by FreakOil » Fri 11 Jan 2008, 01:24:02
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Fishman', 'F')reakOil
Let's take away the right to be stupid, sounds great, who gets to pick? Do crack head females get sterilized? Do third generation welfare families get the same? Do YOU get to pick?
Sorry, I took a while to get back to this. I'll admit my post was a little flippant, to say the least.
Nobody gets to pick who gets to act stupid because nobody gets to act stupid. The law applies to everyone, preventing each citizen of California from overusing fossil fuels to the detriment of the biosphere and the local economy. Blackouts and brownouts are bad for business. This is a major issue in Guangdong province in China, where I used to live. I wouldn't be surprised if business organizations proposed such a law. Corporations want their juice.
This may surprise you, but I believe very deeply in personal freedom. I have a friend whose father was thrown in prison for 13 years for insulting Mao. A neighbor must have snitched on him. That's a horrible state of affairs. All adults should have the right to say what they think and act how the please, as long as it doesn't lead to the direct injury of other people.
But the problem is this: Is the average American really an adult? I'm going out on a limb here, but I'd say that Joe Sixpack is stuck in a juvenile state of mental development, the "party, party, party!" state to be precise. Such a person should not be able to make decisions that affect the state of the entire planet.
As far as personal decisions - pension and medical plans - that's fine with me. We have an excellent highly privatized pension system in Hong Kong where people choose which government-approved investment bank to put a portion of their salary into every month. The same could be done for medical coverage, with perhaps a very "bare-bones" system of basic universal coverage. I really don't care if a halfwit makes bad decisions in these cases because it only affects his/her life. Concerning the grid, environmental and industry experts should examine the problems and discuss them with congressmen, who would draft the legislation.
California is in a particularly tight spot in the coming years because they have expressed the wish for cleaner power. Switching from coal to natural gas would do the trick; however, California is a natural gas island, and they would have to rely on imports of liquified natural gas. They don't have the infrastructure for this. It takes about five to 10 years to build a regasification plant and pipeline network. Red tape and NIMBYism add a few more years. As far as solar and wind, they would need A LOT of time and financing to scale up.