by MattSavinar » Fri 25 Feb 2005, 22:27:12
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BorneoRagnarok', 'O')h .... Matt , you are so unlucky. If that happen in my hometown , we (Chinese) will ask for our friends help to slaughter the dog and eat it if it is clean or dump in front of the owner's house. It is legal becuase the dog is roaming instead of been tied up properly.
Those fat land whales in SUV don't even help you ?? Luckily I did not apply for H1B to US the land where reality meet the dream (or whatever appear in local TV in late 1990's ),
I am also curious when you heard about peak oil . I heard about peak oil in 2001 through dieoff.org but was not convinced until early 2004 through peakoil.net
There was an article (don't remember which one exactly) on From the Wilderness about the economy.
At the time (almost 2 years ago) I thought, "damn, that's some scary s***. But with all these alternatives, surely somebody will think of something. After all, can't we just use that thermal something or other process they wrote about in Discover?"
Read off and on for a few months on ftw, dieoff, etc. . before it finally sunk in after I got my bar results in Nov 2003. I think it would have sunk in earlier had it not been for the fact I had was totally preocuupied with the bar exam during those months, which in and of itself feels like the end of the world.
I put up the site because I didn't know how else to explain to people the whole "clusterf***" of the problem without them having to go through the 6 months of reading off and on, asking "but won't this solve it?' and "what if we did this?" and "can't the government institute this idea. . ." and "hey, this thermal depoly stuff will solve this.. ." and "but it's only a 3 percent decline per year, what's the big deal?" and so on and so on.
If you've ever tried to explain this to someone, you know what I'm talking about. Much easier just to send them a link that addresses all the usual refutations.
Back to the original poster's problem:
Wally Gator,
I hope this doesn't come off the wrong way, but when I first read your post I thought to myself,
"Geez. Here we are with:
Stephen Roach (chief economist at Morgan Stanley) saying we have a 90% chance of economic armageddon in the next few years and that he foresees total collapse of the central banking system;
Matt Simmons (most successfull energy investment banker in the world) stating, 'we're up shit creek with no paddle.' (He didn't use those terms exactly - but those of you who have read his writings know what I mean)
Alan Grenspan warning people to 'get their financial affairs in order.'
Warren Buffet saying we're on the verge of 'financial chaos.'
We've got the biggest money makers in the world saying we're on the verge of financial implosion yet Wally is worried his buddies might make more than him if he decides to take this crisis seriously!"
Wally: if your buddies aren't bright enough to comprehend why Buffet, Soros, Simmons, etc. . . are this concerned about the state of the world economy, I wouldn't worry about them making more money than you.
They're like the Viking Norse guys who insisted that they would still be able to raise sheep even when all the topsoil was gone, or that "sure the topsoil is being eroded, but it won't be totally eroded till I'm long dead, so why should I give a damn."
You're like the guy who thought, "Mmm, the topsoil is sure looking piss poor these days. Maybe I should go over and ask the Intuit (Eskimos) to teach me to fish. Besides, I don't know if running around with this silly hat on is all it's cracked up to be anyways."
Your fear is that the other Vikings will ridicule you if you start hanging out with the Intuit.
They will, of course, ridicule you, but at least you'll be eating when the topsoil is gone. All they'll have left is their silly hats.
Matt