Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

It sure did get quiet in here all of a sudden

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: It sure did get quiet in here all of a sudden

Unread postby PopeGideon » Wed 19 Mar 2008, 17:36:08

precipitous drop in PMs - generally linked to a CB somewhere dumping large quantities. Perhaps to raise cash.
User avatar
PopeGideon
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 151
Joined: Fri 25 Jan 2008, 04:00:00

Re: It sure did get quiet in here all of a sudden

Unread postby americandream » Wed 19 Mar 2008, 17:36:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JFT', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('americandream', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JFT', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'M')akes sense that oil prices are going to undulate. Price spike leads to demand reduction leads to transient price drop. I've been waiting for a sustained drop since $40 a barrel. Hasn't happened yet.

The precipitous drop in metals is pretty mysterious to me, as is the dramatic rebound in Lehman Brothers stock. It was down to about 20 on Monday and is now back up in the 40's.


Probably Lehman is up because the FED bailout on Bear Stearns assured the speculators that, if a big bank got into trouble, they would come to the rescue. Besides, with all those injections of liquidity into the financial system and rate cuts, the investors are feeling assured, thus, a "flight to safety" (investment in gold, silver, etc) is less appealing.


Depends on which investors you mean. The carry trade is still flying south.


I tought the increase in japanese rates had already put an end to it. BTW:do you think the fed rate cut will end up creating a carry trade of its own?

Oh, and remember that "investor confidence" I was speaking about? well...dow jones is dropping -293 as we speak. :D


Personally, I reckon these current Fed moves are really scaring the smart money. I don't think there's any trust left anymore and these moves which are clearly reactive rather than proactive, send out warning signals that all is not well despite assurances. Investors are adopting a hit and run strategy rather than a park and ride. Why, even the creme-de-la-creme of carry, the aussie is on the turn (long term trend).

Until this sub-prime debacle is publicly exorcised, there's going to be what I would term, guerilla war investing.
americandream
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 8650
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: It sure did get quiet in here all of a sudden

Unread postby BigTex » Wed 19 Mar 2008, 17:57:26

Here's a thought:

Smart money is getting out of PMs because they look overbought and it's profit taking. Smart money knows that bigger equity downers are coming, which will further depress PM prices short-term because investors will be selling everything. When PM prices are sucked down with the broad decline, the smart money will come back in and buy at the depressed prices before the PMs start back up while the rest of the equity market languishes. The small investor will miss out on the PM trough because they're too scared of the fact that everything seems to be tanking at once.

I can barely make out the outlines of this pattern, but this is what it looks like to me.

This pattern should repeat when the long term bond market explodes, probably later this year.

The good news is that when the long bond market corrects, there should be the opportunity to buy 30 year bonds paying 8-10%, which should be very good investments going forward.
:)
User avatar
BigTex
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3858
Joined: Thu 03 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Graceland

Re: It sure did get quiet in here all of a sudden

Unread postby pup55 » Wed 19 Mar 2008, 18:12:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'L')ight, sweet crude for April delivery fell $4.94 to settle at $104.48 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange, the largest one-day price decline for a front-month oil contract since 1991


This is a pretty idiotic statement. Of course the five point drop is among the highest. The price is $100 for pete's sake.

On a percentage basis, in the past 17 years, the following one-day price drops were bigger:

Honestly, how stupid do they think people are?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Jan 17, 1991 33.00%
Oct 22, 1990 16.01%
Sep 24, 2001 15.25%
Apr 21, 1989 13.51%
Aug 27, 1990 12.94%
Nov 30, 1990 12.34%
Dec 20, 2000 12.14%
Nov 15, 2001 11.60%
Dec 05, 1990 10.99%
Dec 17, 1998 10.90%
Apr 23, 2003 10.90%
Jan 18, 1991 10.21%
Feb 21, 1991 9.67%
Mar 18, 2003 9.33%
May 23, 1989 9.03%
Nov 14, 2001 8.91%
Jan 23, 1991 8.85%
Mar 21, 1996 8.72%
Sep 21, 2000 8.60%
Oct 02, 1990 8.47%
Mar 08, 2000 8.41%
Oct 24, 1988 8.35%
Aug 08, 1990 8.30%
Nov 20, 1990 8.22%
Jun 15, 1998 8.18%
Oct 19, 1990 8.18%
Jan 23, 2001 8.14%
Jan 23, 1989 8.11%
Dec 21, 1988 8.07%
May 19, 1998 7.89%
Jul 21, 2000 7.66%
Dec 01, 2004 7.41%
Aug 29, 1990 7.03%
Mar 28, 1994 6.94%
Oct 08, 1999 6.90%
Feb 18, 1992 6.89%
Jan 02, 1991 6.86%
Sep 02, 2003 6.84%
Jun 18, 1998 6.59%
Nov 29, 1993 6.53%
Dec 27, 2004 6.47%
Feb 15, 1991 6.45%
Jun 20, 1989 6.38%
Feb 21, 1996 6.37%
Jan 08, 1990 6.33%
Oct 01, 1990 6.13%
Apr 12, 2002 6.08%
Sep 21, 1995 6.05%
Nov 05, 1990 6.00%
Nov 12, 1990 5.96%
Mar 21, 2003 5.94%
Nov 14, 1990 5.92%
Oct 16, 2000 5.92%
Nov 24, 2003 5.92%
Apr 23, 1996 5.69%
Oct 19, 1998 5.65%
Mar 19, 2003 5.65%
Jul 05, 2000 5.63%
Dec 20, 1996 5.61%
Jun 02, 2004 5.60%
Oct 17, 1990 5.58%
Mar 16, 1998 5.55%
Nov 16, 1998 5.53%
May 22, 1996 5.52%
Aug 22, 2001 5.52%
Apr 30, 1996 5.48%
Aug 10, 1998 5.43%
Jun 11, 1998 5.42%
Dec 05, 2000 5.41%
Oct 28, 1999 5.41%
Nov 30, 1998 5.40%
Sep 16, 1996 5.39%
Apr 20, 2000 5.37%
Jun 23, 2003 5.35%
Dec 01, 2000 5.32%
Nov 30, 1999 5.28%
Mar 20, 1996 5.26%
Jul 20, 1999 5.23%
Oct 20, 1988 5.19%
Mar 28, 2001 5.19%
Jan 22, 2003 5.09%
Jun 21, 2000 5.08%
Jun 27, 2001 5.08%
Jan 09, 2002 5.04%
Dec 20, 1989 5.02%
Jul 22, 2003 5.00%
Aug 21, 1996 4.99%
Apr 21, 2004 4.97%
Sep 08, 2000 4.97%
Dec 02, 2004 4.92%
Jan 21, 2000 4.92%
Oct 27, 2004 4.91%
Dec 06, 2001 4.87%
Mar 21, 2000 4.86%
Feb 23, 1998 4.83%
Apr 10, 2003 4.82%
Jun 09, 1998 4.81%
Mar 13, 2003 4.81%
Mar 20, 2000 4.79%
Apr 27, 2005 4.78%
Apr 10, 2000 4.75%
Dec 14, 1987 4.75%
Jan 22, 1990 4.73%
May 02, 1988 4.72%
Jan 17, 2002 4.72%
Jan 04, 2007 4.68%
Dec 02, 1994 4.66%
Dec 15, 1987 4.64%
Apr 07, 1999 4.64%
May 18, 1999 4.63%
Nov 09, 1990 4.62%
Jul 20, 1998 4.58%
Nov 21, 1988 4.56%
May 23, 1994 4.55%
Aug 06, 2007 4.53%
User avatar
pup55
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5249
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: It sure did get quiet in here all of a sudden

Unread postby BigTex » Wed 19 Mar 2008, 18:17:23

The better "record" story from today is gold, which dropped $59 an ounce.

If it had dropped that much in 1972 it would have been free.
:)
User avatar
BigTex
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3858
Joined: Thu 03 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Graceland

Re: It sure did get quiet in here all of a sudden

Unread postby threadbear » Wed 19 Mar 2008, 18:22:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', 'H')ere's a thought:

Smart money is getting out of PMs because they look overbought and it's profit taking. Smart money knows that bigger equity downers are coming, which will further depress PM prices short-term because investors will be selling everything. When PM prices are sucked down with the broad decline, the smart money will come back in and buy at the depressed prices before the PMs start back up while the rest of the equity market languishes. The small investor will miss out on the PM trough because they're too scared of the fact that everything seems to be tanking at once.

I can barely make out the outlines of this pattern, but this is what it looks like to me.

This pattern should repeat when the long term bond market explodes, probably later this year.

The good news is that when the long bond market corrects, there should be the opportunity to buy 30 year bonds paying 8-10%, which should be very good investments going forward.


This was Steven Moyer's position, several months ago, over at Market Oracle. He didn't equate the action to "smart" money though. He figured that, ultimately there would be a run on 401k's and anything else that could be liquidated, in a time of uncertainty, including gold.

He thought gold could go back to 550.00 or thereabouts, at which time he was going to load up, as it would ultimately be the investment of choice, for the remainder of the decade.

Everything is down, today. Looks like Steve could be right.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: It sure did get quiet in here all of a sudden

Unread postby americandream » Wed 19 Mar 2008, 18:33:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', 'H')ere's a thought:

Smart money is getting out of PMs because they look overbought and it's profit taking. Smart money knows that bigger equity downers are coming, which will further depress PM prices short-term because investors will be selling everything. When PM prices are sucked down with the broad decline, the smart money will come back in and buy at the depressed prices before the PMs start back up while the rest of the equity market languishes. The small investor will miss out on the PM trough because they're too scared of the fact that everything seems to be tanking at once.

I can barely make out the outlines of this pattern, but this is what it looks like to me.

This pattern should repeat when the long term bond market explodes, probably later this year.

The good news is that when the long bond market corrects, there should be the opportunity to buy 30 year bonds paying 8-10%, which should be very good investments going forward.


Oh, I agree that there will be buying on short and mid term dips. But until the banks are cleared of all the bad debt that relates to sub-prime financing, I reckon the smart guys will be rotating their funds through the revolving door. That's the stance I've taken. Find somewhere as safe as possible to hold funds and then dart in and out of risk when appropriate...and the current risk averse volatility seems to bear me out.

I'm not sure just how good Treasury ratings will be if the Fed continues to take the shit stuff in as collateral. But then again, if there's an 8% correction, why not run with risk which should be ok by then? What do you reckon?
americandream
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 8650
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: It sure did get quiet in here all of a sudden

Unread postby threadbear » Wed 19 Mar 2008, 18:45:24

Where is the money coming from? The unending question.

I don't believe it is the Fed, nor do I believe it is Japanese housewives, at least not directly. I believe it is hedge funds - or maybe was will be more correct soon enough.

The hedge fund industry is the one which has shown explosive growth over the last 5 years and they have something close to $1.5 trillion under management. They don't hesitate to engage in risky behavior since its not their money. They are heavy users of leverage. Increasingly Pension funds and institutional investors have employed them to "juice" the returns. They can operate anywhere in the financial markets - derivatives to commodities and anywhere in between. They are not long term investors indeed they are the opposite of long term investment. They will exploit any advantage they can find including and certainly not limited to things like the yen carry trade

The concept used to be that their stealth and contrarianism allowed them to navigate the crevices in the markets and extract outsized returns. The effectiveness of that strategy is soon negated by the sheer volume of capital attempting to act in the same manner. It would tend to become much more herd like over time resulting in your "black box" type moves in the markets as they all switch on and pile in.
Yobob:
They have done for the stock markets in the post 2000 period what mutual funds did in the prior decade.

Its all great fun until someone gets their eye poked out. More and more eyes are getting poked of late, as we have witnessed various hedge funds blow up.

History rhymes. Much of the stock market crash in 1929 was blamed on the "investment trusts". They were a forerunner of today' mutual funds but without all those nasty regulations now present. They operated much more like today's hedge funds and then as is now were really the last hurrah before the lights went out.

http://indexcalls.com/forums/index.php? ... ntry340788
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: It sure did get quiet in here all of a sudden

Unread postby Ferretlover » Wed 19 Mar 2008, 19:01:52

Money coming from all those not-entered-on-the-balance-sheets items?
"Open the gates of hell!" ~Morgan Freeman's character in the movie, Olympus Has Fallen.
Ferretlover
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 5852
Joined: Wed 13 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Hundreds of miles further inland

Re: It sure did get quiet in here all of a sudden

Unread postby americandream » Wed 19 Mar 2008, 19:01:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'W')here is the money coming from? The unending question.

I don't believe it is the Fed, nor do I believe it is Japanese housewives, at least not directly. I believe it is hedge funds - or maybe was will be more correct soon enough.

The hedge fund industry is the one which has shown explosive growth over the last 5 years and they have something close to $1.5 trillion under management. They don't hesitate to engage in risky behavior since its not their money. They are heavy users of leverage. Increasingly Pension funds and institutional investors have employed them to "juice" the returns. They can operate anywhere in the financial markets - derivatives to commodities and anywhere in between. They are not long term investors indeed they are the opposite of long term investment. They will exploit any advantage they can find including and certainly not limited to things like the yen carry trade

The concept used to be that their stealth and contrarianism allowed them to navigate the crevices in the markets and extract outsized returns. The effectiveness of that strategy is soon negated by the sheer volume of capital attempting to act in the same manner. It would tend to become much more herd like over time resulting in your "black box" type moves in the markets as they all switch on and pile in.
Yobob:
They have done for the stock markets in the post 2000 period what mutual funds did in the prior decade.

Its all great fun until someone gets their eye poked out. More and more eyes are getting poked of late, as we have witnessed various hedge funds blow up.

History rhymes. Much of the stock market crash in 1929 was blamed on the "investment trusts". They were a forerunner of today' mutual funds but without all those nasty regulations now present. They operated much more like today's hedge funds and then as is now were really the last hurrah before the lights went out.

http://indexcalls.com/forums/index.php? ... ntry340788


A lot depends on how well one can identify underlying trends and market flow. There's a large segment of the market out there who trade at the more superficial level and tend to be the sacrificial lambs to the smart cash, invariably the big pools such as hedge funds.

However, you have to stand back from all of this. Fast paced, capital intensive markets will by their very nature be Darwinian in tendency. Investing in such an environment is a zero sum game...someone has to lose to counterbalance the winner and invariably, the fitter one survives. The sub-prime debacle simply highlights the fact that the pace of investing has shifted a notch and new magnitudes of risk momentum are at play.

I'm not entirely in agreement that we are at the end times for capitalism. Rather, I believe, that we are now in a capital market thats been shed of the last vestiges of any illusions. When confidence returns, it will be confidence of a different calibre. Risk investing will, I suspect be even more red in tooth and claw in years to come and I suspect that the magnitude of volatility will increase significantly. Welcome to the new age of the gladiator.
americandream
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 8650
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: It sure did get quiet in here all of a sudden

Unread postby BigTex » Wed 19 Mar 2008, 19:04:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('americandream', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', 'H')ere's a thought:

Smart money is getting out of PMs because they look overbought and it's profit taking. Smart money knows that bigger equity downers are coming, which will further depress PM prices short-term because investors will be selling everything. When PM prices are sucked down with the broad decline, the smart money will come back in and buy at the depressed prices before the PMs start back up while the rest of the equity market languishes. The small investor will miss out on the PM trough because they're too scared of the fact that everything seems to be tanking at once.

I can barely make out the outlines of this pattern, but this is what it looks like to me.

This pattern should repeat when the long term bond market explodes, probably later this year.

The good news is that when the long bond market corrects, there should be the opportunity to buy 30 year bonds paying 8-10%, which should be very good investments going forward.


Oh, I agree that there will be buying on short and mid term dips. But until the banks are cleared of all the bad debt that relates to sub-prime financing, I reckon the smart guys will be rotating their funds through the revolving door. That's the stance I've taken. Find somewhere as safe as possible to hold funds and then dart in and out of risk when appropriate...and the current risk averse volatility seems to bear me out.

I'm not sure just how good Treasury ratings will be if the Fed continues to take the shit stuff in as collateral. But then again, if there's an 8% correction, why not run with risk which should be ok by then? What do you reckon?


I can probably make a better argument right now than at any time in recent history for why there is NO real safe haven. Stocks, bonds, cash and PMs all have serious downside risk.

Think about it. Stocks are scary, the bond market is potentially even scarier. PMs look overbought, and cash loses a little of its value seemingly every day, and there don't appear to be any changes in the fundamentals that would strengthen the dollar on the horizon.

The only truly safe portfolio I could think of right now (and this is based upon thoughts from many of you) would be cash holdings in a basket of currencies, a basket of PM holdings, and perhaps a few defensive stocks like utilities with a reliable dividend that ought to backstop them in a hard selloff.

Of course, the safest investment of all, as usual, is to pay down debt. That gets you a guaranteed risk free return on investment.

Also, if you have any annuity type payment you make every month like health club dues, premium cable channels, stuff like that, think about the principal that would be necessary to generate that stream of income. If you cut off the annuity payment you are making, you are effectively generating for yourself extra tax-free income. This approach sort of creates what you might call "phantom wealth", in that you are creating a stream of income by foregoing consumption rather than placing capital at risk.

Note that there is a clever bit of risk shifting in the strategy described above as well. You would need $10,000 to generate enough income to pay the $50 a month health club dues, and there would still be risk in that approach. If you cancel the health club membership, however, you are basically equating the benefit of the health club membership to the return you would get on a $10,000 investment, EXCEPT there is no risk in canceling the health club membership (other than the risks associated with not being physically fit, but you can get that elsewhere for free).

Thus, you are generating the same income, but by doing so through foregone consumption you are generating the income RISK-FREE, as opposed to having to do it by investing your $10,000, which will always involve SOME level of risk.

This is just a fancy way of describing the benefits of living frugally, but I think that there is a lot of wisdom in it.
:)
User avatar
BigTex
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3858
Joined: Thu 03 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Graceland
Top

Re: It sure did get quiet in here all of a sudden

Unread postby threadbear » Wed 19 Mar 2008, 19:32:11

Scroll down to flick of Paul Volker weighing in with the amazing intellect :roll: ,Charlie Rose.

http://calculatedrisk.blogspot.com/
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: It sure did get quiet in here all of a sudden

Unread postby anarky321 » Wed 19 Mar 2008, 19:36:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Utopia', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', '
')Makes no sense on the back of a .75-point interest-rate cut, does it?


You hit the nail on the head. It doesn't make sense.



oh but it does

what we are seeing is the first realisation that we are facing a deflationary depression ahead

commodities are going to plunge to much lower levels and that includes gold and oil, although obviously those 2 are going to plunge much less than all the other ones

dollar is up because people are speculating that the ECB, BOE and others are going to start cutting rates agressively since the situation in EU and Asia is starting to look really bad, and anyone with half a good brain can see that inflation will be a non-issue in this recession, thus by keeping their rates up they're only hurting themselves more; inflation in a total credit collapse is a joke

price increases are NOT inflation, inflation is an increase in money supply, this is NOT happening, in fact money supply is drying up fast

too many people on here simply watch the price of oil climb but dont really understand the economic mechanics behind the commodity market, thus when the oil starts plunging they can only explain it with "speculation"

the real answer is demand reduction and deflation due to collapse of credit

in the short-term gold bugs are going to get squicked
User avatar
anarky321
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 231
Joined: Thu 04 Oct 2007, 03:00:00
Location: North-East USA
Top

Re: It sure did get quiet in here all of a sudden

Unread postby threadbear » Wed 19 Mar 2008, 19:43:11

If commodities continue the plunge, you're right Anarky, the deflationist camp wins. It could easily be just a blip, though.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: It sure did get quiet in here all of a sudden

Unread postby anarky321 » Wed 19 Mar 2008, 19:56:53

fractional reserve banking + credit collapse = deflation

FRB + credit collapse + increased reserve ratios due to higher risk = serious...serious deflation (credit is decreased exponentially)

commodities are going to tank for the simple fact that noone will be buying

there's alot of speculative money in commodities right now but those positions will be unwound as the financial crisis progresses ever further

gold is going to break for the simple reason that in a deflationary environment there's no need to hold gold (except if your government is at risk of defaulting of course); gold has been pushed to nosebleeding heights by misinformation and misunderstanding; a huge percentage of the population actually buys the inflation prognosis with all seriousness - they see food prices and oil prices and gold prices shoot up and think *f*ck i need to get into gold to preserve my savings"

this is not so, the runup in oil prices and food prices is not inflationary in nature, it is simply a factor of supply and demand

the runup in housing prices was inflationary because it was fueled by expansion of money - cheap cheap credit, now that the credit is gone we're going to see it collapse on itself in a spectacular deflation

as the economy goes down the tubes commodity prices simply cannot be sustained due to vastly decreased demand for goods (its not that people dont want to buy...they simply cant)

the US consumer has been on a credit binge for the last 5 years

the party is over, and the hangover is going to be a b*tch
User avatar
anarky321
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 231
Joined: Thu 04 Oct 2007, 03:00:00
Location: North-East USA

Re: It sure did get quiet in here all of a sudden

Unread postby dorlomin » Wed 19 Mar 2008, 20:07:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'S')croll down to flick of Paul Volker weighing in with the amazing intellect :roll: ,Charlie Rose.

http://calculatedrisk.blogspot.com/
Had Volker been in charge for the past 8 years would we be in this current position?
User avatar
dorlomin
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5193
Joined: Sun 05 Aug 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: It sure did get quiet in here all of a sudden

Unread postby Pops » Wed 19 Mar 2008, 20:09:54

As my neighbor says:

It sure is pretty but what do you do with it?


IOW put your money in things you can use and no one else can lose.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: It sure did get quiet in here all of a sudden

Unread postby Iaato » Wed 19 Mar 2008, 20:46:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('anarky321', 'f')ractional reserve banking + credit collapse = deflation...

...this is not so, the runup in oil prices and food prices is not inflationary in nature, it is simply a factor of supply and demand

the runup in housing prices was inflationary because it was fueled by expansion of money - cheap cheap credit, now that the credit is gone we're going to see it collapse on itself in a spectacular deflation

as the economy goes down the tubes commodity prices simply cannot be sustained due to vastly decreased demand for goods (its not that people dont want to buy...they simply cant)


You're using an economic theory base for your reasoning, Anarky, which places money at the center of the universe rather than energy. Since we're on a Peak Oil forum, let's try rephrasing all of this in energese. Here is the energetic basis for monetary inflation:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '"')Inflation

The buying power of money is the amount of real goods and services that it can buy. If the amount a dollar can buy diminishes, this is called inflation. Inflation can be caused by increasing the amount of money circulating without increasing the amount of energy flowing and doing work, for example, when more money is printed. It can also occur when the money supply is constant but less work is done, for example, because energy becomes scarce. As long as there is unused fuel energy to be tapped, increasing the money supply can increase the flow of energy through the system, causing growth as well as some inflation.

During wartime, even when the money supply is not increased inflation occurs, because energy is diverted away from normal production into military activities. This reduces the energy available per dollar in the main economy, causing inflation.

Depression and Recession

The depression of 1929 was caused by a shortage of circulating money, a shortage of institutions to process money, and a lack of spending. At that time, the government undertook massive efforts to increase the circulation of money and the flow of energy. Energy was abundant, so stimulating the flow of money increased the inflow of energy. The recession of the 1970s, however, was caused by a shortage of energy. Increasing the money supply did not help in this case, as there was no increase in the inflow of energy. Thus, if the economy is in a period of low growth, increasing the money supply will increase the amount of work in the economy only if there are untapped fuel reserves available. If not, increasing the money supply will only increase inflation."


Brainfood

Fractional reserve banking creates expansion of the money supply in comparison to real production and energy availability. It works fine during periods of growth and high energy availability. When energy availability decreases, fractional reserve banking's expansionary tendencies become problematic. Credit is not money--we are discovering now how worthless credit can become if it is not backed by real capital. It can disappear and destroy corporations and contract the economy that way, but I don't think that credit collapse in and of itself that causes the deflation. It is the relative amount of circulating money in the system (not credit), relative to the amount of circulating energy, that creates either inflation or deflation. Credit is an overlay of trillions and trillions and trillions of dollars worth of debt-paper that has been used to game the system, being leveraged into larger and larger amounts, based on the same or even a decreasing capital base. I think this overlay at this point is mostly make-believe, and could go away poof if everyone agreed to just destroy all the fake paper equitably amongst the entities involved. Of course that is probably what will have to happen when they reset the currency.

That's my take on it, anyway. I find that when I translate economese into energese, everything becomes much clearer, and more honest (scientifically speaking).
“Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value ---- zero.” --Voltaire
User avatar
Iaato
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1008
Joined: Mon 12 Mar 2007, 03:00:00
Location: As close as I can get to the beginning of the pipe.
Top

Re: It sure did get quiet in here all of a sudden

Unread postby threadbear » Wed 19 Mar 2008, 21:08:59

Iatto and Anarky--This is where the rubber hits the road. If oil continues it's downward trajectory, we may have a better idea of how the oil is being priced; whether it's based purely on traditional economic theory, or if it is actually factoring in depleting oil stocks.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: It sure did get quiet in here all of a sudden

Unread postby DantesPeak » Wed 19 Mar 2008, 21:37:05

It's funny that the drop in oil is characterized as huge drop when it is at the highest price in history, except for a few recent weeks.

Those hoping that 'speculators' leave the oil markets may get what they wish for, but those speculators may not be on the side of the market they think are.

If anyone has proof that speculators are on one side of the market or another, let's see it. We've discussed PO here for years with facts, figures, and data. Why should those talking about a speculative bubble get a free ride without presenting any rational evidence to support their position?

I suspect a lot of the drop these last two days is just a normal correction in a very powerful bull market.
User avatar
DantesPeak
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6277
Joined: Sat 23 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: New Jersey

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests