Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

After You, Sir....

Discussions related to the physiological and psychological effects of peak oil on our members and future generations.

Re: After You, Sir....

Postby mos6507 » Mon 12 May 2008, 17:00:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('charliebrownout', '
')Yes, no argument there. We should share with each other willingly. I've participated in groups over the years which aim to give to food banks and the hungry. It is a pitiful drop in the bucket, though.

I wish I had an answer. I love kids. I love my own and other people's. It hurts to think of the innocents starving and suffering just because people haven't figured out a way to share this earth with other people as well as other living things.




Morality is a zero sum game if you follow every act you make (or don't make) to its reverberations across all time and space. Everyone's a victim and a victimizer to some degree. You have to know where to draw the line as far as beating yourself up or beating other people up over what they do.

It's kind of like the microscope that Al Gore gets put under for his environmentalism. Everyone wants to measure every atom of CO2 that can be traced back to him. He's not allowed to be human.
Last edited by mos6507 on Mon 12 May 2008, 17:04:27, edited 1 time in total.
mos6507
 

Re: After You, Sir....

Postby threadbear » Mon 12 May 2008, 17:02:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', 'T')he reason you and everyone else's genes have survived through the aeons to this day owes itself to some morally questionable behavior somewhere in your family tree. They don't call it survival of the fittest for nothing.


Or because they engaged in mutually supportive behavior and thus were enabled to reach breeding age and raise their own offspring to adulthood.


Tell them, Ludi! The good old "Survival of the fittest" bullcrap. Poorly understood in natural systems, and a rationalization for criminal, self interested behaviour, in human social systems.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: After You, Sir....

Postby mos6507 » Mon 12 May 2008, 17:11:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', '
')Tell them, Ludi! The good old "Survival of the fittest" bullcrap. Poorly understood in natural systems, and a rationalization for criminal, self interested behaviour, in human social systems.


I'm not trying to push a Gordon Gecko anti-morality. I'm just saying if everyone took a closer look at their lives they'd realize they aren't as guiltless as they seem. Ever won a job over someone else? Maybe that guy was in financial straights, and jumped off a bridge because he couldn't support his family.

In my case, I'm in an influential position of interviewing potential hires. So I've been instrumental in hiring two people, and NOT hiring a bunch of others. Was it my moral responsibility to find a way to employ these people even if I thought they weren't qualified? I was an "elite" to them.

Despite the welfare state, at some basic level everyone has to sink or swim and compete with eachother. It doesn't have to be with sticks and stones. Your heart can bleed all you want but you just can't avoid it.
mos6507
 

Re: After You, Sir....

Postby charliebrownout » Mon 12 May 2008, 17:13:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')

Morality is a zero sum game if you follow every act you make (or don't make) to its reverberations across all time and space. Everyone's a victim and a victimizer to some degree. You have to know where to draw the line as far as beating yourself up or beating other people up over what they do.

It's kind of like the microscope that Al Gore gets put under for his environmentalism. Everyone wants to measure every atom of CO2 that can be traced back to him. He's not allowed to be human.


If by zero sum game, you mean entirely pointless, I disagree. I don't think the possibility we are causing trouble unknowingly gives us a free card to say "fuck it" and do whatever we want. It just means absolutely moral behavior is impossible to reach, but it doesn't preclude moral behavior alltogether.

That would be akin to a doctor walking away from his job saying "fuck it, they're all gonna die anyway".

I suppose that's an okay answer if you're clinically depressed and a bit of a nihilist, but it isn't really the best option out there.

Regarding Gore, well, he's just a hypocrite. "Do as I say, not as I do" is a hypocritical statement. It really doesn't matter how you slice it.
User avatar
charliebrownout
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 290
Joined: Thu 17 Apr 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: After You, Sir....

Postby charliebrownout » Mon 12 May 2008, 17:17:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')I'm not trying to push a Gordon Gecko anti-morality. I'm just saying if everyone took a closer look at their lives they'd realize they aren't as guiltless as they seem. Ever won a job over someone else? Maybe that guy was in financial straights, and jumped off a bridge because he couldn't support his family.

In my case, I'm in an influential position of interviewing potential hires. So I've been instrumental in hiring two people, and NOT hiring a bunch of others. Was it my moral responsibility to find a way to employ these people even if I thought they weren't qualified? I was an "elite" to them.

Despite the welfare state, at some basic level everyone has to sink or swim and compete with eachother. It doesn't have to be with sticks and stones. Your heart can bleed all you want but you just can't avoid it.


Can you absolutely avoid it? No. Should you avoid it whenever possible? Yes.

There is a big difference between intentionally causing harm and accidentally causing harm--even if the end result appears similar at times.
User avatar
charliebrownout
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 290
Joined: Thu 17 Apr 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: After You, Sir....

Postby Ludi » Mon 12 May 2008, 17:20:16

I personally proclaim myself a hypocrite!

<<<<<<still uses more resources than necessary to sustain life.
Ludi
 

Re: After You, Sir....

Postby Jack » Mon 12 May 2008, 17:30:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('charliebrownout', 'I') know, but there is just something about Mr. More-money-than-God talking about it as though deeply worried. If it were to happen, you know he'd be off in some ivory tower, surrounded by land and well-fed body guards.


Yes, well fed guards who would be entirely willing to do whatever was necessary to protect their client. 8)
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: After You, Sir....

Postby Jack » Mon 12 May 2008, 17:33:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('charliebrownout', 'T')here is a big difference between intentionally causing harm and accidentally causing harm--even if the end result appears similar at times.


How about cheering it on? 8)
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: After You, Sir....

Postby mos6507 » Mon 12 May 2008, 18:01:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('charliebrownout', '
')Regarding Gore, well, he's just a hypocrite. "Do as I say, not as I do" is a hypocritical statement. It really doesn't matter how you slice it.


Ed Begley is a hypocrite too if you want to be really anal about it.
mos6507
 
Top

Re: After You, Sir....

Postby btu2012 » Mon 12 May 2008, 18:07:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jack', 'Y')es, well fed guards who would be entirely willing to do whatever was necessary to protect their client. 8)


Of course well-supplied ivory towers would be prime targets for looting by desperate people. It's happened before during the fall of the Roman Empire. Guards didn't help much, often they figure out that they'd be better killing their master and sharing the loot.

Dream on. :)

Btu
only the paranoid survive
User avatar
btu2012
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1802
Joined: Mon 24 Sep 2007, 03:00:00
Location: third from the sun
Top

Re: After You, Sir....

Postby Jack » Mon 12 May 2008, 18:12:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('btu2012', 'O')f course well-supplied ivory towers would be prime targets for looting by desperate people. It's happened before during the fall of the Roman Empire. Guards didn't help much, often they figure out that they'd be better killing their master and sharing the loot.

Dream on. :)

Btu


You mistake my perspective. I'm thinking like a guard.

So, how many casualties do the desperate people endure before they go elsewhere? My expectation is that correct shot placement can modify their attitude.

Just call me Mr. Optimistic.

8)
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: After You, Sir....

Postby BigTex » Mon 12 May 2008, 18:13:16

Instead of "survival of the fittest", how about "survival of the lucky"?

It seems to me that luck has more to do with it than anything.

There is, of course, the idea that chance favors the prepared, and that sort of thing, but when I look at how we got here in the first place, it seems like a road marked with a lot of good luck.

Our apparent "survival" as a result of our superior intelligence is probably going to look pretty silly in about 10,000 years.

The dinosaurs were quite well adapted to their environment--they were very "fit", but then everything changed and they all died. They were unlucky, not unfit.
:)
User avatar
BigTex
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3858
Joined: Thu 03 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Graceland

Re: After You, Sir....

Postby threadbear » Mon 12 May 2008, 18:26:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('charliebrownout', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')I'm not trying to push a Gordon Gecko anti-morality. I'm just saying if everyone took a closer look at their lives they'd realize they aren't as guiltless as they seem. Ever won a job over someone else? Maybe that guy was in financial straights, and jumped off a bridge because he couldn't support his family.

In my case, I'm in an influential position of interviewing potential hires. So I've been instrumental in hiring two people, and NOT hiring a bunch of others. Was it my moral responsibility to find a way to employ these people even if I thought they weren't qualified? I was an "elite" to them.

Despite the welfare state, at some basic level everyone has to sink or swim and compete with eachother. It doesn't have to be with sticks and stones. Your heart can bleed all you want but you just can't avoid it.


Can you absolutely avoid it? No. Should you avoid it whenever possible? Yes.

There is a big difference between intentionally causing harm and accidentally causing harm--even if the end result appears similar at times.


Even in cooperative models, Mos, the most qualified person to do a job, should be doing it. Some competition is necessary, and is a GOOD thing.

The American corporatocracy, has become increasingly dependent on the obsequiousness of proles (team players) working in a "star" system, that rewards "outstanding individual performance".

The ones who end up dominating are a bunch of loose cannons, who end up destroying the long term viability of their companies, for short term gains. The subprime banking fiasco is a perfect example of this. The same mentality has gripped the entire corporate structure. Read Barbara Ehrenreich's "Bait and Switch" as a primer.

You end up endorsing it, by seeing it in the wrong light. What is going on in the boardrooms of the Fortune 500, is much more a kind of retarded inbred aristocratic rule, represented by interlocking boards of directors, with a "visionary" greedy CEO presiding over dullards. The best of the best often aren't the first ones fired, because human resources excludes them from the get go, in favour of compliant team players.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: After You, Sir....

Postby charliebrownout » Mon 12 May 2008, 18:45:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('charliebrownout', '
')Regarding Gore, well, he's just a hypocrite. "Do as I say, not as I do" is a hypocritical statement. It really doesn't matter how you slice it.


Ed Begley is a hypocrite too if you want to be really anal about it.


More or less, yep.

It doesn't mean they've got a bad message. I'm NOT trying to say global warming is a crock. I'm just saying the detractors who point to Gore's consumption of resources have a valid point.

Afterall, if the guys who shout about conservation won't give up their own lifestyle--how can they expect others to do it?
User avatar
charliebrownout
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 290
Joined: Thu 17 Apr 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: After You, Sir....

Postby charliebrownout » Mon 12 May 2008, 18:53:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', '
')
Even in cooperative models, Mos, the most qualified person to do a job, should be doing it. Some competition is necessary, and is a GOOD thing.

The American corporatocracy, has become increasingly dependent on the obsequiousness of proles (team players) working in a "star" system, that rewards "outstanding individual performance".

The ones who end up dominating are a bunch of loose cannons, who end up destroying the long term viability of their companies, for short term gains. The subprime banking fiasco is a perfect example of this. The same mentality has gripped the entire corporate structure. Read Barbara Ehrenreich's "Bait and Switch" as a primer.

You end up endorsing it, by seeing it in the wrong light. What is going on in the boardrooms of the Fortune 500, is much more a kind of retarded inbred aristocratic rule, represented by interlocking boards of directors, with a "visionary" greedy CEO presiding over dullards. The best of the best often aren't the first ones fired, because human resources excludes them from the get go, in favour of compliant team players.


I think Bush is the poster-boy for what you've mentioned. Being rich doesn't make you smarter, it just makes it easier to survive without being smart.

Also, I'm in full agreement that companies want obedient workers more than they want to develop some sort of brain trust.

BTW, could someone explain to me WHY a CEO deserves million-dollar severance after driving a company into a wall? I don't get it.
User avatar
charliebrownout
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 290
Joined: Thu 17 Apr 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: After You, Sir....

Postby joeltrout » Mon 12 May 2008, 19:06:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('charliebrownout', '
')
I think Bush is the poster-boy for what you've mentioned. Being rich doesn't make you smarter, it just makes it easier to survive without being smart.



Haha. The US president is one of the most powerful positions in the world. Bush isn't president because he is rich and he sure wouldn't have gotten there if he was dumb.

Even if you dont like bush which I assume you dont. You can have respect for someone acheiving the position he is in regardless of whether you agree with all of his decisions.

Until you are president or CEO of a fortune 500 company dont dog what they do. You have no idea what they are doing.

joeltrout
joeltrout
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1297
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: After You, Sir....

Postby charliebrownout » Mon 12 May 2008, 19:23:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('joeltrout', '
')
Haha. The US president is one of the most powerful positions in the world. Bush isn't president because he is rich and he sure wouldn't have gotten there if he was dumb.

Even if you dont like bush which I assume you dont. You can have respect for someone acheiving the position he is in regardless of whether you agree with all of his decisions.

Until you are president or CEO of a fortune 500 company dont dog what they do. You have no idea what they are doing.

joeltrout


I guess I should know my place and just bow down in awe of rich and powerful people...

Then again, that really isn't my style.

I'll concede that I may not know what they are doing, but sometimes I wonder if they do, either. :lol:
User avatar
charliebrownout
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 290
Joined: Thu 17 Apr 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: After You, Sir....

Postby joeltrout » Mon 12 May 2008, 19:27:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('charliebrownout', ' ')but sometimes I wonder if they do, either. :lol:


As soon as I submitted my post I knew I would get this response. :roll:

joeltrout
joeltrout
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1297
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: After You, Sir....

Postby Ludi » Mon 12 May 2008, 19:28:50

I don't respect George W Bush. I'm not a very respectful person.

W is an example of "survival of the lucky." He was fortunate to be born into a wealthy and influential family, and to be able to move from one position to the next in spite of not being very good at each job.
Ludi
 

Re: After You, Sir....

Postby joeltrout » Mon 12 May 2008, 19:42:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'H')e was fortunate to be born into a wealthy and influential family, and to be able to move from one position to the next in spite of not being very good at each job.


There are hundreds of families that meet that criteria.

Remember he did get re-elected.

joeltrout
joeltrout
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1297
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007, 03:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Medical Issues Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron