by pup55 » Tue 05 Feb 2008, 00:10:47
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'p')oor in the US could have it worse. A lot worse
Better listen to RedStateGreen. Those are some pretty good ideas.
Gotta add a couple of things, since I like to think in numbers;
US Census Bureau
According to the most recent government definition, "poor" is mainly defined by how much money you make (some fraction of the median income) and also by the number of people living in your household.
If you are a single person, under 65, living by yourself, "poor" is about $9600 per year, which comes out to about $5.15 per hour, a minimum wage worker that shows up every day.
If you are trying to feed a family of nine, you had better be making about $40K per year. Obviously this varies slightly by region of the country and urban versus rural.
So on the basis of this, I have to add, in addition to everything above, do not, under any circumstances, skimp on birth control. A further thing to be thankful for is not having a lot of non-productive household members, whining, defecating uncontrollably in their clothing, getting sick and needing medical care, and taking a lot of your spare time in unnecessary interaction, that you could be using for more interesting purposes, such as following the Weekly Petroleum Status Report.
Where a lot of the "poor" get into trouble is the fact that they often have two or three of these freeloaders around them all the time. In this society, unfortunately, females are particularly vulnerable to this. Males may also have child support funds extracted from them by the authorities. In either case, this seriously cramps your style. Unfortunately a lot of people got this message after the fact, or not at all.
You are definitely on the right track seeking out an alliance/hanging out with a friend for awhile. If you get some money, be sure to chip some in to avoid him or her accusing you of being a mooch.
The following link gives statistics for the distribution of net worth for Americans.
US Census Bureau #2
As of 2000, the "lowest quintile", that is, the amount at which 20% of the country has a lower net worth than you, is $7200. Add a little for inflation, and maybe this is up to $8K. This is subject to revision, of course, since per the above, there are a lot of people with a house full of plasma TV's and a lot of fancy cars in the driveway who have negative net worth, but if you do not like income as a measurement of poverty, maybe this will suffice. If you have a paid off Toyota Camry and no credit card debt, you are probably above this level already. The uppermost quintile, by the way, was $161K.
Now people can, and do, complain all the time about these measurements of "poverty" and how "you can't live on $5.15 per hour"and all that, but, I will not get into this argument yet. What this goes to show is that there are a lot of people below this level, all the more reason to count your blessings.
Suffice it to say, you might already not be "poor" as officially defined by the government.
Now what might be true is, because of your lifestyle choices, bombardment advertising, your parents/spouse/kids ragging you, and other societal pressures, you feel that your current income is not bountiful enough to give you satisfaction, self-esteem, enjoyment, or social status. It is hard not to fall into that trap, as we all know. But, this is, to a big extent, a matter of attitude, and if you are willing to fire back at your detractors to the effect that you are not poor, the stats say you are not poor, you are spiritually comfortable with your lifestyle, and they can shove it, as long as you are fine with it yourself, no worries. Now, of course, if you feel compelled to get all the way up to, say, the middle class, this is a different proposition and requires a slightly different skill set. This whole idea of social mobility is a completely different issue than mere poverty avoidance.