Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

F-35 cost: Now One TRILLION Bucks

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: F-35 cost: Now One TRILLION Bucks

Unread postby pedalling_faster » Fri 14 Mar 2008, 16:55:05

part of that went to my salary.

so in a roundabout way, that huge project helped me
prepare for Peak Oil/ Energy Transition.
http://www.LASIK-Flap.com/ ~ Health Warning about LASIK Eye Surgery
User avatar
pedalling_faster
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1399
Joined: Sat 10 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

Re: F-35 cost: Now One TRILLION Bucks

Unread postby The_Toecutter » Fri 14 Mar 2008, 17:35:41

One trillion eh?

$400 million could design, develop, test, market, and get the machine tools needed to mass produce an affordable long range midsize EV for a small company like Tesla.

$200 billion could get rapid charge infrastructure all over the entire United States so that long distance travel by electric car becomes practical.

$400 billion could buy one hell of a mass transit system for every major city in the U.S.

$400 billion could get installed roughly 250 GW installed peak capacity worth of wind generators.



...and here we waste it on airplanes.

Gir can sing it best...

Video: peakoil.com's unofficial mascot sings "The Doom Song"
The unnecessary felling of a tree, perhaps the old growth of centuries, seems to me a crime little short of murder. ~Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
The_Toecutter
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: F-35 cost: Now One TRILLION Bucks

Unread postby Anthrobus » Fri 14 Mar 2008, 18:49:16

Is the united states death star already in development and how much is the baby supposed do cost?

Has the ultimate weapon to be a thing of ultimate technology?

What about moral leadership? too expensive?

All this talk of billions and trillions recently makes me lose my sense for scale. Logarithmic thinking. Money is of no concern if the sums are just large enough. Just one measly trillion? come one folks!
The mouse, i`ve been sure for years, limps home from the site of the burning ferris wheel with a brand new, airtight plan for killing the cat.

J. D. Salinger
Anthrobus
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 134
Joined: Mon 12 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Germany

Re: F-35 cost: Now One TRILLION Bucks

Unread postby EnergyUnlimited » Sat 15 Mar 2008, 04:44:45

So what if ground defenses around a world will also begin to rely on lasers?
If it may be possible to fit 100kW laser on board of fighter plane, then it is certainly possible to build 1-5 MW laser based antiaircraft defenses.
Keeping devices small would not be so important, so simpler technology could be used.

Such installations would make a concept of military aircraft to be an obsolete one, unless it is operated in cloudy days where lasers are of no use.
User avatar
EnergyUnlimited
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7537
Joined: Mon 15 May 2006, 03:00:00

Re: F-35 cost: Now One TRILLION Bucks

Unread postby jboogy » Sat 15 Mar 2008, 15:20:41

Zardoz wrote:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')'m absolutely positive that you don't comprehend the very basic concept that we can't wait around and see if the Russians or Chinese come up with something that does warrant it.
Your basic concept is flawed, Zardoz. I contend our ICBM's mean we absolutely can wait around and see what they come up with, the security of the North American continent will never be threatened by conventional, governmental forces again. The ability to destroy aggressors completely garauntees this.
How's this for a concept; withdraw all our personnel and equipment that's deployed in close proximity to Russian and Chinese borders, that might help defuse some tension. Stop responding to every foreign policy crises or disagreement with either violence or the threat of violence, that might calm them a little, stop electing obtuse, belligerent leaders that proclaim things like; "your with us or against us", stop invading and colonizing countries that are coincidentally, both terrorism nests and resource rich.
and
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')e need to have this stuff designed, developed, built, de-bugged, and in position well in advance of that. How hard is that to understand?
If your theory is fundamentally incorrect, I not only will never "understand", I don't want to understand, understanding would imply stupidity on my part.
Maybe you missed this number on another thread: we'll spend more in Iraq in 2008, than both Russia and China will spend on their entire military budgets/ 142 billion.
You paint a picture of our enemies desperately building arms in order to someday conquer us, that is a farce. We now have more destructive conventional power under our command, than all the destructive ability ever amassed in the combined history of the world, but we still need another type of jet, and lots of them.
The idea that our enemies may develope a fighter that's marginally better than our current crop of jets, thus ensuring our ultimate defeat in the event of war, is patently ridiculous.
This is the NFL on a world stage, our linebackers are bigger and faster than yours! Give me a fookin' break, no, better yet, help me to afford health insurance. Peace dividend my ass. God save us from old white guys with too much testosterone.
and
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'Y')ou are aware of all the recent Russian blustering and sabre-rattling, right? What do you think that's all about?
It's about a response to us planning to install missile bases in their former satellites, similar to the bluster and saber rattling we did when Russia tried to install missiles in Cuba. It's what they do, it's what we do. I don't think it warrants ANOTHER trillion dollar military commitment.
What's next, a new generation of bunker-busters every time Bin Laden takes a particularly nasty dump? Where does it end?
In case you haven't noticed the country is bankrupt, and we haven't been attacked by a serious threat, (foreign government) in 64 years. The "official" line is we've apparently spent a few trillion dollars over the past seven years to fight 10000 guys who think an IED is a "wicked pisser."
Perhaps the population would be less swayed to socialism if we had fewer examples of socialism from our "Free Market Capitalists". -----fiddler dave
User avatar
jboogy
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1191
Joined: Mon 06 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: the place where smartasses dwell

Re: F-35 cost: Now One TRILLION Bucks

Unread postby Tanada » Sat 15 Mar 2008, 16:10:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('The_Toecutter', 'O')ne trillion eh?

$400 million could design, develop, test, market, and get the machine tools needed to mass produce an affordable long range midsize EV for a small company like Tesla.

$200 billion could get rapid charge infrastructure all over the entire United States so that long distance travel by electric car becomes practical.

$400 billion could buy one hell of a mass transit system for every major city in the U.S.

$400 billion could get installed roughly 250 GW installed peak capacity worth of wind generators.

...and here we waste it on airplanes.


Saddest of all with $400 Billion we could build 150, 2 GWe fission power plants and take all the Coal plants offline permanently.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Alfred Tennyson', 'W')e are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17094
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA
Top

Re: F-35 cost: Now One TRILLION Bucks

Unread postby Zardoz » Sat 15 Mar 2008, 16:50:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jboogy', 'Y')our basic concept is flawed, Zardoz. I contend our ICBM's mean we absolutely can wait around and see what they come up with, the security of the North American continent will never be threatened by conventional, governmental forces again.

How are we supposed to fight resource wars with ICBMs?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '.')..stop invading and colonizing countries that are coincidentally, both terrorism nests and resource rich.

Great idea. Tell that to Hillary, McCain, and Obama. See if you can sell that concept to our esteemed representatives in Congress.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')his is the NFL on a world stage, our linebackers are bigger and faster than yours!

There you go. That's it exactly. That's how our "leaders" see the world.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hat's next, a new generation of bunker-busters every time Bin Laden takes a particularly nasty dump? Where does it end?

It doesn't. As TS progressively HTF, it can only get worse.

Everything you say is true, of course. In my posts I've just been pointing out the reasons why TPTB feel that this particular trillion-dollar military expenditure is justified.

The wars we'll be fighting in the future will be no more justifiable than the Iraq fiasco. That's about oil, and the next one will be, too, as will all the rest.

The F-35 is not a defensive weapon. It's a "strike fighter" and "attack bomber". Its role is offensive. It'll be just what we need to maintain our biggest-thug image.
"Thank you for attending the oil age. We're going to scrape what we can out of these tar pits in Alberta and then shut down the machines and turn out the lights. Goodnight." - seldom_seen
User avatar
Zardoz
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6323
Joined: Fri 02 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Oil-addicted Southern Californucopia
Top

Re: F-35 cost: Now One TRILLION Bucks

Unread postby Ferretlover » Sat 15 Mar 2008, 17:54:59

Random thought....
How does anyone know that the jet actually costs a trillion dollars, and not that there's been some extra cost padding for black ops?
HHhmmm?
"Open the gates of hell!" ~Morgan Freeman's character in the movie, Olympus Has Fallen.
Ferretlover
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 5852
Joined: Wed 13 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Hundreds of miles further inland

Re: F-35 cost: Now One TRILLION Bucks

Unread postby jboogy » Sun 16 Mar 2008, 02:33:05

I suspected you were playing the devils advocate Zardoz, I almost ended my post with my suspicion, but you did it extremely well, I'm embarassed you fooled me.
Perhaps the population would be less swayed to socialism if we had fewer examples of socialism from our "Free Market Capitalists". -----fiddler dave
User avatar
jboogy
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1191
Joined: Mon 06 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: the place where smartasses dwell

Previous

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest