Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Law of Receding Horizons

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: Law of Receding Horizons

Postby wisconsin_cur » Mon 25 Feb 2008, 05:09:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('yesplease', 'E')ven if hope isn't quantifiable, we'll either have it or not, so looking at it seems kind of trivial, don'tcha think? If we have it, great. If we don't, and lay down and die, then regardless of whether or no we can transition to something different, it won't matter because we won't do it. So, if we want to keep things up, we can just keep going, until we can't.


Hope is a lot more complex than that. I can loose hope in society's ability to cope, this does not mean that I have lost hope in my ability to keep me and mine alive. I can be disillusioned in my hope for world peace, it does not mean that I have lost hope for a second piece of peach cobbler. I may loose hope that my kids will turn out just like I planned, this does not mean that I cannot hope they will turn out to be good people.

Hope in our ability to navigate the future as a nation or culture is vital and any plan (as if we had one) would need to include a way to foster it. Hope got Britain through the Blitz. Hope brings cancer patients through chemo. Hope does a lot of things and it can be fostered through propaganda, a shared sense of sacrifice and success.

If we loose hope to chance, then all the math in the theoretical answers in the world will not fix the problems that we face. We need to keep people on the team or else they will vote against the wind turbines or start robbing the repair man or undertake any number of counter-productive behaviors.

In the theoretical world Hillary should have the Democratic nomination sewed up (actually in a theoretical world Chris Dodd should have the nomination sewed up) but instead we have a first term senator by the name of Barak Obama leading the pack. If we don't want our culture to go the way of the Dodd or the Clinton campaigns we better account for hope... because it really does seem to effect the math.
http://www.thenewfederalistpapers.com
User avatar
wisconsin_cur
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4576
Joined: Thu 10 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: 45 degrees North. 883 feet above sealevel.

Re: Law of Receding Horizons

Postby yesplease » Mon 25 Feb 2008, 05:34:14

I don't think I've heard of how Hillary should theoretically have the Dem's nomination according to math, but who knows?

In any event, What you're talking about specifically, non-cooperative bargain theory, is something that can be used, and I would guess is used, in order to gauge reactions to various policies. IMO it's fairly effective, and using individual reactions as a barometer for something is. Generally speaking, if something can benefit the whole and individual it's a win-win. Contrary to this idea, certain specific groups, who have undue influence thanks to certain set ups, can use this in order to magnify their position.

In plain English, there are actions you can take that, like I said, benefit both society and yourself. For instance, reducing gasoline consumption by driving more efficiently, building yourself a wind power generation, insulating your home and reducing your energy consumption, growing some of your own food, etc... Instead of tuning in and turning off, or buying a nice shiny new whathaveyou.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Professor Membrane', ' ')Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!
User avatar
yesplease
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3765
Joined: Tue 03 Oct 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Law of Receding Horizons

Postby wisconsin_cur » Mon 25 Feb 2008, 05:49:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('yesplease', '
')
In plain English, there are actions you can take that, like I said, benefit both society and yourself. For instance, reducing gasoline consumption by driving more efficiently, building yourself a wind power generation, insulating your home and reducing your energy consumption, growing some of your own food, etc... Instead of tuning in and turning off, or buying a nice shiny new whathaveyou.


And it is hope that keeps people in the "game" and not taking their toys and going home (ie building a bunker and preparing for mad max).

The question I am raising is how we prepare for the future. Do I buy wind turbines (either personally or through increased taxes) or do I buy grain and gold? Hope for the social unit leads me to vote for the wind turbines. If I become disillusioned with the social program of mitigation than I might decide to withdraw (emotionally, financially or physically) and invest in my personal program which may or may not be detrimental to the social program.
http://www.thenewfederalistpapers.com
User avatar
wisconsin_cur
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4576
Joined: Thu 10 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: 45 degrees North. 883 feet above sealevel.

Re: Law of Receding Horizons

Postby yesplease » Mon 25 Feb 2008, 06:13:12

I think that, like I said, the options that benefit yourself and society, would be the first on the list. Since those will take some time, if, at some later point, you feel that it's worthwhile to invest in something social or withdraw from that aspect, you are still free to do so, after having done some stuff that benefits both yourself and others in ther interim.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Professor Membrane', ' ')Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!
User avatar
yesplease
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3765
Joined: Tue 03 Oct 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Law of Receding Horizons

Postby wisconsin_cur » Mon 25 Feb 2008, 06:20:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('yesplease', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('wisconsin_cur', 'B')ut the "laws of economics" are trumped by limits. Some things are not available at any price and many more are not available at a price that we are willing or perhaps able to pay.
Yes they are. What are the limits, long term, for wind turbines?


So I've answered your question?

The limits of growth for wind turbines is the ability of people to hope/believe that they will benefit from building them or that the cost of building them is worth the opportunity cost of doing something else with the wealth they control.
http://www.thenewfederalistpapers.com
User avatar
wisconsin_cur
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4576
Joined: Thu 10 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: 45 degrees North. 883 feet above sealevel.
Top

Re: Law of Receding Horizons

Postby yesplease » Mon 25 Feb 2008, 06:28:50

You've answered a portion of my question. And, like you said, motivation is a concern. I've noticed that (IMO of course) even if options are presented with no foreseeable and reasonable problems, at less cost than what we use now, people will claim they aren't feasible because of unknown problems or assumed behavior. But that goes along the lines of if we don't want something to work, we'll make sure it won't work. I suppose I'm either confident enough, or apathetic enough, to feel that I'll be o.k. in most situations, and perhaps the insecurity of other posters is influencing there outlooks, but in any event, we'll see what happens sooner or later.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Professor Membrane', ' ')Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!
User avatar
yesplease
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3765
Joined: Tue 03 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Law of Receding Horizons

Postby Tyler_JC » Mon 25 Feb 2008, 13:55:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'A')s the price of petroleum increases, the price of everything made with petroleum increases, including all other secondary fuel sources. Is that hard to fathom? They go up in lockstep.

Solar is made with petroleum, otherwise you'd point to silicon foundries powered by wind.

Wind is made with petroleum, otherwise we'd see fiber-blade fabricators run on solar energy.

Ethanol is made with petroleum, otherwise farmer john would drive tractors running off batteries.

Oil-Finder, yesplease, LoneSnark: the same three cornies tilting at windmills.

edit: I forgot namenick. it's not a triumvirate it's quadriplegic :twisted:


I thought we already answered this one?

Oil is not 100% of the cost of every single product.
"www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse."
Tyler_JC
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Sat 25 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Boston, MA
Top

Re: Law of Receding Horizons

Postby Heineken » Tue 26 Feb 2008, 00:09:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'A')s the price of petroleum increases, the price of everything made with petroleum increases, including all other secondary fuel sources. Is that hard to fathom? They go up in lockstep.

Solar is made with petroleum, otherwise you'd point to silicon foundries powered by wind.

Wind is made with petroleum, otherwise we'd see fiber-blade fabricators run on solar energy.

Ethanol is made with petroleum, otherwise farmer john would drive tractors running off batteries.

Oil-Finder, yesplease, LoneSnark: the same three cornies tilting at windmills.

edit: I forgot namenick. it's not a triumvirate it's quadriplegic :twisted:


I thought we already answered this one?

Oil is not 100% of the cost of every single product.


True. But if the product cannot not exist (at least not affordably or maintainably) without oil, what difference does it make?
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog

"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia
Top

Re: Law of Receding Horizons

Postby yesplease » Wed 27 Feb 2008, 01:26:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', 'I') thought we already answered this one?

Oil is not 100% of the cost of every single product.


True. But if the product cannot not exist (at least not affordably or maintainably) without oil, what difference does it make?
The thing is that affordably or maintainably constantly changes, so even if we do need oil in the future for wind turbines in some way, as long as they are still cheaper than alternatives, including the cost of more expensive oil, say from tar sands or something, then we will use them. And if not, we won't. Price forecasting is a pain in the rear wrt policy, and resource availability, and public opinion, and etc... I haven't scratched the surface of any modeling wrt this stuff and those who have can accurately probably leverage that ability to make big bucks and won't be vocal about their predictions.
Last edited by yesplease on Wed 27 Feb 2008, 01:29:16, edited 1 time in total.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Professor Membrane', ' ')Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!
User avatar
yesplease
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3765
Joined: Tue 03 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Law of Receding Horizons

Postby MonteQuest » Wed 27 Feb 2008, 01:27:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', ' ')An increase in oil prices doesn't repeal the laws of economics.


It does if your economic system is based upon cheap energy, debt and and infinite growth.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Law of Receding Horizons

Postby yesplease » Wed 27 Feb 2008, 01:48:22

Fortunately for us nothing tangible in any finite economic system is based on the infinite. ;)
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Professor Membrane', ' ')Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!
User avatar
yesplease
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3765
Joined: Tue 03 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Law of Receding Horizons

Postby Heineken » Wed 27 Feb 2008, 01:53:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('yesplease', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', 'I') thought we already answered this one?

Oil is not 100% of the cost of every single product.


True. But if the product cannot not exist (at least not affordably or maintainably) without oil, what difference does it make?
The thing is that affordably or maintainably constantly changes, so even if we do need oil in the future for wind turbines in some way, as long as they are still cheaper than alternatives, including the cost of more expensive oil, say from tar sands or something, then we will use them. And if not, we won't. Price forecasting is a pain in the rear wrt policy, and resource availability, and public opinion, and etc... I haven't scratched the surface of any modeling wrt this stuff and those who have can accurately probably leverage that ability to make big bucks and won't be vocal about their predictions.


I meant to say "if the product cannot exist," not "cannot not exist." What a ridiculous goof. I type too fast.

Anyway, I think my point remains. I agree that we will exploit any and all options to try to keep the whole goddamned schmeer going, but it's going to be a losing battle and the losses are already starting to pile up visibly. We've built the monster thing we've built on the illusion that you can get something for nothing. The "one-time fossil-fuel bonanza" erected that illusion, and a very persuasive illusion it has been.

Now we start paying the price, and we're going to pay and pay and pay in a million ways large and small.
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog

"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia
Top

Re: Law of Receding Horizons

Postby yesplease » Wed 27 Feb 2008, 02:07:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', 'A')nyway, I think my point remains. I agree that we will exploit any and all options to try to keep the whole goddamned schmeer going, but it's going to be a losing battle and the losses are already starting to pile up visibly. We've built the monster thing we've built on the illusion that you can get something for nothing. The "one-time fossil-fuel bonanza" erected that illusion, and a very persuasive illusion it has been.

Now we start paying the price, and we're going to pay and pay and pay in a million ways large and small.
Could you quantify any of that? I have no clue what you're talking about in any concrete sense. It all sounds quite bad, like the uplift or rapture or whatever series, but aside from that there's not much I can visualize.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Professor Membrane', ' ')Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!
User avatar
yesplease
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3765
Joined: Tue 03 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Law of Receding Horizons

Postby MonteQuest » Wed 27 Feb 2008, 02:20:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('yesplease', 'C')ould you quantify any of that? I have no clue what you're talking about in any concrete sense. It all sounds quite bad, like the uplift or rapture or whatever series, but aside from that there's not much I can visualize.


Read Overshoot: The Ecological Basis for Revolutionary Change by William Catton. He will spell it out in spades for you.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Law of Receding Horizons

Postby yesplease » Wed 27 Feb 2008, 02:23:20

Why would I read that when I'm asking Heineken what they mean in quantitative terms?
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Professor Membrane', ' ')Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!
User avatar
yesplease
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3765
Joined: Tue 03 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Law of Receding Horizons

Postby BigTex » Wed 27 Feb 2008, 02:29:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('yesplease', 'C')ould you quantify any of that? I have no clue what you're talking about in any concrete sense. It all sounds quite bad, like the uplift or rapture or whatever series, but aside from that there's not much I can visualize.


Read Overshoot: The Ecological Basis for Revolutionary Change by William Catton. He will spell it out in spades for you.


If nothing else it will equip you to argue with MQ more effectively.

Read the Amazon reviews. It's interesting what people say about it.
:)
User avatar
BigTex
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3858
Joined: Thu 03 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Graceland
Top

Re: Law of Receding Horizons

Postby yesplease » Wed 27 Feb 2008, 03:17:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', 'I')f nothing else it will equip you to argue with MQ more effectively.
Pointing out that someone is incorrect is hardly argument. ;)
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Professor Membrane', ' ')Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!
User avatar
yesplease
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3765
Joined: Tue 03 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Law of Receding Horizons

Postby mos6507 » Wed 27 Feb 2008, 04:43:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('yesplease', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', 'I')f nothing else it will equip you to argue with MQ more effectively.
Pointing out that someone is incorrect is hardly argument. ;)


It's good to be armed with the knowledge of what a worst case scenario looks like rather than being too much of an optimist (if anyone here can be classified as optimists).
mos6507
 
Top

Re: Law of Receding Horizons

Postby yesplease » Wed 27 Feb 2008, 04:52:18

Sure thing. And in light of the destructive potential available to different nations on this little blue ball, I don't think we need much if any rationalization to prepare for crap and spinning thingys. That being said, certain things, like a close enough GRB, as individuals we couldn't prepare for, so preparation has it's limits.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Professor Membrane', ' ')Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!
User avatar
yesplease
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3765
Joined: Tue 03 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Law of Receding Horizons

Postby BigTex » Wed 27 Feb 2008, 09:52:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('yesplease', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', 'I')f nothing else it will equip you to argue with MQ more effectively.
Pointing out that someone is incorrect is hardly argument. ;)


Have you read it?

If not, go read it. It won't hurt and might help.
:)
User avatar
BigTex
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3858
Joined: Thu 03 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Graceland
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron