by TonyPrep » Sun 27 Jan 2008, 04:53:54
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Oil-Finder', 'T')ony, let's look at what you said earlier in that quote:
"For example, a 100 billion barrel discovery (if it was additional to any estimate of discovery) would only push the peak out by a year or two."
How did you arrive at that "year or two" number?
That was just a finger in the air calculation, but let's do the calculation now. Suppose this discovery added to the estimate of undiscovered oil (estimates of peak try to estimate the conventional oil yet to be discovered, so to affect the peak date, this discovery would have to be additional). Then that puts peak out by 50 billion barrels (half of the 100 billion URR discovery). At 31 billion barrels per year of current consumption, that would push the peak back by 1.6 years, which is within the "year or two" estimate, so that wasn't a bad finger in the air.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Oil-Finder', 'I')n other words, you did the exact same thing the writer of this article did.
Except that I didn't. You just jumped to a conclusion that you hoped would make your case. It did nothing of the sort. the 250 years estimate is a completely different type of estimate from the quotes you found.
You know, sometimes you're wrong, just as I am, sometimes.