by Iaato » Wed 19 Mar 2008, 20:46:50
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('anarky321', 'f')ractional reserve banking + credit collapse = deflation...
...this is not so, the runup in oil prices and food prices is not inflationary in nature, it is simply a factor of supply and demand
the runup in housing prices was inflationary because it was fueled by expansion of money - cheap cheap credit, now that the credit is gone we're going to see it collapse on itself in a spectacular deflation
as the economy goes down the tubes commodity prices simply cannot be sustained due to vastly decreased demand for goods (its not that people dont want to buy...they simply cant)
You're using an economic theory base for your reasoning, Anarky, which places money at the center of the universe rather than energy. Since we're on a Peak Oil forum, let's try rephrasing all of this in energese. Here is the energetic basis for monetary inflation:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '"')Inflation
The buying power of money is the amount of real goods and services that it can buy. If the amount a dollar can buy diminishes, this is called inflation. Inflation can be caused by increasing the amount of money circulating without increasing the amount of energy flowing and doing work, for example, when more money is printed. It can also occur when the money supply is constant but less work is done, for example, because energy becomes scarce. As long as there is unused fuel energy to be tapped, increasing the money supply can increase the flow of energy through the system, causing growth as well as some inflation.
During wartime, even when the money supply is not increased inflation occurs, because energy is diverted away from normal production into military activities. This reduces the energy available per dollar in the main economy, causing inflation.
Depression and Recession
The depression of 1929 was caused by a shortage of circulating money, a shortage of institutions to process money, and a lack of spending. At that time, the government undertook massive efforts to increase the circulation of money and the flow of energy. Energy was abundant, so stimulating the flow of money increased the inflow of energy. The recession of the 1970s, however, was caused by a shortage of energy. Increasing the money supply did not help in this case, as there was no increase in the inflow of energy. Thus, if the economy is in a period of low growth, increasing the money supply will increase the amount of work in the economy only if there are untapped fuel reserves available. If not, increasing the money supply will only increase inflation."
Fractional reserve banking creates expansion of the money supply in comparison to real production and energy availability. It works fine during periods of growth and high energy availability. When energy availability decreases, fractional reserve banking's expansionary tendencies become problematic. Credit is not money--we are discovering now how worthless credit can become if it is not backed by real capital. It can disappear and destroy corporations and contract the economy that way, but I don't think that credit collapse in and of itself that causes the deflation. It is the relative amount of circulating money in the system (not credit), relative to the amount of circulating energy, that creates either inflation or deflation. Credit is an overlay of trillions and trillions and trillions of dollars worth of debt-paper that has been used to game the system, being leveraged into larger and larger amounts, based on the same or even a decreasing capital base. I think this overlay at this point is mostly make-believe, and could go away poof if everyone agreed to just destroy all the fake paper equitably amongst the entities involved. Of course that is probably what will have to happen when they reset the currency.
That's my take on it, anyway. I find that when I translate economese into energese, everything becomes much clearer, and more honest (scientifically speaking).