Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

The Most Uncomfortable Politically-Incorrect Subject

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: The Most Uncomfortable Politically-Incorrect Subject

Unread postby mercurygirl » Sun 25 Nov 2007, 02:38:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Planters Peanut', '(')and available data suggest that 60-80% of intelligence is genetically controlled)
Utter and complete racist nonsense. Intelligence tests are bullshit.

Intelligence tests measure the ability to look at a monochromatic test paper (usually white but often beige or dull yellow) covered with simple black notations (letters, squiggles, straight lines) and deduce complex relations and intellectual structures.

People outside the industrial paradigm see complex patterns in the soft shapes of the natural world. Holograms. Truths too complex for our language. The fact is Inuits do not have 50 or 150 words for snow. What they have is this: (Comparative Eskimo Dictionary) :

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]But the Eskimoan language group uses an extraordinary system of multiple, recursively addable derivational suffixes for word formation called postbases. The list of snow-referring roots to stick them on isn't that long: qani- for a snowflake, api- for snow considered as stuff lying on the ground and covering things up, a root meaning "slush", a root meaning "blizzard", a root meaning "drift", and a few others -- very roughly the same number of roots as in English. Nonetheless, the number of distinct words you can derive from them is not 50, or 150, or 1500, or a million, but simply unbounded. Only stamina sets a limit.
Linguistics and studies of human intelligence remain an infant science, still so new and controversial that the finest students are pariahs. Racism is a sign of a profoundly ignorant, small-hearted, and especially a manipulated tool of the reigning paradigm. Such a person is nothing more than a useful cog in the master's machinery who has yet to step outside his own program. Thus, a robot.


Pstarr is a hero, IMO! Thank you for your words of wisdom.
mercurygirl
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1091
Joined: Sun 29 Jan 2006, 04:00:00

Re: The Most Uncomfortable Politically-Incorrect Subject

Unread postby kadoomsoon » Sun 25 Nov 2007, 14:57:07

Look, the smart slaves rebelled and were shot, hung or mutilated.
what was left were humble subservient blacks, IQ average temporarily lower. Qih time it will climb to average again. takes a few generations.
Last edited by kadoomsoon on Wed 19 Dec 2007, 15:56:07, edited 7 times in total.
___________________________
Everything is going to happen more or less simultaneously.
Your relatives,their broken down car, and their credit card debt are coming to live with you in 2008
User avatar
kadoomsoon
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 422
Joined: Mon 01 Oct 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Rural farm

Re: The Most Uncomfortable Politically-Incorrect Subject

Unread postby RedStateGreen » Sun 25 Nov 2007, 15:32:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')n fact, back in the 1950's, whites in Africa were predicting that, if Africa were to be ruled by blacks, that Africa would continue to go backwards until blacks eventually all live in huts again.


They say that like it's a bad thing.

Yurts, anyone?
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('efarmer', '&')quot;Taste the sizzling fury of fajita skillet death you marauding zombie goon!"

First thing to ask: Cui bono?
User avatar
RedStateGreen
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1859
Joined: Sun 16 Sep 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Oklahoma, USA
Top

Re: The Most Uncomfortable Politically-Incorrect Subject

Unread postby kabu » Sun 25 Nov 2007, 15:34:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', '
')Good article. Time to squirm again...

Carlhole, as someone who's studied enough to know that there is no evidence pointing to a causative relationship between skin colour and IQ, I see nothing in that article that makes me want to squirm. Well... except for references to "God's will" and "our Creator," at the end!

Parts of it are poorly researched and thought out, but other parts are modest, and well presented. A couple passages were just downright entertaining: "Remember, these are averages, and all groups overlap. You can't deduce an individual's intelligence from her ethnicity. The only thing you can reasonably infer is that anyone who presumes to rate your IQ based on the color of your skin is probably dumber than you are," and "whitey does not come out on top. If you came here looking for material for your Aryan supremacy Web site, sorry. Stratifying the world by racial IQ will leave your volk in the dust. You might want to think about marrying a nice Jewish girl from Hong Kong. Or maybe reconsider that whole stratification idea."

The one blog that the writer believes is backing him up on a few of his generalizations actually comes quite short of it. Unfortunately journalists can't think much more critically than their readers, so that's to be expected.

Some of the rhetorical questions asked by the writer were just ignorant. You can tell the writer is completely unaware of the power of expectations. I took a few psych courses, so I'm not. Actually I remembering going over one study- a great one- double-blind one- that was considered "unethical" by many- that proves there's a HUGE connection between IQ gains and teachers' expectations (it involved the researchers falsifying the "IQ scores" of an "IQ test" and then delivering them to all the teachers- great stuff). Stereotypes are the biggest problem in all of this, BY FAR. That dumb fuck of a scientist couldn't present himself critically and responsibly. That's why he was ridiculed by the scientific establishment, and bullied into retirement, in disgrace.

Anyway, "general intelligence" is highly overrated, and we've got a lot more to worry about in the face of peakoil!
User avatar
kabu
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 316
Joined: Sun 29 May 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The Most Uncomfortable Politically-Incorrect Subject

Unread postby kadoomsoon » Wed 19 Dec 2007, 15:55:34

Words of wisdom should be heard.
___________________________
Everything is going to happen more or less simultaneously.
Your relatives,their broken down car, and their credit card debt are coming to live with you in 2008
User avatar
kadoomsoon
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 422
Joined: Mon 01 Oct 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Rural farm

Re: The Most Uncomfortable Politically-Incorrect Subject

Unread postby kadoomsoon » Wed 19 Dec 2007, 15:57:11

Words of wisdom should be heard.
___________________________
Everything is going to happen more or less simultaneously.
Your relatives,their broken down car, and their credit card debt are coming to live with you in 2008
User avatar
kadoomsoon
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 422
Joined: Mon 01 Oct 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Rural farm

Re: The Most Uncomfortable Politically-Incorrect Subject

Unread postby RedStateGreen » Wed 19 Dec 2007, 23:28:40

James Watson has black ancestors, which seems to have surprised him. It shouldn't have, seeing as and estimated 74 million "white" Americans have black ancestors. Most don't know it and find out while doing their genealogies or one of those DNA tests. :lol:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('efarmer', '&')quot;Taste the sizzling fury of fajita skillet death you marauding zombie goon!"

First thing to ask: Cui bono?
User avatar
RedStateGreen
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1859
Joined: Sun 16 Sep 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Oklahoma, USA
Top

Re: The Most Uncomfortable Politically-Incorrect Subject

Unread postby I_Like_Plants » Thu 20 Dec 2007, 01:04:50

There are different TYPES of intelligence more predominent in the various arising human sub-species.

IQ tests as we know them measure what's considered "smart" in our Western culture, among its literate classes - middle-class and higher whites and as should be no surprise, Jews.

Einstein was a very smart man, but could he get along OK on the African veldt? Or up on the Northern sea ice? His type of intelligence would be considered cool,, as he'd probably be on hell of a poet/chant-writer.

Eskimos were, and still are, considered stupid by whites dealing with them in the North, but NO ONE is nearly as smart as them at living and thriving up in the North, without Sno-Cats, polarfleece, or even an iPod.

This is what speciation is all about - differences in temperament, muscle type, body geometry, reaction speed, excitability, etc making each type just a bit more suitable for their environment.

This is a very difficult subject for people to get their head around. I do not think whites are superior, outside of their environment which they evolved in. I prefer to live around my own people, especially given that other groups somehow have "more rights" in the US right now.

I can admire other people from other groups, I have a small DVD collection, 6 discs, of which two are "Bird" and "Rabbit Proof Fence" which I highly recommend. Basically, come to think of it, in both of them, the bad guys are whites. Not all whites .... you'll just have to watch 'em....

Different intelligences, different psyches, that's all. Just like we have in our dogs and cats, the phlegmatic Persian, the hyper and hyper-intellectual Siamese, the nutso tortoiseshell. This is exactly what evolutionary scientists would observe in any worldwide species.
I_Like_Plants
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3839
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 1st territorial capitol of AZ

Re: The Most Uncomfortable Politically-Incorrect Subject

Unread postby kabu » Thu 20 Dec 2007, 14:09:41

Well, there are different types of intelligence, each showing up in various degrees, from one ethnicity to another, and between the two sexes. That's evident.

However, your comments in a different, recent thread suggest that you believe there's less genotypical support for the IQ-related intelligences (logical/mathematical and verbal) in black people (on average), explaining your observations of how black kids act like "animals" in the supermarket, whereas the white ones actually engage in conversation with their parents, capable of reasoning through their fits. There's no evidence of this, though. That means that it's just a bunch of racist ignorance, and makes you look pretty fucking shallow.

You and your kind have quite a ways to go, yet.

You assume that speciation lead to what you keep trying to claim, but you're just speculating. How about you at least start by offering a theory that explores how each racial group's distinctly different environment didn't equally support a need for logical or mathematical intelligence, for enough time to lead to this? As it stands your theory is vague and uninteresting. I've heard better, anyhow...

Or... better yet, read up on stereotypes and confirmation bias, quite taking refuge in your skin colour, and then get a life! :-D
User avatar
kabu
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 316
Joined: Sun 29 May 2005, 03:00:00

Re: The Most Uncomfortable Politically-Incorrect Subject

Unread postby hubbertspeak7777777 » Fri 21 Dec 2007, 16:58:14

Two words... population control. Whenever that topic is brought up, it usually results in many dipshits getting butthurt and going into whine and bitch mode.
hubbertspeak7777777
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 406
Joined: Wed 07 Mar 2007, 04:00:00

Previous

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

cron