Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Thermostat Thread (merged)

How to save energy through both societal and individual actions.

How low is your thermostat in winter?

Poll ended at Wed 28 Feb 2007, 20:49:04

70 or more (I am an energy hog!)
4
No votes
65-69
22
No votes
60-64
16
No votes
55-59
7
No votes
 
Total votes : 49

Re: California Government To Remotely Control Your Thermosta

Postby Kingcoal » Mon 07 Jan 2008, 15:52:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Starvid', 'S')eriously... This is so stupid. Stop blasting carbon into the atmosphere, build alternatives, and then enjoy vast amounts of clean dirt cheap power.

Image

Or if you are talking cooling, why not go for district cooling? It's dead easy technology. A cooling plant, insulated pipes to every house et voila!


I've noticed that you really don't understand the layout of the US, Starvid. You live in a geographically small country with high population density, which allows these strategies. The US, in particular, SoCal, is so sprawled out that district heating/cooling would probably not be a viable option. While I agree that concentrating populations is a much more efficient way to live, that simply isn't the reality in much of the US.

District heating/cooling is used in most all downtown office buildings in the NE US. Why? Because it's the most efficient way to do it.
"That's the problem with mercy, kid... It just ain't professional" - Fast Eddie, The Color of Money
User avatar
Kingcoal
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2149
Joined: Wed 29 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Pennsylvania, USA

Re: California Government To Remotely Control Your Thermosta

Postby Leanan » Mon 07 Jan 2008, 20:27:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mattduke', 'R')ather than controlling our behaviors (with the threat of the police force if we refuse), how about broadcasting a "price" signal instead? When capacity is reached and the price spikes, "smart" thermostats automatically turn it down.


I think most people would hate that. People like to know what they are paying ahead of time. I could see peak vs. off-peak, which people learn to plan around. (Indeed, that's the whole point.) But having the price vary from minute to minute...people would be outraged. Nobody wants to open up their bill and find it's six times higher than last month because of a heat wave, or because a power plant was down for maintenance.
"The problems of today will not be solved by the same thinking that produced the problems in the first place." - Albert Einstein
User avatar
Leanan
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 4582
Joined: Thu 20 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: California Government To Remotely Control Your Thermosta

Postby Starvid » Mon 07 Jan 2008, 20:31:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Kingcoal', 'I')'ve noticed that you really don't understand the layout of the US, Starvid. You live in a geographically small country with high population density, which allows these strategies. The US, in particular, SoCal, is so sprawled out that district heating/cooling would probably not be a viable option. While I agree that concentrating populations is a much more efficient way to live, that simply isn't the reality in much of the US.

Sweden is the size of California, but with a third of the population. Sweden is sparsely populated, probably more so than the US. Mostly this is a country of immense dark forests and deep cold rivers, studded with some islands of agricultural land and cities.

I've been to California. I've seen Los Angeles. An immense hazy coastal plain, covered by rows upon rows upon rows of identical communist-esque villas, crisscrossed by superhighways. I bet those houses are hooked up to gas lines. If they are, they could just as well have hot (or cold) water pipes. Thinking of that, they very likely already have hot water (instead of having a hot water boiler), which just means you have to put some more pipes down. And even if they only have boilers, they have water. Just add more of it.
Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
User avatar
Starvid
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3021
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Uppsala, Sweden

Re: California Government To Remotely Control Your Thermosta

Postby Starvid » Mon 07 Jan 2008, 20:35:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Leanan', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mattduke', 'R')ather than controlling our behaviors (with the threat of the police force if we refuse), how about broadcasting a "price" signal instead? When capacity is reached and the price spikes, "smart" thermostats automatically turn it down.


I think most people would hate that. People like to know what they are paying ahead of time. I could see peak vs. off-peak, which people learn to plan around. (Indeed, that's the whole point.) But having the price vary from minute to minute...people would be outraged. Nobody wants to open up their bill and find it's six times higher than last month because of a heat wave, or because a power plant was down for maintenance.
Around here you can choose between a fixed price or the spot price. Choosing spot price is generally cheaper in the long run as the utilities don't have to charge you for the financial risks they take in fixing the price.

Personally I think fixed prices work best, but not if you have deregulated your market like we have. For financing reasons, electricity markets are better off regulated. Not nationalised, but price regulated.
Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
User avatar
Starvid
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3021
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Uppsala, Sweden
Top

Re: California Government To Remotely Control Your Thermosta

Postby cube » Mon 07 Jan 2008, 22:09:39

Every time my home state gets mentioned on this forum it's usually another example of a slow die-off, power-down, infrastructure collapse thread. Is there a pattern here? :wink:

Remember folks California is the richest state in the richest nation the world has ever known. If we're having problems because we can't "afford" to maintain our infrastructure (power grid) hmm it makes me wonder?

Richard C. Duncan was right....the first major energy crunch will happen in California and it will be an electricity crisis.
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: California Government To Remotely Control Your Thermosta

Postby Twilight » Mon 07 Jan 2008, 22:51:38

This makes an awesome bedtime story.

"...and if you don't do conservation, the liberals will come and mess with your thermostat."

Priceless.
Last edited by Twilight on Mon 07 Jan 2008, 23:26:59, edited 1 time in total.
Twilight
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3027
Joined: Fri 02 Mar 2007, 04:00:00

Re: California Government To Remotely Control Your Thermosta

Postby smallpoxgirl » Mon 07 Jan 2008, 23:06:58

Reason 3,348,224 not to move to California.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: California Government To Remotely Control Your Thermosta

Postby yesplease » Tue 08 Jan 2008, 04:07:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cube', 'R')emember folks California is the richest state in the richest nation the world has ever known. If we're having problems because we can't "afford" to maintain our infrastructure (power grid) hmm it makes me wonder?
And one of the richest per capita municipalities in the richest state in the richest nation became the wealthiest municipality to declare bankruptcy. CA has problems because money/power corrupts... :twisted:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Professor Membrane', ' ')Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!
User avatar
yesplease
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3765
Joined: Tue 03 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: California Government To Remotely Control Your Thermosta

Postby aahala » Tue 08 Jan 2008, 12:46:14

Other than the technology, I don't see much new here.

By a variety of federal laws, the grid overseer has the right
(and the responsibility) to alter, increase, decrease, blah,
blah, blah, eletrical generation, to add, cut off users in order
for the grid to work properly.
User avatar
aahala
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 944
Joined: Thu 03 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: California Government To Remotely Control Your Thermosta

Postby WisJim » Tue 08 Jan 2008, 13:02:06

They already do that with business and commercial customers. Where I work, the power company can shut down the air conditioning chillers if they need to in order to avoid passing their peak genrating capacity--otherwise there would be a choice of brown-outs or starting up less efficient smaller generating plants that use natural gas fueled engines.

Makes sense to me, although I always thought that electricity should get more expensive the more that you use, rather than cheaper, to discourage wasteful usage.
User avatar
WisJim
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1286
Joined: Mon 03 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: western Wisconsin

Re: California Government To Remotely Control Your Thermosta

Postby FreakOil » Fri 11 Jan 2008, 01:24:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Fishman', 'F')reakOil
Let's take away the right to be stupid, sounds great, who gets to pick? Do crack head females get sterilized? Do third generation welfare families get the same? Do YOU get to pick?


Sorry, I took a while to get back to this. I'll admit my post was a little flippant, to say the least.

Nobody gets to pick who gets to act stupid because nobody gets to act stupid. The law applies to everyone, preventing each citizen of California from overusing fossil fuels to the detriment of the biosphere and the local economy. Blackouts and brownouts are bad for business. This is a major issue in Guangdong province in China, where I used to live. I wouldn't be surprised if business organizations proposed such a law. Corporations want their juice.

This may surprise you, but I believe very deeply in personal freedom. I have a friend whose father was thrown in prison for 13 years for insulting Mao. A neighbor must have snitched on him. That's a horrible state of affairs. All adults should have the right to say what they think and act how the please, as long as it doesn't lead to the direct injury of other people.

But the problem is this: Is the average American really an adult? I'm going out on a limb here, but I'd say that Joe Sixpack is stuck in a juvenile state of mental development, the "party, party, party!" state to be precise. Such a person should not be able to make decisions that affect the state of the entire planet.

As far as personal decisions - pension and medical plans - that's fine with me. We have an excellent highly privatized pension system in Hong Kong where people choose which government-approved investment bank to put a portion of their salary into every month. The same could be done for medical coverage, with perhaps a very "bare-bones" system of basic universal coverage. I really don't care if a halfwit makes bad decisions in these cases because it only affects his/her life. Concerning the grid, environmental and industry experts should examine the problems and discuss them with congressmen, who would draft the legislation.

California is in a particularly tight spot in the coming years because they have expressed the wish for cleaner power. Switching from coal to natural gas would do the trick; however, California is a natural gas island, and they would have to rely on imports of liquified natural gas. They don't have the infrastructure for this. It takes about five to 10 years to build a regasification plant and pipeline network. Red tape and NIMBYism add a few more years. As far as solar and wind, they would need A LOT of time and financing to scale up.
User avatar
FreakOil
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 473
Joined: Sun 04 Mar 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Hong Kong
Top

Where's your thermostat?

Postby wisconsin_cur » Fri 11 Jan 2008, 20:53:27

So my wife is a part of a forum that is comprised mostly of mothers and she asked them the following two questions. She wants to compare their answers to this question with yours.
What is the normal temperature of your house? (feel free to distinguish between night-time and day time)
and, what is the lowest temperature that you feel comfortable at (again feel free to expand on the answer to include how you dress around the house)?
I told her that if she wants to ask anymore questions she will need to register and do it herself (this is the second wife inspired post). I suggested keeping with the dog theme ("curs_bi&$#) but she didn't like that too much. Maybe "curs_hotchick"?
http://www.thenewfederalistpapers.com
User avatar
wisconsin_cur
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4576
Joined: Thu 10 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: 45 degrees North. 883 feet above sealevel.

Re: Where's your thermostat?

Postby Don35 » Fri 11 Jan 2008, 21:15:06

Programmable thermostat. At night it is 55, morning 70-72 (I hate to get out of the shower wet and cold), daytime when I’m at work 55, evening at home 68. Now a disclaimer: my apartment is old and leaks like a sieve and STAYS cold no matter what temp I put it on. I just wear a sweater in the evenings.
Everybody thinks they're righteous! Adam Baldwin "Jayne" Firefly/Serenity
User avatar
Don35
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 195
Joined: Tue 07 Feb 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Where's your thermostat?

Postby billp » Fri 11 Jan 2008, 21:41:02

We have a microcontroller controlled heating system too.
We heat with natural gas in abq, nm.
Furnace comes on at 05:30.
When it goes off depends on outside temperature ... and wind.

13 degrees F outside, it runs for about 1.5 hours. Then goes off. But comes on later.
At about 27 degrees F, it runs for about one hour. Then comes on later.
We have microcontoller thermostat set for about 50 degrees F at night.
Only when wind is blowing does furnace come on in the night.
All of this [heating and cooling the whole cave] may not last too longer in the future?
cheers
User avatar
billp
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 414
Joined: Sun 11 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: albuquerque

Re: Where's your thermostat?

Postby Windmills » Fri 11 Jan 2008, 22:06:50

Living in Arizona, we shut off the climate controls for the winter. It's not like we're going to die of anything an Arizona winter can throw at us. Sometimes it gets cold enough to see our breath in here, but usually only a few times each winter. We turn on a small space heater in the bathroom twice a day for a few minutes; once for a doo doo, and once at night to take showers. There's an electric blanket on the couch.

Other than that, it's incidental heat from bodies, movement, and appliances.

If it gets cold, we just put on more layers.
Windmills
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 547
Joined: Tue 11 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Arizona, USA

Re: Where's your thermostat?

Postby Terran » Fri 11 Jan 2008, 22:10:30

Over here on the west coast, the temperature is fairly mild in the 50s for the winter. I only heat my room, using a convection heater. I keep the temperature at 76*F during the day, and keep at at 72*F at night while I'm asleep. I don't like waking up to cold mornings.
User avatar
Terran
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 405
Joined: Wed 07 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Berkeley CA

Re: Where's your thermostat?

Postby WisJim » Fri 11 Jan 2008, 23:08:24

We keep our house between 64 and 70 degrees F. We heat with wood, using a forced air furnace in the basement. We also have a wood cook stove that we use if it either gets cold (below zero) or isn't cold enough to use the furnace but we want some heat for a bit. Otherwise having both wood fired heat sources going at once can get it in the mid 70s in the house, no matter how cold outside, and that's warmer than I like. If it gets sunny out, our sunroom/greenhouse which is attached to the living room, gets toasty and keeps most of the house warm as long as the sun shines. Come evening, we shut the insulating curtains on the sunroom windows and close the door to the house. We're in Western Wisconsin, down the road a piece from the Wi-Cur.
User avatar
WisJim
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1286
Joined: Mon 03 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: western Wisconsin

Re: Where's your thermostat?

Postby one_more_day » Fri 11 Jan 2008, 23:18:11

I am home almost all the time. My thermostat stays at 62 F.
I feel comfortable at 65 and above, but since my house has lots of air leaks, I would almost double my bill to get the extra three degrees.
I have been working on insulation ever since I bought this place, I just still have a lot of work to do.
User avatar
one_more_day
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 74
Joined: Sun 27 Aug 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Where's your thermostat?

Postby kjmclark » Sat 12 Jan 2008, 00:43:00

We're in Southern Michigan. We have a gas furnace, a programmable thermostat, a wood stove, and the house is fairly well done for passive solar on those rare winter days we actually get some sunshine.
The thermostat is set to 55F overnight, but the furnace only rarely actually comes on at night. Around 6am it goes up to 63F (I vary the time depending on overnight low so that it manages to just reach 63F by 7am). We then wake up and fire up the wood stove, which we use (along with something yummy baking in the oven sometimes) to keep the house between 65 and 70. Around 8pm we let the stove go out for the night.
[Edit - here's a funny story. As noted above, most of our heat is from the wood stove. Last month the gas/electric utility estimated our usage since we never saw the meter reader. They just did a reading this morning. Turns out the gas company *owes us* $73.50 this month!]
User avatar
kjmclark
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 428
Joined: Fri 09 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Where's your thermostat?

Postby MarkJames » Sat 12 Jan 2008, 14:37:53

Here in the cold Northeast I generally keep my home, vacation homes, businesses and heated rental properties around 70 to 72F when they're occupied, around 60F when unoccupied and keep unoccupied rooms around 60F. All rooms have their own hydronic heating zones.
One issue many of our fuel and heating customers have is that their homes only have a single hydronic heating zone, so they're heating unoccupied space and occupants can't set the heat at their individual comfort level. It's common to see tenants in heated apartment houses and buildings without zoning or thermostatic radiator valves regulating heat by opening the windows.
User avatar
MarkJames
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 63
Joined: Tue 25 Dec 2007, 04:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Conservation & Efficiency

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron