 - 2
77 - 2
97 - 2
98 - 2
99 - 3
00 - 4
01 - 2
02 - 3
03 - 5
04 - 3
All the rest are one. So you are right, Boris, the peak predictions in the past are less.


well there you go..


first off the sample size is very small..

secondly the introduction of new players 2000 onwards means those making far peak predictions will have a profound effect on a fairly stable set of early predictions.

its not that surprising

Boris
London
User avatar
mididoctors
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 578
Joined: Mon 30 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: London
Top

Re: Peak Oil Hysteria

Unread postby Graeme » Tue 20 May 2008, 06:13:49

I've gone back to look at those authors who have made multiple predictions. I'll take Campbell as an example to begin with:

In 1989, he said 1989
In 1998, Campbell/Leherre said 2004
In 1999, he said 2010
In 2002, he said 2010
In 2003, Laherre said 2010-2020

Shell has a similar pattern:

In 1979, plateau by 2004
In 2003, after 2025

And, IEA (WEO)

1998, 2014
2000, beyond 2020

So you can see that this is significant. Even so-called experts not only cannot agree when peak oil will occur but they keep shifting their predictions to a later date.
Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe. H. G. Wells.
Fatih Birol's motto: leave oil before it leaves us.
User avatar
Graeme
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13258
Joined: Fri 04 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: New Zealand

Re: Peak Oil Hysteria

Unread postby Graeme » Tue 20 May 2008, 06:25:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', 'I')'d like to put in a word of support for Graeme. Yes, his positions are sometimes unreasonably optimistic, but he's a sober and mature contributor and has done much good work here.

Don't attack Graeme, attack his ideas and biases. That's where the fair playing field lies.


Thank you Heineken. That's what I said earlier in this thread. Please discuss the topic of the thread. Boris did, and I have responded.

Obviously, peak oil "theory" is still highly controversial. The NZ government will not consider any other analysis from a group like this about when peak oil will occur. As I said earlier, they take their advice from the IEA. If this group has as different position that can be proved, then it is not communicating this to anyone of importance in government, ie people who are making decisions on this matter. I know that Roscoe Bartlett has made many presentations to the US Congress, but has anyone from this forum spoken to him? Also has any work on peak oil been published in scientific literature? If so, then this would be very powerful evidence that something needs to be done asap. I haven't seen anything lately except one published in Science about the AAPG meeting.

This is a enormous contrast to the scientific literature published on global warming. Much more is known about this subject because of the very large number of scientific studies that I have reported in the global warming news thread in the environment forum. Now that the science is better understood and reported exhaustively by a UN panel over a period of many years, action is now beginning through the UN. Nothing of this sort is happening for peak oil. You have to ask yourself why?
Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe. H. G. Wells.
Fatih Birol's motto: leave oil before it leaves us.
User avatar
Graeme
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13258
Joined: Fri 04 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: New Zealand
Top

Re: Peak Oil Hysteria

Unread postby Hagakure_Leofman » Tue 20 May 2008, 06:36:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Graeme', 'T')his is a enormous contrast to the scientific literature published on global warming. Much more is known about this subject because of the very large number of scientific studies that I have reported in the global warming news thread in the environment forum. Now that the science is better understood and reported exhaustively by a UN panel over a period of many years, action is now beginning through the UN. Nothing of this sort is happening for peak oil. You have to ask yourself why?


Because the economics of depletion are only now becoming an issue?

We're been saturated by an astonishing (and blinding) volume of resource wealth, generated through hydrocarbon use. Now that cheap oil is over, people are going to turn their attentions to why. Then we'll see a lot more study of the issues.

With climate change, there are hundreds of scientific disciplines that cross over to produce the understanding we now have. Eventually, resource depletion studies will catch up.

We're only just starting to run out ---- of everything. :o
User avatar
Hagakure_Leofman
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 387
Joined: Wed 02 Jan 2008, 04:00:00
Location: out dispatching ronan...
Top

Re: Peak Oil Hysteria

Unread postby Graeme » Tue 20 May 2008, 08:25:01

Briefing: Oil

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')leklett, a Professor of Physics at Uppsala University, Sweden is concerned about the production problem allied to growing consumption.

He highlights the current situation in China. The Chinese economy is growing at around 10 percent each year and oil production in the country at full capacity. This means that China will have to import much more oil than the current figure of 3.5 mb/d. "This will push the demand for oil to a completely different scale," Aleklett said.

He believes that the worst-case scenario for peak oil is a plateau from 2007 -- 2012 before oil production starts to decline. The best case will be that production will go up to 93 mb/d. But he thinks that this would require the 10 giant oil fields in Iraq to go into production now.

But a report by the influential energy advisor Cambridge Energy Research Associates (CERA) published in January 2008 takes a different view. Oil is not running out they say, predicting supply will top 100 mb/d by 2017.

Professor Aleklett remains pessimistic about increased rates of discovery in the coming years. "If you look at the discovery trends over the past 40 years, we will find 150 billion barrels in the next 30 years. If you are consuming 30 billion barrels every year means that that stock will last five years," he said.


CNN
Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe. H. G. Wells.
Fatih Birol's motto: leave oil before it leaves us.
User avatar
Graeme
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13258
Joined: Fri 04 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: New Zealand
Top

Re: Peak Oil Hysteria

Unread postby TheDude » Tue 20 May 2008, 09:08:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Graeme', 'E')ven so-called experts not only cannot agree when peak oil will occur but they keep shifting their predictions to a later date.


Image

CERA like to point out Hubbert's error in predicting world peak, or that he was off the mark on the maximum volume the lower 48 produced, totally disregarding the fact that he was quite accurate about the date. Hubbert missed the mark for the world but Deffeyes has the data Hubbert didn't; and we are basically flat since Thanksgiving '05.

Who do you believe?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')ut a report by the influential energy advisor Cambridge Energy Research Associates (CERA) published in January 2008 takes a different view. Oil is not running out they say, predicting supply will top 100 mb/d by 2017.


We'll see by the end of the year whether there's an additional 2 mb/d. I think not, looking at the upcoming megaprojects, which are more accurate for volumes than HL short term.
I do agree with Freddy that a slight uptick may be in the cards. Unconventional will do little more than spin its wheels in the mud.

Like Bakhtari said, we are past the point where we should be obsessing on modeling. There should be a thread documenting examples of this denier asshattery.
Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
And let me tell you something: I dig your work.
User avatar
TheDude
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia
Top

Re: Peak Oil Hysteria

Unread postby TheDude » Tue 20 May 2008, 09:10:03

Thanks for linking to the BP Energy charting tool, Pops. Never messed around with it before.
Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
And let me tell you something: I dig your work.
User avatar
TheDude
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia

Re: Peak Oil Hysteria

Unread postby BigTex » Tue 20 May 2008, 09:14:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('yeahbut', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', 'A')lso, when you post an excerpt from a story and the link to the story, maybe you could post the significance of the story or some commentary if the purpose of the post is to start a discussion.

That shows that you thought about it yourself and have a starting point for relevance.


I enjoy reading some of the articles you bring to the attention of PO, Graeme, but I've gotta agree with Tex on this point, mate. Just posting the article without comment isn't really enough, you need to explain why you're posting and what parts you think are relevant. Otherwise, you get exchanges like drifter asking you how you can possibly believe that oil won't peak for another 30 years(part of the article), and you saying "hey I didn't say that, OPEC and the IEA did". How are we to know which parts of the article you agree or disagree with? A little bit of commentary and analysis of the articles you post would go a long way, I think. Also, maybe then you would not be quite so prolific, but more focussed, so people couldn't throw around the 'troll' tag, which is unjustified IMHO. Just my two cents...


How come Graeme gets ripped for that modus operandi and Cid doesn't? It's got to be because the implied political message from Cid is more welcome than Graeme's.


Cid does what I suggested above--i.e., he puts his own content and spin on whatever story he is posting and it's clear where he is going with something, however silly it may be.

Here is a contrast in the styles:

Graeme Post:

Title: "Spider Webs May Solve All Energy Problems"

Link: "Spider Webs Appear in Houses"

Quote: "Researchers believe that the appearance of spider webs in peoples' houses may represent a way to solve the energy problems of the world."

Comment from Poster: None.



Cid_Yama Post:

Title: "The Sad Tale of The Oppressed Spiders"

Link: "Spider Webs Appear in Houses"

Quote: None.

Comment from Poster: "It appears as if the era of spider oppression is nearing an end. According to the End Times Express, spiders have been infiltrating homes and spinning webs that are designed to act as tripwires for tiny explosive charges. I believe this is the first step in the rise of the spiders and I predict that in 12 months the spiders will be ruling the earth and humans will be their servants."

***

See the difference?
:)
User avatar
BigTex
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3858
Joined: Thu 03 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Graceland
Top

Re: Peak Oil Hysteria

Unread postby DantesPeak » Tue 20 May 2008, 09:30:55

The changes in opinion by Campbell/Leherre are small in comparison to those optimists who forsaw $40 or even $20 oil in 2008 in their 2005 forecasts - but now predict $150 oil.

My point being - why not hold everyone to the same standard? There are probably hundreds of forecasts there would not be PO about now - or even in our lifetimes. So those forecasting PO are much much closer to reality than those that never saw a single supply problem coming.

Is there is mass delusion, it was all of those who never had the slightest clue about the future we now face.
User avatar
DantesPeak
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6277
Joined: Sat 23 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: New Jersey

Re: Peak Oil Hysteria

Unread postby Heineken » Tue 20 May 2008, 09:54:53

I feel that many have spent far too much time trying to pin down the year of the peak. It's a competitive intellectual game: Who will be right? Who will win the gold star?

Those who are "right" will, at best, have made a good guess. There are too many factors entering into this that simply cannot be predicted.

I ignore all this and just keep an eye on the Exxon price sign that dominates the center of the small town I live near. That's the only game that counts.
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog

"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia

Re: Peak Oil Hysteria

Unread postby mididoctors » Tue 20 May 2008, 14:56:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Graeme', 'I')'ve gone back to look at those authors who have made multiple predictions. I'll take Campbell as an example to begin with:

In 1989, he said 1989
In 1998, Campbell/Leherre said 2004
In 1999, he said 2010
In 2002, he said 2010
In 2003, Laherre said 2010-2020

Shell has a similar pattern:

In 1979, plateau by 2004
In 2003, after 2025

And, IEA (WEO)

1998, 2014
2000, beyond 2020

So you can see that this is significant. Even so-called experts not only cannot agree when peak oil will occur but they keep shifting their predictions to a later date.


yes but thats not surprising given the complexity of the issue...

the Irony of course is that we may have peaked in the rear view mirror and many analysts may be out of range..

the shell 1979 fig was pretty spot on

(more luck than anything else)

but given all this hubberts original 2000 guesstimate is not bad IMO

Boris
London
Last edited by mididoctors on Tue 20 May 2008, 16:29:15, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
mididoctors
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 578
Joined: Mon 30 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: London
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests

cron