by MrBill » Thu 20 Mar 2008, 05:05:33
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('efarmer', 'M')r. Bill, you always seem to spoil us with carefully reasoned
and plausible answers to impossible questions.
With the present scale and depth of the financial crisis
could you give us your best guess as to if a stable
regrouping point is:
Months Away
Years Away
Decades Away
Never
That's yet another dumb question efarmer, go piss off
I think this credit crisis will consume 2008 and extend into 2009. Whether that is the end of it will depend crucially on the public policy responses. It took more than two years for the market to find a bottom after the dotcon crash, and this crisis is by far worse. The Internet bubble was bad for investors, but it funded lots of useful new technology and innovation. This financial crash is just wiping out paper gains without creating any other value.
Basically what I am seeing, is that the Fed funds rate cuts are not filtering down to borrowers as banks hoard cash. In flat price terms my cost of borrowing has actually increased since the Fed's latest 75 bps cut.
I do not think this is a reflection of my own credit worthiness? Rather I see it as a limited pool of Interbank liquidity, and it is being rationed by price. I can still borrow, but I have to pay up for it. Otherwise the banks will ration what little funds they have to lend to the institution willing to pay more for it depending, of course, on whether they have good collateral, and are perceived as being creditworthy.
This hurts me in the short-term. But I would expect no less. No trader would like to lend at Libor + 1.00% when he can lend the same money at Libor + 2.50%. However, at this juncture capital security trumps yield, so borrowers are willing to pay up for scarce liquidity to make sure they can fund themselves come what may, and if there is even a hint of instability then the banks themselves are ruthless about cutting off the spigot. This is straining a lot of bank-client relationships as verbal assurances go out the window, and credit risk managers and lawyers scrutinize legal agreements for escape clauses.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ') March 19 (Bloomberg) -- The cost of borrowing in pounds and euros rose as concern grew that some European banks are having increased difficulty accessing credit.
The London interbank offered rate, or Libor, for three-month loans in euros climbed 1 basis point to 4.67 percent today, the highest this year, the British Bankers' Association said. The comparable pound rate also added 1 basis point, to 5.98 percent, also the highest since 2007.
HBOS Plc, Britain's biggest mortgage lender, said today it has ``ready access'' to funding after the company plunged as much as 17 percent. Money-market rates are rising as banks hoard cash on speculation financial institutions will reveal more losses. Bear Stearns Cos. had to be rescued by JPMorgan Chase & Co. this week after a run on the bank.
``The market is concerned about another Bear Stearns-type event unfolding in Europe,'' said Richard Bryant, a bond trader at Citigroup Global Markets Inc. in New York. People are ``on edge yet again,'' he said.
The difference between what the U.K. government and banks pay to borrow for three months, a gauge of the availability of funds in the British money markets, rose to a record 179 basis points, from 152 basis points a week earlier. The spread averaged 11 basis points in the first half of last year.
Credit-default swaps on Edinburgh-based HBOS rose 19 basis points to 270, according to CMA Datavision. Contracts on Lloyds TSB rose 4 basis points to 114, CMA prices show. The securities, used to speculate on a company's ability to repay debt, rise as credit quality worsens. A basis point is 0.01 percentage point.
In hindsight, I could have almost predicted the start of this crisis to the day. When all of a sudden money center banks were calling me up and offering me hundreds of millions at very low spreads I should have seen that as the high tide mark. Actually I did, but I did not suspect spreads would deteriorate as far as they did.
Now we will be employing interest rate swaps (IRS) and future rate agreements (FRA) to protect ourselves against the higher rates to come. However, just to be clear, that protects me from higher Interbank rates, but does not guarantee liquidity. I still have a funding risk (the opposite of re-investment risk) if either my financial situation deteriorate or more likely the asset class that I am using as collateral deteriorates in price or quality. That is why you try to draw liquidity from deep and wide pools, and not have it concentrated in one or two places only.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')March 19 (Bloomberg) -- JWM Partners LLC, the investment firm run by ex-Long-Term Capital Management LP chief
, according to two people with knowledge of the matter.
Meriwether's Relative Value Opportunity fund was hurt as bond managers such as Peloton Partners LLP and Carlyle Capital Corp. were forced to sell securities to meet margin calls, said the investors, who asked not to be identified because JWM doesn't publicly disclose returns. The Greenwich, Connecticut-based firm, which is selling holdings to reduce borrowings and lower risk, didn't have any loans called, they said.
said Benjamin Sarly, head of marketing at Sanno Point Capital Management in New York, a relative-value credit fund.
Meriwether declined to comment.
JWM Partners opened a year after Russia's 1998 default resulted in almost $4 billion of losses for Greenwich, Connecticut-based Long-Term Capital. The Federal Reserve orchestrated a bailout by its 14 lenders.
.