by lawnchair » Wed 30 Jan 2008, 02:18:00
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pup55', '
')They are trying to support 1100 people per arable square km, about five times that of the US.
And again, at 1% growth the US will have 5x its current population in... 162 years. A ways off, I guess. But, we'd stop exporting food and making ethanol long before that (export wheatland model?).
Not that that's going to happen (well, assuming some border restraint). The US will stop growing in population (and in that nebulous holy-grail 'growth') sooner than that. A good thing, though just about every assumption has to change, because every assumption of human history to date has come from "grow... grow at all costs".
However, to get from Haiti to sustainable? Even aggressive family planning wouldn't do much. You look at the
projected population pyramids... and you realize... well, that ain't gonna happen either. Charity for such countries will dry up with surplus oil, and that's gonna be brutal.