by phaster » Sun 02 Mar 2008, 01:51:53
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', 'i')s it moral to thrive when others are struggling to survive?
IMHO the subject line question is kinda of ambiguous, because in nature all organisms from one cell amoebas, animals such as dogs and cat, all the way to humans, there exists an involuntary natural tendency for self preservation.
In nature as well as economic systems, there will be boom and bust cycles, and eventually the law of supply and demand will find a temporary equlibrium point (that is until some other imbalance occurs, as it always does).
For example this past week on the histoy channel, there was an episode on mega disasters about swarms of locust, and the entomologists inverviewed on that program described how and why population booms of locust swarms occur. Basically there exists a resource demand imbalance and when the locust encounter a localized food shortage, the locust under go a physical transformation, group think takes over and they (the locust) swarm to another geographic area in search for food. Eventually the swarm of locust dies off because that biological system in unsustainable.
http://www.history.com/minisite.do?cont ... ni_id=1401
For a long time, I have felt that in many ways, human populations are very much like locust swarms, because of group think. For example for the past few years the real estate market here in california was growing upwards of 20% per year, because I've got a formal education in physics and an interest in numbers, I knew that 20% growth per year for a few years was statistical anomaly, and basically unsustainable from an economic stand point. Bottom line, is I didn't and many others (perhaps many on this discussion board) were able to avoid direct financial pain, becase we recognized that "subprime" group think was BS from the onset.
So in this case I don't see any moral dilemma, in "thriving" so to speak in the current economic evironment.
If the question is about the wider subject about what obligation do I have toward my fellow human being, say half a world away. Sad to say I have come to the realization that even thought I have been in many third world countries, and have seen the human suffering of many different groups up close and personal, as it stands demand is exceeding supply and there will be some kind of event that will rebalance the system. Since I don't know this demand imbalance will play out, the best I can do is to make a conscious effort to minimize my own environment foot print, balance that idea against trying to maximize my own economic benefit, while doing my best to observe "the golden rule"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethic_of_reciprocity
I know its not an elegant solution, but its the best answer I've come to so far.....