by MrBill » Fri 01 Feb 2008, 07:12:52
I do not believe at any level that this US lead global slowdown is in any way related to post peak oil depletion as high crude prices are being caused by a) recent rapid global growth - two-thirds of the new demand is coming from Chindia according to the IEA, and b) nominally high oil prices are a reflection of US dollar weakness and not absolute high prices.
The US dollar was $0.8240 against the euro in 2001. $90 crude is approximately 60 euros at today's exchange rate of $1.4875. If oil was 60 euros, and the US dollar was still as strong as it was in 2001, then crude in US dollars would be $50 and not close to one hundred. This reflects strong demand plus currency devaluation. To look only at the nominal price in US dollars is to lose half of the information.
Assets are falling in price because they were high by historical standards. What I like to call having a Japan Moment [sup]TM[/sup]. When prices can no longer climb any higher (in real terms) they have to fall....
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'R')esearch by Shiller shows
U.S. house prices were virtually unchanged in inflation adjusted terms between 1890 and the late 1990s, before rising a spectacular 71 percent on the same basis from 1997 to 2005.
source:
historic house prices
I appreciate this graph from Seldom Seen because when I compare it to global asset prices I see a high degree of correlation between debt and asset prices. To be fair, one is US debt and the other is global asset prices, but as we know that central banks have been sterilizing export receipts and increasing their own domestic money supply we can deduce that they are 'almost' mirror reflections of one another. In other words, America as the Consumer of Last Resort over the past decade has been reflected in global asset prices - especially property - as those trade gains are monetized.
When I see these asset prices I think regression to the mean. That would have profound implications for an economy deeply in debt if housing prices were to revert to long-run averages as per that Schiller-Case Reuters article above. Equity prices, of course, would also have to reflect that wealth destruction and lower profits going forward as well.
I think when you look for peak oil everywhere you are bound to find its symptoms, well, everywhere. But bottom-line, world consumption of energy - including transport fuels - is still expanding. We are not suffering from energy shortages, yet. This is a classic financial crisis brought about by excessive debt and money supply creation on a global scale.
The backdrop of recent strong global growth is real, but not the cause of a recession. If anything that strong growth has been masking financial problems that have been manifesting themselves since 1985-1990 according to these charts and that Schiller-Case article.
So although I doubt GWB could have made a bad situation any worse, I also do not think we can pin all the blame on him either. The seeds of this disaster were planted back in the 70s, and will likely cumulate in 2028 as the 'Me Generation' reeks its final havock on public finances and policy! ; - )
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.