Some material on recent transport congestion here:
Article
"Arch Coal Inc. (ACI.N: Quote, Profile, Research) is the latest U.S. coal miner to warn about the pain of transportation delays. Earlier this week, it forecast a weaker first quarter in part due to railroad bottlenecks and barge delays that have hampered deliveries, offsetting the benefits of sky-high coal prices."
This puts a different slant on the discussion of bottlenecks. At the moment, energy prices are high, but that is not what is driving transport costs up. The real cause of transport cost inflation (at the moment) is strong growth combined with overloaded transport infrastructure.
A peak oil investor could get goofed up by this kind of phenomenon. Imagine somebody who knew about the "end of cheap coal", and invested in Arch Coal to capitalize on it. The price of coal rose, as expected, but the investment can't perform due to the "end of excess transport capacity". Focusing too much on energy as the limiting factor can lead you astray.
In fact, a good case could be made that congestion is the typical failure mode of extremely complex systems. Look at computer networks or power grids: they don't crash due to lack of energy. They crash due to congestion related phenomena which cause cascading failures.
Also from the article:
""It depends on whether you believe it's short-term or long- term disruption," Monahan said. "Some are restructuring the supply chain. If I'm using vendors that are more remote, there may be advantages to finding a closer supplier."
Most companies have not hit that "trigger point" yet, but there is evidence of companies that were outsourcing 100 percent offshore now hedging and moving 30 percent back closer to home, he added."
So a certain degree of relocalization is already happening, and it has nothing to do with scarcity of fossil fuels.






